Liquid Propulsion Group
Liquid Propulsion Group
  • 13
  • 60 592

วีดีโอ

Water Flow Test 1 - Combined flow
มุมมอง 6833 ปีที่แล้ว
Last weekend was a great weekend for Liquid Propulsion Group. We were able to conduct valuable water-flow testing of our in-house designed bi-propellant rocket engine and associated propellant storage system. With this set of testing, we observed many important characteristics. values including mass flow rates, pressure equilibriums, injector-spray patterns, and more. The next step is water-flo...
Lec0: Sizing a Rocket Engine from Scratch (Intro to Rocket Design)
มุมมอง 51K3 ปีที่แล้ว
This is an introduction to rocket engine sizing and physics. It is recorded for new members of the Liquid Propulsion Group club @ CSUS, but is uploaded publicly. Makar Loktyukhin is the founder of LPG, and is currently serving as a graduate advisor to the club. Links mentioned: cearun.grc.nasa.gov/ www.rocket-propulsion.com/RPA/download.htm www.amazon.com/Rocket-Propulsion-Elements-George-Sutto...
Liquid Propulsion Group: Introductory Concept Design Review
มุมมอง 2.7K4 ปีที่แล้ว
This is our first presentation reviewing our organization and rocket engine design. In attendance: Advisors: Jason Brand - Intel Corp. LPG Members: Makar Loktyukhin John "Yarden" Elias Cameron Wright Emmett Moore (UC Davis) Josh Ira Anthony Lee Diego Marquez Jozsef Augusztiny (UC Davis) B.K. Evangelista Brian Kalayanamitr Enrique Carazes Jorge Avilez Timothy Hicks Jr.
Intro to Rocket Engines: 1D Flow Model
มุมมอง 1.7K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Introduction to basic rocket engine parameters and the equations that govern sizing and flow modeling for the quasi-1D model. Combustion chemistry calculator: cearun.grc.nasa.gov/ More links coming soon
LPG: General Meeting 2 (2 of 4)
มุมมอง 1524 ปีที่แล้ว
LPG: General Meeting 2 (2 of 4)
LPG: General Meeting 2 (3 of 4)
มุมมอง 784 ปีที่แล้ว
LPG: General Meeting 2 (3 of 4)
LPG: General Meeting 2 (4 of 4)
มุมมอง 534 ปีที่แล้ว
LPG: General Meeting 2 (4 of 4)
LPG: General Meeting 2 (1 of 4)
มุมมอง 1154 ปีที่แล้ว
LPG: General Meeting 2 (1 of 4)
LPG: Third General Meeting (Timeline Definition)
มุมมอง 1164 ปีที่แล้ว
Low res because Zoom recording.
LPG: First General Meeting and Intro
มุมมอง 4664 ปีที่แล้ว
LPG: First General Meeting and Intro

ความคิดเห็น

  • @Breadfan00
    @Breadfan00 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nobody ever talk about what happens if Throat Mach Number is larger than 1, e.g. 1.05. Surely it is not possible to hit Mach 1 right on the head, so I suggest you would rather want to be slightly higher, as lower will make your engine not work?

  • @Д.Түвшинбаяр
    @Д.Түвшинбаяр 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I compared (equation at 4:12) with ("The linear velocity of the exiting exhaust gases" in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_engine_nozzle). Do you mean "R bar" is the universal gas constant? (at 4:27)

  • @idris4587
    @idris4587 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does this change with monoprop or thermal engines with LOX variability? I assume then the sizing characteristic graph for optimumal ratios for fuel and oxider shift as it becomes less efficient to use oxider to raise temperature as you increase atomic mass.

  • @pugglez4798
    @pugglez4798 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    FOR ANYONE READING: There is a typo in the isentropic Mach relations, p and rho equations should be to the -y/(y-1) in the video there isn't a negative sign. Great video though, very imformative

    • @idris4587
      @idris4587 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you studying thermo at the moment and got stuck trying to figure this out

  • @odedantebi8086
    @odedantebi8086 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    OK, I will need to watch it like 8 times

  • @geforcekk6
    @geforcekk6 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is that KSP music LOL?

  • @oguzhanege484
    @oguzhanege484 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a contact address or e-mail where I can reach you? I would like to talk about the approximate temperature in Kelvin you reach in your rocket and what kind of flowmeter you prefer to control the liquid flow in this rocket.

  • @Turbo_autism
    @Turbo_autism 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    im confused how do you get mass flow rate when calculating a star and at what point in the engine is this measured

    • @quattrocity9620
      @quattrocity9620 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know this is an old comment and you might have an answer already but since there isn't a response here... when you say "a star" I assume you mean c*, which is the characteristic velocity. If you are asking which point in the engine you "measure" mass flow rate, it's where it's most practical to do so. If you are utilizing a gauge on a valve or a weight sensor to measure how much mass is being used in a certain amount of time that would be where you are "measuring". c* is calculated by taking the chamber pressure (pc) and multiplying it by the area of the throat (At) and dividing that by the mass flow rate (m). c*= (pc*At)/m. Keep in mind this isn't actually standard notation as I don't know how to input the actual symbols. Also keep in mind this is only really useful when disregarding transient (situations of extreme changes in values such as engine startup) conditions.

