วีดีโอ

Will move my office to the forest, too.

I GET IT ! This guy is all over the place in this discussion like the particle embedded in schrodie the pedos' equation, before the wave function collapses, than it just becomes a cold man in the forest.

This is pseudoscience. Makes no sense whatsoever. If you think it does, try explaining the Imperial College double slit in time experiment.

5:23 What a wonderful generalization!

There's also no current or flow in a conductor and it's Ions not electrons that carry the charge. These ions are typically positive metal ions within the conductor's structure. When an electric field is applied, these ions shift slightly from their equilibrium positions in the crystal lattice. This collective movement of ions is what constitutes the electric "current" which is in all actuality "polarity" in conductors. The common belief that electrons flow through conductors is a widespread misconception in basic electricity education. This ionic conduction mechanism applies to all electrical conductors, including wires and circuits in appliances and electrical devices. In batteries, there is ion movement through the electrolyte, but this is a separate process from the conduction in the external circuit.

what if you have a multi wire conductor with no insulation between the wires, will the current flow only through the surface of conductor?

It's because the charge only exists on the peaks and in the valleys of the wave form. It has absolutely nothing to do with the conductor.

Or you could say that thw valley is charged with the same magnetic polarity ad the CUP

This was One of The Best explanations I think I've ever heard! That made so much empirical sense to me and was an absolutely fantastic nutshell explanation. The one way I like to think about it is the drop of dye in a glass of water, or cream in coffee.. or mixing two paint colors together. Why can you mix it... but now NOT... unmix it!?!! Without explaining here, it's a really easy way to understand entropy and the arrow of time.

Indeed, I see, I would presume 🤔 Or, postsume? The ensuing possibilities for the leader to lead me at lavatanssit, depend profoundly on how I as the follower presume and interpret his leading, and the mutual frame of reference, and the surroundings; and, on how he presumes and interprets my following and the mutual frame of reference, and the surroundings. The interdependent communication of leading and following has quite little to do with seeing, if almost at all.

"A Blind Man in a Dark Room Looking for a Black Cat That Is Not There" Particle Science hasn't discovered anything fundamental nor significant since the 1920s. And... today's 'scientists' will announce any ridiculous or mildly spectacular 'discovery' as long it serves the purpose of securing their jobs. Subatomic particles are not detected, they are calculated. Or straight made up. They found the Higgs Boson? The God Particle? OOOhh! Soo, what was the consequence of this "discovery"? - absolutely nothing. They detected Gravitational Waves? Ooooh! Same BS

So, the particle search methods are not insurable nor accountable. If they are, then, prove it.

I think entropy and all it entails are the most fundamentally misunderstood concepts in physics.

Every 'force' has an equal and opposite reaction. The equal and opposite reaction to entropy is called consciousness.

My definition of entropy: When a change takes place in a well-defined system, the new configuration will always be a more probable state, as determined by the system's rules.

These errors of Einstein, Maxwell etc., which derived from the errors of talmudists, is important also geoeconomically.

From John 1:1: "In the beginning was the Word [Logos - lohkous, loukkaus, loikkaus], and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome a it." As here, all and everything appear as polar pairs. There is no space nor time without polarity and forming of pair. If there's Theos(/Teos/Tee uus), there's also Logos(/lohkous/loukkaus/loikkaus). Also, creation, or, appearance, or, emergence is and comes sisäkkäin, a bit alike the Blofeld cats in the transparent box. Even though in John, the creation is (probably for translation reasons) "he", God made human as a woman and a man; that is, as a polar pair.

I remember the SpinLaunch idea from my childhood! 🤣😅 We even tested it with centrifuge slings & water balloons 😃 But, how would SpinLaunch G forces against the astronauts'/cosmonauts' bodies differ from more regular space ship launch G forces?

Not a deep explanation, but you have clearly pointed it out being so 👍.

I love getting high and just think about " why does anything even exist? Why? Am I real?"

So, the speed of light is not constant.

If a flow of music passes through a group of lavatanssijat, a lot more (at least seemingly more 🤔) energy is emitted, than there initially was in the music that was brought in. Alike if light a fire with a match.

We are going down or up a drain, faster and faster. Alike the galaxies.

I wonder why they all give the same exact example? They know no other?

Didn't you see 'The Fly ' with Jeff Goldblum ?

There is no materia. It's an illusion. A strong wind may feel alike a wall, even though actually it's a wave that's met in a very fast velocity. We may also be appearences of patterns of waves. For example, Laura Marling's song Patterns. For another example, I can - in a sense - teleport Pohjolan Aurinko socks from immateriality into a pair of socks by knitting, via a loop portal.

Thanks for the interesting videos. I've been wondering the same! It can be studied for some measure by dancing lavatanssit. If the wall is thought as a wave, too, but going towards different direction & different force & vibration & position than the shopping cart... Or, how to pass through the dancing floor full of other dancers, with partner... the music helps the process partly - or, in a dimension - in a holografic way.

Quantum, or, a certain amount of measurable change in the radiation background? Something like when a radiofrequency is measured and interpreted as a radio program?

Perhaps an electron and photon are but minute physical particles with extraordinary qualities ...

A minute high frequency gravitational wave vibration of spacetime.!

