- 87
- 202 348
Mathematical Toolbox
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 26 พ.ค. 2021
I try to make math more accessible and share user-friendly books.
EASY BOOK ON PDEs?! - Responding To Math Stack Exchange Questions
Today we're gonna be responding to a question posted on Math Stack Exchange. The original poster is looking for an easy book on PDEs, but unfortunately has received almost no useful advice. The OP is going to be using Strauss, and wants a much easier book on the subject. Believe it or not, he was recommended Evans, twice, and Strauss once. What follows is some discussion and reaction to the OP and replies.
Let me know if you enjoyed the video as much as I enjoyed filming it.
Be sure to check out our memberships if you would like additional content.
Affiliate/paid links:
Partial Differential Equations by Strauss: amzn.to/4hQ1et7
Partial Differential Equations Farlow: amzn.to/40K6APH
An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations by Renardy and Rogers: amzn.to/3EspbZ4
Introduction to Partial Differential Equations by Olver: amzn.to/3WPt2Wg
Partial Differential Equations by Evans: amzn.to/42QAe8F
Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems by Boyce and DiPrima: amzn.to/415JHro
Elementary Differential Equations with Boundary Value Problems by Edwards and Penney: amzn.to/3EvypUn
Elementary Differential Equations with Boundary Value Problems by Zill: amzn.to/40PkUGn
Partial Differential Equations by Choksi: amzn.to/4aMfMaR
Another book that can be tried is the one by Haberman, but I have no experience with it. Many subscribers have said positive things about it. Here's a link: amzn.to/40NCAT6
Timestamps:
0:00 OP's Question Part 1
1:42 My Response
3:45 MSE User Responses
8:35 The Reality of the Situation
9:51 Last thoughts
Let me know if you enjoyed the video as much as I enjoyed filming it.
Be sure to check out our memberships if you would like additional content.
Affiliate/paid links:
Partial Differential Equations by Strauss: amzn.to/4hQ1et7
Partial Differential Equations Farlow: amzn.to/40K6APH
An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations by Renardy and Rogers: amzn.to/3EspbZ4
Introduction to Partial Differential Equations by Olver: amzn.to/3WPt2Wg
Partial Differential Equations by Evans: amzn.to/42QAe8F
Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems by Boyce and DiPrima: amzn.to/415JHro
Elementary Differential Equations with Boundary Value Problems by Edwards and Penney: amzn.to/3EvypUn
Elementary Differential Equations with Boundary Value Problems by Zill: amzn.to/40PkUGn
Partial Differential Equations by Choksi: amzn.to/4aMfMaR
Another book that can be tried is the one by Haberman, but I have no experience with it. Many subscribers have said positive things about it. Here's a link: amzn.to/40NCAT6
Timestamps:
0:00 OP's Question Part 1
1:42 My Response
3:45 MSE User Responses
8:35 The Reality of the Situation
9:51 Last thoughts
มุมมอง: 1 098
วีดีโอ
Solving Calculus of Variations Problems Using the Euler-Lagrange Equation
มุมมอง 525วันที่ผ่านมา
Today we are gonna be solving some calculus of variations problems using the Euler-Lagrange equation. I've tried to make this as simple as possible, but let me know if there's anything that can be improved upon. If you're interested in exclusive content be sure to check out our TH-cam memberships or our Patreon. Also consider using our affiliate links if you want to help support what we do! Pat...
Math Books of 2024!
มุมมอง 4.3K14 วันที่ผ่านมา
Today I show my most read books of 2024. If you want to buy any of these books be sure to check out our affiliate links! Also check out our Patreon or our TH-cam Memberships! As of the upload of this video, I am still in the process of importing content from Patreon. I ask for your patience. Thank you for supporting us! Affiliate/paid links: Functional Analysis by Sasane: amzn.to/4ghtHXB Calcul...
Are All PDE Books a NIGHTMARE?!
มุมมอง 5Kหลายเดือนก่อน
Today we are discussing PDE books and if there exist PDE books that are not a nightmare. The answer, of course, is yes and no. Watching the video back I need to make a clarification. I say "problem solving" type PDE books to indicate the usual run of the mill undergraduate level PDE book (Farlow). These are the books that cover separation of variables, Fourier Transforms, etc. I also use "theor...
