วีดีโอ

Thanks for your observations. Just be respectful and kind every where we go, we'll be fine. However, please respect our cultures. No half nudity and provocative behaviour in public.

Hope that you have had a good time and a pleasant stay as a digital nomad in KL.

massive privacy concerns though

Great video, keep up the good work 😊

Go away and do not come again then.. Nobody is forcing you to travel here.. If I don't like somewhere, I won't go to that place again, simple solution..

part3 The 25-year Ottoman-Venetian war, which resulted in the conquest of Crete, will also end the comparison of Romans-Turks developed by Renaissance thinkers and spread by Sansovino. Venetian sledgehammers, who came to Istanbul after the peace signed in 1669, will persistently embroider the motif of "Eastern despotism" and this theme will quickly spread across Europe. The reasons for this change of view are complex: On the one hand, the development of the concept of freedom in Europe with the Enlightenment, and on the other hand, the distance between the Ottoman Empire and the deterioration of the order gradually widened. However, at the same time, to the extent that the Ottoman state, which fascinated Renaissance intellectuals with its power, lost its power, the admiration of the West turned into disdain and even hatred. As a result, Renaissance intellectuals trying to get rid of religious schemes did not only look at Turks in terms of Christianity and Islam. Going back to our example, "The Life of Muhammad", which forms the introduction to the first edition of Sansovino's Historia Universale, is omitted in the third edition, after being re-added in the fourth edition, it disappears in the next editions. Thus, instead of marginalizing the Turks within the framework of an insurmountable opposition, the way of examining them by introducing them into the historical and ideological patterns of the West was preferred. Therefore, the Roman model, which represents absolutism together with military and administrative power, was easily adapted to the Ottoman state. Geopolitics also played an important role in this, because the Ottoman was the product of the same geography, especially the East Roman Empire. However, by doing this, the West reaches the point of renouncing the Roman heritage, which it regards as the origin of its culture and history, especially in the Renaissance period, and risks losing this legacy to the most important adversary of the period, the Turks. In the Enlightenment period, starting from the second half of the 17th century, when the state and power model based on military and purely political power, whose most important representative was Machiavelli, gradually began to give place to the concepts of freedom and human rights, the concept expressing the Ottoman order was admired. He left the Roman "as a force, to the Eastern despotism, which would be presented as a counter-model by thinkers like Montesquieu." As can be seen, what has happened since that day is not that the "West" "recognizes" Turks or "fails to recognize them", but its interpretation according to the models it has produced. As for the Turks, before their time of Westernization, they could have remained unaware or at least indifferent to these debates and comments. However, since the process of Westernization starting from Tanzimat until today expresses the integration with the Western way of thinking in the final analysis, it also brings the necessity of adapting to the way the West perceives Turks. Prof. Dr. Stefanos Yerasimos Social History Journal, Issue 118, October 2003 Notes: 1 “Chronica per extensum descripta”, published by E. Pastorello Rerum italicarum scriptores, Bologna, 1932, c. XII. 2 Andanças e viajes de Pero Tafur por diversas partes del mundo avidos, Madrid, 1874, p. 168. 3 History of Mehmed the Conqueror by Kritovoulos, trans. Charles T. Riggs, Princeton, 1934, p. 181-182. 4 The manuscript was purchased by the French ambassador Girardin in 1687 and is today in the French National Library; see. Julian Raby, "Mehmed the Conqueror's Greek Scriptorium", Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 37/1983, p. 20-21. 5 La Cronica dell'anno 1400 all'anno 1500, Florence, 1984, p. 127-128. 6 Discorsi sulla prima Deca di Tito Livio, first edition 1531. The quote is from the French edition (La Pl’iade, 1974, p. 511). 7 Eugenio Alberi, Le relazioni degli ambasciatori veneti al Senate durante il secolo decimosesto, III. serial, Florence, 1840, c. 1 second from Facebook group Etruscans And Their Turkish Origin And Real History - Etrüskler