  • @malwinabielecka4392
    @malwinabielecka4392 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice haircut

  • @pyramiddept
    @pyramiddept ปีที่แล้ว

    PyraLink Aerospace

  • @jeppelarsen6582
    @jeppelarsen6582 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey mate, I have a question for you. What is more desirable regarding fuel oxidizer mixing in the chamber? That the fuel and oxidizer both comes into the chamber as gas phases, or both as liquid, or one as liquid and the other as a gas? Because I guess you would not, heat transfer wise, want the fuel to turn into fully gas(nuclear boiling ok) in the cooling jacket, but you would also not like to have a long liquid fuel penetration length in the chamber. So how would you design the engine so that you make sure the bulk average temperature of the fuel is just shy of boiling when entering the injector!? That is a hard problem I think! Also because I guess the amount of cooling mass flow of fuel is fixed, as well as the initial temperature of the fuel.

    • @carlgeorgbiermann2915
      @carlgeorgbiermann2915 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Few thoughts. I think from a mixing perspective, gaseous injection is better, but typically fuels are present in liquid form so extra steps need to be taken in order to turn them into gases. IIRC SpaceX's Raptors do gaseous injection. But I gess, liquid-liquid injectors aim for mechanical atomization rather than boiling them, so having them right below boiling point is less of a concern

  • @marcovalentinoalvarado3290
    @marcovalentinoalvarado3290 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so stupidly fascinating, but what are prior requirements to understand this subject? I have no clue about all the maths/physics behind it, but I want to know more and more! PD: Liked and subscribed!

  • @flloyd
    @flloyd ปีที่แล้ว

    Its not rock.....hey......

  • @zog9850
    @zog9850 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where did you post the test results please? Great test, congratulations!

  • @varunahlawat9013
    @varunahlawat9013 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pull up more such videos please!

  • @alexandreguitchkine2112
    @alexandreguitchkine2112 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is called "gas burner", not rocket engine, chaps. Back to drawing board and learn some physics :)

    • @I___
      @I___ ปีที่แล้ว

      я бы дал тебе её подержать! )))

  • @shrinivasnymthabad7622
    @shrinivasnymthabad7622 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok but there are like a million different specific impulse formulas on the internet which one is true can someone help

  • @slevinshafel9395
    @slevinshafel9395 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:50 Lightes gas dont make sense. We want kinetic energy wich before you mention is speed*mass so if reduce mas you lose thrust. What i see is: more HYDROGEN more combustion(chimic reaction) more ISP: H2>CH4(methane)>C2H6(Ether)....>C3H7NO2S(RP1(i think is the worst because less Hydrogen per Carbon and "NO2S" is just useless weight. That make me think in NH3(Amonio but its nasty reaction and Nitrogen weght more than Carbon))

    • @tristanlongangue5671
      @tristanlongangue5671 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you you double the speed of an object you quadruple the kinetic energy and if you double it’s mass you double its kinetic energy so by having a lighter gas you can have more kinetic energy because you can accelerate it faster. And you can carry more too I think

  • @slevinshafel9395
    @slevinshafel9395 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:01 You are wrong on that. Otherwise you have molecule wich dont generate presure inside the chamer. The problem is the temperature. if you solve that you got the best Isp.

  • @slevinshafel9395
    @slevinshafel9395 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:25 Thanks, i dont know about this. RP-1/LOX what ratio is for stoichiometric? to see the efect on diferent presurechamber.

  • @slevinshafel9395
    @slevinshafel9395 ปีที่แล้ว

    24:02 i like that in any stage the user can shutdown it.

  • @slevinshafel9395
    @slevinshafel9395 ปีที่แล้ว

    look nice let see what i can learn.

  • @frankinyoderessa7573
    @frankinyoderessa7573 ปีที่แล้ว

    have you considered machining precision pins to help perfectly line up the flanges so the pintor injector is axial my flush?

  • @bnl1852
    @bnl1852 ปีที่แล้ว

    You just tied together my fluid mechanics, propulsion, and gas dynamics courses in a way that they actually make sense together. They were all so abstract to me before, thank you so much. Also notability is the best.

  • @MorningStar_BT
    @MorningStar_BT ปีที่แล้ว

    I have questions about the CC. With nasa cea, i can achieve stagnition conditions with infinite area nozzle. How it can be appliciable to reality ? How can I tide the CC to nozzle ?

  • @MorningStar_BT
    @MorningStar_BT ปีที่แล้ว

    question : why i choose the o/f value that maximize T0/M , What about the highest spesific impulse?

    • @angl3_275
      @angl3_275 ปีที่แล้ว

      T0/M is proportional to exhaust velocity/specific impulse, so maximized T0/M is maximized specific impulse I believe.

    • @Prometheus7272
      @Prometheus7272 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@angl3_275Correct

  • @yungexperiment
    @yungexperiment ปีที่แล้ว

    No sound?

