วีดีโอ

From nuk in to emp turn us, the only thing that I don't understand is why is it hard to get the power back is it coz the EMP will still active, is yes how long dose it stay active 🤔

4:40 Electromagnetic waves = visible light?!?! Brov.... its like sayin: The milkyway galaxy = planet earth....

Looks a lot like Ton 619.

There is some points need to know according to me, 1) they saw a black hole and they jump into it like a lake 😊😊...here many people knows that the black hole are 1000 times bigger than our earth...they are not in a spaceship of speed of light, normal spaceship...and need minimum 100 light years to reach at event horizon.. story writer need to know the size of Black hole... 2) ...the hero moved by spaceship at the age of nearly 35 to 45 ,and return at age 124 years...80 years difference.. doesn't seen any difference on earth except his daughter.. I mean infrastructure are same as 80 years...i hope anyone get my point 🤔🤔

They shot on sight,

Love your content. This experiment had my brother and I debating!

'How an EMP works' = 'it disrupts the power grid'. That's what, not how.

Lol straight up trolling for extra (clicks-views) for the main channel!

Wouldn't it be blindingly bright? The accretion disk?

the optimal time for releasing deadweight is just before or at periapsis during a gravity assist. it ensure the spacecraft benefits from maximum gravitational energy and conserves fuel for future maneuvers. cooper is shown to release way past periapsis & after burning quite a bit of fuel escaping gargantuan

Fun fact Christopher Nolan went on location

Fun fact: the Doppler effect is one of the arguments used to explain the Big Bang theory.

Sorry but saying this is what it should have looked like is wrong. Not tryna hate but they took 100 hours for a single frame of footage on this black hole. And it was bettet

the maker of interstellar is so dedicated, that he/she flew to a blackhole to take this shot.

The interstellar render of gargantua took around 100 hours per frame and 100 days per second. It took them over a year to craft what you see. Sounds overkill till you realize this was done 10 years ago with no notion of what a black hole actually looked like. Still one of if not the best visual in a movie to this day

This video is correct, however I understood This was the most accurate model of the time. I also heard that the modelling helped the research that accurately predicted what black holes would look like.

“So I just animated one pretty similar to the movie” bro??????? You can’t just drop that so casually that shit is awesome in the proper usage

“Black holes are where god divided by 0”

What if black holes are cameras

Thank you for going out there and being a W camera man

EMP are just nothing but a pulse, it's just that people tend to use them in the wrong way.

technically wouldnt it look like a hole with light pouring in like a hole in a body of water. no defined round shape just light pouring into a dark crevice

It's still perfect

909 Rogelio Turnpike

Recarding the orbits: the Kerr metric admits three possible stable(!) orbits, as can be checked in the paper by Bardeen, Press, Teukolsky: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 178, pp. 347-370 (1972): 1. For zero angular momentum: innermost stable orbit = 3 x Schwarzschild radius 2. For angular momentum a = M, corresponding to corotational behaviour: innermost stable orbit = 0.5 * Schwarzschild radius 3. For angular momentum a = M, corresponding to retrograde motion: innermost stable orbit = 9/2 * Schwarzschild radius. Obviously the time dilation speaks for solution 2 and so the claim is kind of correct that sooner or later other objects in the vicinity will vanish.

Wouldn't the ring be so incredibly bright that you couldn't actually see the event horizon at all? I had thought that was the most un realistic part. Our images of the black holes we do have for example are looking at wavelengths of light we normally cannot see in order to give us that image of the horizon. To our eyes in the movie it shouldn't look that different from a star I think

059 Kirk Keys

Bailey Way

this video also makes it clear

Walsh Walks

The black hole in interstellar didn’t need a makeover it was so scientifically accurate + it was made before humanity even got a image of a black hole

3704 Harber Villages

We need a 2nd movie :(

The black hole is the BEAST THE TIME MACHINEEE!!!

Interstellar is not just a movie, but a science. 😎

Dion Meadow

its funny because they spent 90 hours per frame of that black hole

I think i saw from somewhere where they said the reason it doesnt look like the one we photographed is because of the angle it was taken from. Cuz they ended up flipping the angle and bluring things and it looked prety close

It’s crazy because no one knows what it should look like but yet everyone thinks they know. It’s really ignorance following ignorance. And I’m supposed to believe that? Yeah, thumbs down everyone. Don’t follow ignorance…

Freddie Trafficway

So we're supposed to expect that your rendition is much better than kip thorn's rendition with a physics lab using a supermassive computer that interpreted all the equations to make the most accurate visual representation possibly is Just junk?

How do you know fuck ball?...really?

Franco Field

Great work. Looks like it was a lot of care put in and it shows. Am I wrong in thinking that the distance of the observer would alter our perspective pretty severely? As in, making the gravitational lensing more or less pronounced?

So what you’re saying is, they perfectly reconstructed a non-spinning, or slow spinning black hole. Sure that doesn’t exist in nature as far as we know, but it’s still possible. Your version is just more realistic, theirs is still correct though.

The disc orbiting the black hole should also be a lot bluer because of the extreme temperatures. (They didnt include this in the movie because it would be so hot that it would melt the spacecraft they were flying in)

🤔

That's why the fraudulent government put LED lights

Gargantua sounds more like a pawrnstar name 😂❤