วีดีโอ

@@RealAsian click. I didn't know you cann use /w insert_PlayerName

@Foolish-Playz lol fair enough. Just saying, some game won't work with that command lol

Honorable mention: It work with both username and display name

@@Prigorny A failed stream

@@Froggyboy624 Damn........ Grunts m buff when....

@Foolish-Playz Sad, idk Also Im not gonna unsub, its a joke

@@Froggyboy624 You decide. The button is there for a reason lol

@@morizfgteevfansroblox5690 Unfortunately sapper loadout in general are quite underpowered. If you position well with this loadout winning is possible. Armored units need to be used properly. I do agree though that the win rate of this loadout isn't as high as the other loadouts but it is a fun non arty strat

@harrazzaki Oooo. Cool idea. Fun fact. I actually prefer the missile tank over the halftrack. I ran it with the sapper and Bunker buster.

@olivers.7821 Mmmm. Only one issue. The vision of units look less visible. As the vision and the day time have a very similar color. I'll consider it though.

@mazowszan_mapping Mmm cool idea. Very versatile in terrain and choke points. LMG isn't my favorite and I might replace it with morter team. Also flame launcher might be better. Regardless of my ranting cool idea will attempt to do something similar to this one day

3 bunker busters, 2 snipers, and a supply truck cost just under 600 tix. Go nuts with it.

@@foxxowoxxowillow7855 I am going to assume hmt is heavy multi tank?. If so multi H tank is generally quite under used due to recon tanks and rpg and BT absolutely destroying it. On defense and on a map with lots of choke points I could see multi h being good. I have used it a few times. Just haven't found the star loadout for it. I'll see what I can come up with maybe 1 day

​@@Foolish-Playz Yeah. Heavy Multi. A lot of people say it's pretty bad, so I just had to see if it was really true. And in my experience, it's actually one of, if not my best loadout so far. I'd say it can really be more defensive or passive. Sometimes offensive, but only if your opponent doesn't have a good counter to it, at least in early-game. Despite the extra weapons, it is sometimes better to only keep it held back to use its Heavy Cannon. It's hard to explain, but it's honestly more comparable to Heavy Tank CW than BT in that way. So far, it's actually done well even in its "bad" matchups in my experience. IFV, BT, RPG, no problem. But you often have to change your strategy a lot. I'd say it works on any map that's small enough, ideally with a center Outpost to rush. But choke points do help.

@@foxxowoxxowillow7855 Exactly. Multi H isn't bad. It's just very defensive and need a lot of cover. Also the reason why it's considered bad is that defensive loadouts in pvp sucks. They can't push well. They don't win the game. they stall till the opponent leaves. Multi H is still decent on attack. I like using it. Just most maps don't favor it and also it has to be spwned in from a post and not in deployment phase

@@Foolish-Playz I get a lot of success in my experience, especially on Italian Town 2v2, but yeah, it takes a lot more effort for sure. There're some maps that don't work well for it, either. I'll be honest, you could argue just as well it's an LG loadout. It often relies a lot on just spamming them to insta-kill any infantry push. At least when it's forced more defensive. HMT really needs it. But it's mostly just about avoiding trades and ideally trying to keep the middle Outpost once you have it. It can do that well, because it's hard to really kill anything in this loadout. But it's definitely slow, for sure. It can push, but only very, very slowly. Two steps forward, one step back kind of play.

Honestly, I thought it was pretty questionable at first, too. But it makes sense on the map. It's basically the Maginot Line strategy (except working as intended). Build a big fortified area on the flank you know you can't push, and dedicate the rest of your effort to the other. but yeah, I doubt it'd be any good if this were Italian Town, Pinewoods, etc. Sapper doesn't mesh well with an otherwise offensive loadout if it can't get a choke point on a flank of its own to hold. Good example of that on the second match honestly.

@@foxxowoxxowillow7855in the first match any kind of artillery would have shredded him, also ifv is kinda bad.

