วีดีโอ

Piper like most hyper calvinists study other calvinists, not the Bible. What they can’t understand they call it a mystery!

This thought popped into my mind when Dr. Goepfrich spoke about all men being in the image of GOD, From my reading in constable's notes many of the pagan rituals a mask is used by the priest/ practitioner, perhaps to alter the image or to conceal the identity, IDK , just a thought.

This Biblical Science Institute is a gate keeper organization hiding the truth of Biblical Cosmology. This guy could never debate a real Flat Earther

Excellent interview and very informative!

Thanks, Danny! I have been confused about this for decades! Thanks for clearing this up!!

Calvinism is literally a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Please explain also 1Thes.5:9 that says.. believers ( all) are not appointed to God's wrath. There are so many believers killed during the tribulation see Rev.6:9-11 those souls under the altar and Rev.7:9-17 the great multitudes in white robes.They go through the tribulation and if you said the wrath of God is at the beginning of tribulation then those believers killed during the tribulation experience and suffer on God's wrath??? Then they are not included on the promise on 1Thes.5:9???

Can you please support also what you said that those things that happening during the opening of the seal is heaven sent,even the coming of the anti christ..where can i find it in the bible ..please give us the reference,thanks.

Bro.i heard you said that the bible say that the wrath of God begin at the opening of the first seal..can you please give us the reference of it in the bible? When i read Rev.6:1-17 i didn't see it,maybe there is other verses on the bible that clearly say it ,can you please support what you said by giving the exact reference,thanks

What?! This is a complete non sequitur, a false dichotomy... Jesus TAUGHT things, what he TAUGHT is a part of HIM! If we preach hell, did we "replace" Jesus? If we preach faith, did we "replace" Jesus? If we preach rewards, did we "replace" Jesus?

The Bible does NOT say the wrath of God begins with opening 1st seal... where does it state that? The seals cannot be the wrath of God for a couple clear reasons: 1.) Wrath is against the unbelievers, but SEAL #5 is the martyrdom of God's saints! God's saints are not appointed to God's wrath (1 thess 5) 2.) SEAL #5 martyred saints are asking "how long until God's wrath comes to avenge their blood" ...clearly they don't believe God's wrath is happening at that time 3.) God's response to the SEAL #5 martyred saints: is NOT telling them his wrath is already happening...but that they must wait a little longer for it to come 4.) SEAL #6 we find unbelievers who are ONLY THEN SHOCKED by the appearance of the Lamb...realizing that his wrath is about to come and NOW they must hide from him

So good to see you back at it Daniel.

06:40 Arminians agree with Erasmus. But instead of dealing with what Luther said in the Bondage of the Will, the disputers simply disagree without any real interaction with the arguments of Erasmus and Luther. Calvin's Calvinism also deals with the same issues.

Classical dispensationalism not hyper dispensationalism seems correct.

Thanks, Danny! GREAT information!

Another thing you Free Gracers never adequately address, is when you punt to rewards for the thousands of Scriptures clearly using salvation language, you still have the same logical problem of merit you want to use for any conditional obedience. If Jesus really and truly merited everything, then he merited all rewards too-it logically follows, it's inevitable. If the Cross is all merit, there is no way people can receive rewards based on their efforts and works, the very thing you condemn regarding salvation. It becomes no less merit and earning to gain a better and more glorious reward than your fellowman than it does to merit salvation-they both are based on your works. So works rewardism is not based on grace, and violates it's principle. Also as an aside, please ditch "Conditionalism" as coined by Donny on SFT. It is both inaccurate in that OSAS also believes in a condition (one time mini work of choosing to trust), and also is a theological term already in use for annihiliationism.

@20:00 Jesus directly condemns seeking to be justified in the sight of men: "You are those who justify yourselves before men" (Lk. 16:15 NKJ). There is no way James, who uses salvation terminology in James 2, is somehow contradicting Jesus' teaching that we should be not justified before men.

