วีดีโอ

Very deceiving title.

In many of the YT/papers/articles that I've found it's the Inmarsat IOR that refers to. But have anyone tried looking at the Inmarsat POR, co it's western "border" is close to the search area ?

This needs more investigating to find out what really happened. Ed

In the first few minutes you've already lost credibility by suggesting the initial search was driven by some sense of certainty. I believe it was driven by a sense of uncertainty and the desire to solve the mystery. There is no bogeyman here, there's only theories that may have a higher confidence than others but no one has ever mentioned certainty. Sheesh.

In addition to being a 777 pilot, Juan is also a former US Air Force pilot. Mentour has done many accident reviews of crashes I'd researched and had so much new information it's incredible.

This is a reply on 2 channels(Decoding the Unknown & Mentour), so it looks a bit strange. The answer to the plane crash is: Captain Chesley Sullenberger I'm on holiday at the moment and that means I get to watch a lot of TH-cam. I have also wondered about what has happened with MH-370. Something Mentour mentions at the start is that a plane cannot disappear, plane parts will be found in the sea or on a beach. Parts have been found and also more than I thought. I had a conversation with my parents a few years ago about the matter. And my idea was to have spaces in the nose, wingtips and in the tail with balls where the plane's number will be written. It will make it possible to find more parts in the event of a plane crash. As previously written in Mentour's video, it is said that a plane cannot disappear. Why haven't they investigated how a plane disappears ? There is a natural difference in how an aircraft behaves on land and on water. But what would an impact with a large concentration of debris or missing parts look like? And then I think of a movie with Tom Hanks where he plays Captain Chesley Sullenberger. How about comparing the preparations regarding Flight 1549 and MH-370 ?

It does sound crazy that someone would play with an electrical bus and willingly shut off all main systems of a 777 but then again the extremely big elephants in the room are the arcs and the simulator flight paths. How can you explain those without considering if in fact turning off the SDU was done willingly. Also, do not underestimate sea exploration effots. Its incredibly hard to survey the ocean floor

Most pilots think the captain took dole control of the aircraft and followed a plan to took his own life along with those of the passengers. Why go out if his way to prevent the investigation from finding the wreck and securing evidence of his actions? I can only speculate he wanted to protect his own reputation or his family or perhaps insurance had something to do with it. In Asia, there was the precedent of the Silk air crash where the captain pulled the CVR's cb prior to crashing the aircraft and the local authorities always denied the destruction of the aircraft was intentional - against the NTSB 's conclusions.

The heterosexual guy keeps interrupting the gay guy

Ok now I’m more interested. Thank you

I was stationed on Diego Garcia for a full year and I know this island well so when I say I have a theory on what happened to mh-370 it involves this island. I fully believe the plane suffered a catastrophic fire, explosion or something that caused it to lose compression at 30k feet. Due to the "problem" the pilots could not get the plane below breathable air level before everyone on the plane passed out, including the pilots. The plane is on or was on auto pilot or the pilots switched it off and on and left it on due to passing out but either way the plane is flying itself with everyone out cold and about to be dead. After enough time passes and the plane is flying crazy patterns, everyone dies and the plane drifts over and eventually heads towards Diego Garcia, a major base for the US Navy and the British govt as the island is a part of the British Indian ocean territories. BIOT. With the plane approaching, it took hours btw, and no response from said aircraft, guess what they elected to do? Yep.... I believe they didn't want some rogue pilot pulling a 9-11 on a nuclear weapon equipped island with just military people on it. The US Navy shot this plane down and hid what wreckage they could locate on diego. It's there and what pieces they couldn't get to is what the public has so far recovered.

28:45 Need clairifcation on a few things here. 1.) Are BTO and BFO data both able to be tampered with? If so why wouldn't there be an assumption that the landing area probablility circle for the northern route could fall victim to the same tampering or "vulnerability" as you call it that the southern route suffers from. 2.) Why wasn't there more detail on the complexities of setting up an autoland for an airport which this 777 likely would not have in its database? Compound that with the sugguestion you all made earlier that this cosmodrome would likely be ~250 miles outside of the fuel range of the aircraft, in which case you'd have to assume the plane is funtioning off of rat power alone, the thought of an auto land at night, in a glide, rat power alone flown by folks who may or may not be pilots is just as crazy as the UFO theory to me. I don't understand the subjects you all pick and choose to painstakingly pick appart which really arent crucial to the actual understanding of the incident but fail to immediately identify certain things as plausible or not plausible.

