วีดีโอ

I like this translation. Hope it makes a comeback!

Stick with the old AV King James Bible, God's perfect words in English (the NKJV is corrupted, as the other new versions)

I LOVE BOTH MEN BUT IM WITH MCARTHER YOU NEED TO HAVE SIN IN YOUR LIFE OR KNOW GOD/ HOW CAN A BABY KNOW ABOUT GOD ...AND IF U BAPTIZE A BABY DO THEY NEED TO BE BAPTIXED AGAIN WHEN THEY GET SAVED? AND WHAT IF THEY NEVER ACCEPT GOD?

Going to order this ❤.

Thanks :)

Both are liars because none of them have Ecclesiastical Authority, which comes from Jesys Christ alone.

Just ordered this based on this review it does not look like the print runs into the gutter ? And is perfect for my edc bible. They have it in kjv and new king james i went njkv because i never had one before thanks ✝️ be with you brother 🙏

Here are a few questions for anyone trying to figure this out: 1. What is the ultimate purpose of baptism? 2. Is the end result of baptism ultimately good and in line with God's vision? (This should be an automatic yes. If you disagree, share why.) 3. Since the Bible neither confirms or denies (explicitly) that infant baptism should be practiced, given that it's an ultimate good practice, wouldn't as a responsible parent who is already aware of the truth of Jesus Christ naturally want their children to be as close to Him as soon as possible? In other words, why wait? It's not a vaccine or some man-made procedure that is subject to failure. It's a ritual/tradition that doesnt have any negative impacts as far as im concerned. P.S. On the "belief" part, John implying that infants "can't believe" is ridiculous... I might even ask what scripture he read to lead him to that conclusion. Don't let pro-abortionists know that "babies can't express their thoughts/consciousness like we can therefore no baptism"... That's more ammunition to people who completely disregard all aspects of human life.

Excellent video! Getting mine delivered today ❤️ excited

My premium gift bible is only glued binding😢

Beautiful., now I know where to go.

Thank you for posting

Thank you so much sir for posting this. I am definitely glad you did, because now I am sure of my purchase! Thank you!

Ephesians 4:5. Acts 2:38,,,,mark 16:16. Paul wrote Do Not Pervert the gospel. 1 Peter 3:21

Thanks for showing this. God Bless!

THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DEBATING BAPTISM SHOWS HOW BAD CHRISTIANITY HAS BECOME. YOU MUST BE BAPTIZED PERIOD! JUST LOOK IT UP. JESUS WAS BAPTIZED, PAUL, AND EVERY DISCIPLE IN THE BOOK OF ACTS. AND THERE WAS EVEN A PROPHET NAMED "JOHN THE BAPTIST" LOL! ACTS 2:37-40, NO DEBATING THIS!

R.C Sproul understood continuity in the Bible(Rom 9:4) to believers and their Children. Baptism points to God's adoption , God's promises and Covenants which included God's Holy people and includes 8 day old Babies. R.C Sproul also understood that God's Holy people needed circumcision of the heart(1Cor10:1-6) R.C Sproul also understand the Apostle Paul in Rom 2:29 that the sign is not eternal life, its circumcision of the heart..

59:45 Sproul observes that MacArthur adheres to the scriptures. Yes, all believers do. All who are born of God do this. MacArthur is not the best at it, nor is Sproul, nor am I. One thing I notice about MacArthur (in other venues) is that he is quick to condemn young believers who are learning what the power of the Holy Spirit is like, and have emotional responses. To me, such responses are like a spiritual kindergarten, and the believers should be affirmed for their willingness to be open to the Holy Spirit even if they are just splashing in a baby pool at present. To MacArthur, they are deceived and of the devil. The real question is: Is the Holy Spirit's power moving in immature people, or are immature people just being emotional, or is it demonic? MacArthur has taken it upon himself to judge them, but in so doing he judges the Holy Spirit who saw fit to give them a taste of His power. So why do Sproul and MacArthur sing each other's praises? It's a yeast. They are brothers, but they are not the smartest, nor the best. Because MacArthur judges the Holy Spirit and condemns his spiritually younger brothers and sisters in those settings, it would be wise to listen to him with filters to protect your own heart. You might not have the ability to stand on your own and do this. You might NEED guys who are much smarter than you to learn from. But don't go blindly. Cessationists are wrong. Mac is a cessationist.

