- 290
- 52 935
Severn Vineyard
United Kingdom
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 11 พ.ค. 2014
Severn at The Station - Sunday February 2 2025
Hello! You’re in the right place to join us live as we gather at The Station, celebrating what God has been doing with us everywhere. Today we are bringing worship, prayer and community news, and Owen Lynch continues his series on “A community of hope”. We’re also sharing the Lord’s Supper - get bread and juice ready if you’d like to join in.
มุมมอง: 14
วีดีโอ
Severn at The Harbour from Feb 16 2025
มุมมอง 3214 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
Don't forget, we're meeting in a different venue for six weeks starting on Sunday February 16th - The Harbour, Totterdown. We made this to help everyone remember!
‘How the revolution spreads’ by Owen Lynch, 2 February 2025
มุมมอง 2914 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
What does God's coming kingdom look like in you? Owen Lynch looks at how Jesus compared this to a little bit of yeast that transforms a whole batch of dough - but what does that actually mean for us? Could the apparent weakness of self-sacrifice and small expressions of love, joy, peace, patience and kindness really be all that significant, especially when we love big, spectacular experiences? ...
‘What unites us?’ by Owen and Claire Lynch, 19 January 2025
มุมมอง 2014 วันที่ผ่านมา
When people in churches disagree, is there anything we know that should unite us? Owen Lynch looks at how Paul addressed believers who were becoming divided over personalities, leadership, ideas and practical issues. The believers and leaders were diverse, surprisingly inclusive to many. Was the answer to change that? Or was the cross of Christ uniquely powerful and necessary to unite people? C...
Severn at The Station - Sunday January 19 2025
มุมมอง 4014 วันที่ผ่านมา
Hello! You’re in the right place to join us live as we gather at The Station, celebrating what God has been doing with us everywhere. Today we are bringing worship, prayer and community news, Owen Lynch talks about what unites us, and Claire Lynch will lead a time of reflection. We’ll also share the Lord’s Supper - get bread and juice ready if you would like to join in.
That's My King
มุมมอง 3421 วันที่ผ่านมา
From a sermon by Dr. S.M. Lockridge given in 1976, with video made by Grace Community Church shared under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported licence. Music added by Bern Leckie, sharable under same licence. Hear the full talk from Severn Vineyard which includes this here: www.severnvineyard.org/sunday-talks-bloglist/2025/1/12/journeys-what-can-we-learn-from-the-magi-12-january-2025
‘Is our emotional and spiritual health in balance?’ by Owen Lynch, 5 January 2025
มุมมอง 43หลายเดือนก่อน
Does this new year feel light and joyful, or have we loaded ourselves up with burdens? Owen Lynch looks at how spiritual and emotional health are important to us and need to be kept in balance. Jesus criticised religious leaders who brought loads of expectation which they could not carry themselves, and offered a better way of life. Have we taken up Jesus’ offer? Maybe we can tell by asking if ...
Severn at The Station - Sunday January 5 2025
มุมมอง 39หลายเดือนก่อน
Hello and happy new year! You’re in the right place to join us live as we gather at The Station, celebrating what God has been doing with us everywhere. Today we are bringing worship, prayer and community news, and Owen Lynch is speaking.
Severn service December 22 2024
มุมมอง 39หลายเดือนก่อน
Hello and happy (nearly) Christmas! You’re in the right place to join us live as we gather at The Station, celebrating what God has been doing with us everywhere. Today’s final Sunday service of the year brings adults and children all in together, and we’re getting ready for Christmas with stories, games, songs and prayers.
Severn at The Station - Sunday December 15 2024
มุมมอง 24หลายเดือนก่อน
Hello! You’re in the right place to join us live as we gather at The Station, celebrating what God has been doing with us everywhere. Today we are bringing Advent worship, prayer and community news, and Liz Nixon is sharing about our gifts from God.
