Driving Net Profit with Zero Emissions
Driving Net Profit with Zero Emissions
  • 120
  • 72 086
Episode 21: Green Horizons: Scenic World's Journey to Carbon Neutrality
In this episode of the “Driving Profit with Net Zero Emissions” podcast, we delve into Scenic World Blue Mountains, Australia's most visited privately owned tourism attraction, located in the Blue Mountains region near Sydney, NSW. We're excited to discuss Scenic World's strategic commitment to environmental stewardship, embodied in their Environment and Sustainability Policy, and their journey towards achieving carbon neutral certification.
Join us as we explore:
• The history of Scenic World
• Scenic World’s indigenous connection
• Scenic World’s operations and supply chain
• Scenic World’s emission sources
• Scenic World’s sustainability initiatives
• Scenic World’s road to carbon neutrality
• Scenic World’s climate risks adaptation
👉 Follow Barbara here: www.linkedin.com/in/barbaraalbert100/
👉 Follow Anthea here: www.linkedin.com/in/anthea-hammon/
💁 CHAPTERS
[In some instances, some headers in the chapters may be able to go in the summary as well.]
~ 00:02:30 About Scenic World
~ 00:04:30 The History of Scenic World
~ 00:06:30 Scenic World’s ESG commitments
~ 00:08:30 What caring for country means for Scenic World
~ 00:10:30 Scenic World’s emission sources
~ 00:15:30 Scenic World’s overall target
~ 00:17:00 How does Scenic World handle waste?
~ 00:24:21 Scenic World’s visitors
~ 00:25:30 How does Scenic World communicate their sustainability initiatives
~ 00:27:00 Recommendations for other tourism operators
~ 00:30:00 Scenic World’s carbon neutrality
~ 00:37:00 Scenic World’s climate risks adaptation
~ 00:45:00 Scenic World’s goal going forward
~ 00:47:00 Key takeaway message
👉 You can also listen to the podcast on different apps:
Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/4YLvi59oFMXylC1OjObAIS?si=o1FuDLn3QZ-5ZVDHjgWrIA
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/ph/podcast/episode-21-green-horizons-scenic-worlds-journey-to/id1571436808?i=1000661871566
100% Renewables webpage: 100percentrenewables.com.au/podcast/green-horizons-scenic-worlds-journey-to-carbon-neutrality/
📜 Transcript:
💯 Don’t forget to like this video and please recommend this podcast to your colleagues and friends!
มุมมอง: 25

