- 375
- 149 767
Keung HOA
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 26 ม.ค. 2018
This channel is about creating original work, this includes original music, original videos, original graphic interpretations of emotions. We do not exist in a vacuum, and what we do and feel is inexorably intertwined with our surroundings, but as content creators, we hang our pride and joy on our original creations. What you experience on my channel is exactly that, and hopefully this will inspire you to grow your own creativity.
Whimsy (Official XADR Visualiser)
Whimsy (Official XADR Visualiser) is a new composition by Keung Hoa. Special effects are created in DaVinci Resolve Studio version 19.
มุมมอง: 33
วีดีโอ
ENCHANTED (Official XADR Visualiser)
มุมมอง 10412 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
ENCHANTED (Official XADR Visualiser) is a new composition by Keung Hoa.
EERY FOREST (Official XADR Visualiser)
มุมมอง 3314 วันที่ผ่านมา
The Official XADR Visualiser of EERY FOREST by Keung Hoa. Please enjoy, all comments welcome.
CLOUDS (Official XADR Visualiser)
มุมมอง 10528 วันที่ผ่านมา
CLOUDS is a new composition by Keung Hoa. It seeks to depict the loftiness of clouds, as well as the ominous danger they represent, and ultimately their beauty. Clouds 00:00 Title 00:10 Looking up 01:46 Stirring in the sky 02:34 Menace brewing 02:57 Turbulences 05:42 Calming for now 06:04 Serenity returns 06:58 Looking up in relief Thank you.
A FINE DAY (Official XADR Visualiser)
มุมมอง 62หลายเดือนก่อน
A FINE DAY (Official XADR Visualiser) is a new original composition by Keung Hoa. Hope you enjoy it.
A Walk in the Park (Official XADR Visualiser)
มุมมอง 109หลายเดือนก่อน
A Walk in the Park (Official XADR Visualiser) is a new composition by Keung Hoa. Please enjoy.
MOSAIQ XADR (Official Visualiser)
มุมมอง 1152 หลายเดือนก่อน
MOSAIQ XADR (Official Visualiser) is a new composition by KEUNG HOA, another step in the lifelong project of pursuing the best in music creation.
FRAGMENTS OF TIME XADR (Official Release Music Video)
มุมมอง 1412 หลายเดือนก่อน
The FRAGMENTS OF TIME XADR (Official Release Music Video) by KEUNG HOA invites you to an audiovisual experience of a different level. Remember to use your headphones to better appreciate the high dynamic range audio reproduction.
GLIDING ON AIR (Official XADR Release)
มุมมอง 742 หลายเดือนก่อน
A new composition by KEUNG HOA, Gliding On Air brings a new level of quality of sound reproduction to the listener. Best enjoyed with headphones.
SERENICA XADR (Official Release)
มุมมอง 1972 หลายเดือนก่อน
SERENICA XADR (Official Release) is a new composition by KEUNG HOA.
SUPERSTARS (Official XADR Release)
มุมมอง 1222 หลายเดือนก่อน
A new composition by KEUNG HOA, SUPERSTARS takes you to a new dimension of sight and sound, a refreshing new experience you will certainly enjoy.
SUPER STRIDE XADR
มุมมอง 1392 หลายเดือนก่อน
SUPER STRIDE XADR by Keung Hoa is an easy listening dynamic tune for a nice walk or drive, or simply for listening pleasure.
FOREVER (Official XADR)
มุมมอง 2622 หลายเดือนก่อน
A new composition by KEUNG HOA, Forever marks a return to simpler melodies of times past when music was made to catch your attention by its melodic quality.
REDUX SPACE CONNEXION (XADR RELEASE)
มุมมอง 1443 หลายเดือนก่อน
Remastered Space Connexion by KEUNG HOA, with newer, brighter, sound.
F-22 RAPTOR IN 1/48 SCALE BY HASEGAWA
มุมมอง 1797 หลายเดือนก่อน
F-22 RAPTOR IN 1/48 SCALE BY HASEGAWA
KINETIC DASSAULT MIRAGE 2000-5 in 1/48 Scale
มุมมอง 3558 หลายเดือนก่อน
KINETIC DASSAULT MIRAGE 2000-5 in 1/48 Scale
❤
Thanks for watching.
Very good job !! Bravo !
Thank you.
Very nice song anyway..Thank you for replying..
Thank you too
TRAE TRIPULACION!!!! que felicidad, por fin!!!
Thank you for watching.
What is your daw ? I am using Studio One Pro
I use GarageBand to create the soundtrack, which is then exported as separate tracks. Final output is produced from DaVinci Resolve.
Hello, brother..ça fait vraiment chaud au coeur de voir que tu te bats et réussi à faire..Tu es battant ! It is really amazing !! Flowers pic are they from our garden ?
Yes the flowers are from my garden, the music is created using GarageBand, exported as multitrack files and re-compiled in DaVinci Resolve together with the video output, final output is produced from DaVinci Resolve with all the special effects.
🎵🎶👏👏🎧🎧!!!
🎧🎧🎧!!!
Do yourself a favour, for goodness sake, put on your headphones and prepare to be enveloped in pure melodic surround enjoyment!