par2 In the introduction to the first edition of Historia Universale, published in three fascicles between 1560-1561, Sansovino describes the purpose of the book as follows: Among the states of the world for which we have enough knowledge, I always thought that the Turkish ruler deserves the most respect for his state, because of the great obedience of his people and the happy fortune of the entire Turkish nation. It is astonishing to see in what form and how easily it grew and gained such fame and fame in such a short period of time. If we investigate their origins and carefully examine their internal and external affairs, we can say that indeed the military discipline, obedience, and fortune of the Romans passed to this race after the collapse of this state. The word fortuna, which we have translated as "fortune" here and mentioned twice, actually corresponds to the old and noble meaning of the word "state", which is used only in terms such as "state bird" in Turkish today, and is equivalent to the concepts of "welfare", "happiness" and "blessing". Used twice with Fortuna, obbedienza, or obedience, gives the two keys to the success of the Turks, as well as the axis of similarity and continuity between the Roman and Turkish empires. However, the "state", which is a divine blessing, was achieved through the obedience of the Turks to their chiefs and the military discipline used as an equivalent. In his introduction to Annali Turcheschi, which was first published in 1571 and contains a chronological breakdown of Turkish history as an appendix to the Historia Universale, Sansovino further clarifies this issue: I have always argued that the greatness and strength of the Turkish nation deserves great respect, because when looking at the army and civilian orders that have existed for a long time, it seems that they are not rude in their situation, but precious people. In terms of the army, I cannot see who of ours could be more disciplined than the Turks and closer to the Roman order. As the inheritors of the aforementioned Romans, they settle for little during the expedition, are very patient in hard work, obey their chiefs, follow the goals of conquest stubbornly, are masters of war tricks, and as a result carry out military affairs with such steadfastness that they do not give up any difficulty to win and dominate. As for the things of the peace order, they please their people with this form of absolute justice, by breaking all the tricks of the case that arise from the confused minds of the quarrelsome people and by quickly resolving the conflicts of others in their own interests. Therefore, a few years ago, I gathered what they had done in a fairly accurate book called The Universal History of the Origin and Empire of the Turks. My goal is for the world to learn the basis of their power by seeing and reading them, and therefore to find a cure to their unbridled chaos that advances like a steppe fire and will henceforth bring calamities to us and burn the last remnants of Christianity. At the same time, in this text published in the third year of a new Ottoman-Venetian war, the year of the Battle of Inebahti, Sansovino could not be expected to be a "Turkish friend"; And what could "Turkish friendship" mean in 16th century Venice? Sansovino is a Renaissance intellectual who believes only in the necessity of a good and correct recognition of his adversary, but when this effort for recognition reaches a level of admiration, this admiration was expressed openly even during the days when two nations fought on a frontier from the Dalmatian coast to Cyprus. is not an obstacle. Likewise, the Venetian sledgehammer Marcantonio Barbaro, who would spend most of his time as an ambassador in Istanbul, was sent to the senate upon his return to his hometown after the Ottoman-Venetian peace in 1573, which left Cyprus and a significant part of the Dalmatian coast to the Turks. He concludes in his report: Great prince and unique seers, since by God's will, the Ottoman emperor conquered so many provinces through constant victories, bound so many kingdoms to himself, and thus earned him a dreadful reputation all over the world, it would not be foolish to consider the possibility of his eventually reaching the universal kingdom. . The second edition of Historia Universale is published in 1564 and the third edition in 1568. Now it has become a classic about Turks and its effects are beginning to be seen. The French philosopher Jean Bodin, who published his The Method of History in 1566, handles the same theme: How can the ruler of Germany attempt to compete with the sultan of the Turks, and who can claim more absolute royal titles than this last? ... Indeed, if there is a power somewhere that can bear the name empire or a true absolute kingdom, that power is in the hands of the sultan ... It is best to consider the sultan of the Turks as the heir to the Roman Empire; Because, after capturing Byzantium, the capital of the empire, from the Christians, he conquered the Babylon region from the Persians and added the countries beyond the Danube to the Dniester river to the former provinces of Rome, and all these regions today constitute the largest part of the lands in his possession. The aim of the French writer, whose hometown is far from the Turkish danger and whose main enemy is the German emperor, is more political. The main benefit of declaring the Ottoman sultan as the heir of Rome, who had been the ally of France against Germany for thirty years, was to withhold that title, which was the basis of his power, from the German emperor. However, this behavior of the author is proof that the Ottoman state has been a part of European policy ever since. Taking advantage of the Ottoman-Venetian peace in 1573, Sansovino Historia Universale published the fourth edition and the second edition of Annali Turcheschi. The seventh and final edition is published more than half a century later in 1654, in the midst of a new and long Ottoman-Venetian war. Its volume is divided into two, as it can no longer fit in a single volume. The first volume consists of 471 pages, the second consists of 522 pages, and this is added Annali Turcheschi, or Ottoman history, brought to the end of the reign of Sultan Ibrahim (1648).

