วีดีโอ

Thank you ❤

Can you upload trial? These videos are very helpful and educational

The presentation of this video for free is public service at its best. Law schools should be required to show this to their students instead of clinging to the traditional recitations that serve no other purpose than to kill time and to shield the professor's incompetence. Recitations? Yes, but it should be the students asking questions and clarifications from the mentor and not the other way.

❤

Kundi kase hinagisan po Ng tiyatita tiyobuo enriqueta tibayan Federico Tibayan Ng daga Kubo ko Di masisira Kubo ko eh !!!! At Kaya Meron lupa kami para pakinabangan Namin bakit lage kontrabida buotita nayan gamitin Namin lupa Namin pakulong buotita nayan kaso Ng landgrabbing po nang aagaw Ng lupa buotita Federico Tibayan Enriqueta Tibayan nayan wala po consent sakin ang buotita nayan akopo na panganay na anak po your honor judge Austria regional trial court nbi pnp Ibaan electric abs cbn gma from complainant Janet Mendoza ibaba kanluran cottage San Agustin Ibaan Batangas godsjustice

Is the juge a woman or a man

This is very helpful! Thank you for sharing!

Very informative...

Hehe e papano Naman Hindi mag overload Ang mga court kung Hindi Tanga Ang pulis at piskal mga bayaran

Sana ginawa nyong tagalog kasi mas maraming mahihirap ang di nakakaunawa ng English.. sila pa yung madalas nalalabag ang karapatan

More of this po sana

Followup KO Lang po rapecase lawsuit IV-02-INV-22G-00655 that I filed to regional trial court Batangas bulwagan towards rapist emelito barante manugang of Marissa tirso from Janet G Mendoza rapevictim ibaba kanluran cottage San Agustin ibaan Batangas

Maraming salamat po.

Kuya RANDY OCC RTC🙂

Justice Singh (Prosecutor)?

RTC I'm appealing to the court your honor help me seek justice as rape victim...... regarding the rapist emelito barante manugang of Marissa tirso who runaway from this crime !!!! My bf Po eversince here at ibaba cottage San Agustin ibaan Batangas is Benigno Cuevas ILagan II known as Rob Gomez in showbiz your honor ........but I was like the previous marian delariva ms.universe who was raped by men your honor !!!!! ......I was raped twice already here at ibaba San Agustin ibaan Batangas........first Cris manalo but to be practical due to poverty I freed him with a cash bond of hundred thousand .......and now the incident happened again I was raped by a stranger stray man rapist emelito barante drunk july25 2022 8-9pm that said night !!!!! Instructed by police women's desk dejoyah I reported this incident to the ibaan police blotter book signed as myself rapevictim Janet Mendoza... I sued the wanted rapist emelito barante who runaway from this crime your honor !!!! I just hope all the evidence proof will not be expidite from the medico legal of regional batangas your honor ?? Because from what I observed this Arnoldmay decastros troops are trying to imitate this incident and invent bluff stories such as nakaw-imagination frame-up scamm .... just so they can ruin my image as rapevictim and divert or reverse this case your honor ........and If I'm right from my instincts I'm also putting a lawsuit too about these scammers Arnoldmay decastro buo Federico tibayan landa mafia landgrabber basher neighbors and all those who have conspiracy to this rape case your honor ...... I can sense them always bashing gossiping fakenews your honor during the night stalking with in my cottages vicinity planning to assassinate me your honor !!!! They wanna kill me Po because of their too much interest in our lot where I'm residing with here at ibaba cottage San Agustin ibaan Batangas as Janet G Mendoza the eldest daughter of domingamino Mendoza my parents whom the lot was entitled with your honor !!!! The schedule of the hearing of this rape case according to bulwagan of Batangas is set within two weeks from now to raffle the piscal who will handle this rape case I filled at the court your honor along with the issuance of sophoena from gf of Benigno Cuevas ILagan II known RobGomez.....Janet G Mendoza ibaba cottage San Agustin ibaan Batangas victim of rape godsjustice God attest these are legit freedom of the press....

( Welcome: to site,place what to active in change base, Pwde na kayo Sumali sa battle of TH-camrs originals Line phillipines, SORORITY/fraternity now patch clans and our society.AE caravan flags race 22/16_08-30 great life ended!?. #NOTEDVOTED/SHAREANDPOLICYADULT.PH!

I am in hongkong i learned a lot in this pre trial in court i will apply to my self thanks

Thank you for your post that is so timely and informative. I included it in a TH-cam playlist I made on the codal provisions of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure. Kung wala ang mga videos na katulad ng post mo, makakatulog ang manonood ng aking playlist LOL. Salamat po ulit. Here is the link to my playlist th-cam.com/video/CaaDKB0sjpE/w-d-xo.html

Thank you for your post that is so timely and informative. I included it in a TH-cam playlist I made on the codal provisions of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure. Kung wala ang mga videos na katulad ng post mo, makakatulog ang manonood ng aking playlist LOL. Salamat po ulit. Here is the link to my playlist th-cam.com/video/CaaDKB0sjpE/w-d-xo.html

this is a great help to a police prosecutor but not even a lawyer

Is it possible to have pre trial hearing evethough there is pending motion to quash that has not resolved by the court

Very informative and looking forward for more ..Thank you

RIP to the great Justice Cornejo

Asking for the summary of this video presentation.😊

Sana may makasagot din: may the prosecution mark as its own evidence the counter-affidavit of accused the latter filed before the prosecutor? Defense counsel kasi did not mark said counter-affidavit and after presentation of prosecution, he filled a demurrer to evidence. Hindi pinamark ni Defense yung counteraffidavit during pretrial (since the counteraffidavit contains statements that are not beneficial to the accused).

