วีดีโอ

@@jordan_gentry it is overpriced for what it does, for sure. But maybe this stumbling video was a bit misleading, because I am usually getting pretty good results from the brain track, and the OP-XY is a sequencer with a very fast and solid workflow for me, and it does interesting things that my other sequencers do less or different . So I don’t regret buying it, but when in need of an affordable option I would recommend people other stuff.

@@agentmirv yes, with some knob movement. I really like the built in sounds, they are diverse and tweakable.

Thank you

@@rayderrich it is an amazing synth! I am very bad at dusting off, always seems that the dust just moves instead of going away. But I will try not to forget to do a new attempt before the next video.

@@jantuitman Ik had me er niet mee moeten bemoeien, Jan. Ik kijk graag weer naar je volgende videos, en ben benieuwd hoe de Summit daarin een rol speelt.

@@rayderrich geen probleem

Thanks! It is a great 4 timbral sound module but I would definitely not buy it if you don’t already own a sequencer, because the sequencer on the MC101 iitself is pretty clumsy to work with, so as a groovebox I cannot really recommend it.

@@jantuitmanbut hapax is almost 3x the price mc 101 so you get what you paid for 😅

Thank you! I am curious what attracts you to the Wavestate. I haven’t used mine for a while because I was more into the (more direct) Minifreak but last week I put it back on a stand and I am hoping to make some music on it very soon again.

@@jantuitman The touching of the buttons. Laying in my bed making music lol...for me my timing feels better on hardware. Love your work and can't wait to hear more!!

Leuk dat het je bevalt

Yes. I love scripter and want to do some videos about it.

Hi, I want to give more than 1 answer, so here is a list of points: 1. I use Squarp Hapax now instead of Pyramid. The Hapax allows to lock MidiFX parameters for the different parts of the track, so it is very powerful for your specific use case: starting tracks and switching different MidiFX. 2. If you would do this with a Deluge and a Pyramid, you’d make different tracks with different MidiFX on the Pyramid, save them there, and then send the notes from the Deluge (so no notes in the Pyramid). This would be the easiest way of doing it, and you wouldn’t save the MidiFX in the Deluge but rather use the combination of track number on the Deluge and Pyramid to select the right midi fx. 3. The Deluge is open source now, and I happen to be developing new features for it! (I want to make a video about it very soon). I am currently working on a. feature for playing notes that are not “in key”, but maybe I will do MidiFX in the future or otherwise someone else probably will have the same idea. So I am pretty sure that the Deluge will have midi fx in a couple of months.

Yes you can do this, and you can also manually add automation lanes.

Thanks for the feedback, i will listen to what you meant! I also found that this definately wasn't my best jam but i try to finish stuff regardless of how good it is, because in the end that leads me also to making more 'good' jams. Hopefully i will produce less bad jams in the future but currenlty they still happen...

@@jantuitman No jam is bad, they all lead to something better as we keep learning, plus there is nothing wrong with just having fun!

On this keys screen there are 7 colors, 1 for each note in that are in your scale (e.g. C major). If you disable the scale, there will be only 1 color, for the C notes, so that you can easily see where new octaves start. On the song screen of the Deluge there are 12 possible colors. There each color can be used to mean “song part” because the launch buttons which are the right most column of the deluge will launch all clips that have the same color as the button, all at once. So if you make the clips of verse 1 dark blue, you can launch all the clips that are supposed to play during verse 1 of your song by just pressing a single button. I tested that and it works as long as you have 12 groups max. Which is sufficient for huge compositions as the Deluge has unlimited clip length and also doesn’t care if you make 10 clips of the same color.

@@jantuitman a nightmare for a colourblind...

Actually I am not correct about the colors of this keys screen I now see rewatching it! Because even though only 7 different notes are in the scale it uses more colors. It is very hard to count because many colors are very similar, it uses a gradient. I think there are about 20 or so.

@@FUNCULOBUSH I never considered that, but I think indeed It might be very annoying to use the Deluge clip variations feature if you are color blind. Not only are the group colors an issue, the deluge uses red and green to distinguish between playing and muted tracks. The Hapax sequencer (which I also have videos about) uses positions on the grid rather than colors for clip variations. I think it would work much better for color blind people, although for people with the extreme rare yellow / blue color blindness there might still be an issue left because the Hapax uses blue for clips that are not playing and yellow for clips that are playing.

Yes, it is a nice device that deserves to be dusted off, I hope you’ll enjoy with what you will make on it!

I'm trying to decide whether to get a Deluge or a Syntakt to complement my Minilogue XD. What would your recommendation be? I'm planning to use it for sequencing the minilogue (besides just jamming / writing musing on it). I realise the work flows might be quite different, but can't really play with any of them before purchasing.

@@xpayk deluge. If you want to right songs. Sytakt has a deeper synth sound design engine. But the deluge has sampling and wavetables. Deluge is more like center of your workflow whereas syntakt is and additional instruments. But Deluge is very unique. Can take it anywhere too.