Taxes for the Masses
Taxes for the Masses
  • 97
  • 3 128
Taxes for the Masses - On the Latest Tax Research: HARC Edition
88
In this episode, we discuss some of the latest tax research presented at the Hawaii Accounting Research Conference in January 2025.
Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/25153342?
มุมมอง: 25

วีดีโอ

Taxes for the Masses - RERUN: Ep 81 On Declining Accounting Enrollments, Revisited
มุมมอง 1721 วันที่ผ่านมา
87 We are taking a very short winter break, but we have something special for your listening enjoyment! We're revisiting this episode, which in turn revisits the potential reasons behind declining accounting enrollments, helped by special guest and MIT Professor Andrew Sutherland. We'll return soon with new episodes for 2025! Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/24926153?
Taxes for the Masses - On Sin Taxes
มุมมอง 10หลายเดือนก่อน
86 In this episode, we discuss the role of sin taxes in discouraging legal but potentially harmful behavior and in raising tax revenue. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/24752197?
Taxes for the Masses - On Settlements and Judgments Part 2
มุมมอง 7หลายเดือนก่อน
85 In this episode, we discuss the potential tax benefits settlements and judgments from lawsuits can generate for the companies that pay them. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/24509166?
Taxes for the Masses - On Settlements and Judgments Part 1
มุมมอง 212 หลายเดือนก่อน
84 In this episode, we discuss how settlements and judgments are taxed by recipients, as well as arguments for changes to the current law. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/24257228?
Taxes for the Masses - On Public Accounting Offshoring
มุมมอง 822 หลายเดือนก่อน
83 In this episode, we invite University of Texas at Austin doctoral candidate Kaitlyn Kroeger to discuss her research on the effects of public accounting firms offshoring their services. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/23985316?
Taxes for the Masses - On Donor Advised Funds
มุมมอง 283 หลายเดือนก่อน
82 In this episode, we discuss the rules around charitable and political donations, as well as how donor advised funds can facilitate anonymous giving to politically engaged charities. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/23722549?
Taxes for the Masses - On Declining Accounting Professionals, Revisited
มุมมอง 313 หลายเดือนก่อน
81 In this episode, we invite Andrew Sutherland, Associate Professor of Accounting at MIT, to revisit explanations behind declining accounting professionals and to discus his research on the topic. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/23456568?
Taxes for the Masses - On Taxing Tips
มุมมอง 254 หลายเดือนก่อน
80 In this episode, we discuss the potential consequences of both presidential candidates' proposals to exempt tips from taxes. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/23181918?
Taxes for the Masses - On the the Latest Tax Research - Texas Waterloo Edition
มุมมอง 324 หลายเดือนก่อน
91 In this episode, we discuss two of the papers presented recently at the 6th Biennial Taxation Research Symposium hosted at the University of Texas in conjunction with the University of Waterloo. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/22920569?
Taxes for the Masses - On Trump's Tax Proposals
มุมมอง 204 หลายเดือนก่อน
79 In this episode, we discuss former President Trump's tax proposals as a 2024 presidential candidate. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/22686769?
Taxes for the Masses - On Harris' Tax Proposals
มุมมอง 175 หลายเดือนก่อน
78 In this episode, we discuss Vice President Harris' tax proposals as a 2024 presidential candidate. Episode link: play.headliner.app/episode/22417825?
Taxes for the Masses - RERUN: Ep 72 On Shohei Ohtani’s Contract