How would anyone in their right mind discover the heresy of Deformed Theology of Calvinism if people like R C Sproul didn't go out as Satan's agent and preach and Brain wash them?? If you want to hear an exact description of Satan's Character just read how Calvinists describe their god! Its a perfectly accurate description of Satan! Calvinist: god delights in destroying most human beings! God arranges all things by his sovereign counsel, in such a way that individuals are born, who are doomed from the womb to certain death and are to glorify him by their destruction.( John Calvin Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 3, Chapter 23, Paragraph 6) Calvinist: god infict's evil on people he delights in doing so! “Creatures are so governed by the secret counsel of God, that nothing happens but what he has knowingly and willingly decreed.” (John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 1, Chapter 16, Paragraph 3) Calvinist: god decides who will be his murderers and theives! “thieves and murderers, and other evildoers, are instruments of divine providence, being employed by the Lord himself to execute judgments which he has resolved to inflict.” (John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 1, Chapter 17, Paragraph 5) Calvinist: god commands and forces people and the devil to do evil acts! “The devil, and the whole train of the ungodly, are in all directions, held in by the hand of God as with a bridle, so that they can neither conceive any mischief, nor plan what they have conceived, nor how muchsoever they may have planned, move a single finger to perpetrate, unless in so far as he permits, nay unless in so far as he commands, that they are not only bound by his fetters but are even forced to do him service” (John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 1, Chapter 17, Paragraph 11) Calvinist: no evil has happened that god didn't command it be done! ”He testifies that He creates light and darkness, forms good and evil (Isaiah 45:7); that no evil happens which He hath not done (Amos 3:6). Let them tell me whether God exercises His judgments willingly or unwillingly.” (John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 1, Chapter 18, Paragraph 3) Calvinist: god forces people not to come to him. he bars access to them “…salvation is freely offered to some while others are barred from access to it.” (John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 3, Chapter 21, Paragraph 5)

How come these Calvinists don't ever debate non-Calvinists? I would love to have heard vs John Lennox or Leighton Flowers

Its great that RC Sproul has come to the conclusion that he is one of the lottery salvation winners. The special hand picked elect, part of the big forordained winners club. But is proud to tell you in his many clever worded teaching, that you, your children and grand children are not so lucky! To bad so sad I am glad I am not you attitude! Shame on false teachers like Mr Sproul who denys salvation on those whom God died for and loves! That being the whole human race. The true gospel of Jesus Christ is good news. Sproul preaches another gospel that is bad news. Read what Sproul's teacher has taught him John Calvin: God arranges all things by his sovereign counsel, in such a way that individuals are born, who are doomed from the womb to certain death and are to glorify him by their destruction.( John Calvin Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 3,Chapter 23, Paragraph 6) “Creatures are so governedby the secret counsel of God, that nothing happens but what he has knowingly and willingly decreed.” (John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 1, Chapter 16, Paragraph 3) “The devil, and the whole train of the ungodly, are in all directions, held in by the hand of God as with a bridle, so that they can neither conceive any mischief, nor plan what they have conceived, nor how muchsoever they may have planned, move a single finger to perpetrate, unless in so far as he permits, nay unless in so far as he commands, that they are not only bound by his fetters but are even forced to do him service” (John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 1, Chapter 17, Paragraph 11) “We call predestination God’s eternal decree, by which he compacted with himself what he willed to become of each man. For all are not created in equal condition; rather, eternal life is fore-ordained for some, eternal damnation for others.” (John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 3, Chapter 21, Paragraph 5) No Mr Sproul , forced salvation is rape and is no LOVE at all! TRUTH IN LOVE This is good, and pleases God our Savior, 4 who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave himself as a ransom for all people.1 Timothy 2 : 3-6 Those that don't see this, can't see this, because they have blinded themselves and will not see. No one is saved by Reformed Calvinistic lottery salvation! Only those who respond to Gods call to "Repent and be Baptized" are saved. No man has an excuse. Calvinism is spiritual death and those that follow him do so with their own free will.

this is not a debate rather it's a presentation or separate sermon from 2 lecturers.

