วีดีโอ

ظوةسننسو

Thanks for the excellent presentation. I noticed that you used "Metric" scale for variables measured by the 7-point Likert scale which should be "Ordinal". could you please explain the reason? because I have variables scored by the the 7-point Likert scale (1.SD - 7. SA) and I want to know which scale type should I use in the SmartPLS 4 (Metric, Ordinal, or Categorical)?

I want to express my gratitude for your comprehensive tutorials. You can convey the essence of the issue in a very short time. Could you show how to perform the importance performance map analysis when we also have moderating variables?

Thank you so much for this helpful video

How to run this bootsrapping method in smartPLS 4? Is it correct to see Confidence Intervals in Final Result -> Path Coefficients?

PLS Algorithms and Consistent PLS Algorithms are used for reflective and formative models.

Great joint efforts!

Great!

Dear Teacher: I have an HTMT value of 0.985 what should I do? Is there any way to debug the problem. Thank you.

what are the value of 900 in the HTMT stand for? in the HTMT table

Thanks very much. Could you please show us how to operate to test the discriminant validity in AMOS using HTMT inference?

Hi, what a great and useful video, thanks for this.. sorry, I am a student in Iran and I need to install smartpls 3 for 32 bit windows, but I couldn't find it on your website. could you please help me for this? how can I find and download it????

Hi Dear smart pls manger, My name is ilham madi from algeria, I did use smart pls 4 the last version, and i chose trial license free for 30 days, and after 5 or 6 days when i open to work i find it ends??? And i couldn't sing one more time !!! and i soon finishing phd, i don't have more time.. What should i do? And why did this happen? My work been shut down, Cause me a lot!! Pls help me ... Ilham madi Phd management

You sound like Saul Goodman

Amazing sir💕💗💝

Greetings! Thank you very much for such a valuable session. I have a few queries regarding PLS 4. 1. I have a model with a moderator and mediator, and I am checking the moderator effect on the path between the exogenous and endogenous (mediator) constructs at high and low levels as per my study hypothesis. My query is can I check the moderator effect at +1 and -1 SD in the PLS-SEM extension tool (PROCESS), or do I simply need to report the beta value which I get from PLS-SEM bootstrapping? As PLS-SEM do not give us beta value at +1 and -1 SD, we can only get these values from conditional direct effect in the PROCESS tool. 2. I am also treating my demographics as control variables. My query is whether I need to report control variables results by running PLS-SEM bootstrapping to check control variables’ confounding effects on the endogenous constructs as we did earlier in PLS 3, or I need to report control variables results by running it in the PROCESS tool within PLS-SEM? As control variables within PLS-SEM have different values as compared to PROCESS tool values within PLS-SEM. Need kind guidance. Regards

Thank you very much for your helpful video. Could you indicate how to calculate the CoMe index when there is more than one mediators (serial mediators for example) and the moderation relies on the last path of the mediation ? Thank you !

in model A CoMe how did you calculate the SD of w?

Thank You so much for this great video! I can understand smartpls in just minutes, thanks for sharing.

Because the correlation is negative so some HTMT values are Negativee (below 0). I am wondering it is appropriate to present negative values in HTMT matrix?

✨ 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙤𝙨𝙢

Hello. How do you draw delimitation lines in the IPMA map?

I just completed my first course in the series PLS-SEM: A Comprehensive Introduction. I must confess I was amazed by the quality of this material. It was completely out of the ordinary. Now I feel more comfortable talking about PLS SEM and SmartPLS what is the url of the site to verify the certificate if one wants to put it on his LinkedIn profile?

dear researchers, if I want to conduct 2 categorical moderators (gender, age), do I have to run PLS-MGA for each group separately?. do I have to check the interaction effect for the whole model for each group separately?. thank you

Wow, what a simple and great video. Thank you for sharing.

Hi, could you please the academic reference for accepting HTMT of less than 1,after doing a complete bootrapping? Where can i find this info? article plz?|

Sir, my HTMT inferences is good during bootstrapping but HTMT is not good during PLS Algorithm, can I say discriminant validity is achieved. Please guide

I have got HTMT value as 1.025 which loes is between the confidence intervals (0.652, 1.059). So can I consider it to be ok..?