‘Jesus, our Christmas gift’ by Liz Nixon, 15 December 2024
มุมมอง 26หลายเดือนก่อน
What makes a great gift? Liz Nixon looks at the value of thoughtful, meaningful gifts and how they can build relationships when we grow love in return. The talk concludes with ten minutes of ‘examen’ prayer, which can also be practised with the Pray As You Go app at pray-as-you-go.org
‘A story of trust’ by Owen Lynch, 1 December 2024
มุมมอง 172 หลายเดือนก่อน
What does the story of Jesus' birth tell us about God? Owen Lynch looks at this and shares his own reasons for having faith in Jesus. Do we want the stories which define us to be God's stories about us, our value, and how much we are loved and filled with his love, joy and peace to share this year?
Severn at The Station - Sunday November 24 2024
มุมมอง 132 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hello! You’re in the right place to join us live as we gather at The Station, celebrating what God has been doing with us everywhere. Today’s service brings adults and children all in together. We’re looking ahead to Advent and how we can be filled with hope, joy, peace and love, and we’ll be sharing stories, games, songs and prayers.
‘Am I willing for Jesus to change my mind?’ by Owen Lynch, 17 November 2024
มุมมอง 242 หลายเดือนก่อน
What does it mean to follow Jesus and end up changing our minds about something important? Owen Lynch looks at Paul’s movements in Acts of the Apostles, which were not just physical across Europe, but changes in his long-held beliefs about what the long hoped-for Jewish messiah - their anointed leader - would look like. Many were quoting “clobber” passages from scripture to prove that Jesus cou...
Severn at The Station - Sunday November 17 2024
มุมมอง 182 หลายเดือนก่อน
Hello! You’re in the right place to join us live as we gather at The Station, celebrating what God has been doing with us everywhere. Today we are bringing worship and prayer, sharing community news and launching our Christmas appeal for clients of our Foodbank and CAP (Christians Against Poverty). Owen Lynch will also be continuing his talk series on Acts of the Apostles, “A community of hope”.
‘Has the gospel made us more inclusive, progressive and hopeful?’ by Owen Lynch, 10 November 2024
มุมมอง 402 หลายเดือนก่อน
‘Has the gospel made us more inclusive, progressive and hopeful?’ by Owen Lynch, 10 November 2024
Severn at The Station - Sunday November 10 2024
มุมมอง 412 หลายเดือนก่อน
Severn at The Station - Sunday November 10 2024
Severn at The Station - Sunday November 3 2024
มุมมอง 343 หลายเดือนก่อน
Severn at The Station - Sunday November 3 2024
‘The woman who washed Jesus’ feet’ by Dan Green, 3 November 2024
มุมมอง 283 หลายเดือนก่อน
‘The woman who washed Jesus’ feet’ by Dan Green, 3 November 2024
‘Is God male?’ by Claire Lynch, 20 October 2024
มุมมอง 273 หลายเดือนก่อน
‘Is God male?’ by Claire Lynch, 20 October 2024
Severn at The Station - Sunday October 27 2024
มุมมอง 243 หลายเดือนก่อน
Severn at The Station - Sunday October 27 2024
‘Revelationship’ by Phil Joiner, 6 October 2024
มุมมอง 344 หลายเดือนก่อน
‘Revelationship’ by Phil Joiner, 6 October 2024
Severn at The Station - Sunday October 6 2024
มุมมอง 364 หลายเดือนก่อน
Severn at The Station - Sunday October 6 2024
Severn at The Station - Sunday September 29 2024
มุมมอง 694 หลายเดือนก่อน
Severn at The Station - Sunday September 29 2024
‘Experiencing the love of God’ by David Jennings, 29 September 2024
มุมมอง 184 หลายเดือนก่อน
‘Experiencing the love of God’ by David Jennings, 29 September 2024
Severn at The Station - Sunday September 22 2024
มุมมอง 254 หลายเดือนก่อน
Severn at The Station - Sunday September 22 2024
‘A God who blesses’ by Claire Lynch, 15 September 2024
มุมมอง 194 หลายเดือนก่อน
‘A God who blesses’ by Claire Lynch, 15 September 2024
‘What shapes our sense of identity?’ by Owen Lynch, 1 September 2024
มุมมอง 455 หลายเดือนก่อน
‘What shapes our sense of identity?’ by Owen Lynch, 1 September 2024
Severn at The Station - Sunday September 1 2024
มุมมอง 315 หลายเดือนก่อน
Severn at The Station - Sunday September 1 2024
Great Song!!!