วีดีโอ

Climate Change and Long-termism: shaping our future today
มุมมอง 652หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies. In this video, we explore the concept of long-termism, inspired by the insights of William MacAskill. Long-termism teaches us that the lives of future people are just as important as our own, and the choices we make now will have profound implications for their well-bein...
Episode 20: Above and Beyond: BridgeClimb Sydney's Environmental Journey
มุมมอง 3522 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this episode of “Driving Profit with Net Zero emissions” podcast, we're joined by Deb Zimmer, CEO of BridgeClimb Sydney as we delve deep into the world of one of Sydney’s most iconic attractions. Discover the intersection of adventure and sustainability as Deb shares insights into BridgeClimb's journey towards achieving carbon neutrality. Join us as we explore: • BridgeClimb’s Unique Visitor...
ASRS Part 15B: Enhancing your sustainability reporting with voluntary frameworks and initiatives
มุมมอง 1342 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies and helping our clients prepare for mandatory climate reporting. Welcome back to our ASRS series! In this video, which is the last one in the series, we will explore how you can enhance your mandatory sustainability reporting by considering additional voluntary frameworks...
ASRS Part 15A: The annual ASRS ‘sustainability report’ and director liabilities
มุมมอง 1192 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies and helping our clients prepare for mandatory climate reporting. Welcome back to our comprehensive exploration of the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS). In this video, I'll guide you through the critical topic of the ASRS sustainability report and direc...
ASRS Part 14B: Step-by-step guide on how to develop effective climate metrics and targets under ASRS
มุมมอง 2002 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies. Welcome back to our ASRS series! Today, we're diving into the step-by-step guide on how to develop effective climate metrics and targets under the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards. Step 1: Setting impactful climate targets begins with a clear understanding o...
ASRS Part 14A: The strategic importance of climate metrics and targets under ASRS
มุมมอง 1762 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies. In this video, we’ll explore the crucial steps for developing effective climate metrics and targets under the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS). The Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS) mandate comprehensive performance metrics disclosu...
ASRS Part 13B: Crafting your transition plan: A detailed roadmap
มุมมอง 543 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies. Welcome back to our comprehensive exploration of the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS), which is currently in the exposure draft stage. In this video, we're diving deep into crafting transition plans for ASRS compliance. I' walk you through a step-by-s...
ASRS Part 13A: Introduction to transition plans for ASRS compliance
มุมมอง 843 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies. Welcome back to our comprehensive exploration of the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS), which is currently in the exposure draft stage. Today, I'll guide you through the critical topic of developing transition plans for ASRS compliance. In this video, ...
ASRS Part 12B: Step by step guide for conducting scenario analysis under ASRS
มุมมอง 773 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero and transition strategies. Welcome back to our comprehensive exploration of the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS). In this video, we’ll discuss the step-by step guide to conducting scenario analysis for ASRS compliance. Scenario analysis can be challenging due to ...
ASRS Part 12A: Introduction to scenario analysis for ASRS compliance
มุมมอง 1003 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero and transition strategies. Welcome back to our comprehensive exploration of the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS). In this video I'll walk you through understanding climate-related scenario analysis to enhance your sustainability reporting. In this video, we'll co...
ASRS Part 11C: From risk identification to management and ASRS compliance
มุมมอง 643 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies. Join Barbara Albert, Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, as she guides us through the intricate process of aligning risk management strategies with the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS) in our latest video. This comprehensive session delves into the crucial ste...
ASRS Part 11B: Introduction to climate risks and opportunities under IFRS/ASRS
มุมมอง 873 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies. Explore the dynamic landscape of climate risks and opportunities with Barbara Albert, Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, in our latest video. As the global business environment evolves under the pressures of climate change, understanding these risks and how to manage them become...
ASRS Part 11A: Climate risks and opportunities disclosures overview under IFRS/ASRS
มุมมอง 673 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies. Discover how the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS) transform business transparency and accountability in our latest video. Learn about the critical role of ASRS in enhancing how companies report the impact of climate change on their operations and fina...
ASRS Part 6: When Australian companies need to report and assurance requirements
มุมมอง 1123 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hi! I am Barbara Albert, the Co-CEO of 100% Renewables, a consultancy specialising in the development of net-zero strategies. Welcome back to our comprehensive exploration of the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS), which is currently in the exposure draft stage. In this instalment, we focus on the proposed reporting timelines and assurance requirements for each group under ASR...
ASRS Part 5: Decoding mandatory ASRS climate legislation cohorts
มุมมอง 953 หลายเดือนก่อน
ASRS Part 5: Decoding mandatory ASRS climate legislation cohorts
ASRS Part 10: Carbon footprinting under IFRS/ASRS)
มุมมอง 1073 หลายเดือนก่อน
ASRS Part 10: Carbon footprinting under IFRS/ASRS)
ASRS Part 2: The power of mandatory and voluntary sustainability reporting
มุมมอง 2273 หลายเดือนก่อน
ASRS Part 2: The power of mandatory and voluntary sustainability reporting
ASRS Part 1: Introduction to ASRS and its importance for Australian companies
มุมมอง 4883 หลายเดือนก่อน
ASRS Part 1: Introduction to ASRS and its importance for Australian companies
ASRS Part 9: Getting your organisation ready for the growing demand for climate-related information
มุมมอง 1164 หลายเดือนก่อน
ASRS Part 9: Getting your organisation ready for the growing demand for climate-related information
ASRS Part 8: The ripple effect of the incoming ASRS climate standards
มุมมอง 1454 หลายเดือนก่อน
ASRS Part 8: The ripple effect of the incoming ASRS climate standards
ASRS Part 7: Are Australian companies ready to report under the mandatory ASRS climate legislation?
มุมมอง 1344 หลายเดือนก่อน
ASRS Part 7: Are Australian companies ready to report under the mandatory ASRS climate legislation?
ASRS Part 4: Navigating mandatory ASRS climate reporting compliance
มุมมอง 1815 หลายเดือนก่อน
ASRS Part 4: Navigating mandatory ASRS climate reporting compliance
ASRS Part 3: The evolution of sustainability reporting
มุมมอง 2465 หลายเดือนก่อน
ASRS Part 3: The evolution of sustainability reporting
Episode 19: How to Confidently Buy High-integrity Carbon Offsets
มุมมอง 2428 หลายเดือนก่อน
Episode 19: How to Confidently Buy High-integrity Carbon Offsets
Episode 18: Creating Change: Western Sydney University’s Sustainable Leadership
มุมมอง 119ปีที่แล้ว
Episode 18: Creating Change: Western Sydney University’s Sustainable Leadership
What is the difference between net zero and carbon neutral?
มุมมอง 1.3Kปีที่แล้ว
What is the difference between net zero and carbon neutral?
EP17: Striking at the root, with Simon Holmes à Court
มุมมอง 112ปีที่แล้ว
EP17: Striking at the root, with Simon Holmes à Court
Strategies for net zero emissions for manufacturing businesses
มุมมอง 631ปีที่แล้ว
Strategies for net zero emissions for manufacturing businesses
How are net zero and ESG connected?
มุมมอง 465ปีที่แล้ว
How are net zero and ESG connected?