1 Corinthians 1:17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel ( 1 Corinthians 15:1-4): not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. Please know what dispensation we are in? Ephesians 3:2 Video: Why Rightly Dividing Bible Study 1 & 2 Rodney

Baptism is not the sign of the new covenant IMO. God often commanded behaviors that did not make sense sometimes, but turned out to be important for the health of His people. It is therefore entirely probable that He ordered infant circumcision because of similar reasons. A circumcision in a newborn is extremely easy, not associated with complications, and recovery is over in a couple of days at most. On the other hand, an adult circumcision is a serious operation, quite painful, prone to infection, and recovery takes a considerable amount of time. It makes perfect sense to follow God’s advice in the timing of receiving the sign of the covenant. Another problem is that women had no sign in the OT. And it was also a surgical excision of a part of the body, whereas immersion in water is a spiritual experience, not an experience if the flesh. In fact, the OT was all about the flesh, and the NT emphasized the importance of spirit over the flesh. The comparisons between the two acts as being covenant signs therefore fails as there are too many differences.

1:07:35 water baptism is not the sign of the new covenant, its the baptism of the Spirit that is a sign that we are part of the new covenant. And that Spirit is also the ring of sonship. Everybody that was part of the old testament covenant had to be circumcised of the flesh, while we are circumcised of the spirit. I'm sure its well noted that the thief on the cross was not water baptised, but yet he is in heaven because he was circumcised of the heart when he spoke those words to Jesus. As Jesus said to the woman, 'your faith has made you whole'. Circumcision of the flesh is not an outwardly sign like water baptism is, its a sign between the nation of Israel and God. Their outwardly sign was meant to be the same as ours - the fruits that come from loving the Lord.

Mike Hopper , first of all😂.Really Mark 4:44?a verse that doesn’t exist😂 Matthew 4:23 and Mark 1:39 all translations have Galilee 😂 and lastly for 2 Samuel 21:19 look carefully in your kjv and the word “brother” is in slanted form because it was added in. Next time do your homework before judging other translations ok? 👍

The Bible warns about adding or subtracting from God's Word. Deuteronomy 4:2, “ Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.”also again...King James Bible And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. Revelation 22:19. The pope has NO authority to add or subtract ANYTHING from GODS WORD, do you catholics truly believe that GOD needs a man... a pope to add or subtract from HIS WORD??

Our ... mans wisdom, is foolishness too GOD. We can make any tradition we want, but it does not make it of GOD. How can we add too GODs WORD or wisdom? The catholic church did not always hold to infant baptism , it was added many years later. The RCC has added and taken away from GODS WORD at its will, to fit as it sees fit. No man , even the pope has that authority , even though he claims he does, in his encyclycals.

Traditions of "MAN" are NOT scripture, therefore are not provable of GOD. CHRIST HIMSELF even noted a instance of traditions of man." For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do." KJV Mark 7:8. As much as I love R.C. Sproul, he is just simply wrong on this matter.

L

I listen to RC a lot. Then I came to this video randomly. But was kind of disappointed to see the position he held on the subject. Never thought such a brilliant mind could think this way.

Jesus said "let the little children come to me and do not forbid them ;for of such is the kingdom of heaven."Mathew 19:14.by your misintetprtaion your are hindering them to be children of God and to grow up understanding. The earlier the better.

math. 28.19 is spurious, you're suppose to be baptised in Jesus name.

