วีดีโอ

Don’t forget before BP there was AI & before AI was AP.

Germanic unity at every opportunity.

The dumb and dumber hair style is cool.

More than five minutes in and he still hasn´t gotten started yet. Damn, get on with it.

Really?? Perfect teeth, western hunter gatherer😂

Not really surprising from the culture which has contributed the least out of all to make claims to be better than it is

for logical people who saw old maps its clear that germanic tribes by name came from scandinavia later than slavs ps dont argue with me argue with dna tests

I1 = Vanir R1b = Aesir

BP? Oh hell naw. Bce is bad enough but dwamn. People who use BP think they're smarter than they are. Thanks for translating it into normal people terms and times. Bless you

Pozdrav iz Vince. Dodji te nam.

Why do you not think it was Armenia the return I mean? What evidence do you have that suggests this or rather contradicts the findings of Harvard was it you said? Please explain.

(23:00) "there ain't no cure for the Sumer cline blues..." Hail winning. o/

While they are related to WSHG, they are not the same or nor descended from them. WSHG has some EHG/Yamnaya admixture which is not found in the early Tarim mummies. The core ancestry common to both early Tarim mummies and WSHG seems to be mostly ANE + some East Asian. WSHG is that plus EHG/Yamnaya.

I1 was isolated on an island between Upsala and Finland? They originally were hunters from Southern Europe. Became isolated around 20 thou yrs BP. Left island around 3 thou yrs BP. Became Ynglings - "From out of the East..." . All Germanic tribes descent from them. There is a gene for tallness in Scandinavia that probably originated in the Gravetians who were very tall, so Grevetians were probably the origin of I1?

Damn, cuh! Dey finally realized y’all whyte teas is blek! Bout time!

I stumbled upon a video once that said the baltic region may have pre-dated Scandinavia in ship building and may have had the earliest viking type of travel. There is a possibility that they had massive ships which could probobly hold sheep. Just a thought

They burnt the places down when the person modeled in the pottery died. It was their town, it was her plan. So when she dies they burn the whole link down and start again with the new girl.

Drug fused ppl from very young ages makes ya look a little wierd. Oracle making was a trade skill resulting in bio-chemistry pharmacology

thanks for your video , a happy dane , great DNA , they not lie

sydsverige har været en del af Danmark længer ind , det har været en del af sverige fakta , god video

4000 year ago the nortsea was not that hige , ther was people in doggerbanke then , people was walking ther , today ther is sea ther great video

the English tunge/way to talk come from Angel (sud Denmark /nord germany ,) saxon(germany) jyder( jylland/Denmark) they go to England in the year400 , after the romen was going to rom, and in the 788-1064 the viking was ther, live ther, Danerlagen ,(norway , Denmark sveden) and flanderen thats why all that DNA from Skandinaven , and they was slave trader for 300 years, so they move a lot of people , sorry my English are not 100% .

Im R1b-z2103 from albania and this branch is found mostly in yamnaya samples

Racism is changing someones culture because you dont like them, but our people survived the dark ages and plauge and will survive this.

Hilarious, "1/4 to 1/2" and the pre-1945 style jingoistic ASJ hooting and hollering runs wild. 😂 The funniest part are the people acting proud of not having any "Gallo-Frankish" ancestry as if there is a significant difference being a mix of Romanized Celts and Germanic invaders and being a mix of Romanized Celts and Germanic Invaders (separated by a mere 35 kilometers of water). 😂

I regularly rewatch these video to refresh

KOSOVO IS SERBIA !!!

Hey Baldrick; with that haircut you need a Monk's Robe :D

Indo European refers to a language group. Not a people.

It may be far from todays Balts, but in ancient times, the Balts inhabited not just Latvia and Lithuania, but also Prussia (and Belarus). Prussia to Denmark and then up Sweden is considerably shorter. Or, Gotland was used as a real hub, and we know Gotland played a pivotal role many times back then.

