วีดีโอ

I love it ❤

Beautiful ❤

🥳🥳🥰🥰

I love it❤

Belgrave road?

Beautiful gardens, walk, nature, autumn colors, footage. Video liked 👍 I subscribed to your beautiful channel, friend 38 (hope you too) 🙂

Beautiful places and footage. Video liked 👍

Lovely video…Enjoyed watching..Thanks for Sharing

Thanks for the video. Love Leicester and Belgrave/Melton Road.

Hi! 👍 will they keep the lights on until Saturday? I’m planning on going with my colleagues :) coming from Manchester

So lovely ❤❤❤❤

Beautiful! I wish be there someday

Tu fan #1 ❤

i like this content.. u can check up too, from anathor channel magnification (i dont know him.. but their vid also the best vid too.. ithinkso) th-cam.com/channels/vxd6OJQoLsPirRalrzvKWw.html

Thanks for that! I was sitting at Abbey, to the far left of you. That was a WET and muddy weekend!

Planets appear as tiny dots. Plz waste your money

Inspire models are bad. Flawed telescopes

Inspire models are flawed. These telescopes suffer from chromatic aberration. The price is too high and view is not that great. Planets appear as tiny dots. Forget the stars...you can watch the stars without any aid. With this telescope stars look the same. I will never recommend this telescope to anyone. Please save money and buy "Scientific explorer 152 inch aperture". This model can give you good results. Celestron Inspire is a waste of money. I regret buying it.

I was able to see things like this... But unfortunately my most powerful objective lens has gone missing 😐 and now I can only magnify thinks 20x

Awesome 👍 how did you get it to stay still Everytime I try to look at them they fly off

Strange I have the 80 az and get a much better shot than that

Ask yourself, what do I want from this telescope? If it's a gift for a child who may change hobby very quickly and be innocently unquestioning, then great. If however you want to look seriously at planets etc. even as a beginner then avoid this telescope. Some sites describe is as a beginner to intermediate telescope - I would say complete novice. Like with most things, you get what you pay for. Essentially you are paying nigh on £300 for an accessory tray and smart phone holder. I am misguded? Seriously mistaken? Consider this: Sky At Night magazine gave the optics for this telescope one of the lowest ratings out of all the features it reviewed for this particular model (build and design, optics, asembly etc. etc.). Optics are important maybe? Believe me I wanted to refute other negative reviews for this telescope. Then I used it myself. People say 'but it's a lovley scope!' or ' OK, so Jupiter is a small featureless disc and Mars a red dot almost - BUT you're viewing it from you back garden!! Ain't that great!' Not when you could save a little more and get a telescope with more aperture/focal length/go to mount etc. Buy this scope and buy expensive eyepieces to try and improve it, forever pray for near perfect seeing conditions - to still see tiny discs and twinkles. Look on TH-cam for this telescope - you'll get flash commercials or user posts of views of the moon, and the moon....and of er.. of the moon. And to top it off, of the moon. A good telescope to view the moon. Please, please I implore you, please refute my review with actual, unenhanced views with this telescope of Jupiter's cloud belts and possibly the elusive GRS, or Mars, or Saturn and the rings with Casini division. Why? Because I've paid for this and am lamenting myself. Realistically? Serious astronomy is still quite niche, so to see what I would like to see is expensive. An affluent individual's hobby. Summary of telescope: A Celestron hustle.

Amazon review of this telescope: Ask yourself, what do I want from this telescope? If it's a gift for a child who may change hobby very quickly and be innocently unquestioning, then great. If however you want to look seriously at planets etc. even as a beginner then avoid this telescope. Some sites describe is as a beginner to intermediate telescope - I would say complete novice. Like with most things, you get what you pay for. Essentially you are paying nigh on £300 for an accessory tray and smart phone holder. I am misguded? Seriously mistaken? Consider this: Sky At Night magazine gave the optics for this telescope one of the lowest ratings out of all the features it reviewed for this particular model (build and design, optics, asembly etc. etc.). Optics are important maybe? Believe me I wanted to refute other negative reviews for this telescope. Then I used it myself. People say 'but it's a lovley scope!' or ' OK, so Jupiter is a small featureless disc and Mars a red dot almost - BUT you're viewing it from you back garden!! Ain't that great!' Not when you could save a little more and get a telescope with more aperture/focal length/go to mount etc. Buy this scope and buy expensive eyepieces to try and improve it, forever pray for near perfect seeing conditions - to still see tiny discs and twinkles. Look on TH-cam for this telescope - you'll get flash commercials or user posts of views of the moon, and the moon....and of er.. of the moon. And to top it off, of the moon. A good telescope to view the moon. Please, please I implore you, please refute my review with actual, unenhanced views with this telescope of Jupiter's cloud belts and possibly the elusive GRS, or Mars, or Saturn and the rings with Casini division. Why? Because I've paid for this and am lamenting myself. Realistically? Serious astronomy is still quite niche, so to see what I would like to see is expensive. An affluent individual's hobby. Summary of telescope: A Celestron hustle.

Good luck with anything esle - you'll see a spec - if you're lucky. I bought this scope. It's best for viewing the moon - and that's about it. Basically paid £300 for a accessory tray, night vision light and smart phone adaptor. Sky At Night magazine (who.should know a little bit about astronomy) rated the Celestron 100AZ. The optics was one of the lowest ratings - kind of fundamental really, wouldn't you say? Be prepared to buy expensive eyepieces and getting on your knees and praying for near perfect conditions to see anything with this particular scope.

Good luck with the 'rings of Saturn' guys - you'll see a spec - if you're lucky. I bought this scope. It's best for viewing the moon - and that's about it. Basically paid £300 for a accessory tray, night vision light and smart phone adaptor. Sky At Night magazine (who should know a little bit about astronomy) rated the Celestron 100AZ. The optics was one of the lowest ratings - kind of fundamental really, wouldn't you say? Be prepared to buy expensive eyepieces and getting on your knees and praying for near perfect conditions to see anything with this particular scope.

야

Nice! I have an Inspire model, however I cannot get the phone adapter to focus. Any tips?? Thanks

Just ordered this telescope! How do u find the telescope? Pros/cons? Does it have slow motion controls for manual tracking of planets? How's the mount and finderscope?

Beautiful. Any chances to capture Saturn with it's rings and share it with us in the near future? Regards and clear skies

Very nice video. What camera/phone did you use to capture the images? regards

how would you rate the telescope? are there any limitations to it? What do you mainly use it for? Thanks!

Thank you :) clear skies

Beautiful music that accompanies a much appreciated video, keep up the good work and clear skies!!

Hi, is this low power? If so, what is highest usable power?

Beautiful image, thanks for posting, clear skies!

Sitting there for 2014 band 5! Can't wait!

What band are you sitting in (2,3,4 or 5)???

That sound is amazing, I hope I can go someday

Thanks for sharing - I can show my friends what a Grand Prix start is really like! :) - The feeling you get from the cars bumping off the rev limiter as the 5 red lights come on is amazing... !!