Thank you for a beautiful, thought provoking talk
Thankyou😊😊
Acts 17:30 - 31: In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. 31 For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising him from the dead.”
Merry Christmas to you to have a great Christmas
Thank you Kyle a wonderful message
Paul is a deceiver who teaches a different gospel. Being gay is spoken about in the Old Testament.
WTF!? Homoxesuality was only discovered 150 years ago. There's no reference to it in the NT, in the OT, or any other ancient document.
I met ellie mumford about 5 times. I've never forgotten her. A very lovely lady. Also John Mumford. Glory to God Almighty 🙏
The bible is a man made book with man made wisdom (Kain and Abel) and man made errors : + light wasn't there before the sun + the earth wasn't there before the sun + Adam and Eve didn't exist + insects have six legs not four legs + the value of Pi isn't 3 + homosexuality is not a seduction by a satan, but a natural born healthy sexual orientation with an evolutionary sense + the "firmament" is not a solid "roof" over the world + the moon doesn't produce visible light + etc etc If the bible would be the word of god or inspired by god it would be without errors, but it isn't. As easy as that.
The author of Genesis 1 would have known that light is produced by the sun and that plants need light to grow. These are not "errors", they are deliberate rhetorical choices. The real error is treating as historical what was obviously a myth the moment it was penned. Scripture being inspired by God doesn't mean it's without errors. You're confusing inspiration with inerrancy. The former is long-standing Christian tradition. The latter is an erroneous modern doctrine held by a few denominations and invented around a century ago.
@@MusicalRaichu Everybody knows that the light comes from the sun. So what "rhetorical choices"? The bi ble describes in detail nat ural processes simply wrong. Its not me saying the bib le is without errors, its the followers of the bi ble saying that. But obviously its not.
@@MusicalRaichu And how is the bi ble inspired by a go d? Leviticus was developed during the Persian empire (Yehud Madinata) aprox. between 538-332 BCE, over 200 years (some say 300 years) , written by many generations of heb rew men and their knowledge, trial and er ror, just like we nowadays based on our knowledge, experience and agreements delop our laws over the time. If thats inspired by a god, then why is it corrected all the time based on human experience? Surely thats not inpired by any go d, its ma n-ma de.
My recent life has been a challenge due to health concerns. I appreciate the topic as I have been struggling with my life being limited. Accepting it has been my struggle. That is difficulty.
Thank you. I have been a Christian since I was 8. Today, I am so glad I heard you. I needed to hear that Christ is in the midst of what's happening in my life.
Thank you for sharing. Opening up about your personal struggles is a vulnerable place to go. ❤
Cool vid
Love the question what is the kingdom of God. Thank you for sharing scripture too. The kingdom of heaven is within. Amen. Very good sermon. Thank you.
Thank you. I have found so much in your service. It has given me a new look at the savior after a lot of years. I share your broadcast with my sister as well.
A great reminder to continue healing and deliverance in its broadest sense, thank you
Really appreciate this series and have shared it .
Absolutely loved this and am sharing it with my life group in Cape Town. Well done and thank you Claire x
You should do audio books
Nice job
I don't care what Saul/Paul said about it. Jesus didn't say a thing about it. By the way, Saul/Paul went from persecuting Christians before his "conversion" to continuing to persecute Christians after it. Saul/Paul is just another human with an opinion (on too many things I think). His opinions are no more noble or Christian than mine.
The last argument of what Paul might think of a modern consensual same sex relationship is almost not able to be discerned. Paul and the Roman Empire as you said, had little to no examples of these relationships. They may have existed rarely but as you said. They would probably be frowned upon by even the male population committing pedastry and rape. Consensual sexual relationships were far less of a norm in that culture. So to be sure it can only be speculated what Paul might think of the modern. But the fact remains that same sex marriage is a newer concept and also consensual same sex relationships have always happened. I'm sure Paul would not be in favor of putting same sex attracted people to death. Nor victims of abuse. It's obvious that Paul gave a damn about people in general.