ความคิดเห็น

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 5 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 5 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 5 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 5 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 5 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @taylorjobby
    @taylorjobby 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Simon Holmes a Sock Puppet..Daddy was a coal mining magnate...Hypocrite

  • @kkhalifah1019
    @kkhalifah1019 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Different alphabets from the same alphabet soup.

  • @NetZeroEarth
    @NetZeroEarth 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🔥 Amazing information

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @NetZeroEarth
    @NetZeroEarth 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome analysis

  • @Deluarsyeed
    @Deluarsyeed 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic exploration of the evolution of sustainability reporting in ASRS Part 3! 🌱📊 Engaging and informative content! #Sustainability #ReportingEvolutio

  • @bradleymarshall9334
    @bradleymarshall9334 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Promo*SM

  • @AndrejsBoka
    @AndrejsBoka ปีที่แล้ว

    I guess most important to add also the source of the terminology, e.g. ISO, GHG protocol or specific local legislation

    • @drivingnetprofitwithzeroem
      @drivingnetprofitwithzeroem ปีที่แล้ว

      Great comment, Andrejs. Since the release of the ISO Net Zero Guidelines and the SBTi Net Zero Standard, we have a definition of what net zero means as opposed to carbon neutrality. We've published an updated video, which you can find here: th-cam.com/video/fKys9gHc4fc/w-d-xo.html

  • @xlxl4108
    @xlxl4108 ปีที่แล้ว

    So dull…are you explaining or just reading off materials

  • @timothy7990
    @timothy7990 ปีที่แล้ว

    Promo'SM

  • @anglosaxonmike8325
    @anglosaxonmike8325 ปีที่แล้ว

    Net zero is technically impossible to achieve.

  • @hameedmazkour3219
    @hameedmazkour3219 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Thank you for this video. However, from a literature perspective, who are the scholars that pursue this trend nowadays?

  • @OldScientist
    @OldScientist ปีที่แล้ว

    They are connected by delusion. There will be global starvation if fossil fuels are eliminated. At risk in coming decades will be half of the world’s 8.5 billion to 10 billion people who are fed by crops grown with fertilizers derived from fossil fuels. Getting to Net Zero by 2050 would cost $9.2 trillion a year globally (McKinsey). That's not going to be good value for money. That's nearly one-tenth of global GDP. That money would be better spent on a myriad of things including educating the fifth of humanity who are illiterate and represent a 7% annual loss to the world's economy. Any country that attempts it will be indebted or impoverished. Example: For the UK to reach net zero by electrification of its transport fleet and heating system, it will require a tripling (as a minimum) of its current electrical generation capacity among other things. This will essentially require the UK consuming all of the current global supply of copper and other rare metals for the next 25 years. The cost will be unaffordable and the skilled manpower levels unattainable. And that is just to eliminate the 1% of the global CO2 emissions that the UK is responsible for. So times that by 100 for the Earth. 10,000 child slaves in the cobalt mines of the Congo not enough for you? Make it a million. Imagine all the human suffering and environmental damage done from all that resource extraction! An electric vehicle requires 6 times the mineral input compared to a conventional one, and the carbon cost is greater until you reach 80,000 miles. Production of all of these minerals has been mastered by China: a totalitarian communist regime that thinks nothing of the mass murder of its own citizens, imagine how much it cares about the rest of us. And why are we embarking on this great net zero crusade? For what? So someone can virtue signal by driving around in a Tesla. Maddeningly, there is no climate crisis. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past.

  • @HarryZyx
    @HarryZyx ปีที่แล้ว

    It would have been useful to know what ESG and CSR stand for.

    • @hameedmazkour3219
      @hameedmazkour3219 ปีที่แล้ว

      She has touched on them, csr corporate Social responsibility. Esg environment Social governance

  • @OldScientist
    @OldScientist ปีที่แล้ว

    All propaganda. Getting to Net Zero by 2050 would cost $9.2 trillion a year globally (McKinsey). That's not going to be good value for money. That's nearly one-tenth of global GDP. That money would be better spent on a myriad of things including educating the fifth of humanity who are illiterate and represent a 7% annual loss to the world's economy. Any country that attempts it will be indebted or impoverished. Example: For the UK to reach net zero by electrification of its transport fleet and heating system, it will require a tripling (as a minimum) of its current electrical generation capacity among other things. This will essentially require the UK consuming all of the current global supply of copper and other rare metals for the next 25 years. The cost will be unaffordable and the skilled manpower levels unattainable. And that is just to eliminate the 1% of the global CO2 emissions that the UK is responsible for. So times that by 100 for the Earth. 10,000 child slaves in the cobalt mines of the Congo not enough for you? Make it a million. Imagine all the human suffering and environmental damage done from all that resource extraction! And for what? So someone can virtue signal by driving around in a Tesla. Maddeningly, there is no climate crisis. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past.