Subscriber Struggling with Stochastic Calculus
มุมมอง 1.3Kหลายเดือนก่อน
Today, I’m attempting to help a subscriber struggling with the Klebaner book on stochastic calculus. I’m limited by my own background and experiences, so feel free to share your advice for them in the comments. I was a bit tired while recording, so I apologize if my sentence structure is occasionally unclear. Check out our Patreon, Discord, and our Amazon affiliate links down below: Patreon: pa...
Book Haul: Nonlinear PDEs, Stochastic Calculus Workbooks, and more!
มุมมอง 2.6Kหลายเดือนก่อน
Keep in mind that all of the commentary on these books is given at a first glance. I have not spent any serious amount of time with these books, so I apologize in advance for any errors on my part. Check out our Patreon, Discord, and our Amazon affiliate links down below: Patreon: patreon.com/MathematicalToolbox Discord: discord.gg/gqhRwfhXMM Amazon Affiliate Links: Applied PDEs by Logan: amzn....
Integrating Factors for Stochastic Differential Equations - Stochastic Calculus Simplified
มุมมอง 5672 หลายเดือนก่อน
Today we are going to be exploring the use of integrating factors in SDEs. We've got only a couple of examples today and our usual exercise. Let me know if you see any errors, inconsistencies, need help, etc. Please check out our Patreon and use our affiliate/paid links. Check out our Patreon: patreon.com/MathematicalToolbox Affiliate/paid links: Stochastic Calculus by Calin 2nd ed: amzn.to/46x...
Continuous Probability Theory by Hinich and Mackenzie
มุมมอง 7593 หลายเดือนก่อน
Today we've got another entry for our hall of fame playlist. Continuous probability from the beginning of the book. I absolutely had to make a video about this book. Thank you all for watching and consider checking out our Patreon using the link below: patreon.com/MathematicalToolbox Shoutout to Rho Chi and Rick Taylor over there on Patreon as well.
Ranking Math Book Publishers + My Favorite Books
มุมมอง 3.2K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
Today, we are gonna be rating math book publishers. This is not a complete list, but the publishers listed here are those of which I have five or more books. I made no attempt whatsoever at being objective. If your favorite publisher gets rated lower than you'd like, it is because I personally do not find utility in their books. It does not mean that I believe that that publisher should go out ...
Knowing When You're Done With A Math Subject
มุมมอง 3.4K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
Amazon affiliate (paid) links: Stochastic Calculus by Calin: amzn.to/4eNoKpg Functional Analysis Kreyszig: amzn.to/4078ET2 Functional Analysis by Sasane: amzn.to/4dOltVv Functional Analysis by Griffel: amzn.to/4eOXWVL Analysis by Cummings: amzn.to/4f5S2iO Analysis by Tao: amzn.to/4f7zcI9 Analysis by Ross: amzn.to/3BObl1P Analysis by Zorn: amzn.to/3Nx89dm Analysis by Binmore: amzn.to/3NuwyAl Ana...
What I Use to Study (Mathematics)
มุมมอง 5674 หลายเดือนก่อน
Today I'm showing you all what I carry in my backpack for an average study session. My dad got me this backpack for my birthday a year ago and it has held up to the abuse. The rest of the items I've acquired over the years. If you need more budget options please let me know in the comments and I'll be happy to help brainstorm ideas for you. Hopefully this video was fun for you all. Let me know ...
My Mathematics Background and University Experience
มุมมอง 1.2K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
Today we are talking about my background and some of the lessons I've learned over the past 10 or so years. I am being open and honest about my experiences in mathematics and university. I have had many failures and some successes along the way. I own my failures and shortcomings and if I imply otherwise at any point in the video then I apologize for that. My intent is not to say how hard or di...
Difficulty Learning Mathematics Without Solutions
มุมมอง 3.7K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this video I respond to another subscriber that is having difficulty with math books that do not contain solutions. Based off of my past experience studying mathematics, I believe this is due to this user's lack of understanding on how to study. My remedy to this situation is to ensure understanding of theorems, propositions, examples, proofs, etc. This should make most exercises much easier...