I just ordered the Meng version. In the late '70s we lived on the airway into the local airport, I saw F-106s almost daily.
Thank you for watching, you will enjoy it, I am sure.
Best sound with 🎧🎧🎧!!!
Multiple track output imported into DaVinci Resolve allows for better instrument separation in the final render from DaVinci.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🤭🌹🥂🍾
Thank you for watching
Uauuuuuu 🌹👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🎶✨️🫂🥂🍾
Thank you, glad you like it
LINDÍSSIMO INSTRUMENTAL... Quem está ouvindo com fones de ouvido, ficará encantado 🎉🎉🎉😊...
thank you, the sound has been optimised for headphones, glad you enjoy it.
Added synthesiser track to melody line, boosted reverb for most instruments, reworked bass track with new lower notes, improved clarity of drum track, boosted level of drum track in final output, taper at end is made smoother.
👍👍👍
thank you, hope you're well.
Nice one 💯
thanks Edith
Edith how are you?
David R Lentz, Columbus, Ohio, USA I had two of this kit, one to build with the landing gear down, the canopy raised, with all the access panels, ordnance bays, etc., all open to view, the crew chief and service crew making visual inspection; and the other would have a USAF pilot seated in the cockpit, gear up, in flight approaching 20,000 metres, well exceeding Mach two, as the winged predator much as its namesake closes upon a cavalier intruder suddenly unwitting prey . . . . Unfortunately, with both kits, I could not make the upper and lower halves fit together correctly to close properly; no matter how I adjusted, retried, shifted, fiddled, struggled, even pleaded, the two halves obstinately remained three or four millimetres (3-4 mm; round 1/8th of an inch; 0.125”) awry, never for the twain to meet. I in my exasperation chuckled them back into the boxes, stowing them upon a shelf. Hasegawa, I want back my $90.00 each. Aside from you poor design, I have a personal reason.
That’s no good, Hasegawa kits tend to be quite fiddly, this looks like to be one of those…
@@keunghoa Exactly! Thank you for your concurrence.
The others cost as much or more and aren’t any better.
This boxing is the choice one also as it comes with a full complement of weapons.
This song is nice.
Thank you for watching, very glad that you liked it.
Beautiful composition and sound! Fascinating neoclassical style with a little jazz mixed in! Very cool visuals as well! :-) I compose for piano and keyboards, too! Best wishes, Michelle
Thank you so much for your kind words, your appreciation means a lot to me, thank you for subscribing to my channel!
I'm also a 100% positive I built the Hasegawa 1/48 Phantom before 1986. Was the colorful VF-51 CAG bird you show on the Tamiya box. I built it while still single and living in barracks so it would have been 83 or earlier.
Amazingly Hasegawa is still selling those pre-2000 F-4 kits today. I have in my stash an F-4G from 1990 that I will review soon. Thank you for your interest and comment.
Thank you for this review.
You’re welcome.
Ignore the trolls especially the Auzzie t**t! Nice review - I’m building the Airfix 1:72 and it’s amazing how well you get to know the individual parts, so seeing this, you can immediately see the differences in the bigger scale I’m curcurious, what are the paint marks on some of the sprues for? I can’t figure that out!
Thank you for your comment. The dark spots on some sprues are actually shadows caused by the oblique lighting used to photograph them, because of the light coloured plastic, it was quite difficult to show details otherwise. Tamiya used intricate shapes on their sprue trees following the contour of the parts to provide maximum protection.
@@keunghoa Ah ha - my theory was that the sprues with the black paint were marked either if they needed painting before building in or that you had sanded/cleaned them up while still on the sprue. I was wrong with both. Sounds like you animated a photo - my assumption was a steady hand on a video camera, hence my confusion! Thanks for putting my mind to rest!
One of my all time favourite aircraft. Nice looking kit. I have it in 1/72 and have been saving it. Good video.
Many thanks for your comment. Thank you for visiting this channel.
"promosm"
Cheers
It's so awesome, dear friend.
Thank you so much. Good of you for watching and sharing your comment.
@@keunghoa You're welcome.
Are paid by Tamiya by any chance. Every "BEST" kit from you is Tamiya!
Not just Tamiya, also Meng for the FA-18E, the F-106A, Eduard for the P-51D and Tempest, GWH for the F-15E, you should check out these videos as well and also other people’s reviews on the internet, there are plenty of them, check them out. I wish Tamiya would pay me for praising their kits! Let me know if you can find a 1/32 Corsair that is better than the Tamiya one.
I will indeed. @@keunghoa
Please commentate I dont do subtitles
Thanks for watching.