It seems like there is a recent trend towards underestimating past population replacements. The same has happened with the Anatolians and Turkish… People look to the lack of significant East Asian DNA in Turks and then conclude that Turks must be assimilated Anatolians, yet the recorded history says they depopulated huge swathes of Anatolia. The estimates of Turkic descent are underestimated because of falsely assuming that the Oghuz Turkic tribes arriving in Anatolia/Azerbaijan were genetically similar to Kazakhs and Tuvans… A better estimate of the percentage of replaced Anatolians should be possible to derive by comparing modern Turkish to a reference population of some mix of Russian Tatars, Iranians, and Turkmen, or by comparing modern Turkish directly to Archaeological Anatolian samples. Looking at the dissimilarity of modern Turkish to East Asians or even Central Asians results in a false conclusion…

What about Kazakhstan? Were they Yamnaya or more like an addition or admixture to yamnaya or separate different people associated with the yamnaya, particularly northwest of Kazakhstan? To add to that what about Kyrgyzstan to or is Kyrgyzstan different and more like them migrating to India instead of to Iberia like Kazakhstan where the the Pontic steppes are in the Eurasian steppe of whom these people whoever they were also migrated to ancient Iberia /spain in particular

What is going on with your hair. 😂. Please tell me this isn’t your new hair do.

I think I’ll now probably fall into a rabbit hole to research the scholarly reactions to this paper and subsequent developments over the year or so since this video was posted. I don’t have a dog in this race - I’m neither English nor of Anglo-Saxon extraction - but I have studied ancient languages and archaeology, and on both fronts I’ve always found the denial of the Anglo-Saxon invasion rather dubious. Unfortunately, I think a neutral term that merely refers to an ethnic group has historically been hijacked by racists, imperialists and right-wing white nationalists, which has made it somewhat radioactive in academic circles and led to an activist backlash that is more political than scholarly. For instance, here in the U.S. (and especially in New England where I live), we have an old term called WASP (white Anglo-Saxon Protestant) to refer to our traditional upper class, the Boston Brahmins and what not; it’s a term that by definition is exclusionary and suggests affluence, Ivy League education, ancestors that came over on the Mayflower, etc. As Irish Catholics, even the Kennedys are not real WASPs, lol. The evidence is whatever it is, and credible scholarship will endeavor to interpret that evidence NOT through the prism of one’s own biases and political sympathies but in a manner more consistent with scientific rigor. To get political for a moment, though, I do find it hilarious that, evidently, the Anglo-Saxons largely replaced the native population and language in large swathes of what is now England, which is exactly the kind of outcome many English people and American WASPs (haha) today fear from modern immigration policies. Perhaps their handwringing results from the inherited memory of their own ancestors’ success? I understand, though, the desire to preserve one’s heritage and culture, and I don’t think that’s necessarily a nefarious thing unless it is used as a justification to oppress or discriminate against others. Personally, I think a large, aggressive and disruptive “invasion” of displaced people makes sense linguistically. The influence of Norman French on the English language by a French-speaking elite was massive, creating a complex language with a sprawling vocabulary of approximately a million words (of which 10-15% are in common use), some 30% of which have Latin roots through Norman French, and yet it is still English, still a Germanic language. The replacement of the native Celtic language by English is really strange.

😂😂😂 idiot pedo europeans 😂😂😂

The story of I1 is set out in the paper “From Stone to Bronze in prehistoric Scandinavia” as Posted by GENOMIC ATLAS on 15 JULY, You shouldn’t be making video’s on the subject of I1 without reading this paper first. Why you never refer to this paper, just mystifies me. We do know for sure the origin of I1 - just read the paper.

I’m an I1 from Mercia presently living in Russia and will explore Finland and Sweden to visit my East Scandi ancestors next summer (if travel is still possible).

Oh-Ho man! 😆 Can you imagine being an Englishman, that damn near half of you is scientifically deemed “French?” I can’t say that I even find that convincing. Give me five full names of these 43% French English people, along with a presentation of the actual data as proof 🙃 The later medieval influx of French was probably the Huguenots. If you have Huguenot ancestors it usually is traceable

