วีดีโอ

He did not

Either that or he's trying to convince Metternich that his army is stronger than it is. Napoleon is on his hind legs making a desperate attempt to preserve his stranglehold on Europe.

They wrongly linked that event with a previous scene where Napoleon meets the tsar and throws his hat after an argument.

wenn könig unwichtig entschuldigen würde, man empfangt heute noch baron ohnbelang. danke.

When you're at war with a country that's trying to take over the continent, they won't trust you and vice versa. I guess the significance of the part of history that this scene recreates is that it shows how Diplomacy can work.

Wow I was wrong to read this, my brain hurts.ahahahaha Is it a hobby of yours to make up fairytales or you are simply too bored to study history ? Perhaps if you read only 1 book about that period it might seem like a eureka moment for you.

However, Napoleon was right that Britain was using Prussia, Russia, and Austria to fight Napoleon. While Napoleon was a brilliant commander and administrator, he did not understand the complexities of diplomacy since he is more a military man which failed to learn the lessons of why he’s fighting too many wars.

​@@republicempire446 no he wasn’t he was going to break his treaty of Amines and while my Islands of Great Britain and Ireland were enjoy there for over a year of peace and enjoyment but little did we knew Bonaparte was building up his forces and building his fleet of Frog ships to secretly sneak in my people’s lands and bombarded every British civilised area right by the sea to take the lands by force all for himself so he brought the war apron himself if my island spies didn’t find out Napoleon duped my people with a fake peace treaty my people would be genocide from that Monster Bonaparte who’s so evil and Napoleon wasn’t right he was Republic Empire Frog French man me and my people didn’t force any of those countries they made there choice when they saw Napoleon failed to defeat my island allies the Russians they all relished they made a mistake joining the villain of the Napoleonic wars indeed and that’s why Prussia, and Austria rejoin to and fight and free there homes from the monster who destroyed there lands and ruined there lives besides the Portugal people join my people by free will choice because my and my redcoats lobster brothers in arms saved them from being butchered by Napoleon evil troopers of terror and we didn’t force his high majesty King Charles of Spain off his thorn the Monster Napoleon did because he wanted Spain all to himself which lead to him gaining more enemies since he’s hates other country people except French because he doesn’t love those countries only using there resources to genocide people and rule the world as a monster mad man close to being just as evil and bad as Hitler himself so Napoleon was trying to fib about everyone’s rulers because being evil but in reality Bonaparte was the true evil monster who use people as expandable pawns to boost his own power for him and his wife only but no one else why else would some of Napoleon Marshals would not join him after he was justified banished for genocide millions of innocent people when he returned to do tyranny once again because they knew he was weaker and they had a chance to defend there land for there own mistake war and they lose French Republic Empire man do you get your French people lose because there new recruits were too young and weak to fight besides Napoleon didn’t listen to his father in law his high majesty Emperor Francis II told him to resign his role when he had the chance of his power hungry war to end and stop campaigning again before he goes even mad then before but tragically Napoleon didn’t and he should never had invaded Switzerland during the treaty of Amines and framing my people for it when they didn’t do it at all so the guilt one was Napoleon still since he invaded a poor defenceless land while, Great Britain and, Ireland and Spain and Batavian Republic was enjoying the fake treaty of peace of Amines so if you say Napoleon was right one more time French Republic Empire man your just as dark and evil of cold hearted just like Bonaparte and Hitler for wanting to genocide millions of innocent people who did nothing wrong back then you dishonourable villain man 100% indeed!

They were untrustworthy snakes as well, breaking treaties and agreements whenever it suited them, causing the deaths of so many people long before Napoleon was emperor. A poisonous race that is highlighted by this particular “diplomat” who also actively tried to sabotage and suppress the Greek revolution against the Ottoman Empire.

It’s called being a hypocrite.

Fine, thank you. And you?

@@clausesanta5042 Fine thanks

@@theeagleman9407 Alright. Let's talk about future of Europe.

@@clausesanta5042 the future could be better than the painfull past

It was nothing undiplomatic at all it was more of a blunt diplomatic gesture

Yes, he did. And when Metternich refused to pick it up (as protocol at the time demanded), Napoleon became even more agitated.

The Situation in Europe now Same to WW2

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sideburns

true! The actual conversation was reported by Metternich to Emperor Francis in the memo i mentioned above, giving the source.

@@757hh the treaty part

He did still beat armies 4-5 times his size in many battles in the 1814 campaign But the coalition could afford to take massive loss and continue. Napoleon in 1813 had no room for any error.

@@archivesoffantasy5560 Correct, and he even won a stupendous victory in 1813 at the Battle of Dresden....he should have accepted Austria's generous peace offer, but refused it.....he admitted at St. Helena that he had been a fool to turn down that offer

Jerry Jaye but how many times have the coalitions shown themselves to hate Napoleon and the revolutionary reforms he promoted ? My point is would they really have stopped there and let Napoleon remain Emperor of just France. They would likely try to then remove him altogether. This is speculation tho.

@@archivesoffantasy5560 Yes, you make a good point. I would just add, though, that Austria now had its Princess as Napoleon's wife....and if Napoleon remained emperor, then his SON would be the next emperor....and that son was the grandson of the Emperor Francis of Austria.....That gave Austria a strong motive to keep Nappy in charge....plus, Metternich agreed with Napoleon the many times that Nappy told Mett. "I have stopped the Revolution. After me, it will resume its advance."....Metternich knew that Napoleon was right. As its was, the Bourbons were kicked off the throne again just 15 years after Nappy's defeat at Waterloo. The Prussians and Russians HATED Nappy. But the Austrians did not. So Austria might have been able to keep him in charge......It appears from Metternich's private correspondence with Francis that he tried hard to do just that.