Great explanation bro

From Wikipedia I am told that the energy of a Photon in the visible range is roughly 2eV. It is a wave that lasts exactly one second. My opinion: If there is anything called a photon then it is the amount of energy that is given free as a burst of Electro Magnetic Emission (EME), possibly seen as light when an electron makes a jump inwards to a lower energy state in an atom. It can have different energy values depending on it's frequency. From what I read I get that Planks constant is the lowest possible energy for 1 cycle of EME. Other than that the only quantized I see is that the electron can only be at a number of set positions in the atom. That a quanta of energy is needed to knock an electron free I see as it could just as well be that a set frequency (the atoms resonance frequency) is needed not nock the electron up to an energy value that allows it to leave it's atom.

Glad I found you. I appreciate the explanation.

Hello friends! This video is a translation of the video of my main channel www.youtube.com/@inznan. I don't know English well, so I apologize if there are a lot of mistakes in the video.

music?

How did your nipples learn how to fold light 😅... I am smarter than this. I promise.. Is it possible gravity is the base for everything? I often think of Gravity as God. Which is faster: light, electricity or gravity? Is it even possible to measure the speed of Gravity?

Fields are something the great Richard Feynman wanted to get rid of but failed.

Thanks for your interesting article. My intuition said there is something important about this mechanical effect. This model shows how a field represented by a sheet of elastic material under the right initial conditions naturally form quantized energy levels. From there it was easy to form very stable three dimensional structures using a very minimal amount of material. (similar to the way engineers built large light weight space structures) th-cam.com/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 You and your followers might find the quantum-like analog useful in visualize nature properties of fields. I have been trying to describe the “U” shape wave that is produced in my amateur science mechanical model in the video link. I hear if you over-lap all the waves together using Fournier Transforms, it may make a “U” shape or square wave. Can this be correct representation Feynman Path Integrals? In the model, “U” shape waves are produced as the loading increases and just before the wave-like function shifts to the next higher energy level. Your followers might be interested in seeing the load verse deflection graph in white paper found elsewhere on my TH-cam channel. Actually replicating it with a sheet of clear folder plastic and tape and seeing it first hand is worth the effort. 2:18

It's not a special kind of matter. It's a mathematical model where there's a measurement of some thing at each point in space and time.

One thing that bugs me is not that particles can manifest as excitations or waves or blah blah in a field. It is, what a field consists of as a realistic description? I don't care if you want to write an equation for pretty much everything that is happening, but in the end you need ...smaller part(icle)s that oscillate to generate the bigger ones. So ...go to the beginning again. And how can one buy the ...all things are waves etc...Waves pass through one another and for a moment they may seem like a different wave but they should ...pass through. Yet we have decoherence, atoms, charge, and still a neutron has a magnetic moment (why?) or you have quantum mechanics and general relativity predicting shitty numbers for the density of dark matter...so they are both wrong!!! Physicists try and try and they still seem like, 95% off of an accurate description, model etc. That is why it is best to stick with what works good enough for a scale.

Waves = fields Could we have a probabilistic future coming into existence with the absorption and emission of light waves? We could explain light waves as a process over a ‘period of time’ with particle characteristics or photons as the future unfolds. A potential probabilistic uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π future unfolds with potential photon ∆E=hf energy, of what might happen, exchanging into kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons, of what is actually happening. Light photon energy cascades down forming greater degrees of freedom for entropy and the irreversible processes of Classical Physics with heat energy always flowing from hot to cold and friction always changing motion into heat forming the ‘Arrow of Time’ within each reference frame.

nice!! this is one of the most difficult "thing" to explain to non-physicist! Thank you very much!!! next time, i will just point them to your video!! :D

Hmm. I’m none the wiser.

Thank you how about qualia fields?

This is the biggest red herring in science; that quantum behaviour is strange and weird and defies logic. Nothing in this universe defies logic. If your theory thinks it does, then your theory is doomed. A paradox is a logical contradiction and are never found despite all the hype. Even the quantum eraser experiment that appears to prove retro causality, is trivial in a deterministic universe. (Some people call that super determinism but they are just people who don't know what determinism means). Zeno is the most famous of the paradox inventors, but he was only showing that contemporary ideas produced nonsense.

I came to realise this guy is getting paid per mention of the word _paradox._

There are no "physical paradoxes". Only hypothetical, theoretical, literary, and cognitive paradoxes. What we call physical paradoxes are just things about the universe we can't explain yet. Like: "What was there before the big bang?"- How can there be something before time even began? What we don't know isn't in conflict or contradiction... It's just we don't know it yet, or we may never know it.

what paradox do we see that is similar to that higher dimensional scenario ? i dont think we ever see anything that looks so unexplainable. does that means we already live at the highest dimension? maybe the most similar thing i can think of is electrons ?

should you not at least explain why people thought fire was a paradox? i need some opening context.... to place everything else you followed up with.

Yes, and this is certainly germane to UFO/UAP's. Another way of confirming/denying here the "validity" of POV is to re-phrase "we have..." when speaking of the mentioned continuums, and implement the awareness that space, time and dimensions..."Have us.". All is non-numeric. Infinity will not be summed. To Vaguely comprehend is what gets distributed unless there is no fracturing of what is really ONE BIG THING.