Thanks!. I’m an amateur albeit very interested. I was previously under the impression there was no steppe ancestry (at least none of the EHG component) in Anatolians (but that they did have CHG) and therefore previously concluded the language must have come from the CHG. I.e hypthesis B. (Never bought the Mesopotamia stuff). I was never quite comfortable with that, because of the R1 y-dna. I thought at Yamnaya the EHG males outcompeted CHG without imparting their language. Not impossible, but to then spread a patrilineal warrior culture just seemed odd, if the language underpinning that culture had been spoken by outcompeted males whose daughters passed it on. The idea seemed tall to believe with confidence. But now.If Anatolians can be modelled to have WSH ancestry after all, it changes everything. I think what seems clear is the Anatolians had very mixed ancestry anyway, and the language must have spread there with an elite dominance dynamic at work. That is supported by the history of the Hittites, that they took over and empire of Hattic people. That would make the language’s ultimate associated DNA ancestry difficult to model, so perhaps I should have expected that (as you did). That goes for the apparent lack of additional European ancestry west of the Black Sea as well. If the speakers were 90% non-European by ancestry, surely we can expect to make a lot of mistakes with the 10%. So woth the greatest diversity of Anatolian languages being in the West, I don’t think there is another choice other than hypotheis A-West. It looks like the male haplogroup question is deepening. The Corded Ware looks more like a neigbouring group of the same race adopting Indo-European, than descendants of the Yamnaya. From then on Corded Ware is associated with Satem languages, and the group rich in the non Yamnaya other R1b is associated with Celtic, Italic. The Germanic people in their Steppe Ancestry component must have been a mix of the group carrying this new R1b, probably the beaker folk, and the Corded Ware. But the language mostly came from the former.

for their argument, they note there are no mass graves found. against their argument, there has never been a peaceful migration sponsored by a heroic culture. The Romans massively fortified the Saxon shore for some reason. what would Guildas or Bede have to gain by lying?

Surely, if all of our ancestors came from Africa, where the first humans originated, is it so unreasonable to assume or even state that the first settelers in every country must have had dark skin? 🤔

A-word comes from Iran. It means Iranian. Welcum. DonT drink the Wagner-Absynth.

We (Scots) destroyed theASnhlo-Saxons in 1066. And destroyed England in 1707. You are British. This is as anachronistic as the existence of the 'Irish'. Theres never been any such people. They are a myth invented by the Germpire and its PedoPriests. So is the fantasy of the 'English'.

Tom Im trying to think where I read that the Jutish component in Britain was corroborated by a distribution map of. certain brooch types compiled only recently from detecting finds that matched exactly the areas of England described as Jutish by monks and scholars writing 300 years after the migration. Just cant put my finger on where I read this ?

Kudos to you for getting out this info that you're so passionate about. I've reviewed your stuff for awhile now and noticed that you sadly still believe in the Aryan Invasion Theory. I guess you've not heard of the story of the great Aryan king named KaraviryaArjuna who is responsible for making a great offence by killing a brahmin over a special cow (kamendhenu) causing the brahimin's son, Parashuram to deliberately force out the "white Aryans" from the area today known as India. The Puranas say that 23 generations were banished from re-entering the structured society, thus making them lose the Vedic culture of memorization of the Veda, the brahminical varna training, and cow protection. We can see remains of megalithic structures across the world today but only in the Vedas are the Aryan peoples attributed to creating such things. See, the Arya have always existed and will always exist. After every time the Earth realm (Bhumiloka) is devastated (pralaya) they return to seed the next ars f Manu (man). The Vedic timescale is massive and the many, though suppressed and hidden artifacts, that have been found on evert continent give more validation to this fact of Aryan dominance.

Could OTA (ótti) be cognate, or related, to the attested Odinic name Yggur?

Wouldn't a aurochs be very clearly horned? What appears sometimes as horns on the D-type quadruped is clearly an "Kolbenarmring", arm-ring with thickened terminals, when you look at them, and on many bracteates you can see the Kolbenarmring isn't connected to the head, and in some it's missing altogether. I think that's interesting because it seems that usually the horse is crowned with the arm-ring.

My haplogroup is U5a1a1. Google says it might have originated in that culture

What a eurocentric wank fest 😂😂😂😂

May I ask why the Solutrean hypothesis is not plausible? Surely if Polynesians made it to South America, could not have Solutrean people made it to N America? Everything in the Americas is Asian, Asian, Asian. Asian--political correctness, IMO. Not everything has to revolve around Asia.