The organization and presenting of this info is so terrible. Especially for a journalist and a media guy. But its good info, so i have to listen. There has been no effective building of a story from a journalistic standpoint, and the scientific method that clearly when into the info being presentent unfortunately has not come through in this podcast. I personally don't care about building the "story" but the scientific facts need to be presented logically, that is in a logical order and flow. It's very much been flying by the seat of Jeff's pants. I've watched up to here straight through and will continue over the next few days. Hope if theres a season 2 or more episodes at a later date that they're more organized. Keep bringing us info because it IS important, unfortunately its hard to digest. I do appreciate the time you guys put into this

18:56 that idea infuriates people because it makes people believe that you’re unwilling to let go of your theories even when data indicate that your theories are invalid. It makes you seem desperate and conspiratorial. FYI

yes 7:28 but wouldn’t someone see a person pulling up the carpet who didn’t have a uniform on? And as someone who’s flown first class quite frequently I can tell you that in any first class cabin there’s at least one if not two flight attendants dedicated to serving just that cabin so the ‘bad guy’ would have to either ‘knock out’ everyone in first class including their flight attendants and then ensure no coach attendants and/or passengers enter first class plus that no pilots leave the cockpit. Come on!

how could it be anything malicious aimed at us? it was a muslim country’s airline with a mostly Chinese passenger list.

May have been better to talk with one or both of those whose opinion you disagree with rather than a nothing interview with Juan.

Jeff is clinically insane 😂

The pilot suicide theory also doesn't explain why he would want to fly all the way to the southern Indian Ocean...... Why not just slam the plane into the ground? Unfortunately, we simply have no clue what happened. I guess he could have gone completely nuts, but still....... It may be one of the better theories, but it still doesn't seem to sit right..... It does explain the scenario on his home flight simulator, I guess....

I never bought into the satellite theory that placed it South off of Australia! My theory is the crew allowed unauthorized people in the cockpit which according to reports they had a history of doing in. A struggle ensued to take control of the plane which accounts for the erratic altitude movements on radar before the plane turned West before dropping off of radar. I think it continued West, this explains the reports from multiple sources of a unusually low flying aircraft that morning over the Maldives. which have been totally ignored. I believe its probable intended destination was an island off of Yemen a haven for terrorists, probably Socotra airport which runway is large enough to land a 777. According to its wiki page it only has one commercial flight per week, and is relatively deserted other times. From the reported amount of fuel on board, a 777 flown normally could probably just about make it, but with the extra fuel needed to stay low, it went down somewhere in the Northwestern Indian Ocean This is also supported by the debris found on the islands off of Africa. Of course there is no proof of this, just another theory that matches the timeline of events if the current Satellite theory is wrong!

sorry guys, this is not convincing, so you are saying he wasn't suicidal? if not then I struggle to undertsnad what you are arguing against, the certainty?, but the plane didnt turn itself, you cant say those turns from commercial route were on autopilot, he overflew Malaysia to boot, he was conscious enough to do all that but never called for help or attempted to land, accident scenario is even wilder than suicide. The holes you point out rely on normal pilot procedure which I find quite puzzling. He does those extreme actions because he has extreme goals, you yourself said the actions were not impoosible. Also about pilot knowledge, a determined person can learn a lot, I understand that that level of knowledge is not something a regular pilot would seek but he wasn't a regulr pilot was he, he needed specific information for specific tasks and i believe in the 21st century you can find information if you look hard enough and look in the right places.

Two questions. One. I don’t quite understand why they dive becoming steeper requires a control input? Two. Stipulating that, is there any requirement that the control input be conscious? It seems to me that the dive could have caused an unrestrained but dead pilot to slump forward onto the control column.

Why would flying with no fuel(in a simulator) be weird. Haven't people heard about Air Transat Flight 236? Or the Gimli Glider? If a plane can be saved without fuel. All passengers saved. That really cool? At least i think so. Why wouldn't a pilot practice running out of fuel. If the captain was on an un-aliving misson. Why fly for hours. Why not do a Garman Wings? Why would the captain be guilty of anything. I'd be surprised if it doesn't turn out to be something completely different. Then what a lot of what people are talking about. My guess is something weird and unforeseen happened to the plane itself. Some sort of failure

Wouldn't Blaine and Gololobov being spooks be one obvious explanation. Spooks as spies or working for intelligence. Or something like that

Mindless meandering babbling... Very disappointing.

This Russia angle is so weird. UFOs are more likely

Flapperon? Debris washing up on beaches? Have you not heard about the flapperon and other debris?

Gotta love how the "Russia, Russia, Russia" people always think they're not into conspiracy theories. Just hilarious!

Please pronounce it as the individual letters (C.S.I.R.O.) you sound like a typical yank when ya try and say it as a word. Nobody says it like you do.

There was a recent crash, I believe, of a small jet flying for a couple hours no response. Military jets did not scramble until heading for Washington, DC

Amazing that plane flew for so long, flying over enemy territories without being intercepted or checked out

"If you live in an airport, planes come in to land all the time." I used to live in Almaty, and this is certainly true of its airport. It's generally not as busy as most western equivalents, but there are take-offs and landings throughout the day. Also, the hours before dawn are an especially busy time there, because for whatever reason, lots of flights to Kazakhstan depart from Europe or Russia the night before. (I've heard it said that airport taxes are a bit lower in the middle of the night, but that's anecdotal.) The point being that none of the local residents would bat an eyelid if a large plane flew overhead at 5am.