Galing nga. Beats subjudice. Sana makarating kay judge eto. In the light of Oplan Red October: see link below: The case of PP vs Geronimo (lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c35d3) is now superseded by the need to pardon both the rebels and the government forces involved in rebellion complexed with rape, and the rape portion may not have been commited during the rebellion but against the rebel while in the service. And while it is generally prohibited because there can be no rape in furtherance of rebellion and the complexing thereof will increase the penalty, the fact that the latter argument exist as a possible exception to the rule, then the court has thought of this not as an impossibility in the event that an exception may arise In the case at bar, in order to move on and put aside the crimes that both sides of the conflict have committed in furtherance of their own causes and the pre-requisites for their pardon have been complied with, it is in order that pardon be granted. www.bing.com/search?form=MOZLBR&pc=MOZI&q=Oplan+Red+October+NPA+and+dissident+soldiers+unite

My fav crim procedure professor, justice ma cristina cornejo

Thanks po. God bless

When are you going to post the rest of the 5 part video.. :( please share!!

uy si justice guillen.. :)

Thank you po! It helps a lot

Well done! Thanks for sharing! It augmented my knowledge about criminal procedures which I excelled while in law school.

can we object the documents to be marked during the pre trial conference?

this is what i want, the elements of surprise

Nakaka2long ito sa mga students 2lad ko.pero mukhang wala ng na a upload..kasi kami mag mock trial kami

bata pa si justice cornejo...for educational purposes only.

good am sir! can you upload preliminary conference and Pre Trial in administrative cases. Ty in advance!!!

mukhang di naman carnapper

2019 What program is this? When? We need more!

people does not know D'z kind of Old Fassion inDeeeeeeEEEEEEED Fatal PRO blem in Balance will not be lost , But now i Know "!nCoM-PiTenTe" Problema Sistema !NOCENTE fUNK"L cOMErc!Al bREAk

This is the flaw of the present rules. The judge discusses the civil aspect when in fact the criminal case is a prejudicial question. If the accused are acquitted no civil liability attaches. There should be a bifurcated trial. First, adjudicate first the criminal aspect. If the accused is guilty, then the second phase is to try the civil case. If the accused are acquitted then, phase two is no longer applicable. This makes more sense than jumping on discussing both the criminal and civil aspect during the pre-trial. The only issue here is ownership. Who owns the car. If the accused owns it there is no carnaping. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. The mere fact that the car is registered in the name of the corporation is just a presumption of ownership if the ownership is being question by the accused. The prosecutor would like to prove that the cash advances are not dation in pago because the payment for such subscription. The best evidence therefore are the receipt of payment and the stock certificate not mere the testimony of the account. The testimony of the corporate secretary is very material because he prepares the board resolutions and keep the stock certificates The accountant could just testify as to the amount of advances but not what the advances represent. Which is why the mode of discovery for production of documents is very important. Here, it looks like the defense did not utilize the production of documents for had she done so she would have discovered the truth. Whether her client is telling the truth or not. If she finds from the document that the advances are not really s dation en pago, then it is time to discuss settlement. Since the car was recovered, the settlement of the civil aspect would help the dismissal of the criminal aspect. The defense should not merely rely on the testimony of his client. The testimony of the security is also material to prove that he gave they to the accused because he bekieved that the accused is the owner of the vehicle and somebody instructed him to give the key to accused because the accused now is now believed to be the owner of the car. I don't see these evidence are presented in court. This is the problem when the court runs against just to satisfy Justice Davide's court.

This shortening of proceedings in criminal cases though it may sounds reasonable in meeting the standard of despensing justice in a short period of time, the due process under the Constitution is compromised especially in felony cases. In my opinion, the defense is not ready with her chief in case. She failed to realize that her theory is about her client's word against the word of the accused, to prove that her client was not at fault and he was not negligent. The defense maintains that her client was not negligent because the complaining witness suddenly stopped his vehicle and in the process thereof the accused hit complaining witness vehicle. When the judge raised the issue whether or not the accused vehicle was stopped at the time it was hit by the accused, defense counsel argued that the complaining was not at stop position. The People has arqued that the accused vehicle was stopped but did she did not say if it was full stop when the accused hit the vehicle of complaining witness. She relied mainly on the sketch and the police report. There are still lots of questions that remain unanswered for example how fast was complaint running his vehicle before the accident and before he finally stopped and also how fast was the accused running his vehicle when he hit the complaining vehicle. Was the complaining vehicle running slow or fast before it came to a full stop.The conditions of the road and the weather and whether or not complaining vehicle stopped immediately right after he observed the red sign or the was still moving his vehicle while the stop sign was yellow. How far did he stop before the stop sign. The video only shows the red sign. Was there a vehicle behind the accused at the time of the accident. If the complaining vehicle was already at stopped when the accused hit him, it is possible that the vehicle, if there was any, behind the accused the could also have hit the accused or skidded a little bit. Since the police was not at the scene he has no personal knowledge what actually happened during the accident. The fact that the accused signed the police or report, it doesn't mean that the accused is locked in. The defense could let the accused explain why he signed and under what circumstances. The defense should present an expert witness to prove her theory of the case. Since, she didn't, I have no doubt that the accused will be convicted

sana maka upload pa po kayo ❤ learned a lot god bless and more power

Very informative. I am learning.

Ayus na video... saan pa ba makakahanap ng ganitong klaseng presentation?🤔🤔

Wow bata pa si Justice Velasco dito Court Admin pa lang sya

Thanks. Can be used for my steno practice. Hoping for more vids.

This is great.

Thanks for this video...God bless