Toxic Study Habits and Mindsets In Mathematics
มุมมอง 1.7K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
I apologize for the lack of uploads. I have been sitting on this video for a few weeks because I wanted to make sure that I was not giving bad advice. I also wanted to make sure that I gave you all disclaimers and what to watch out for. I do not recommend studying mathematics in a leisurely way without having gone through mathematics in a serious way first. Once you have put in the time and ene...
Try These FIVE Things if You Are Getting Stuck in Mathematics
มุมมอง 1.3K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
Today we are gonna talk about how to get "unstuck" in mathematics. These are not tips on how to study, but rather on how to save yourself from dropping the subject. Affiliate links: Mathematical Analysis by Binmore: amzn.to/4cbjaLP Functional Analysis by Shima: amzn.to/4aNyaOY How to Think about Analysis by Alcock: amzn.to/45bt1z7 Measure Theory by Malik et al: amzn.to/4c9SbQW Principles of Mat...
Financial Engineering for EVERYONE! (Patreon Request) - Stefanica
มุมมอง 1.3K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
Financial Engineering for EVERYONE! (Patreon Request) - Stefanica
The Relationship Between Differential Equations and Volterra Integral Equations
มุมมอง 4349 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Relationship Between Differential Equations and Volterra Integral Equations
A First Course in Integral Equations by Wazwaz
มุมมอง 1K9 หลายเดือนก่อน
A First Course in Integral Equations by Wazwaz
Rigorous Partial Differential Equations Book That is Actually READABLE! - Pivato
มุมมอง 3.5K9 หลายเดือนก่อน
Rigorous Partial Differential Equations Book That is Actually READABLE! - Pivato
Solving the Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation Using the Adomian Decomposition Method
มุมมอง 1K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
Solving the Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation Using the Adomian Decomposition Method
Best Book on Measure Theory and Integration? - Malik, Singh, Gupta, Malik
มุมมอง 1.8K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
Best Book on Measure Theory and Integration? - Malik, Singh, Gupta, Malik
Stochastic Calculus Simplified: Variation of Parameters
มุมมอง 1.1K11 หลายเดือนก่อน
Stochastic Calculus Simplified: Variation of Parameters
Intermediate Partial Differential Equations by Gustafson
มุมมอง 62711 หลายเดือนก่อน
Intermediate Partial Differential Equations by Gustafson
Numerical Functional Analysis for EVERYONE! - Sawyer
มุมมอง 70911 หลายเดือนก่อน
Numerical Functional Analysis for EVERYONE! - Sawyer
From Probability to Stochastic Differential Equations - Melsa and Sage
มุมมอง 885ปีที่แล้ว
From Probability to Stochastic Differential Equations - Melsa and Sage
Higher Mathematics for Physics and Engineering - Shima and Nakayama
มุมมอง 1.3Kปีที่แล้ว
Higher Mathematics for Physics and Engineering - Shima and Nakayama
Real Analysis for Measure, Probability, and Functional Analysis - Ash
มุมมอง 899ปีที่แล้ว
Real Analysis for Measure, Probability, and Functional Analysis - Ash
Abstract Algebra for High School Students!? - Mastering Algebra by Oster
มุมมอง 774ปีที่แล้ว
Abstract Algebra for High School Students!? - Mastering Algebra by Oster
Mastering Probability: A Quick Look at Blitzstein and Hwang's Work
มุมมอง 1.7Kปีที่แล้ว
Mastering Probability: A Quick Look at Blitzstein and Hwang's Work
Tour of my Bookshelf: Mail Haul 3: Fourier Analysis, Distribution Theory, and LOTS of Diff. Eq's
มุมมอง 1.1Kปีที่แล้ว
Tour of my Bookshelf: Mail Haul 3: Fourier Analysis, Distribution Theory, and LOTS of Diff. Eq's
do u have in mind a pde book which will be suitable for me, im only 14 but i know ODE's, calc 1,2,3, linear algebra, and proof writing, so im somewhat good at reading books but are there any u think would be specifically good ; ps i still want it to include things like fourier transformations
Try Pivato. If you want to utilize your background in reading and writing proofs, then you're gonna have to learn some analysis. The pivato would be the first place I would start, though. It will probably be a little rough, but apparently, you're very bright, so I'm sure you could get through it. You can try Choksi, but it requires some analysis. Some of the analysis stuff is reviewed in the appendices. It's very user-friendly.
