วีดีโอ

I like saying that Freud is like Hippocrates. Hippocrates laid the groundwork for modern medicine, but you wouldn't want to be treated the same way hippocrates was treating his patients, would you? But there is one difference, Hippocrates was actually trying to learn, while Freud was just trying to save face.

In Britain from 1800 to1900. 20,000 Waterwheels decreased in number. Windmills decreased in number. The Englishman Thomas Newcomen's 1,500 Atmospheric Pumps disappeared. The Scotsman James Watt's 500 Steam Powered Engines and their descendants increased in number to 10,000,000 !!! To every SINGLE Waterwheel in 1800 we could now add 500 James Watt type Steam Powered Engines and their descendants in 1900 !!! The Power output of the whole country increased by 500 times, and so, Production capacity !!! In one human lifetime. And you don't need a flowing river of water for each one either! So they could be sited anywhere, even on the Sea, where even a Water-Wheel can't go.This WAS the Industrial Revolution, it was a Power Revolution and it was kicked off by only one single Invention, James Watt's Invention of the world's first PRACTICAL Steam Powered Engine in Scotland. It was nothing to do with efficiency, it was all due to the dumping of Calley, Savery, Newcomen, and the great Smeaton's Atmospheric Power and Arkwright's Water-Power for Watt's Steam Power. Now we could have 2 million more Factories, Steamships, Locomotives and whatever else we needed Power for. Take away James Watt's Steam Power and you don't get an Industrial Revolution. It took 3000 years to get to 20,000 Waterwheels, then 100 years to get an additional 10,000,000 Steam Powered Engines. That WAS the Industrial Revolution.

"The deep, deep peace of the double-bed after the hurly-burly of the chaise-longue."

"shall I take m'peen from beneath the rumpled underlay of me jammies and use it to skitch the slippery warmness of thy nether-regions, Dale?" asked Seamus who was feeling explosions of ungoodess as he muttered such words...

He covered up pearl harbor a Republican would never have done that

Before I even start the video I’m going to say yes, Germanicus would’ve been top 3.

Your take is US centric and historically inaccurate (and this is coming from an American). The British were involved in the slave trade in the Caribbean as early as the mid 1500s. Shakespeare is definitely working during the colonial construct of racism, and sometimes repudiates/sometimes reflects it.

International law can be studied in the treatise "The Law of Nations" which has some very useful information. For example, a "nation state" is only a society. It has nothing to do with a landmass. Ultimately all nations live on the same landmass, planet earth. Nations can be on limited territory but so can your own house, just as an embassy does. An embassy is sovereign territory inside another different territory.

And we should have a trial like Nurmburg for bent politicians. Bent backhanders, £50,000 for that. Not payed for luxury football games ffs. While they skint the OAPs.again!!! Poor sods. Bring them to buck

Nice video. 👍

Thank you for sharing! Very well explained :)

We voted to remain in the UK. We voted to leave the EU.

I enjoy your lectures that are extremely helpful in my literature course at university in Canada. Thank you

you forgot to mention that even roman historian who were not friend of cyrus the great, they also admired cyrus! It's undeniable that greek and roman historian admire cyrus the great!

You asked for commentary: sorry that I cannot provide you with a better one. I note some remarkable circular reasoning. th-cam.com/video/1MkwdE7nZ-w/w-d-xo.htmlsi=3rJkI9CvUs2O0ZPi

Wow wow wow. Had to process this one!!!!

Shared on Facebook

Very das Manig account, but enjoyably sensible under that q-up. ❤😂🎉

Sigh. This story was written by Americans Mathew Franklin Whittier and Abby Poyen Whittier, as a spiritualist redemption novel. It wasn't a "ghost story" until Dickens got his hands on it, hurriedly commercializing it within six weeks. Mathew and Abby started from a story they had written in the early 1830's called "The New Year's Bells," which was plagiarized and published by Francis A. Durivage in a compilation entitled "The Three Brides, Love in a Cottage, and Other Tales." You will find it as the next-to-last item in that book. I have overwhelming evidence to support my conclusions, and I am waiting for academics to seriously engage me instead of ignoring me..