  • @alexconverse1122
    @alexconverse1122 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome content thank you

  • @muhammadhashim9238
    @muhammadhashim9238 ปีที่แล้ว

    cannot have enough words to thank you for this beautiful content you have delivered to me

  • @wyattb3138
    @wyattb3138 ปีที่แล้ว

    Heard KSP music, so now I know this guy knows his stuff…

    • @nugs2727
      @nugs2727 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was thinking the same thing lmao

    • @robxcarlson
      @robxcarlson 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes ksp music

    • @dinklydorf9215
      @dinklydorf9215 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Speaking the truths

    • @catt8822
      @catt8822 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is actually so real

  • @hieubui5576
    @hieubui5576 ปีที่แล้ว

    <3

  • @hrswamy2370
    @hrswamy2370 ปีที่แล้ว

    💕💕💞

  • @MrAlexey89
    @MrAlexey89 ปีที่แล้ว

    вот вроде нормальное объяснение с картинками, жаль только, что на импортном языке

    • @danielalasoo2930
      @danielalasoo2930 ปีที่แล้ว

      Мог бы английский подтянуть

  • @andrzejreinke
    @andrzejreinke ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome!

  • @isaiahwhitten6645
    @isaiahwhitten6645 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where's your testing site?

  • @bradleyjomard
    @bradleyjomard ปีที่แล้ว

    how do you find the combustion temperature T0?

  • @jhwblender
    @jhwblender ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this a test of the injector nozzles?

  • @dulatkarim7899
    @dulatkarim7899 ปีที่แล้ว

    it is quite interesting, how can I join your group? what are the requirements?

  • @dylanembry
    @dylanembry 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks awesome, is there any numbers on the engine yet from testing? (thrust, Isp, O/F ratio)

  • @hefestusargentum8701
    @hefestusargentum8701 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello! I'm russian design and analysis engineer of liquid rocket engines. I'v 1 year experience in Energomash and 6 months experience in United Engine Corporation. I'm political refugee. And now I'm in the US. Do you know if is possible work in the US being engineer with russian degree and experience after granted for asylum?

    • @lolQ459
      @lolQ459 ปีที่แล้ว

      No. Stay away commie.

    • @I___
      @I___ ปีที่แล้ว

      нет. в лучшем случае через 10 лет и не в ведущих компаниях... Европа более толерантна, особенно кто только начинает. Посмотри Португалию. я тоже думал, что заведу частную компанию, перетащу друзей и будем продавать баллистическую доставку по всему миру и на НОО ))) Но внимательное наблюдение за событиями, показало, что существует масса инструкций, согласно которым очень сложно заниматься и иметь в собственности компании, занимающиеся ракетно-космической тематикой, если ты не гражданин по-рождению. И это не разовое решение вопроса! Большая часть этих инструкций проходит через FAA, а значит каждое согласование на пуск будет почти нереальным... ...посмотри на Маска с тестовыми пусками, как он мучается!)))

    • @KingDevDas
      @KingDevDas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Would you like to work for me?I have a rocket startup and all the necessary approvals from the government. I need experienced talents like yourselves.

  • @harshauppuluri1181
    @harshauppuluri1181 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chamber pressure is pressure created during combustion isn't right??

  • @nithishsreddy1659
    @nithishsreddy1659 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So whats your tank pressure??

  • @TOMGAMESEMAIS
    @TOMGAMESEMAIS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice. can you make a video to explain about the inlet pressure? I did saw your video about the introduction to rocket engine design. I'm very interested in build a own project. I dont want to use pressurized tanks because i think this is not scalable to a real vehicle. My objective is to use a eletric pump but i dont know the necessary pressure.

  • @rverm1000
    @rverm1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good content

  • @naveenv4227
    @naveenv4227 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro this channel is so cool. Keep making rocket videos.

  • @gergelytolgyesi7326
    @gergelytolgyesi7326 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love how the ksp music keeps playing xd

    • @_brinter
      @_brinter ปีที่แล้ว

      Fits the theme of the video

    • @whiteraider12
      @whiteraider12 ปีที่แล้ว

      I heard it too lol

  • @omargaber3122
    @omargaber3122 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    wonderfull

  • @ryansmithers7143
    @ryansmithers7143 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    beautiful

  • @emmetray9703
    @emmetray9703 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you get combustion chamber pressure Po?

    • @xxWender98xx
      @xxWender98xx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you choose it, it's a design parameter. Typically is fixed due to technological limits (around 250bar, but spacex increased the limiti to 300bar)

    • @emmetray9703
      @emmetray9703 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xxWender98xx and according for what I have to choose it? according a chamber material ? I mean , for example, if someone chooses 1000 psi, it means that he did choose it according the material he bought?

    • @xxWender98xx
      @xxWender98xx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@emmetray9703 You must always seek the highest pressure in order to have the maximum efficiency and thrust, so you choose it based on the material you want to use. If you want a cheap simple engine without regenerative cooling maybe you choose a lower pressure.

    • @emmetray9703
      @emmetray9703 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xxWender98xx got it , so at the end , it depends on material I want to use and engine structure. Thank you,

    • @xxWender98xx
      @xxWender98xx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@emmetray9703 yes, you are welcome

  • @ryansmithers7143
    @ryansmithers7143 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    📝