Really wonderful video, thank you for sharing. Agree on all points. 1. I’m curious, do you want to do grad school? Or are you self-studying for fun? It seems like you’ve studied and mastered much harder books than the courses you listed! 2. You said you did a math minor - what was your major? Super curious! Thanks for the great videos! Enjoying binging them
YES. I wish someone told me to use note cards in undergrad! This is great advice, you’re basically talking about deliberate practice and spaced repetition
Not surprised that you’ve studied martial arts! Very similar mindset
Loved this video! Especially loved the “math is suffering, that’s why we like it” bit 😂 Copping that phrase for my own students! Question: as you said, a lot of this advice sounds like it’s geared to self-study (e.g. a grad student or hobbyist). Do you have any analogous tips for toxic mindsets during undergrad studies? Like, you don’t get to pick the book you want to use, or the exercises. And I don’t know if you have the time to solve extra problems from other books… Cheers and thanks again!
Thanks! This review turned me on to his book on soap films and minimal surfaces! I have Spivak's vol 2-4 on the subject and am currently having some fun with Needham's "Visual Differential Geometry and Forms" I did a quick skim of reviews on Oprea's Intro to DG and saw that he stays with the Frenet-Serret frames and does not introduce Forms. I'm loving your channel! Thank you for these reviews!
The look really good BUT .... hard to find in the USA ... also, there should be good money in "rebinding" books with spiral format! Thanks for the heads up ... I'll keep an eye out for these texts!
You have very unique videos on TH-cam. Good job ! 👍👍
Thank you, sir!
EXCELLENT ... content and video! As always, thank you! I studied from (among others) a text by David Williams entitled WEIGHING THE ODDS ... Cambridge Press, 2001, so expensive
Check out 'Partial Differential Equations - An Introduction' by David Colton (Dover) - an execellent short introduction to modern pde's + solutions ...
Thanks! I don't think I've ever checked that one out before.
Stanley J. Farlow Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers (Dover Books on Mathematics) highly recommended, undergraduate level.
Thanks for sharing. What do you like about the book?
Thanks for the video! 🎉🎉🎉 I have the book by Zill (extended version with PDE) and it's as good as it gets for ODE at the engineering/physics level, but also as a brief introduction to PDE. For PDE proper, i have the books by Asmar and Haberman, but still haven't studied them ... i skimmed them and read little chuncks and they look great! I also have the book by Pivato to dwelve deeper into the theory...
Thanks for being here! Thanks for sharing your thoughts about Zill and other books!
9:10 damn, i hoped you showed the Pivato book 😅
Not gonna lie, I actually forgot about it. Thanks for bringing it up. I have had Choksi on my desk and have been reading through it. Pivato would fit right in with Choksi.
@MathematicalToolbox i checked the Choksi and it looks even better than Pivato! I have read the beginnning of the chapter on distributions... so clear 🤩 What would be your "Choksi" equivalent for ODE? A book with some theoretical aspects, but still readable
I feel the exact same way. Choksi is VERY good. I haven't done a deep dive into the theory of ODE books yet. Dharmaiah looks very good, though. Check out the Google books version, not the Kindle version, though. You can also get yourself the paperback, of course.
This might be the type of situation where people should think before they type.
😂 100% agree!
@@MathematicalToolbox I don;t know if they are genuinely trying to be helpful, or if they just want to seem cool. Kind of like the people that recommend spivek's calculus book, even when it makes no sense to.
I am surprised that no one is talking about Applied Partial Differential Equations with Fourier Series and Boundary Value Problems by Haberman, This is a good book for starters.
I got that and the Asmar's book, both look like great introductions!
How well can that student do proofs and what is his background in real analysis?
Probably no background. He says his background is in elementary ODEs and multivariable calculus. It is not appropriate for Evans and is barely appropriate for Strauss.
Evans' book is for math graduate students specializing in pde.
Agree!
Strauss' book is for beginner students in mathematics.
I would hardly say it's appropriate for the beginner of mathematics. Although I think that is the supposed target audience.
You continue to do an incredibly nice job of reviewing these texts ... very consistent, very balanced ... I really enjoy viewing your videos even though it cost me a bit of money as I often discover books that I wish to investigate more thoroughly! Thank you! I almost forgot to mention your careful attention to PRICE ... most students are on a budget and I am sure they appreciate your well-founded comments!