Sadly there are a number of issues with the Hobby Boss 1/48 Black Widow kits. (I have their P-61C kit, which I may cross-kit with either a Monogram P-61B or a GWH P-61B kit for a more accurate C model.) Firstly the cross section on the upper main fuselage behind the cockpit to the rear cockpit is far too angular. There should be a small clear curve on the shoulders. (Their P-61 C kit has the same fuselage parts) The nose radome is too short, being the same radome as their P-61A. The B and C models had a longer nose radome for a more advanced, Heavier, Radar fit. Lastly the main landing gear bay (and doors) are simply wrong. The Main Gear Bay had no rear Bulkhead. In the P-61A this was an issue because debris from rough airfields would be kicked up into the rear boom by the huge wheels and tires, and, after a time to accumulate, would unbalance the plane. This was due to the two single doors being open on landing and stayed open until after takeoff. To Fix this Northrop divided the gear door where the leg was into a very small door for the leg (Which remained open on the ground) and the rest would open to extend and retract the gear, then close again before landing and after takeoff. All would close over the gear bay when the Landing gear was fuilly retracted, thus essentially sealing off the bay itself In flight, but NOT for takeoff/landing. This was introduced with the B model and ALL subsequent models, including the F-15A Reporter Photo recon version. The Great Wall Hobby kit does correctly include parts correct for each variant. BTW the wing spoilerons are also incorrectly depicted, they lay flat on the upper wing in flight, not retracted vertically into the wing. (Compare with either the Monorgram/Revell or GWH kits.) The GWH kits also include full intake ducting on the Wing leading edges, something the Hobby Boss 1.32 kit also does! So why is there only Frontal grill pieces provided here?) Last is an issue in the Decals. The Stars and Bars for the wings are too large - they were the same size as the samll Stars and Bars on the fuselage. Similarly the red walkway strips are far too thick, about twice as braod as the original walkways. I think the red serial numbers for the tails are alo too big, but check references for that, some were larger. They are also missing a number of "No Step" stencils. I am also unsure if option 2 "Sleepy Time Gal" had pinup nose art on both sides - that would have been unusual, but not unknown.
Thank you so much for your very detailed comment about the Hobby Boss P-61B. You have raised many issues I was not aware of so I am grateful for these as they will benefit others who may contemplate buying this kit. The GWH P-61B is certainly at a different level for accuracy and finer details, this would be my choice for a definitive representation of this most iconic night fighter.
I built that last year its a great kit
Yes I think it’s the best 1/48 scale Mig-29 on the market. Thanks for watching.
Thanks for the review. It looks like a decent kit.
Probably the best 1/48 Rafale to date. Thank you for watching.
Did you build this model?
No I did not.
Hasegawa kits from late 1990s/early 2000 were considered classic for their high quality and accurate shapes. I have built their F16 and F15 without any problems, just need a bit of patience and follow instructions carefully.
Great music for getting up in the morning!
Ignorant me sees a Bf-110 with Japanese radial engines
You are right the Gekko reminds me of the Bf-110 from the front also, but I think the Gekko has a cleaner design, such as the single vertical fin vs the smaller double rudders of the Bf-110.
Good job. Someone built something other than a zero or a ki 61 tony
Thank you for watching.
Great review, very nice kit I built the Revell 1/48 version such a cool aircraft.
Many thanks! I also like the early jets from the 1950s and 1960s. The F-102 was replaced by the F-106, another great jet from the same manufacturer, Convair. There’s also a review of this jet on my site.
Cool review.
Glad you enjoyed it, thanks for watching.
Is that nato black base color?
Yes it is. I used the Tamiya spray can version.
Wow! You can now not only hear the bass but also FEEL it!!! And the drums really take on a new dimension: the kicks are really meaty and the cymbals and percussion feel so airy! Thank you TH-cam for reproducing such quality audio track.
As clear as water, as fresh as its smell, this adds a sparkle to your ear and eye as you make it through the day…
Nice.
Thank you, really appreciate your comment.
One should also factor-in cost and availability, both of which favor the old Hasegawa kit. As a personal side note, I'm not a fan of the simulated avionics bays found in the Meng kit. Not having built one I can't say with certainty but to my eyes they look like two more areas that will need filler, sanding, and rescribing of panel lines surrounding the bays when not built in the item position.
Thank you for your feedback. I agree with your comment about the avionics bays. Personally I am not a fan of display of openings in a finished model. However the Meng kit makes up for this with its superior general detail of external surfaces compared to the Hasegawa kit.
A loud statement about the turbulent times we live in. When will things get better?
*Promosm*
Thanks for watching
Excellent video, thanks for posting and telling us modelers of recommendations, problems, and things to watch out for. You mentioned about fit, but would you also recommend any additions, like photo-etch or accessories?? Look forward to your reply.
Thank you for watching the video. As it was, I did not see any need for pe or accessories as the level of detail out of box was already very high. The most fiddly part of the build was the set of shtora units (red lights) either side of the gun tube, as they are meant to swivel horizontally after assembly.
Dear mate this is marvelous so so pretty congratulations
Thank you so much for visiting this channel
Thanks for the preview…. Whats the name of the song?
The soundtrack is Eery Forest, my own composition. Thanks for visiting, and a big thank you for subscribing!
...It's only a Tamiya commercial!!!😬😬😬😬😬
I have the Hasegawa 1/48 F-4G, the Zoukei-Mura 1/48 F-4F and F-4S, the Academy 1/48 F-4B and now the Tamiya 1/48 F-4B, so the claim that Tamiya’s is the best is based on what I have compared it to. My opinion is based on value for money, quality of the kit, ease of build.