มุมมอง 85 หลายเดือนก่อน
78 As we are on a short summer break, we have something special planned for your listening enjoyment! Get ready to revisit some of your favorite tax topics with our timeless reruns. In this episode, we discuss the tax motivations behind Shohei Ohtani's record-breaking and tax-savvy contract with the LA Dodgers (and Lisa honors legendary Dodgers announcer Vin Scully). Check out the latest news o...
Taxes for the Masses - RERUN: Ep 71 On the Taxation of Music Catalog Sales
มุมมอง 96 หลายเดือนก่อน
41 As we are on a short summer break, we have something special planned for your listening enjoyment! Get ready to revisit some of your favorite tax topics with our timeless reruns. In this episode, we discuss the tax motivations for the rising trend in music catalog sales (and B sings a little Tay Tay). Check out the latest news on the podcast here: linktr.ee/taxesforthemasses Episode link: pl...
Taxes for the Masses - RERUN: Ep 68 On Bezos’ Move to Florida
มุมมอง 126 หลายเดือนก่อน
40 As we are on a short summer break, we have something special planned for your listening enjoyment! Get ready to revisit some of your favorite tax topics with our timeless reruns. In this episode, we discuss the potential tax motivations and implications of Bezos’ big move to Florida. Check out the latest news on the podcast here: linktr.ee/taxesforthemasses Episode link: play.headliner.app/e...
Taxes for the Masses - RERUN: Ep 66 On the Tax Consequences of NIL
มุมมอง 77 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - RERUN: Ep 66 On the Tax Consequences of NIL
Taxes for the Masses - RERUN: Ep 38 - On Gifts and Estates (Part I)
มุมมอง 137 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - RERUN: Ep 38 - On Gifts and Estates (Part I)
Taxes for the Masses - On Scott Hodge's Book Taxocracy
มุมมอง 328 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - On Scott Hodge's Book Taxocracy
Taxes for the Masses - On the Qualified Business Income Deduction
มุมมอง 438 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - On the Qualified Business Income Deduction
Taxes for the Masses - On the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act's Winners and Losers
มุมมอง 209 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - On the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act's Winners and Losers
Taxes for the Masses - On Declining Accounting Professionals
มุมมอง 359 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - On Declining Accounting Professionals
Taxes for the Masses - On Shohei Ohtani's Contract
มุมมอง 389 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - On Shohei Ohtani's Contract
Taxes for the Masses - On the Taxation of Music Catalog Sales
มุมมอง 4510 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - On the Taxation of Music Catalog Sales
Taxes for the Masses - On the Latest Tax Research - ATA 2024
มุมมอง 1810 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - On the Latest Tax Research - ATA 2024
Taxes for the Masses - On the Tax Gap
มุมมอง 1811 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - On the Tax Gap
Taxes for the Masses - On Bezos' Move to Florida
มุมมอง 3011 หลายเดือนก่อน
Taxes for the Masses - On Bezos' Move to Florida
Taxes for the Masses - On Microsoft's Audit
มุมมอง 13ปีที่แล้ว
Taxes for the Masses - On Microsoft's Audit
Taxes for the Masses - On the Tax Consequences of NIL
มุมมอง 60ปีที่แล้ว
Taxes for the Masses - On the Tax Consequences of NIL
Taxes for the Masses - On Things Congress Could Have Done in 2023
มุมมอง 7ปีที่แล้ว
Taxes for the Masses - On Things Congress Could Have Done in 2023
Taxes for the Masses - On the End of the Double Irish Tax Structure
มุมมอง 21ปีที่แล้ว
Taxes for the Masses - On the End of the Double Irish Tax Structure