Thank you, sir. Yes, price is definitely an important factor for me. It's why I haven't bought the Haberman book on PDEs yet. Do you draw a line on when a book becomes too expensive? For me, it's around $80 USD. You're also very consistent in being here. I appreciate you!
For me, it is easier to acquire the books than to actually work through them. I don't know how people manage their time to be able to move through multiple, parallel books with a working knowledge in a short period of time. It feels like more than one TH-cam channel does it.
I believe that E-books are in general superior to physical copies primarily for two reasons. One, index search is easier. Two, notes can be directly added to where they are relevant.
Amazing review.
@@achunaryan3418 thank you! Which was your favorite from here? Also, what books did you read in 2024? Thank you!
@@MathematicalToolboxo Reilly programming quantum computers, understanding deep learning j.d. prince, and applied akka patterns by michael nash
The uni Im transferring to in the fall uses Applied Partial Differential Equations w/ Fourier Series and Boundary Value Problems - Richard Haberman. I own a copy of the 4th ed, but I haven't gotten too deep into it as Im still taking ODE's. That said, it starts out fairly readable and I was able to understand it having just Calc 3 under my belt. I would imagine as the book gets further along Ill need some linear algebra. The preface of the 4th edition doesn't mention needing to know analysis, and explicitly states that it keeps proofs to a minimum which I would assume precludes needing analysis as a pre-requisite.
Yeah, you're good not knowing analysis with that one, from what little I've seen and heard. It appears to be super readable, and a LOT of people have recommended it to me. I'd love to get my hands on a copy, but $120-$ 150 USD is yikes. I think you'll be fine with that book, but be sure to reach out if you need any help.
A personal issue for me is: I don't like s as a variable. Especially when hand written, s can be confused for a 5. Nice to see a new exercise series here.
Thanks for the input! Next time, I'll use ξ 🤓.
Mathematics can be frustrating. Sometimes we need a mental break. I know I've been to the point of quitting math a couple of times. One of the undergrad advisors has said that when you are working on your Ph.D. in math, your love for math needs to be just a little greater than your tolerance for the frustration of the work. That's a paraphrase. It was an important idea. Perspective is important in anything. Why do we do the things we do? Psychology suggests: we don't always know. We need to seek to understand what is really important to us in life.
This is really good philosophy/advice. The next time I talk about a related topic, I'll share your input and shout you out!
Did you know that a meta study from 2023 that looked at tens of others studies on worked examples in the field of math education has been determined to be MORE beneficial than hard core problem solving itself for students learning mathematics? The reason is simple. Any problem that is truly fully solved in detail will identify your gaps in understanding. Pure problem solving will take longer and there will exist WAY more frustration and you will never truly have insight if there are small nuances you have not mastered on some math building blocks that are prerequisite to your topic of study. You can then LATER add problem solving but only after you have basic mastery of the concepts that are new to you. Books on any undergraduate math and graduate math that will be structured in the style of fully worked examples will be a goldmine. Sadly I doubt many will take the lead to make those kind of books even though there is right now actual hard core evidence that for students learning new math topics or new math areas, worked examples done right will ALWAYS be significantly better than you having to be subjected to enormous cognitive load that is typical of standard problem solving, aka MATH PHOBIA. Math phobia exists only when cognitive load is high(typical problem solving) and specially in middle school and high school when you never get proper explanations of the concepts and mechanisms of WHY every formula works as it does, that you are forced to just accept. If you find some pioneer educators out there who tried really hard to make formal logic and proofs accessible(without over simplification) to students in high school and even maybe at the end of middle school please let me know. I'll probably buy every one of those books because I'm interested in the pedagogical tools and examples they use to make proofs and logic digestible to way younger people than what's currently done today where mostly only once you get to college/university you start learning how to read , understand and write proofs.
Wow, I have not heard of that. I'll try looking for it. Do you have a link? Thanks for sharing this
@@MathematicalToolbox To find the article paste into google GUEST POST: Worked Examples: An Effective Tool for Math Learning I suggest you also read the meta study itself. But the conclusion in the post is why I wrote to you just so you're aware that in proper math pedagogy research academia this fact is well known. Sadly this info did not pass down to actual amateur and pro mathematician "normies" common knowledge. Conclusion of the article: "As we learned in this post, studying worked examples leads to better performance than problem solving. But studying worked examples has another advantage: it can help you gauge (or monitor) your knowledge. We tend to overestimate what we know, which can lead us astray when studying - by spending too little time on material we need to learn. Fortunately, a few studies have found that studying worked examples reduces this overconfidence (5, 6), which can help you direct your study efforts more appropriately."