Those who identify themselves as Calvinists make an absolute elitist interpretation of the Word of God and in particular Romans 8:29-30 > For whom HE did foreknow, HE also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of HIS Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom HE did predestinate, them HE also called: and whom HE called, them HE also justified: and whom HE justified, them HE also glorified. Explanation - the phrase "whom HE did foreknow" is not a reference to any individual Man (male or female) but to Mankind in its entirety. God foreknows all of humanity from before the foundation of the world and HE provided for HIS plan of redemption only through Jesus Christ (the slain from the foundation of the world - Revelation 13:8 > ... the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.). Ephesians 1:10 > That in the dispensation of the fulness of times HE might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in Him: The finale at the end of Christ's Millennium reign - 1 Corinthians 15:27-28 > For HE hath put all things under His feet. But when HE saith all things are put under Him, it is manifest that HE is excepted, which did put all things under Him. And when all things shall be subdued unto Him, then shall the Son also Himself be subject unto HIM that put all things under Him, that God may be ALL in ALL. Explanation - ultimately there is only the Triune God (Father, Word and Holy Spirit). God exists in eternity past and in eternity to come. All of the Word of God is the history of the Earth in a brief period called time inserted between eternity to explain to us what God has done for us in HIS love and HIS plan and purpose. Shalom

NLT is okay, but I would not pick this economy version if I was using this full time as a pastor.

Jesus shares the DNA of the Holy Spirit and Mary.

They are both wrong. We are baptized by the Holy Spirit into the "body of Christ."

I have this Bible but I must sell it as I can't see the notes at all. Text a struggle too. Font too small and print way too light. Huge disappointment. I'll never use it.

I’m with John

As RC said, there is no explicit command or example of infant baptism in the NT. There are only examples of believer's baptism. Neither is there an implicit command or example. The debate is over. Baptism is no replacement for circumcision. If it were, we would only baptise males. Circumcision is a Jewish thing while NT baptism is a Christian thing. Infant baptism is a construct of humans and the Roman Catholics have used it for centuries to control their faithful. No baptism, no heaven. RC doesn't go there, but his hero, Augustine absolutely did. Calvin "clearly" says in one place that infant baptism is salvific and in another that it is not. So much for clarity.

It's more difficult to become a Christian when one thinks one already is.

Thank you for uploading and making this available.

I'd rather die horribly than call a pedobaptist my brother.

infant baptism is the badge of antichrist and the harlot churches justification for the murder of the saints. no peace with you murdering whores ever.

This is so odd that people who say that they believe the word of Christ would take such liberty to add to the word of Christ! Don’t add to or take away from God’s word!

Sunday is our special day, HOORAY It's the day all Heathens celebrate as their day of fun, go out and sing, dance, get stoned, drunk and celebrate the good life of fun and hedonism, Lord Ahriman has set aside this day as a tribute to our liberator, Satan, we are all so fortunate that the real meaning of life has been revealed to us and we want to share it with you. Join us.

JOHN 6 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live for ever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.’ 52 The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’ 53 So Jesus said to them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. 54 Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day; 55 for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. 56 Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. 57 Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me. 58 This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live for ever.’ 59 He said these things while he was teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum. 60 When many of his disciples heard it, they said, ‘This teaching is difficult; who can accept it?’ 61 But Jesus, being aware that his disciples were complaining about it, said to them, ‘Does this offend you? 62 Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? 63 It is the spirit that gives life; the flesh is useless. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. 64 But among you there are some who do not believe.’ For Jesus knew from the first who were the ones that did not believe, and who was the one that would betray him. 65 And he said, ‘For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted by the Father.’ 66 Because of this many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him. 67 So Jesus asked the twelve, ‘Do you also wish to go away?’ 68 Simon Peter answered him, ‘Lord, to whom can we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 We have come to believe and know that you are the Holy One of God

2021.11.27.

Infant baptism is a ridiculous proposition.

Unfortunately, neither view is defensible either biblically or historically. Try Luther, Augustine or Chrysostom.