Hello - thanks for your thoughtful reply! Indeed, it's hard to discern what anyone thought of something they had rarely, if ever, encountered and would not be codified into law for 2,000 years after their life! Part of that discernment is what you're engaging with here - trying to work out what was in the writer's culture and what could have been their intention for writing. Romans is a complex text, well worth absorbing in full - and yet, we only have to get as far as chapter 2 to realise chapter 1 isn't a basis to condemn anyone. Thanks for considering this with us!
All this is TOTALLY different from gays and gay marriage today. Many gays today do NOT practice anal sex. They are called sides. After Paul had listed many sins in Romans 1, he says if you have committed any one of these sins then the whole point of his argument was was Rom 2:1 "You therefore have no excuse you who pass judgement on someone else...." I was a Baptist Pastor and overseas missionary and I am gay, medically proven during electronic shock therapy organized by a Dr who was President of the Baptist Church at that time. Happy to explain. I am not sexually active but I was told I was not welcome to even attend a Baptist Church, just because I am gay (and a side). I have now left the church. God creates some people gay and it is perfectly normal. God has also created some of over 1500 animal species gay. Did God make a HUGE mistake? Of course not.
Hi Ron - thanks for adding your experiences here, and for pointing out that what is listed understood by some as sin from their reading of the Bible may be very different from what was described in the Bible and from what they might be condemning today. It's awful to hear about what happened to you with that church. Hoping and praying for you to thrive in your connection with God and believers who can recognise and affirm what God has really been doing in your life. Keep in touch!
We have to be always growing in understanding of complex issues
Agreed! Thank you for doing this here with us - hope you find other helpful material too!
He may have had latent tendencies but did not like the idea of putting his penis in a fecal exit canal. Feces is disgusting to many people and even a latent homo might puke at the thought.
Remember Kindness 💜💙♥️
Thank you for your wisdom & understanding of scripture. This kind of knowledge comes to you by the Holy Spirt. Thank you for sharing it with us you’re an intelligent Man ✝️🏳️🌈✝️🌈✝️⭐️♥️🇺🇸
Thank you for your excellent explanation of old dispensation verbiage. As for today 2. Loving kind and caring respectful men who are committed to a compassionate consenting intimate union is OK with God God says in his word How Lovely it is when brothers Love each other ✝️🌈✝️🏳️🌈✝️⭐️✝️💜✝️👍✝️♥️
It is unlikely that Paul was ever privy to the intimate sexual exchanges between a man and a woman, much less between two men or two women. More likely is it that he was referring to public displays of sexuality he may have come upon in the fora and back-streets of the major cities he was wont of the visit, displays which may have offended his provincial Jewish sensibilities and which he, in his ignorance, interpreted as “men inflamed in their passions for one another”.
Really a wonderful sermon! I have struggled with Romans. Thank you for such a thought provoking part of scripture. I have found some dear people i know living by the rules.
Time,space, and Jesus wow beautiful
Romans 2 tells us not to judge and that we will be condemned for doing so which is the point of Romans 1. But Conservative Christians don't read that Chapter. They are focused on being the sin police for what they believe is sinful and no humility whatsoever that they could possibly be wrong.
Paul was a misogynists and liar, he never even met Jesus. Even James the brother of Jesus and Peter distanced themselves from him. Follow the true teachings of Jesus and not the words of the evil that is Paul, who was fooled by the devil. It was the devil who met him and not Jesus. The true Gospels were not put in the Bible and hidden by the church. The only true one is James and the churches lied about his relationship to Jesus and his other brothers and sisters. The truth will set you free.🇬🇧
In the past being gay would have had huge health problems and no medications. So live it up, for tomorrow you die.
As all gay people, I was born gay; it was not a choice, just as straight people do not choose to be straight. As such, homosexuality is not a sin. We are all children of god with a piece of god within us. Therefore, the sin is hating others, including gays.
This is too good! #NAME? *Promo sm*!
