วีดีโอ

I have alot of videos of DSO with my dob and more to come 🙂

@@universewonders1 no I mean with manual dob not with go to mount

@@Xindian_mapping_n_Edits i did omce and the result wasnt that good, its very difficult to capture dso manually

@@universewonders1 but in a single exposure can u see some details. I would only like to see that

@Xindian_mapping_n_Edits not much most of it is camera noise

I do, just not all of them. In this video it was 2 years ago i was just starting iut and didnt have means to stack the pictures yes

@@universewonders1 oh

5 inch cassegrain

@@melihbayleon749 thankyou 🙂

Starspikes pro software, i add colour to the stars and spikes.

@@shribalamardisaren253 thankyou🙂

@@ChirayuPathe svbony sv405cc

@@universewonders1 nice 👍🏻

@@abababb1153 sharpcap has push to function, did a video about this, let me dig up the link for you

@@abababb1153 th-cam.com/video/el_VhgnXcac/w-d-xo.htmlsi=WRh9kumWcMUageN5

@@abababb1153 processed the image a long time ago, im sure i can do loads better today 🙂

@@spray_cheese it can be better, but only when the planet is closer, last year i did much better than this

My telescope is not that powerful 🙂

I dont have larger reflectors but you need an equatorial mount for larger ones

I know.. however a cassegrain is better than a dob and i know that because i used both, it is sharper even with smaller aperture, and that tube only cost me 200 euros used so its cheap. An 8 inch dob cannot track the planet and its more painful to image like that, an 8 inch goto dob on the other hand its very expensive

@@universewonders1 yup.. I'll have to agree with that.. anyway good luck and keep sharing with us .. clear skies!

@@jayeshmadke thankyou for watching 🙂

Yes venus is bright to the eye, and cant really see any surface details just white and what phase it is at

​@@universewonders1Because it's all friggin hot dense clouds. With moon block the bulk of the light say to a 3" aperture so it's not too blinding.

@@niiights astronomy camera

set up too ?

@@niiights skywatcher virtuoso 150 Sv405cc camera Sv220 filter

@@universewonders1 how does the telescope work ? do u attach the camera to it or is it computerised ?

@@westonlove5100 thankyou, i usually just ignore them but sometimes its too much to bear when you contuously deal with it

@@alexleroy2000 youre a joker arent you

@@universewonders1 maybe it’s because my pc can make pictures betters than this? The space isn’t so full colored like this , everyone over contrast and put lots of uv or infrared filters so we can see something this pretty

@@conradsanders8475 i inputted the coordinates on my telescope mount to goto the comet

Yes i use a field flattener with it, without it has horrible field curvature, astro cameras all of them will focus with the skywatcher flattener even with filters but when using a filter you need an adapter that i mentioned in another video, dslr wont focus with the skywatcher flattener

th-cam.com/video/JMeczW7ddss/w-d-xo.html

@@pianoforte1720 yes hubble imaged these in 1995

@@lukasduarte2947 telescope name: skywatcher virtuoso 150 Camera name: sv405cc from svbony

@@DankSinatra42O another person in the comments just said the same thing, it does look like a hand if you see it in a different way, intetesting

@@bobbymoss6160 people like you give me more courage to continue with my channel, clearly youre not an astrophotographer and must also be a flat earther, seen enough people like you. If you dont like what you see keep scrolling

Follow me on my instagram i have all my photos that i take there

instagram.com/jonathan_astro1/profilecard/?igsh=MWJjNGFsNzJyeWl3dw==

@@KeithGoodwin-s7b im a proud nerd though 😃

@@universewonders1 amen