- 247
- 180 128
Lydia McGrew
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2011
The goal: To take common sense about the Bible and make it rigorous.
I'm an analytic philosopher, specializing in theory of knowledge. I've published widely in both classical and formal epistemology. On this channel I'm applying my work in the theory of knowledge to the books of the Bible, especially the Gospels, and to apologetics, the defense of Christianity. My aim is to bring a combination of scholarly rigor and common sense to these topics, providing the skeptic with well-considered reasons to accept Christianity and the believer with well-argued ways to defend it.
My books in New Testament so far are Hidden in Plain View, The Mirror or the Mask, and The Eye of the Beholder. I am also publishing articles in New Testament journals and continuing to work in philosophy and publish in philosophy journals.
Soli Deo gloria.
I'm an analytic philosopher, specializing in theory of knowledge. I've published widely in both classical and formal epistemology. On this channel I'm applying my work in the theory of knowledge to the books of the Bible, especially the Gospels, and to apologetics, the defense of Christianity. My aim is to bring a combination of scholarly rigor and common sense to these topics, providing the skeptic with well-considered reasons to accept Christianity and the believer with well-argued ways to defend it.
My books in New Testament so far are Hidden in Plain View, The Mirror or the Mask, and The Eye of the Beholder. I am also publishing articles in New Testament journals and continuing to work in philosophy and publish in philosophy journals.
Soli Deo gloria.
The Rigid Rule of First Impressions
Critical scholars who reject harmonization like to portray those who harmonize the Gospels as ignorant, rigid, and unhistorical. Supposedly this all arises from allowing one's theological preoccupations to cause one to engage in bizarre behavior (harmonization) that one wouldn't use in other contexts. Perhaps no one is better at giving this impression than Bart Ehrman, and sadly, it's an evaluation that has been internalized by some Christian scholars.
Today I read a quotation from Ehrman in which he makes his famous claim that harmonizing is "writing your own Gospel." He even goes so far as to saying that you're "robbing" the Gospel authors of their individual "integrity" as writers. He makes a question-begging analogy to overt fiction to support these claims and to set up the rigid rule of first impressions.
ehrmanblog.org/harmonizing-gospels/
Thumbnail photo by Dan Sears - Dan Sears UNC-Chapel Hill, CC BY 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=41276400
Today I read a quotation from Ehrman in which he makes his famous claim that harmonizing is "writing your own Gospel." He even goes so far as to saying that you're "robbing" the Gospel authors of their individual "integrity" as writers. He makes a question-begging analogy to overt fiction to support these claims and to set up the rigid rule of first impressions.
ehrmanblog.org/harmonizing-gospels/
Thumbnail photo by Dan Sears - Dan Sears UNC-Chapel Hill, CC BY 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=41276400
มุมมอง: 349
วีดีโอ
Rigid critical scholars: Is there a contradiction about Jesus' words on the cross?
มุมมอง 39216 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
Today I'm starting a series in which I especially emphasize the rigidity of critical Gospels' scholars who create strained contradictions and reject sensible harmonizations. This theme has been implicit in much of my work, but I'm trying to make it more explicit. The claim that conservatives interpreting the Gospels lack nuance and are rigid is so misguided that the truth is exactly the opposit...
Three Meanings of Meaning
มุมมอง 37814 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this video I respond carefully to the unfortunate and incorrect comparison that Dr. Licona has recently made between Mark's hyperbolic language in Mark 1:5 (that all Jerusalem and Judea was coming out to be baptized by John) and the fact-changing literary devices that I have argued the Gospel authors did not use. Licona has literally said that Mark is "changing the facts" in that verse, whic...
Alleged Seams in John Part 9: Chapter 20-21
มุมมอง 11921 วันที่ผ่านมา
This will be the last installment in my series on alleged seams in John. Does the fact that John 20:30-31 sounds sort of ending-like provide evidence of an editor? I answer no. I also examine the very strange scholarly tendency to turn John 21:24 on its head. That verse says that the Beloved Disciple is the one who "wrote these things," but oddly, various scholars take this to mean that he didn...
Alleged Seams in John Part 8: A truly silly argument from silence
มุมมอง 41928 วันที่ผ่านมา
Today's seams in John video describes a truly strange, truly silly claim of a seam or aporia in John. The claim is that in John 19 Jesus is left outside in view of the crowd when Pilate is supposed to be questioning him back in the Praetorium. Huh? Apparently John isn't allowed to leave anything to basic reading or hearing comprehension. If he doesn't spell. it. out. he's saying that it didn't ...
Alleged Seams in John Part 7: No one is asking where Jesus is going?
มุมมอง 193หลายเดือนก่อน
Is there a contradiction between John 16:5, where Jesus says that none of the disciples is asking him, "Where are you going?" and John 13:36, where Peter asks Jesus, "Where are you going?" I argue that there isn't. Watch (or listen) to find out why. Plus, even if this were contradictory, it would hardly be evidence for a "seam" left by an editor. This is so obvious that Raymond Brown has had to...