Congratulations 👏👏👏

Cannot hear this

hello, can I have different languages in the answers in my excel sheet? or it should be in 1 language all the table?

Pls bagus sy suka menggunakan ut riset sy.

Nice video. I have learnt nothing from this video.

i don't know why but its like a ASMR :)

Thanks for the video; Unfortunately I couldn't understand what to do when my Discriminant Validity is not established. What should I do? According to the paper, I must either Increase the monotrait-heteromethod correlations OR Decrease the heterotrait-heteromethod correlations. Well, how can I do that?

Dear Smart PLS, 1. If a theoretical model has been tested using SEM PLS and has passed all measurement models and structural models ... One of the variables (reflective-first order) after experiencing a reduction in loading factors etc. from the beginning there are 5 indicators only 1 indicator remains ... Is it permitted this happens? If yes, is there any literary basis that states this? 2. How to solve if the HTMT value is greater than 0.9? 3. Is there an effect of the number of samples and the total number of items on the success of data processing using second-order method SEM PLS? The number of samples in my study was 55 organizational analysis units and 5 variables with 81 items. 4. Is it still necessary to check the normality of the data related to question no 3? 5. If the model in my question number 3 is processed using a second-order and it fails (does not pass the measurement model), what should I do? Is it permissible to process it using the first order? Please help. Stay healthy and successful.

In my model the variable on which I have classified my data in two groups is accreditation and that is secobdary data. Rest all are primary data. Can I run multigroup analysis on that?

Nice video, Can we perform IPMA if there are three DV? If yes, please guide. Thank you

Helo, how to remove some variabel which are not fit with HTMT criteria? I mean how to read that? As we know in SMART PLS result we have vertical column and horizontal column.

Dear Scholars, Is it required to conduct omnibus test of group differences (OTG) if the study compare different categories under one group. For instance, if the study attempts to examine the heterogeneity effect in a single group, namely 'Authority type', and that includes three categories i.e. 1)Government; 2) Semi-government; and 3) Private. Sarstedt, Henseler, and Ringle (2011) proposed the omnibus test of group differences (OTG) for analyzing the differences of two and more groups of relationships. Based on the case mentioned above, according to Sarstedt, Henseler, and Ringle (2011), what is considered as a group? is it 'Authority type' ? or three classication stated under the group? Can i just conduct PLS- MGA in above case?

Dear Scholars, Is it required to conduct omnibus test of group differences (OTG) if the study compare different categories under one group. For instance, if the study attempts to examine the heterogeneity effect in a single group, namely 'Authority type', and that includes three categories i.e. 1)Government; 2) Semi-government; and 3) Private. Sarstedt, Henseler, and Ringle (2011) proposed the omnibus test of group differences (OTG) for analyzing the differences of two and more groups of relationships. Based on the case mentioned above, according to Sarstedt, Henseler, and Ringle (2011), what is considered as a group? is it 'Authority type' ? or three classication stated under the group? Can i just conduct PLS- MGA in above case?

Hello, thank you for the videos. I have a question. After MGA of two "age" groups (70 cases vs 50 cases), I realized that there is a "great" difference between the p-values of each group shown in the "Bootstrapping Results" tab (such as 0,038 vs 0,380). However, in the MGA tabs (PLS-MGA, Parametric Test and Welch-Satterthwait Test) there is no indication that shows a significant difference (less than 0,05 and greater than 0,95). In addition, there are some differences between the parametric and nonparametric MGA results. What's the best way to evaluate these results? Thank you!

How can I cite in my papers the interval analysis 0.05 an 0.95?

Hi, if the figure of HTMT is more than 0.90 then what I need to do, pls help...

Thank you for this helpful video tutorial

Hello, I ran Discriminant validity analysis by following the video. And, all correlations are below HTMT(.80) and only one correlation is in between HTMT(.90 and .80). Can I report it as "I have chosen the HTMT criterion in terms of specificity level of HTMT(.90), and therefore discriminant validity is established"?

please , how to compare more than 2 groups?

thanks you for the videos，that really helps me.Great！

hi dear thank u very very very much the best

HiProf, I m unable to see path values over diagram after doing MGA. I am getting MGA results etc in tables but not path values over diagram. What I m missing?