Renaissance LIGHTS 'PERSPECTIVE TO TURKS/TROJANS! (Transformations/Resets) Prof. Dr. Stefanos Yerasimos "The Origin of the Turks and Troy" During the Renaissance - or roughly from the invention of the printing house until 1600 - thousands of books and brochures on Turks were published in major European languages. Although the reason for this is that the Turks are perceived as a threat by the Europeans, the aim was not only to denigrate them or to search for ways to eliminate them, but to evaluate and understand the Turks beyond these initial reactions, and thus to accustom themselves to this dangerous neighborhood. In addition to a large literature that tried to exclude "barbarism" and "infidelity", an important and distinguished section of the Renaissance intellectuals tried to tame the Turks by drawing them into their own mental universe and by examining them with the historical and ideological perceptions of the West. European historians, who encountered the Turks during the Crusades and knew that they were of Central Asian origin, will seek a new origin for them in the 14th century. The Venetian doge and historian Andrea Dandolo, who died in 1354, when the Ottomans crossed into Europe, writes: The homeland of the Turks is behind the Caucasus mountains, its roots go back to Turkos, the son of Troilos, the son of Priam, the king of Trojans. After the conquest of the city, Turkos took refuge in these regions with most of his followers.1 From now on, Renaissance scholars will register the Trojan origins of the Turks. The Turks were not only "one of us" by being tied to the Greek mythology, which is the origin of Western historical fiction, but also those who would take Constantinople, the last remnant of the Roman Empire, were related to the founder of Rome, Aeneas. Thus, the empire did not disappear, but remained within the same family. Since the Middle Ages and starting with the kings of France, many European dynasties have sought to attach themselves to the heroes of the Trojan war, thus competing in the West with the German princes at the head of the Holy Roman-German Empire, regarded as the continuation of the Roman Empire; however, it is not the Turks who associate their Trojan origin here, but the Europeans themselves. The situation is actually even more complicated because Troy was famous for the war between the Greeks and the Trojans. In this war, the Trojans were defeated, but a group of survivors formed Rome with Aeneas, and Rome expanded over time, defeating the Greeks and avenging Troy. However, after the Roman Empire lost to the east and made Constantinople its capital, it became Greek, and the power passed to the Greeks again. This time, another Trojan group, the Turks, who took shelter in the depths of Asia, will return and take their second revenge. Before the conquest of Istanbul, we see that this interpretation was settled among the last Byzantines. Catalan Pero Tafur, who came to the city at the end of 1437, notes a saying that everyone speaks here: "The Turks will avenge Troy." The Trojan-Greek war also constitutes the first core of the struggle between East and West, Asia and Europe. The return of the Trojan-Turks heralds the victory of the Asians. According to Fatih's historian Kritovulos, such an interpretation was also adopted by the sultan. II, who went to besiege Lesbos in 1462. Mehmed stopped in Troy and searched the graves of the heroes mentioned in Homer and said: God has given me the revenge of this city and its inhabitants, even after many years. Thanks to me, the children of the Greeks, Macedonians, Thessalians, and Moraeans who destroyed this city in the past have received the punishment they deserve for the injustices they often inflicted against us Asians at that time and after that, after many years. It is natural that this rumor, which has been circulating between Venice and Istanbul for two centuries, has come to the ears of Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror and adopted by him. He has known this culture since his youth and wanted to be one of its heroes. During his visit to Troy, he had a Greek copy of the Iliad built for his library, 4 the following year, the Florentine Benedetto Dei, who met him in Istanbul, said, "also Alexander and Xerxes, Carthaginian Hannibal and African Scipion, Pyrhus and he told me that he wanted to be in the power of the thousands of past rulers. Thus, the emergence of the Turks and their conquest of Anatolia and Ancient Greek lands was interpreted by the Renaissance Europe as the return of the Trojans. However, the advance of the Ottoman state into Europe and west of