Thank you for this video. I think the great error in the ages about homosexuality is that it has been associated with sexual excess solely. Sexual orientation and the reality of it has never been discussed or mentioned. Deeply loving and monogamous long term relationships happen between two people of the same the sex all over the world all the time. These individuals are not attracted at all to the opposite sex. They are gay by birth. And yet, because of a warped interpretation of scripture, natural sexual orientation towards the same sex is seen as sexual depravity. As the video discusses, many heterosexual men (it happened in greco roman times and it still happens today) might have sex with another man who is sexually passive (or not sexually passive) for different reasons and that doesn't compromise his masculinity, but you see this case of homosexuality is different from someone who is truly gay. The case of the heterosexual man having sex with men is a case of sexual excess, in my eyes. Sexual excess can distract a person from their spiritual life whether they are gay or straight. Being gay is not a case of sexual excess. Sure, heterosexuals and gays all have the same human tendency to fall into lust but just having a sexual orientation by birth towards the same sex does not make a person sexually depraved . That is what needs to be understood by all Christians and the world at large!
It is certainly correct that our phenomenon of “homosexuality” did not exist in the ancient world, anywhere on the globe. That is the overwhelming consensus of scholars of the history of sexuality working across a whole array of disciplines. Nothing Paul or any ancient person or text said can legitimately be claimed to address or have in mind or apply to our “homosexuality” and LGBTs. All of it was uttered, written, and formulated without the slightest conception or awareness of phenomena such as ours. Indeed, the bulk of the transitional period from an ancient to a modern construction of sexuality would come only millennia later, roughly 1600 to 1800 CE, though the transition wouldn’t be complete in the modern industrialized world until well into the 20th century. During that transitional period, as in early attempts to look back across the divide, and during encounters between people from different parts of the world, great confusion reigned. People found it extraordinarily difficult to understand a different construction of sexuality, or even that they were encountering such. The early ethnographic literature is replete with tales of utter sexual incomprehension. Paul can no more address our phenomena than Anacreon or Plato can. And though, in unbridled fits of reader-response criticism, some modern readers can enjoy reading some Anacreon, the ancient Greek poet would have been as horrified by our “homosexuality” as modern LGBTs would be were they to conduct themselves by Anacreon’s assumed sexual code. However, the portrait you paint of ancient pederasty is a stilted, one-sided, cartoonish caricature that would make just about any classicist or historian of ancient sexuality laugh in your face. You really need to read some ancient pederastic poetry. Start with _Greek Anthology_ 12, the so-called “musa puerilis.” Then move on to the pederastic poetry of Anacreon, Bacchylides, Callimachus, Catullus (Iuventus poems), Horace ( _Carm._ 4.1 ), Ibycus, Theocritus (among the _Idylls_ ), Theognis, Tibullus (3.11), and Vergil ( _Ecl._ 2 ). You may also wish to stop getting your information from inexpert and never entirely accurate biblical scholars, none of whom are recognized experts on the history of sexuality. Read the expert secondary literature directly. You can start with the articles “homosexuality, male” and “homosexuality, female” in _The Oxford Classical Dictionary_ (online ed.), and the sources cited therein. You can then get a more global approach from the following: Aldrich, Robert, ed. _Gay Life and Culture: A World History._ New York: Universe Publishing, 2006. Edsall, Nicholas C. _Toward Stonewall: Homosexuality and Society in the Modern Western World._ Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2003.
Wasn’t Jesus gay? I know the priests at my church are.
Test Paul as a true apostle
Personally I would not worry too much about what Paul wrote. The source of his inspiration was mostly imaginary and then presented in the context of Bronze Age ignorance and prejudice. Are you concerned about what Muhammad said or Joseph Smith or countless others. Would you have been if you were bought up in a different family or culture. I admire your sincerity though. Good luck.
I think that it is difficult to see Romans 1 in the way in which you describe it. I'm not sure if there are early Christian teachers who commented on Paul's letter to the Romans, but it would be helpful to hear their interpretations of this chapter. I, for one, am a "red-letter" Christian, so I consider Paul's teaching to be nothing more than opinion and feel that his opinion of homosexuality is simply wrong. It was wrong then and it is wrong today.