I aspire to be an educator,do you mind sharing some sources/the meta study?
@@monishrules6580 I already shared what you need to find the article and the study.
Today we are gonna be solving some calculus of variations problems using the Euler-Lagrange equation. I've tried to make this as simple as possible, but let me know if there's anything that can be improved upon. If you're interested in exclusive content be sure to check out our TH-cam memberships or our Patreon. Also consider using our affiliate links if you want to help support what we do! Video on the Komzsik book: th-cam.com/video/0pp4BUF7-hs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=iqCVeeXlTctHLgeK
Awesome MT! interested to know ALL the books you read in 2024..
As far as books that I dedicated more than around five hours to, that's about it. There are some other books that I worked on for the Patreon articles, but the list is probably greater than 20 books. Mostly analysis and differential equations type stuff. What did you read last year?
@@MathematicalToolbox Just the ones that were in my syllabus. Here's the list - 1. Discrete Math with Graph Theory - Goodaire/Parmenter 2. Abstract Algebra - Gallian 3. Operations Research - Taha 4. Elements of Real Analysis - Denlinger
Thanks for the video!!! 🙏🙏🙏 hope the new year is going great 🎉🎉🎉 By the way I have a suggestion for you: I'm reading a book on differential forms by Fortney (Springer edition), and it's wonderful!! Should you ever wanna learn df, it's the best introductory book, with a lot of pictures and intuition! PS: i found a used copy of the Oprea book on differential geometry and will couple it with the book by Tapp when the time comes
Thanks! I hope the year is going great for you as well. Yeah, that's a great suggestion! I had started to read it when I started getting back into math in ~2021. The one by Collier is also very good. It's much more informal. Maybe I'll give DF another try, but I just so happened to find myself another good book on functional analysis! Thanks for that Tapp recommendation, by the way. I've been considering getting it, but I already have quite a few books on the subject. What are you currently working on, besides the Fortney book? Also, thoughts on DF as a subject?
@MathematicalToolbox Well, since I work full time, I can't really afford to study two subjects at once. If I get tired of working on a single subject, I pause it (like i put on hold Complex Analysis to work on df). Differential forms is a very cool subject, conceptually not so easy (they are multilinear alternating forms on the tangent space of a manifold), and feels more advanced than the usual stuff, probably because they are less known. they're also a good way to get into differential geometry since integration on manifolds is done essentially through differential forms. My interest in differential forms and differential geometry is mainly to get to study general relativity and cosmology. Functional analysis looks always a bit intimidating 😁 what new reference did you found?
@MathematicalToolbox oh yes Collier ... I forgot about that one! I will probably check it out, it should complement well the book by Fortney...
at 2.19 what do you mean by the example of R as an R-vector space being too much for someone who has learned Linear Algebra? Isn't that the whole point of a first course in Linear Algebra?
Yeah, you're exactly right with that particular example and the purpose of a first course in linear algebra! What I'm trying to say is that the amount of abstract examples (e.g., "X has this property" or "X satisfies this condition" without first showing the reader how to do it) in this book might be overwhelming for an audience equipped only with linear algebra and calculus. A student with analysis (and linear algebra) should be better prepared for this book in general. Whether we agree or not, I hope I've made my point clear. Thanks for your comment!
A note on the review of the first book: In Europe, as I understand it, calculus is synonymous with what is called real analysis in the US
Great reviews. A very nice and friendly book on functional analysis is "An Introduction to Functional Analysis" by James C. Robinson (2020) - solutions to all exercises in back! ...
I could've sworn I had checked that one out before, but I think I'm confusing it with another! That one looks very well written and easy to read. Great suggestion, sir!
I think I would also enjoy the book by Malik. But I just finished Calc I so I don't think I'll be picking it up any time soon. I think I'm ready to dive into Real Analysis, do you recommend the book by Tao? Its hilarious that you hate discrete probability lol.
