วีดีโอ

Lets get some cameras on you guys and it’ll be so much better

Love your Summer of Sixties podcasts you made. Upon listening to your 1969 episode I discovered you made a slight error about one 1969 movie you referenced. Anne of the Thousand Days actually has nothing to do with Anne of Green Gables. Its instead a historical drama starring Richard Burton as Henry VIII and the movie revolves around Henry VIII's second wife Anne Boleyn who's reign as his queen only lasted a thousand days before she was beheaded. Essentially its a sequel of sorts to A Man for All Seasons which was about the tension between Henry and Thomas Moore regarding Henry's first wife Catherine of Aragon. Henry wants to annul the marriage with Catherine while Thomas Moore refused to co-operate because annulment was against God.

Hey guys, if Israel really wanted to commit genocide surely they could level Palestinian zones in a matter of hours? And hasn't the Palestinian population 5x'd since 1948? Otherwise, loved the conversation ❤🎉

Why are John Sayles' films so hard to obtain? And if offered for sale ,go at ridiculous prices like £42?

Why am i only stumbling on this nou😢

Excellent video!

Great episode! Looking forward to hearing more :-)

I really liked most of your analysis of Robocop, but when you discussed Starship Troopers and the typical Trump-bashing started at 55:28 with reference to fascism, I stopped listening to your discussion. I'm sorry, but I just can't stand any form politically biased analysis of movies, plays, books and games. I don't get it. If you're able to understand Verhoeven's perspective on war and fascism, why can't you at least acknowledge the fact that right from the start, president Trump was at war with both the CIA and the military industrial complex, with the corrupt FBI, with both the DNC and the GOP, with the globalist leaders of the world (including the pope), with the British Royal Family, corrupt NGO's, the central banks, mainstream media, the Mexican drugs cartels, Wall Street, Big Tech companies (with their fascist censorship policies), Big Pharma (with their ridiculously high prices for life-saving medication like insulin), and that he still did not start any war during his administration (unlike Obama and Biden)? He even resisted the enormous pressure by Israel to attack Iran on its behalf, and managed to contain the nuclear threat of North Korea. Anyway, although I can't take you seriously anymore as political analists, l do think you are both pretty good political commentators. So, despite your bias I still gave your video a well-deserved like for the review of Robocop. FWIW, I'm Dutch, just like Paul Verhoeven (with whom I once had a very interesting, informal conversation), so I am not partisan myself when it comes to American politics (I didn't like Trump's Israel policy and friendship with Netanyahu at all, and I hated his push for untested vaccines), but it was clear to me that Trump had the intention to finally realize JFK's plan to abolish the CIA, dismantle the Fed, restrict the power of the military industrial complex, destroy the powerful secret societies that JFK talked about, which seem to have a tremendous amount of influence in D.C., to stop the US military interference abroad, covert as well as overt ('sold' to the American people for more than 20 years under the pretence of the 'justified' perpetual 'War on Terror'), and to stop the devastating globalist policy of weakening the US economy by offshore outsourcing of domestic heavy industry, high tech industry, and energy production to countries like China and then allowing these countries to buy huge amounts of US real estate, US companies, and strategic parts of the US infrastructure, including harbors/ports, while allowing them to build up a strategic network of political influence within D.C. that is not in the interest of the American people (just ask Swalwell, Feinstein and Fauci). Although president Trump couldn't realize much of JFK's 1962-1963 agenda (just like JFK himself), at least he did try to pull US troops out of the Middle East and broker peace deals. As for Paul Verhoeven, I think you both have a pretty good understanding of what he was trying to do with his movies, but I would like to add the important fact that his anti-war/anti-fascism philosophy is not motivated by his political views, but rather by his personal experience of the attrocities of WW2 in The Netherlands during the German occupation. His movies reflect his own personal perspective on war, violence, abuse, betrayal, treason, torture, corruption and fascism. Despite the over-the-top graphic violence and sex in his movies, Paul Verhoeven is actually an intellectual with a degree in Physics and Mathematics from Leyden University who loves academic debates and is an avid reader. Despite their provocative style, his movies are always layered and never conclusive, that's why I think they are still relevant after many years.