Hi Dave - that's an interesting view, thanks! The formation of a New Testament canon is a topic you might like to explore, by the sounds of it, and much is written about how and why certain texts were included and many others were not. As far as I understand, this became an issue because of disagreements over ideas in circulation and was settled mostly on the basis of how close the writers were believed to have been to Jesus. Paul gets in because of what happened to him, as Luke wrote in Acts, receiving a change of heart and a God-given spiritual leadership role, which would then have been tested in the practice of church planting. I'm wondering what you think of Acts in general, then, as there's not much to put in "red letters" straight from Jesus, but it's essential for any of us who aren't Jewish - otherwise, we'd never be accepted as Spirit-filled by Messianic Jews! I believe that the early Christians found Acts and the letters extremely useful, but I'm also struck by how radically the Spirit was changing believers' minds about things they had thought were permanently settled. What do you think?
@@BernLeckie Thanks for the reply. I don't completely disregard all that is in the books outside the gospels but I only consider them to have authority if they are in line with Jesus teaching and ministry. You might say I would treat them as many protestants treat the books in the Catholic Bible that are missing from most protestant Bibles.
Is he justifying homosexuality?
Great question - I think it needs some careful unpacking (so apologies if this seems a bit long...) First, what do we mean by "homosexuality"? One of the points Owen makes in the video is that what would have come to the mind of a first century person would be different from what comes to mind to us today. Paul was not justifying any of the behaviours he listed in the second half of Romans 1, but what he was drawing readers/listeners in to condemn was a sense of "them", other people who ought to be condemned, but he surprises the reader/listener by including everyone (including them, and us!) in his rhetoric. So in Romans 2, Paul makes the point that, as we should all stand condemned, none of us should condemn each other, even where we see sin. There is then a big journey Paul takes people through, leading to Jesus and, on the other side of receiving grace from him, the need for having our minds changed, getting to know God's will and living with believers who have different views on important issues of conscience. Sin is still very much a thing, not to be taken lightly! But what constitutes sin for different people remains a question, at least in some cases. Christians argued then about whether breaking the law on eating food offered to (false) idols was sin - Paul directed people to be Jesus-centred, loving and sensitive to each other. Christians argue now about whether there might be agape, self-giving love which we know comes from God (1 John 4) expressed in same-sex relationships, and I think that's an issue we need to treat in a similar way to the divisive issues of Paul's time. What do you think, though?
Homosexuality IS condemned by GOD in the bible in both the new and old testament scriptures multiple times. God created marriage to be one man with one woman. Sodom and Gomorrah come to mind. We are pretty much there now.
It's a trait over which one has no control and of itself harms no one. This was only discovered 150 years ago. Neither OT nor NT even mention it let alone condem it. God creating marriage for a man and a woman obviously did not stop him also creating it for two gay men and for two les women as we plainly observe.
To get the truth, see videos and writings of scholar, Dr. Robert A. J. Gagnon, who is the leading expert on the Bible and homosexulity. All of the attempts you find on the internet to downplay Paul's condematio of homosexuality in general are not true and twisting of the words for particular agendas.
I’m sure that’s why we are so close to a nook ww3 with Russia and China, to cleanse the world just as sodom and Gomorrah were cleansed and the people that condoned that lifestyle like the author of this video
It wasn’t just Paul’s writings and let us not forget about sodom and Gomorrah! Leviticus 18:22 - Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable. Leviticus 20:13 - If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. Romans 1:24-27 - Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator - who is forever praised. Amen. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error. I Corinthians 6:9 - Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men. 1 Timothy 1:10 - For the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers - and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine
Plus what Jesus said in Matthew's gospel chapter 18
The bible is only 3000 years old, humans like us (homo sapiens) exist for 300,000 years. In none of the millions of artefacts, cave paintings, scriptures or any other testimony in the 297,000 years before the bible, a "homosexuality hating, one and only God YHWH” or "Adam and Eve" was ever mentioned. Any archaeological testimony of that version of a god is out of the short "biblical time" when people already invented that story and believed in it. This version of a "homosexuality hating, one and only God YHWH" is an invention only 4000-3000 years old.
Why would God of righteousness and good condone homosexuality? I believe God will destroy civilization for three things..GREED..SELF-LOVE..AND . PERVERSION....as he did SODOM AND GOMORRAH ...