Jerry Jaye Emperor Francis of Austria still declared war on Napoleon when his daughter was married to him. Honestly Napoleon wasn’t harsh enough on some of his enemies

Leipzig, of course, need not have happened....Napoleon had just won a HUGE victory in the Battle of Dresden, and he was going to march on Berlin and capture the city....his generals all balked and urged him to, instead, leave Germany and take the army to France....Napoleon told them this would be a disaster....the generals insisted.....Napoleon was correct, because on their way back to France, the French Army unknowingly ran right into the entire Allied Army....in the Battle of Leipzig, Napoleon was outnumbered by 5 to 3 and was lucky to escape with as many soldiers as he did.

Your Emperor is insane 😂

(I was pretending to be Napoleon when I wrote this

Yes, it is right before the battle of Dresden, during the armistice of Plasswitz, June - July 1813.

@@757hh Metternich wrote the discussion down in the memo he wrote afterward to Emperor Francis.....it is in "The Memoirs of Prince Metternich" published in 1881 by Charles Scribner & Sons publisher, in NYC......large city libraries would have it....NY, Chicago, Cleveland;;;

Yes, Metternich himself wrote. in a piece about Napoleon, that Nappy once threw his famous hat onto the floor in disgust at some remark by Metternich.....He wrote that Nappy kept looking at him and then at the hat, as though Nappy expected Count Metternich to pick up the hat....which, Metternich wrote, "I declined to do.";;;;;hahaha!

@@essessessesq Napoleon had hus tantrums lol

@@AbrahamLincoln4 He did, but Metternich wrote in his Memoir that the outbursts by Nappy were staged, to create an effect

It won...

@@KaiserFranzJosefI with the help of many other nations lol

@@AbrahamLincoln4 so what - you die with 56, he lives till 86 lol

@@AbrahamLincoln4 Regardless, they won 🤣

@@AbrahamLincoln4 ...who couldn't have won without Austria's support

Yes. Jawohl.

Everyone remember the Der Untergang movie he played as Albert Speer

No. He didn't.

But this scene takes place in the summer of 1813, not 1809. It's the War of the Sixth Coalition, not the Fifth. (Napoleon did no damage to Vienna when he took it back in 1809, or in 1805.)

@@essessessesq 😂

@@richardmalcolm1457 only if he did, lol

No he wasn’t that kind of person. In fact Bertier advised him to completely destroy the Austrian empire after Wagram, but Napoleon opted for a peace. A peace which the Austrian broke again, as they were used to.

Just like the self proclaimed prophet Muhammad

You know a movie to tv show is low budget when all they can do is an empty room with little to no decoration.

Yes, it's indeed a very good series.

Its actually very high budget. It was the most expensive European TV miniseries ever. Costing $46,330,000 to produce. And its not a suprise. The dialogue does feel a bit off sometimes because it was made in English, French and Italian. But the production quality is quite high, there are alot of battle scenes and accurate costumes.

@@devdixit2440 Not to mention the famous cast!

Seriously,you forget war and peace made by the director of waterloo,sergei bondarchuk,the 1964 one

"I am France"

@@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser did he reduce Egypt to Rubble

you are right......on St. Helena, he admitted that his ego got the best of him and made him believe he was invincible.

@@essessessesq I think, at the end of the story, he paid the fact of coming from a backwater place with narrow-minded people

@@fabrizioriva1281 well, Nap, knew he was from the lower nobility of Corsica, and that the high aristocrats looked down on him....He believed he could remain in power only if those snobs were afraid of him.

@@essessessesq Possibly this is another problem with him: thinking first about himself, and not his nation. If he had remained just First Consul, instead of the masquerade of being an Emperor, France would have a chance to better face the hurdles, and Napoleon himself would never end his life on a desert island.

@@fabrizioriva1281 you are correct, like most politicians and leaders, Napoleon was VERY self-centered and had a huge ego.

DORIAN PRIME Well said and so true!

What ideas did the French leave, just by curiosity?

@@andromilk2634 the Napoleonic Code

@@andromilk2634 Liberty

@@andromilk2634 liberty equality fraternity

Apart from Talleyrand

true. Metternich is Kissinger's idol.

Jerry Jaye Henry Kissinger has said that he admires Metternich before ??

@@kennethho888 Yes. Kissinger wrote his doctoral dissertation about Metternich, full of praise and admiration for him. Kissinger published it as his first book.....www.amazon.com/World-Restored-Metternich-Castlereagh-Problems/dp/1626549788

You forget the only man Metternich though of as the only one to oppose him. Count Giovanni Capo D' Istria.

Bankers don't really play with Emperors as puppets. Emperors are more like dice. The wise banker will win no matter who wins the battle. The banker does not stand behind any particular Emperor. He does not depend on them.

@@harmonica7064 Um...yes.

@Mr. Caesar Yes. Plus, Josephine was a monarchist and wanted him to restore the Bourbons to the throne....Napoleon was pro-Bourbon in many ways, but admitted that his own ambition demanded that HE become the monarch.