First question 🏆

What if the plane didnt crash, but was planned?

As a long-time business analyst who has done countless root cause analysis in the IT world, my opinion would be that most every time you have confusing evidence pointing to multiple directions, you will most likely find an unexpected set of different causes aligning in a unique way. Relatively speaking, MH370 was a very small machine lost in a vast ocean. As a one-off event, the more time that passes, the more likely the aircraft will only ever be found accidentally, and that could take decades or longer.

The ocean's pretty big, They could have landed on a secret aircraft carrier, that was waiting for them at that particular location🤷‍♂️

Hey guys! Love the show. I’ve been interested in MH370 since first hearing about it. I have a thought. Seeing that there’s very little evidence that the pilot(s) had motive, depression, suicidal ideation, etc., what about the scenario that something catastrophic happens wherein the plane was able to continue flying, but info about the speed, height, etc., was unavailable. The pilot makes the sharp turn, and heads back to land. Unknowing where they are, they start working on trying to get power back on. They spend the next 6 hours trying to figure out where they are. By the time they understand, they 3000 miles off course and perish in the ocean.

Classic green dot style, dramatically presumptive ?

When you have Juan Browne and even Ron Rogers ( retired UA B777 captain ) on TH-cam, it’s going to be good

It's like listening to Beavis and Butthead commmenting in aviation videos instead of MTV. From 44 mins, the only worth listening to is Juans comments

I think the greatest mystery, yet to be solved is - what happened between Jeff and Andy?? 👀

So a guy who brags “Look look I’m a Russian agent” couldn’t possibly be a double agent asset of the US/West? - so now we know the true agenda of this channel and the narrative you are pushing - but as many have pointed out Russia would gain nothing from this … but it sure would benefit US and Raytheon - I doubt you and Captain cosplayer are planning any videos on that theory.

“False pings” are possible but notice how your expert then swiftly adds “doesn’t have any baring on this case” - it has a big baring on this case as they still can’t find the plane!! - as I said on another video everything can be hacked and can be hacked by government sponsored hackers. Having now watched this video, which at times I felt like disinformation to push a narrative at times distasteful, not sure how family members of this sad event appreciate “we need to tease the audience” (including victims family members who are part of the audience) and the guy showing his cosplay pilot uniform, stating if he entered a cockpit he’d probably be arrested (beggars belief what are you guys thinking saying and showing that??) - I have to conclude having watched this episode that you linked me to, Jeff, that this series of videos and the two books are pushing the plane went down in ocean and is part of the cover-up of what really happened to the flight and the innocent victims of this shady crime and investigation.

So why haven’t you answered a simple question, as you keep distracting with barnacles evidence which proves nothing - Has it been proven that the debris actually came from the MH370 aircraft? Every piece of an aircraft has a unique stamp.

What this guy is saying is that every thing is totally explainable, and plausible. I watched it multiple times. You keep interrupting him and contradicting what he is trying to tell you. He actually explains it very clearly if you just listen to him.

Were there any pings from passenger cellphones at all during the flighr?

It landed in Afganistan. Later it crashed in Ukraine..

Jeff, i have a question. We always assumed that the plane was at cruise altitude of around 35/40k feet above sea level during the whole path into the indian ocean, if we assume the hijacker could know about this SDU (which we assume he didn't but we can't actually exclude it). I'm thinking that if he was flying at a considerably lower altitude, say 10k feet, in the middle of the ocean, that wouldn't have caused anyone to detect it anyways. Now the question, is it possible that a considerably lower altitude could alter the x/y position of the plane on the earth and bring to a considerable error on the arcs? (since the distance from plane to satellite would have been say a couple miles different). If that is true, the error brought from the first arc to the 7th could lead to a huge error on the research point. At the end, if the altitude was 10k feet, the plane would have been around 4.5/5 miles farther from the satellite compared to the plane being at 35/40k. Does that make any sense? EDIT: i've been thinking about this while driving home from work, and i kinda understood myself that the fuel efficiency would have be much different and the plane couldn't fly for so long, but still, i wonder if an altitude difference could considerably alter the ping circles data..

these guys talk a lot and say nothing

Hi Andy and Jeff. I have just started to listen to your podcast a week ago and am very much enjoying listening to your explanations of everything. One thing you didn't know is 8 th of March . I grew up in Former Yugoslavia and 8th March was always celebrated as a international women's day /a mothers day. It was a big deal for women overthere and it still is for me now. I am now in Melbourne Australia (since1989) and people here never paid attention to this date until recently, but i like not to work on this day , go for a walk, have a coffee with my mum and daughter.