Hi Marian - thanks for your comment and for asking your question! I respect that you may have been writing rhetorically, and I believe you've made your point clearly. But if you're at all wondering why people like me who love God, follow Jesus and are grateful for him dealing with sin in my life would be open to God condoning something which, for me, would be sin, then I can share a personal view. I believe that God has made us all differently. We have much in common, but also much to grow to understand about each other and what God has done in us. I have grown, I believe in Christ, to marvel at expressions of self-giving, agape love in many unexpected places, and I thank God for this as I believe John was right when he wrote, "Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God." (1 John 4:7) This means that God can surprise and amaze us with love. It also means that, when Christians disagree about something, I expect that the self-giving, humble and loving voices are more likely to be correct than the angry, fearful ones. As John also writes, "There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love." (1 John 4:18) So to get back to your question directly, I believe that the God of righteousness and good condones, supplies and entirely hopes for our faithful expressions of agape, self-giving love, authentic to each person in the way they were made. The term "homosexuality" may, in your mind, as it probably did for the first readers of Romans 1, stand for other things, but I hope that our faith in Christ means that we need not fear them or anything else. Does that help?
The deeper facts have nothing to do with male or female, no jew or gentile ect.........flesh and blood one mind does all good and evil by ONE power the boss of all imagination's that was before creation is the oldest facts called God in all life.
listening to your definition and interpretation of Scripture is definitely not what Paul wrote under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. You quote extrabiblical sources and forces it into Scripture to fit your doctrine. Jehovah (Exodus 6:3 KJV) instituted marriage between one man and one woman till death do them part (Genesis 1:27; 2:24; Romans 7:2-3; 1 Corinthians 7:39; Matthew 19:6; Mark 10:9; etc. KJV). You must understand that even the Jews (Israel) transgressed their LAW and continually gone a whoring after the gods of Babylon Egypt etc. and do the same abominable acts as they did. This is the reason GOD destroyed the world with the deluge because of the abominations for homosexuality, lesbianism, paedophilia, spectrophilia, bestiality, fornication, adultery, idolatry, etc. was abounding (Genesis 6-9 KJV). As for Sodom and Gomorrah was another example of the wrath of on homosexuals who even went as far as to want to rape the men which was angels who lodged in Lot’s house… (Genesis 18-19 KJV). In Scripture it is not just the obvious that is an abomination in the sight of GOD as the lgbtq2z narrative but also fornication and adultery is sin which will lead the practitioner to hell. Note the warning of Paul in 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 King James Version 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. You cannot claim :11 if you are still practicing or in agreement or be entertained by those who practice :9-10. The warning in Romans 1-2 KJV for GOD will hand you over to a reprobate mind… Heed the warning to the church in Revelation 2-3; 20:10-15; 21:7-8; etc. KJV. Since the ascension of the LORD Jesus Christ grievous wolfs entered into the ecclesia not sparing the flock but devour them with traditions and doctrines of man and devils. Look what the lgbtq2z did they perverted the rainbow and used it to their own destruction for this world is set for the destruction by fire... (2 Peter 3:7-13; Revelation 19:11-21:5 KJV) … Thus, if you are practicing any of these abominable acts or are entertained by it or are in agreement with those who do it you are in agreement with their folly and will be under the same condemnation according to the Scriptures. You cannot reason it away or change the Scriptures to suit your doctrine for the Word of GOD is set forever in Heaven and man cannot change it. Man tried it for millennia now and did not succeed; we see today more than 38.000 non and denominational religious institutional organisations who congregates in one or more of the 46+ million theatres aka ‘churches’ reading from one or more of the 900+modern bibles which is not the word of GOD but perversions and is constantly revised to conform to the apostate church! GOD is not the GOD of confusion and His word is not of private interpretation… Paul was not confused in what he wrote in Romans 1:24-32 King James Version 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. Paul was referring to gays and lesbians but even more than that… You need to repent of your twisting of the Scriptures to force them into your doctrine for you will stand before the Holy and Righteous LORD and Savior Jesus Christ who will be the JUDGE of the world giving account and since you call yourself a teacher know this your judgment will trickster James 3:1 King James Version 1 My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation. Matthew 12:31-37 King James Version 31 Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. 32 And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. 33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit. 34 O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. 35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. 36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. 37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.