Alleged Seams in John Part 6: John 14:30-31 "Arise, let us go."
มุมมอง 165หลายเดือนก่อน
Today I talk about a passage that is considered a "biggie" among arguments for editorial seams in John: The supposed contradictions created by John 14:30-31. I argue that these contradictions are overblown and that the phrase "arise, let us go" in John 14:31 appears to be the result of vivid witness memory, not a contradictory clue to a bumbling editor. (This is also the position of D.A. Carson.)
Alleged Seams in John Part 5: Mary of Bethany
มุมมอง 152หลายเดือนก่อน
Gary Burge uses the parenthetical remark from the narrator about Mary of Bethany in John 11:2 as an example of "seams" or "aporias" in John. He considers it to be a "problem" that this is a forward reference to John 12, the story of Mary anointing Jesus, which hasn't yet been narrated when John refers to her in John 11:2 as "the Mary" who anointed Jesus' feet. How is this even *supposed* to be ...
Alleged seams in John Part 4: Should John 5 come right before John 7?
มุมมอง 196หลายเดือนก่อน
Is there a problem with the chronological order that John indicates for the events in chapters 5, 6, and 7? Here I continue to argue that there is not. Critical scholars have created "problems" where no problem really exists. I discuss several more extremely weak arguments that chapters 5 and 6 are out of order, despite their explicit temporal indicator "after these things," and that there are ...
Alleged Seams in John Part 3: "The other side" of the Sea of Galilee
มุมมอง 2382 หลายเดือนก่อน
I'm continuing to argue against the claim that John's Gospel has "seams" that show where editors other than the Beloved Disciple have been ham-handedly stitching material together. This week and next week I'll discuss the claim that John 5 and John 6 are in the wrong order. Should we be trying to sort events in Galilee and events in Jerusalem, putting as many as possible of the Galilee events t...
Alleged seams in John part 2: "Into the Judean land"
มุมมอง 2922 หลายเดือนก่อน
Today I'm talking about the alleged "seam" in John 3:22, which says that after these things, Jesus and his disciples came/went "into the Judean land." Does this mean that they weren't in Judea before? Is this an internal contradiction, because Jesus was already in Judea, in Jerusalem, in the preceding events? And does it mean that an editor was trying awkwardly to fit stories together in the Go...
Alleged Seams in the Gospel of John 1
มุมมอง 4302 หลายเดือนก่อน
What are so-called "seams" (or aporia) in the Gospel of John? This week I start a new series on this topic with fresh content that is not even found in my book The Eye of the Beholder. Some scholars use the presence of (allegedly) awkward transitions, (alleged) contradictions, and (allegedly) out-of-order segments to argue for the involvement of editors (even multiple editors) in the compositio...
Multiple Attestation Tumbling Down
มุมมอง 3772 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this last in the series on why you should care if the Gospel authors put words into Jesus' mouth I warn again about thinking that "multiple attestation" to some type of teaching or some type of event will make up the epistemic deficiencies of the case, if you've already granted that the Gospel authors did this. As discussed in an earlier video on multiple attestation (see link), what we're l...
Explicitness is Evidential
มุมมอง 3012 หลายเดือนก่อน
Why should it matter if the Gospel authors put their words into Jesus' mouth? The sayings in John 8:58 and 10:30 are, at least on the face of it, especially clear as statements of deity. In _Jesus, Contradicted_, Dr. Licona takes this to be a reason to question their recognizable historicity. He argues that, if Jesus was reluctant (as reported in the Synoptics) to let it be widely known that he...
Jesus' Historical Teaching = Data
มุมมอง 4093 หลายเดือนก่อน
Why does it matter if Jesus didn't historically, recognizably say something recorded in the Gospels? What if what we find there is just the author's extrapolation or application of Jesus' teaching put into his mouth, based on the author's belief that this is the "higher meaning" of what Jesus really taught, or that this is what Jesus would have said if asked? Even if you're not a Christian (yet...
The apostles' distinction between their interpretations and Jesus' teachings
มุมมอง 7313 หลายเดือนก่อน
The apostles' distinction between their interpretations and Jesus' teachings
Licona's Views on John are shared by all the kool kids?
มุมมอง 6103 หลายเดือนก่อน
Licona's Views on John are shared by all the kool kids?
3 Principles for Max Data and Contradictions
มุมมอง 5424 หลายเดือนก่อน
3 Principles for Max Data and Contradictions
Are "apologetic" sections in the resurrection stories suspicious?
มุมมอง 5974 หลายเดือนก่อน
Are "apologetic" sections in the resurrection stories suspicious?
Arguments From Silence: The Chances and Changes of This Mortal Life
มุมมอง 2515 หลายเดือนก่อน
Arguments From Silence: The Chances and Changes of This Mortal Life
Arguments From Silence: The Randomness of Saliency
มุมมอง 2865 หลายเดือนก่อน
Arguments From Silence: The Randomness of Saliency
Arguments From Silence And Bad Analogies
มุมมอง 4095 หลายเดือนก่อน
Arguments From Silence And Bad Analogies