I would recommend an intro to math proof first, but feel free to give Tao a shot. Tao is good if you want a hard book that starts from first principles. You can also try Ash's book on Real Variables and Basic Metric Space Topology. It has full solutions.
@@MathematicalToolbox Thanks for the additional Recco's! I think I'm pretty good on proof, I've been doing all the Geometry and Calc proofs. I even did some basic Topology proofs. Haven't gotten to the Metric Spaces yet, I will check that out.
@jammasound I did the first chapter of the book by Pugh and it's great. It's also suggested by another channel (mathematical adventures)...
Do u solve all the exercises?
Depends on the book and the layout of the exercises. If they are dispersed throughout the text then yes, I will. If they are at the end of a section then I'll do 5-10 exercises. What about you?
@MathematicalToolbox I usually solve the easy ones first, and then pick 2/3 problems that seem 'interesting'.
Today I show my most read books of 2024. If you want to buy any of these books be sure to check out our affiliate links! Also check out our Patreon or our TH-cam Memberships! As of the upload of this video, I am still in the process of importing content from Patreon. I ask for your patience. Thank you for supporting us! Shoutout to @CrazyShores for encouraging me to do this video! I also apologize for the echo present in the video.
I notice you didn't select Baby Rudin ... smart! That's a very concise text and the one used in my first analysis course ... this one looks to be a better jumping off point!
Oh wow. That must have been tough! Rudin is not my thing, and I try to dissuade my audience from it any chance certain I get. There are plenty of modern textbooks out there that are easier to understand.
Your reviews are always so solid ... insightful, balanced, informative! Thank you for taking the time to prepare all these data!
Thank you!
I have several Fourier Analysis ... looks to be a welcome addition with some real-world applications ... thanks for pointing it out! After searching, I found nothing about a second edition ... that means AMAZON!
This could be the most valuable review you have ever presented. I have used this text and I agree! Thank You!
Thank you!
Nice Lecture ... quick but I can always stop the video and follow the steps! Thank you!
Indeed. I've personally always found it boring, waiting for a lecturer to finish writing the equation down when I can already anticipate it. I've always been curious what people thought about it, though. Thanks!
You find (and review) some unique texts and your reviews are very helpful! Thank you!
Thank you, sir!
Very Nice Set
10:38 IIUC basically no-one in UK universities has tenure anymore, but "senior lecturer" in the UK is equivalent to a tenured US "assistant professor" title. Only actual, full professors are titled "professor" in the UK (and Ireland). OTOH Alcock's position is in mathematics education and it seems that her research is all or almost all in that area.
Thanks for the info!
7:02 How would this compare to Pugh’s _Real Mathematical Analysis_ ? Is this actually more in-depth than Pugh?
Sir indian authors are good
Indeed, they are. Some of the best!
What is the need to learn PDEs?
What is the need to study math at all? Some people really like the theory behind it. Some people like the applications, and some people just want a challenge. Some need it for their work in science and engineering. It can be for many reasons! If you can't think of the "why," then perhaps you can always try with an easier book. Everyone should probably be at least somewhat familiar with how to solve some elementary PDEs.
Have you heard of Partial Differential Equations: A First Course by Rustum Choksi? It's supposed to require just real analysis, basic familiarity with multivariable calculus, and linear algebra.
The professor actually reached out and told me about it. It's actually VERY good. I would even say it's the most readable book on the theory of PDEs. This is a great book and great recommendation. Thank you for sharing it with us.
Where are the links for parts 1 and 2?
Oh thank God, it's not just me. I bought a PDE book, and I struggled to get through the first few pages. It assumed too much prior physics knowledge for me.
What book was it? Some books might bamboozle you into thinking you need to have a background in physics. They will usually tell you in the preface, though. I almost dropped ODEs early on because of that exact same situation. We were using Boyce and Diprima, and I also had a terrible professor. All the dumb applications and direction fields in the beginning really overwhelmed me early on. Having some background on the subject can really help, but picking the right book is essential. Thanks for sharing, and stay strong!
Excellent ... again! Thank you!
How you find such great books at spectacular prices, I don't know ... but I take my hat off to you! Great Job!
It's a lot of luck sometimes. I like my books to be in as good condition as possible, but buying previous editions or bad condition books helps!