วีดีโอ

I'm new to Heidegger, but this intro brings him into clarity, thank you. Heidegger's illustration of time rings true, but the category of Being...not so much. The leap from beings to Being seems to me an artificial construct, inferred from our individual experience, or phenomenology. Why is Being necessary?

100% AI generated conversations. Google Notebook LLM

Respectful, this is one of the most illogical dialogue I’ve ever heard. It’s painful to listen to. It’s like a schizophrenic conversation where a person is making statement and then immediately contradicting themselves, while responding to the contradict with an “oh, yeah. That’s interesting.” Scrambling for a way to sidestep the obvious, these type of conversations have stepped outside of reality.

Best channel.

One of the best explanations of Kant I’ve found here

So obnoxious to listen to people who sound like AI. I will report this as AI generated.

This sounds like AI speaking right?

Now I REALLY want to know who the humans behind this podcast are! Great choice of books to discuss! I love the idea behind your podcast. Do you write this content or do you have AI generate it?

I would love to know who the humans behind this AI podcast are! (Btw, is this the first AI podcast ever made?) @5:16 this is one of the most accurate descriptions of Kant's understanding of human experience I've found on TH-cam. I like that a lot! One suggestion you may find helpful is to be very precise which word you're using when you use the word "object" as opposed to "thing." In this particular example, the =x is the piece that doesn't change. In other words, be objectivation reveals objects appresently, so it'd be more accurate to say that "objects" do change, but that "things" don't. (As long as we're in the context of describing Kant's understanding of human experience.) Ironically, when the one AI says "precisely," @5:30, it's not precisely. They have shifted the conversation to "perception," but experience is deeper and wider than perception. Post-Humanism is here... I'm convinced of it.

Listening from kashmir

One of the best channels in youtube.

"motion as act of the subject" reminds me of both Buddhist doctrines and Hume...

How would I really know if I am listening to AI, or to two educated humans discussing vat brains? Is my subjectivity, experiencing the the lecture, itself an instance of being a vat brain?

Thanks for bringing up a podcast about philosophy of the mind. But I always believed that the driver example was more associated with Rosenthal and higher order representation theories then with Tye and first order theories. If you notice that change in yourself when you drive for a long while on autopilot then you realize what you doing, it means there are two ways of being conscious, creature conscious and state conscious, as Rosenthal put it. I guess it can be used for Tye, but i feel the example is more revealing of the subjective experience that there is a need for a higher order thought to be conscious.

Really good job. It could have been useful, however, to make some distinctions clear from the start. E.g. sensory vs. intellectual knowledge, phenomenon vs. things-in-themselves, A vs. B edition of the KrV. And it seems you skip over the main takeaway of Heidegger's interpretation of Kant, namely, his turning a pure cognitive relationship into an existential one: die Zusammengehörigkeit von Menschen und Sein.

Thank you, please keep uploading videos am so happy to see this channel growing with this beautiful content

4:58 Space and time are not categories in Kant but pure intuitions. Better use here the more encompassing expression "a priori forms".

Have searched for a summary of D&R, and yours is actually the clearest and simplest to understand. But 1 thing disturbs me. In your description, you write that it is AI generated. Do you mean that the entire video is AI generated, which does not seem to be the case, since the voices don't sound machine like at all. Or do you mean the text? Because if it is the text, then AI seems to be better at explaining than actual human beings [from the other channels]. Hope you can clarify which part is AI. Cheers.

I know I'm listening to AI and I'm totally cool with it. This is a great breakdown of Corbalis.

is this googles AI podcast, sounds like it, heard it elsewhere in another podcast. I do admit it seems to work well. However the giveaway is not seeing the two people doing the chat. Tho Im sure they are even working on software to create the artificial images. Personally This would work good in robots I think, it would allow the robots to be more engaging with the people over some discussion or brainstorming, anyway just saying.

Is this real people talking? It sounds like AI voice reading a script.

Fantastic presentation.

I think it's more productive to think of abstractions ( and memory ) as enablers for our intentions to live through time. Concepts are universals and evolution's way for us humans to function and survive.

Very good account…time should be viewed as a necessary framework not absolute outside our experience.His overall transcendental deduction presupposes an analyst with minimal capacity to conduct the enquiry. Like Plato’s third man argument…. Very difficult to validate a system without viewing it from outside that system or presupposing some features of said system. Good work!

Is the content AI generated?

I protended I would enjoy this episode

Obnoxious AI

Nice, I'd definitely read it, but unfortunately it's an ''academic book'', so it's price is way above what the orindary person can afford to read it.

Made by AI everyone -- with Google NotebookLLM - anyone can access this AI tool for free, feed in a PDF, and make a faux podcast like this.

Not ther smartest conversation I have heard.

These two have an artificial, staged, and unnatural way to interact that is, in lack of a worse name, terrible! And all these nonsense talk: ok, sure, yeah, hm… whenever one ends a short sentence, man, that’s infuriating (and sometimes comical).

We have 6 senses we have another common sense.of we don't have that we never know what is reality.

Imagine having x ray eyes like a superman or have the ability to fly the same speed as light. We not built for that , therefore evolution what way is it developing ??.

They say that the Greek language has a word for everything. Hebrew is totally different very little letters yet we don't understand that Hebrew use concrete terms not abstract ideas. A fly eyes are not like ours, imagine having such eyes we go mad.

Good voices and points but sounds choreographed

I enjoy your podcast very much. There's a fine balance between doing philosophy and being a cartoon. It seems to me the likely viewers of your videos are not so ignorant as to not know the basic ideas of a particular philosopher. So you've got at least 80% cartooning -- it's a good script -- and very little philosophy that hit home. It's like when a hamburger is made mostly of sawdust. I enjoy your podcast very much. I might advise you to do more philosophy and be less of a cartoon. Keep up the good work. Whomever your viewers are, I think they like what you're doing. But those of us who are not basically total beginners want more philosophy. *Throws two cents into a bucket*

.as a German Biologist - this is about the End Phase of Domestication - we race unstoppable to the Techno Sphere Abyss - we become Sheeple on the Techno Sphere Farm - Slaves of Robots to maintain it until we Self Extinct . - This may be the Path of any Civilization - Self Extinction and the Evolution of the Techno Topos World - that is able to colonize the Cosmos - as it never needs anything of the Bio Sphere. All tools we ever invented, created, mass produced - were abused to kill each other. We even kill ourselves with food and excess pleasures of all sorts Things to Come - H G Wells many more to come The End of the Bios Sphere is the Start of the Techno Sphere

How do you make these AI podcasts last that long?

fuck yeah

Wait are these videos AI????

Ai is amazing lol

interesting

Sounds like an AI. Two AIs actually

AI Podcast alert!!

The part on consciousness was interesting, but it is quite surprising that in 2014, with all the published psychological and neuroscientific evidence against it someone would still argue for the Whorfian hypothesis in summer form.. 🤷

To the person behind this channel, thank you for the effort put into making this ai shorts. They have a great utility to me To everyone else, I encourage you to treat those summaries as trailer for reading the actual books if you find them interesting. AI is not a substitute for personal engagement.

So smug. So ignorant.

Is this AI generated?

Book of Tobit is relevant to this subject matter

Hell yeah, Dunbar. Dunbar’s number in particular has been a fascinating rumination