You should realize that Calvinism has a stronger definition of grace than Free Grace does. Even if you argue they back load works by saying fruit is necessary, they do not believe their efforts are what produce this fruit, but rather it is an automatic gift. You can claim that's the same thing as self-producing the fruit, but logically it isn't. Calvinists are the only theology that believes man literally has to do nothing at all, that grace is completely unconditional upon man's choice and effort, but saints are just along for the ride. Under Free Grace that believes in actual free will, Calvinist's will argue you have to be wiser and make a more righteous choice than other unbelievers who reject Christ-isn't it a more righteous thing to trust on Christ than not? Now, by Free Grace's own logic, that becomes a meritorious work of salvation added to the Cross. Free Grace then wants to add a special ad hoc exemption for their "one little bitty meriting work of trusting on Jesus for one nanosecond of time," by claiming faith is not a work. But the problem is, it becomes double speak, because they define any actions whatsoever as contributing to the merit of salvation. This is why both OSAS and Free Grace are deceptions, because although grace does mean we do not merit salvation, it also does not mean there are no conditions. The conflating of those two things is not logically valid. The reason it does not make us more righteous to perform certain actions is because they are not based on merit, but based on obedience empowered by grace-they are non-meritorious conditions that don't contribute to earning the resulting salvation. Like if I clap may hands to receive a free Lamborghini, that does not somehow mean I earned it, it does not follow. Receiving a gift does not merit the gift. And once you've opened the door for even one tiny work that doesn't contribute to merit, you've opened the door to any amount. How can we be secure under this system of God asking something of us? By knowing that whatever God asks he will actually provide the empowerment we need; and that's real security, not just believing a lie to feel secure. As some OSAS Arminians say, "I'm an Arminian before trusting in the Cross, and a Calvinist after." Free Grace incorporates some of the erroneous logic of Calvinism, that any actions required for salvation must necessarily mean an attempt to earn it, and than create special exemptions for themselves where ever that contradicts their belief in actual free will. Then they eliminate free will after one nanosecond of belief, and turn back to a Calvinistic type belief that free will cannot contribute even a little bit to salvation-it's a contradictory mess. So Calvinism and Free Grace both end up embracing the same logical mistake (that Calvinists started in their war on actual free will). It does not mean we are earning our salvation if God asks some actions of us that he empowers us to do.

This was great! Praise the Lord for your videos because I don’t have a church in my area that teaches like this. What a blessing you are brother. The Lord bless you

Depart from me, I never knew you. Matthew 7:23 5:15

"Reformed" Arminians is an oxymoron.

Many of the so-called "Reformed" churches today, are equivocating on the strict Calvinism which is deduced from the propositional revelation in the Bible.

Who is the whosoever? 2:27

How can they confess what they have not belived?

Salvation is by believing on Jesus alone as set forth in the gospel.

Tom is so helpful in studying Calvinism and the gospel of grace. Also his fellow friend, Dennis Rokser Grace Institute of Biblical Studies has a playlist that covers Calvinism beginning to end and goes into great detail to explain not just its ideologies but compares those ideologies to what the Bible actually teaches.its long but in segments and when I watched it , I couldn’t wait to watch the next teaching. ( Watch in sequence is the best way imo to go through the videos because the subsequent teaching builds upon the last. ) I’d recommend all to check out that channel as it is so helpful and eye opening to being able to not just understand but defend against Calvinist/ reformed views.

Amen, brother Chris ❤🙏💯

1:06:25 Here you touched a little bit on the topic of election with John 6:37 and John 6:44, and I would have liked if you had expanded on this subject. This is because Duluth still maintains the concept of election unto salvation based on foreknowledge. In this regard, they align with Arminian theology. Someone needs to tell them that election is unto service.

47:08 Jimothy putting forward that the Jewish leaders thwarted the will of God .... @IdolKiller

I love Pastor Tom S. Thanks for posting this :)

This is extremely interesting. Thank you for sharing this with us. 🙏

Hey, I think I know who recorded that video!

Well, at least you support the sin nature, a lot of Free Grace and Provisionists preach the inherent goodness of man. I would not interpret this passage the way FG or LS interprets it.

Calvinism is no more in error than the rest of Christianity. Truth is freedom. I no longer question the authenticity of today's Bible versions, I learned how corrupt they are. My study solved the conflicts and inconsistencies that have plagued my walk. I found, the men who wrote the books assembled in what is now many versions of the original, are unidentifiable. The books were named long after the texts were written and many edits and omissions have occurred since. Proof? If it was the authentic word of God, why would the Bible be revised over and over again? Thanks to deconstruction and a yearlong investigation into ancient Greek and Hebrew scripture, I can say the modern Bible is fake. It is not what clergy says it is. Yeshua came and went. His mission was completed. Educate the clergy, they get paid to advise yet they know little or they are complicit in the lie.

32:04 So, Dr. Lisle, whom i have seen/heard directly at FBD on several occasions, a Biblicist, does not hold or imply or accept or declare or recommend or believe in a 'flat earth' theory.

We are not ONLY depraved but we ARE dead. God MUST in mercy and HIS righteousness choose some to salvation. None of us deserve anything from God

Sir, too MANY ARE obsessed with calvin. JUST stay with the pure Word and don't try to twist it to make God fit our conception of how God should be

1 John 3:9 notes that a believer is INCAPABLE of sin. This is because one's faith brings the Holy Spirit in them who cannot be involved with sin. Read Romans 7 for a detailed description of this and the role of the flesh in this matter.

Calvinism is an abomination.

The only thing you missed is that unfaithful believers already perished in the trib