ความคิดเห็น

  • @scruffyleon7383
    @scruffyleon7383 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Obviously a Democrat propaganda site. It is easy to see why there are only 56 subscribers.and NO LIKES. I won't be back.

  • @sherwinlouie2191
    @sherwinlouie2191 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome content. Thank you!

    • @taxesforthemasses
      @taxesforthemasses 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks so much for listening!

  • @jhacksb1399
    @jhacksb1399 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Here’s a headline from the Harvard Crimson that may cheer you up: “State Legislature Is Considering an Endowment Tax; Experts Say It Could ‘Cripple’ Harvard.” The sooner the better, I’d say. Who says Beacon Hill never does anything for working-class Americans? Or tries to, anyway. If I were a state rep, this is what I would say: “Mr. Speaker, I make a motion to suspend the rules and proceed to an immediate roll-call vote of the ayes and nays on this long-overdue tax-Harvard-back-to-the-Stone-Age bill. “And then after enactment, Mr. Speaker, we can attach a rider to dispense with the 90-day waiting period to immediately begin the ‘potentially catastrophic’ taxation that ‘would simply wreak havoc’ on Harvard.” Sadly, even though the bill has been filed, it probably won’t be going anywhere, at least not in this session. But there’s always next year. What makes the bill even more heart-warming is that it is a “wealth tax,” forcing institutions to pay an annual tax - 2.5% in this proposal - on all assets, including endowments. Harvard’s endowment is currently $50.7 billion. That means that the first year, the state would extract about $1.25 billion from the pro-Palestinian pampered pukes. Even sweeter is that this proposed assessment on billion-dollar endowments is nothing more than an upgrade on the proposed national “wealth tax.” That abomination has been pushed for years by the likes of the fake Indian, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who became a Harvard/Hamas multi-millionaire as a racial fraudster. She scammed Harvard into thinking she was a Native American. They paid her $350,000 a year to “teach” one course. They gave her an interest-free loan so she could buy a $5-million wigwam within easy walking distance of her favorite cheese shop in Harvard Square. This is why the nattering Nazi nebbishes of Harvard need a $50 billion endowment - so they can keep handing big wampum to grifters like the fake Indian and to Claudine Gay, the $900,000-a-year DEI plagiarist. But now Lieawatha, Bernie Sanders and all the other Democrat nuts in Congress want a “wealth tax” - but only on the rich, a category inevitably drawn up to somehow exclude George Soros and his ilk. The Fake Indian’s proposed wealth tax in Congress would require individuals with a net worth above the limit ($50 or $100 million, but soon to be $50,000-$100,000) to pay some set tax every year - 2% or 3% on their so-called assets. What could possibly go wrong? White-collar crime would suddenly sprout all kinds of lucrative new rackets - moving assets around, hiding income, fraudulent assessments, etc. Think of the Massachusetts’ so-called millionaires’ tax, on steroids. I think it’s safe to say that at least 90% of the Harvard faculty supports wealth taxes - at least on people unlike themselves, who earned their own wealth and who don’t have trust funds. After all, it’s for the children. As Dementia Joe Biden likes to say of everyone except his crackhead son who goes on trial for income-tax evasion next month: “Pay your fair share!” But now that a similar tax that might negatively impact their affluence is proposed, it’s the end of the world. Larry Summers, the former president of Harvard, gets the vapors when he even considers the idea of Harvard paying its fair share. “Massachusetts derives much of its distinctive strength from great universities,” he told the Harvard Crimson, “and this tax would cripple the ability of Massachusetts universities to compete going forward.” You eggheads never gave a damn about “crippling” the ability of working people to live in peace, so why the hell should we care about continuing to prop up you tenured terrorists in the indolent one-percent lifestyles to which you have become accustomed? One reason Harvard is all bent out of shape about this proposed tax is that it’s done such a lousy job with its investments. Yale is already closing in on number one in endowments. Hey Harvard, here’s a quarter. Call someone who cares. “Why,” Summers blubbered, “would anyone contribute to a university where, over time, half the value of their gift was going to be confiscated by the state?” Same question could be asked about workers paying income taxes in Massachusetts. Not to mention the confiscatory inheritance tax. And the capital-gains taxes…. Why should Harvard be given a free ride, but not a plumber or an electrician? The Crimson also rounded up another blow-in crackpot, Jonathan Gruber of MIT, who still has a lot to answer for over his shepherding of Obamacare, another unspeakable Democrat assault on the working classes. In a statement, “Doctor” Gruber said that there is “no reason to single out particular institutions based on their endowment. That makes no sense.” Then how does it make any sense to single out individuals based on their holdings? The difference is, Harvard (and MIT) think they’re too la-de-da chichi fabulous to be taxed. They’ve been right so far, but we’ll see how long that lasts. We, the taxpayers, can flee to Free America. Harvard and MIT can’t. The pointy-headed intellectuals can’t believe that somehow they might have to play by the same rules as the hoi polloi. It would take a heart of stone not to laugh. The state bill was scheduled to be deep-sixed in committee yesterday, but at least the solons are forced to talk about it. One of the lobbyists for the idle-rich billionaires at Harvard/Hamas said the new tax would “undermine the unique ecosystem that is higher education in Massachusetts.” You mean there would be fewer roads blocked by chanting hippies? No more hate rallies on the Charles? Jews wouldn’t be chased down Mass Avenue by mobs of Hitler Youth from the Third World on full scholarships? American flags would fly again in Harvard Yard, instead of Nazi banners? If the Harvard bill does go down the tubes this week and I were in the Legislature, I would move for immediate reconsideration of this landmark legislation, Mr. Speaker. It’s for the children. Order “Paper Boy: Read All About It!” at howiecarrshow.com

  • @zebrobertson
    @zebrobertson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    fun and informative! thank you!

  • @jaysonenglish9537
    @jaysonenglish9537 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Traitor trump