The reason there is so much laughter; and puns, which Dickens said he disliked; in "A Christmas Carol," is because it was originally co-authored by American humorist, Mathew Franklin Whittier, younger brother of the Quaker poet John Greenleaf Whittier, working with his wife, Abby Poyen Whittier. Mathew supplied the humor and casual language, while Abby provided the spiritualism (which she originally intended to be authentic according to the esoteric teachings she had studied).

The strangeness of this passage is a result of careless editing by Dickens. If you look closely at the handwritten draft (held at the Morgan Library and Museum), you will see that the original sentence refers to "my spirit of" something. In other words, Dickens revised it to make the narrator a spirit, with no relevant context, because he was dashing through this manuscript unthinkingly, creating a commercialized ghost story from a spiritualist redemption novella. It's yet another sign (and there are even more damning ones) that Dickens was hurriedly re-writing someone else's manuscript. I have documented one very clear instance in my paper, "Evidence that 'A Christmas Carol' was Originally Written by Mathew Franklin Whittier and Abby Poyen Whittier, Rather than by Charles Dickens."

Furries got banned

I believe in cucumbers 🥒

Oh. It just kinda stopped, almost in mid sentence. Which is a shame because it was really good, setting Hobbes' thought in the context of his age. Thank you, but I could have taken a good deal more.

If we had a serious problem then why don't you ask China to stop creating coal fired power plants... okay, so we don't have a problem.

Virtually every person who believes in or publicizes climate change from teachers, presenters, politicians or individuals are doing absolutely nothing in their personal lives to lessen their carbon footprint. To do so we all have to almost stop doing everything and that would show up immediately in the economy collapsing and it is doing nothing of the sort.

No, it is not going to make dry extremes worse. What it will do is increase water precipitation events and turn previous arid areas, such as the Sahara and Siberia, wet. There is no real geological evidence that you have both extremes at once, you either have dry eras (Like we are in now.) or wet eras; you don't get a wetter amazon and a drier Sahara when the extremes are turned up.

To say the state provides us rights is to say that they are not inherent in each human. You are taking privileges and labeling them as rights when you do that.

As a fighter myself i have this gene yea i really dont care about hetting hurt or hurting others

Since when SATAN ask for permission.

FYI Indonesia also starting to use Westminster model during Prabowo time now

Was it a catering service for soldiers or for officers?

This was a fantastic lecture

The origins were probably Satan bc it was an evil movement

Roosevelt 2024

Fischer's thesis is correct - they were looking for an excuse. One can see parallels today... ultimately, when a long standing regime is at risk of losing power because there's no string left, it will either preemptively go to war, or aid an event that will trigger a war. This is for self-preservation.

Hi

Martin Susan Jones Edward Lopez Nancy

You call it a war but you present it as if one side is fighting the war and the other side as innocent. You have to remember that change is being pushed which undermines the rights of others. For example, "trans rights" involves putting biological men into women's prisons and sports. There is no good reason to present those who are opposed to the changes, which are clearly detrimental to women, as the hostile group who are making an unprovoked culture war.

It's not propaganda when Cyrus' deeds and personal characteristics are described by many contemporary sources including the old testament, Xenophon the Greek general and historian, the father of history Herodotus, the Cyrus cylinder in Babylon besides numerous persian sources. He banned slavery in his empire, gave the conquered people freedom to practice their own traditions, and worship their own gods (marduk, jehova, ahura mazda etc.). That's why the Cyrus cylinder is celebrated as the first declaration of human rights, and a copy is displayed at the United Nations. Propaganda? Why is it so difficult for Europeans to admit that the Eastern people, including the Persians, were far more civilized than their contemporary Europeans?

Masollit 🇬🇧 🇬🇭?? Cause of my Brothers Demise?

this is a really well explained literature-

What did he die of? 😮

Great stuff! Thank you.

You have a soothing voice sister

I love you and you motivate me , thank you ma

Black feminism makes sense given the way black men treat black women as there slaves 🤔

He wasnt an emperor

Show me single level playing field in real life. Zuby.

A sacrifice to the Algorithm. Respect for your content. Respect for your beard.