  • @ratulsinha9654
    @ratulsinha9654 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @user-zv7ov4io7x
    @user-zv7ov4io7x ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative, please cover basics of Energy , emissions &, waste

  • @halimsk4727
    @halimsk4727 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🙏🙏 Why aren't your video views increasing? And not reaching people? The reason is 1. Your video is not being SEO properly 2. Your video is not reaching the right people 3. Not using video hashtags properly 4. Not sharing the video on social media There are a few more reasons. That's why your videos are limited to your channel. Can't get out In a word, your video is awesome. such videos are in great demand. If you do these things correctly. Hopefully you will get a lot of visitors. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have. If i can help a wonderful person like you. Feel lucky. I will cooperate with you in all kinds. I am waiting your reply,,,

  • @Ricksworld1962
    @Ricksworld1962 ปีที่แล้ว

    If this “Net Zero” is truly referring to a multitude of “greenhouse gas emissions”, then why is the only one spoken of that must be reduced to zero, “Carbon Dioxide”? Using common sense, even if we all stopped breathing (which is carbon dioxide when we exhale), the other Natural sources of carbon will continue to produce much more than we could Ever produce in our entire lifetime. Volcanic eruptions for one. Even the Ocean heating and cooling, produces thousands of times more than humans could ever produce. This is the biggest lie, shoved down the throats of the middle and lower classes of the planet

  • @kabazza
    @kabazza ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic episode - thank you

  • @apollo2276
    @apollo2276 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just mainstream narrative being repeated here. What is net zero? Its absolute BS that's what it is. They say co2 causes climate change. Ok let's look at the science. The specific gravity of co2 is 1.592. Which means being heavier than air. How can any scientist explain that a heavier than air gas somehow gets into the atmosphere? IT CAN'T ! Co2 can only fall downward. Its subject to the same laws of gravity and yet the sheeple are still convinced that what the government tells them is true. Wake up world :)

  • @NetZeroEarth
    @NetZeroEarth 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you this is extremely insightful

  • @Mark-rd1it
    @Mark-rd1it 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about volcanoes. This is BS

  • @alickoldfield5435
    @alickoldfield5435 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    p̾r̾o̾m̾o̾s̾m̾

  • @fishingphill
    @fishingphill 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Round one of the NSW government supercharger rollout has closed last week. When will we hear who has one the tenders for rural towns and where they are going to be installed? Very keen to get an update.

  • @energyeducation4860
    @energyeducation4860 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vidoes

  • @SteffenFragtrup
    @SteffenFragtrup 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am unsure of which protocol your define the scopes upon, but its not one that is aligned with the GHG Protocol were scope 2 covers more than just electricity consumption

  • @genem2452
    @genem2452 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Prⓞм𝕠𝕤𝐌 💃

  • @furqanullah8743
    @furqanullah8743 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    From where i can find emission factor for Pakistan or how to calculate using energy mix?

    • @Sivah_Akash
      @Sivah_Akash 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Generally the local electricity utility or the goverment publish the emission factors.

    • @ratulsinha9654
      @ratulsinha9654 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ask imran Khan 😆

    • @furqanullah8743
      @furqanullah8743 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ratulsinha9654 pehle modi G ko climate sikhado wo kehte hain k climate nahi badal Raha janta badal Rahi hai

    • @ratulsinha9654
      @ratulsinha9654 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@furqanullah8743 isliye G20 summit 2023 india me hoga . Aur imran Khan hospital me

    • @furqanullah8743
      @furqanullah8743 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or imran Khan ki waja se world environment day 2021 Pakistan ne host kia tha

  • @dragon.fromindia3235
    @dragon.fromindia3235 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    SELL GOLD AND SILVER BUY PLATINUM PRICE IS LOW NOW PROMOTE PLATINUM PRICE IS RISING LIKE GOLD....///..

  • @user-gv1dq2jj6u
    @user-gv1dq2jj6u 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    #Hollook#

  • @oviefredericksimon9483
    @oviefredericksimon9483 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, What do you mean by your last statement where you said "if the target is engagement-based?" Please can you kindly clarify that?

  • @Ramamurthi23
    @Ramamurthi23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1 like

  • @AA-hh7fu
    @AA-hh7fu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    th-cam.com/video/gimMKo9DJ5s/w-d-xo.html