วีดีโอ

Thank you for this video 👏

Plastic strain is 116% in 23:24? Is that because its a uniaxial monotonic stress strain curve that only predicts necking but not fracture?

Your explanation is easy to understand, thank you

Hello and thank you for the video. I have two questions. In 1st presented case - share topology case - do you perhaps hnow which contact formulation is used by Workbench? I cannot find any info on that, I allready checked the ds.dat file. In 2nd presented case - contact case - I would like to know which contact formulation are you using here? Under Details of "Contact region" you have "Advanced" options. Could you tell us which "Formulation" did you select? Thank you and best regards

Great Video! Thanks

Thanks

Thanks man!

Thank you!

Hello sir please am a beginner in ansys workbench.But when ever I try to simulate I encounter solver error please help me . Am using ansys student R1

This issue is because you have 1 element in 2 directions and reduced integration scheme. You are out of limitations for this type. Changing integation scheme from reduced to full solves the problem. It can be changed in body properties.

Sir Can you please upload the full machine static and dynamic analysis video. Because I want to understand the constraints

I stand with Russia.

Thank you so much for the video. I think the topic is a subtle and professional point of view, for fresh ones like me🙂

Amazing video so much good information thank you very much! hugs from Brazil!

Thank for the video. There are some process where this rule is “must have” but in general (global) strength process it makes more issues than successes.

Thank you❤

Thanks for the video after such a long break. I understand your situation and wish you best for the future. Furthermore, if it is possible, do make a video on Submodelling procedures (Displacement-based & Force-based) in Ansys. Thanks once again.

Important topic and quite simple explanation of main contact approaches. Ty

Good lesson!

Great Video! Hard to find good info on this even in the Ansys leaning hub

What will happen if a shell element with a large thickness, like the cube example you showed, is pressed towards the solid body. Will the force only be applied to the nodes where the shell element is defined or over the whole thickness of the element. I hope you understand this question. I have run into some problems trying to model a brake rotor as a shell, but it seems to be causing major inaccuracies at the contact with the retainer because the force is applied at a smaller area then in reality.

Thank you! I never realized that the contact groups had their own details menus! This was a lifesaver

do more of these streams, they are pretty helpful

Thank you so much for the informative video. Can you explain how to solve the rotation problem in the straight edge model? I am having a problem because I have mede a model where I have a shell connected to the beam and the beam rotates with the shell, and I have made another model where I connect shell to 3D beam and I cannot mimic that effect.

Thanks for making&loading this one here... very useful for whoever needs it. Your english is great, pls don't be sorry about it. Cheers!

Thank you. The video is so helpful. I appreciate.

It was informative to see the effect of the shell DOF effect when connecting via a cylindrical surface vs a straight edge. Especially understanding the little nuances when considering the not so obvious like the effect of buckling on the cylinder shell to solid interface. Thank you.

I can't express enough gratitude for you taking the time to make these instructional videos. Finding learning materials on some of the more complex aspects of Ansys has been pretty difficult since I started using it. I would love it if you could also cover meshing techniques between different types of bodies. For example, simplifying a structural tube member from 3D solids to a 2D shell of just the outer faces (extracted from space claim), but then still getting the mesh area around a contact area with another body to match the nodes up correctly? I cannot use the "share topology" within spaceclaim feature between the different types of bodies with quadratic element types. I've been struggling with this quite a bit lately with a current project because of the size of the structure requires massive solve times if I use 3D elements. But I cannot just make the assumption that the body is one single unified solid, as I am concerned with the shear stresses in the weld joints. & I need those joints to be pretty fine to extract accurate stresses. Do you have any recommendations for tackling this issue? I cannot find any clear documentation on how/when to use any of the Mesh Edit features in mechanical.

LOL... love the cat interruption :)

👍

Норм..... 👍

Во..... нормуль, нормальная мова, респект... 💪👍

As always - tool is useless if the one holding it are incompetent

Useful 👍🏻