Certufied Finnish defence cheese

@@Boolard-ln2pu IFV isn't bad in my opinion. Just an out-of-meta strategy. It has advantages in just doing a lot in one unit, even if it's rarely necessary and somewhat risky. Still would only rank it low A-tier because it has decent strats, so it's not bad. A lot of people underuse its ATGM and push with it too much, too But yeah, I was definitely thinking that, too. But it's not like any loadout doesn't have bad matchups. Recently, I was running mass infantry (mostly SMG Squad) with Scout Tanks and MT+ as my only vehicles on Pinewoods 1v1. I went up against Light Gunner, Rocket Truck, and BT. Had basically nothing to kill BT, and LG + RT shreds SMG spam. I still won though because I baited their BT into a corner, spread out my infantry, made more Scout Tanks, flanked their structures to deny income, and just overall won through attrition. It was a close match. But what I'm saying is, skill goes a long way in bad matchups. Watch their Red Army Swarm video to see what I mean. Similar things happened in that one.

@ there are loadouts that don't have bad matchups and bad matchups should be avoided when making a loadout. Also you "baiting" his Bt wasn't you fixing the issue, it was just him making a dumb mistake.

Howi and rockets are more tricky to beat. Position is key

​@@Foolish-Playz agreed. Skill goes a longer way than people think. I got a matchup against LG, BT, and rocket truck with my mass infantry loadout earlier. Which only has Scout Tank, MT+, and AT Rifle for anti-armor. I still won because I trapped their BT in a corner after baiting it away from the middle so my other units could flank and take their income though. I lost a lot of SMG squads, but they were paying even more for vehicles and LGs. It was a pretty close match, but I think a lot of people get too entrenched in their original strategy after it doesn't work. Especially a lot of aggro loadout players that aren't used to passive plays.

@@foxxowoxxowillow7855 W win. Skill is a very underrated thing in NIC. Some units require less skill while others need to be aware of their strengths and weaknesses. Understanding these things really helps in a match. W win by you

​@@foxxowoxxowillow7855Yeah but it just takes one guy that know what he is doing, and you pretty much cooked.

@@Lucaj1007 I wouldn't say so. My opponent made a mistake, but that doesn't mean he could avoid it. At least not with what he knew. You can argue for some logic or another, but I flanked for his Outpost when he didn't know where my new units were for about 6 turns, so he couldn't've known whether or not I was really trying to take his Outpost with more units than he could see, or if it was just bait for his BT like it was. It wasn't the "wrong" choice. He'd taken a lot of losses, too, being at eco disadvantage, but was still holding me in the center with his BT and LGs. But he also couldn't've known I spammed a bunch of Scout Tanks just behind my SMG Squads that were waiting to push his wall of LGs. It's called a feint, and not a bluff, because even a feint still swings a killing blow. It's a mind game, but not a hollow threat.

Oooooooo....... Maybe.......

Oh yes but if you manage your tix well they get a lot of value. I once had a recon tank with 11 kills lol

I tried. I got bombed lol. Maybe though.....

​@@Foolish-Playzfriend I try to make vid with only infantry

@PickleBoy174 AT LAST!!!!

as sapper user, i like making entire map bosnia just to annoy my friend for no reason

pretty short actually. I had a game that lasted for 1.5 hours with this loadout on grassland quarry!!

​@@Foolish-Playzso did you record that or...

@@senohgaming1867 I have it on camera!!

@Siromath4481 I prefer not to use the atgm. The extra cost isn't really worth it and in this loadout you have a cheap recon unit and a big tank if needed. Atgm can work but I don't recommend due to the higher cost

@Foolish-Playz Yeah but he good against tank with rocket like ifv but for me is pretty good but i has my idea of Inventory but is expensive xd

@Siromath4481 Use what you prefer. Always better to use units you like or prefer.

@@Foolish-Playz yeah if u play good some unit U good for pvp because me very good on like play mobile howitzer because i can attack and move so if im damaged i attack and i move for heal

@@Foolish-Playz btw ty for ur video is so cool