the Mediterranean left the Trojan analogy inadequate. This new branch of the Trojans was not content with taking revenge on the Greeks, but on the way to become the continuation of Rome by establishing a new empire like their older brothers, the Romans. The Italian thinker Niccol Machiavelli, who wrote commentary on the work of the Roman historian Titus Livius between 1513 and 1519, says: Despite the absence of an empire that would fully retain Roman possessions, at least it was among the nations that lived in the beautiful virtue of these lands. it was seen that these lands were shared among the nations that lived in a beautiful virtue. The empires established by the Franks, Turks, the Egyptian sultan and the peoples of Germany today are among them. At the time of these lines, indeed, the Turks are only one of the candidates who could be the heirs of the Roman Empire. But in the meantime, they would eliminate one of Machiavelli's other candidates, the Mamelukes in Egypt, and they would have eroded the doors of Vienna in 1531, when the author's notes were published. The word "virtue" in Machiavelli's quote above is equivalent to the concept of "asabiyyet" developed in Ibn Khaldun's Muqaddimah, and the ability of one community to seize power and rule other communities and to establish a state or an empire. It expresses its ability. Thus, as long as Turkish pressure increased in Europe, alongside an anti-Turkish, propaganda-oriented literature aimed at large masses, it was the possibility and ability of the Turks to reunite the lands once dominated by the Roman Empire, which were of interest and almost enchanted the elite. This trend of thought will reach its peak with Francesco Sansovino. His father, the famous architect Jacopo Sansovino, came to Venice to build the San Marco library and his son settled in this city. Francesco earned his living as a writer and editor, compiled and published hundreds of volumes. Among them, he has seven books on Turks, the most important of which was published in 1560. The year 1560 is a turning point in terms of the progress of the Turks in the Mediterranean: That year, the Spanish navy was defeated in the Battle of Djerba and the West Mediterranean road was opened for the Turks. Sansovino thinks to compile and publish articles on the Turks; for such a corpus has not been produced, at least in Italy, until then. There is nothing directly related to the Turks in the collection of travels published by Giovanni Ramusio of Venice in three large volumes in the 1550s. Since the Turks, who are close neighbors, are not considered part of the travel literature aimed at promoting the newly discovered countries, it is up to Sansovino to fill this gap in the field of publication. The aim of the writer-publisher is to respond to the expectations of his current readers and to synthesize what is known and thought about Turks. Ramusio's synthesis for distant countries before that falls into the type of geography in which travel literature forms a part. There are places to go, see and buy here. The countries held by the Turks are part of a common past, and the knowledge about Turks is concerned about a common future. For this reason, "Turkish knowledge" goes into history, not geography, and Sansovino will compile a history book. The title of the book is "On the Universal History of the Origin and Empire of the Turks" (Dell'Historia Universale dell'Origine et Imperio de 'Turchi). It is necessary to dwell on this name. As we mentioned above, Sansovino offers a history book; however, this is a "universal history" and yet it is not a general universal history, but a universal history of the Turks. More precisely, it is declared that the universal history belongs to the Turks. The word imperio also refers to this; because the word we translate as "empire" actually means "absolute power" and hence imperium is one and cannot be shared. As the Eastern Roman, that is, Byzantine emperors, Charlemagne and his successor Holy Roman-Germanic rulers did not want to recognize the imperial qualities, the Ottoman sultans also continued this tradition and especially in the years when the Historia Universale was written, Suleiman the Magnificent, Charles Quint did not become the German emperor. he insisted on recognizing it only as the king of Spain. Starting from the third edition of the work, the word "della", which we translated as "subject", which makes the statement relative, will be removed from the title and the subject will be determined as "the universal history of the Turks" in a way that will not raise any doubts from now on. part1

Turkiye is beautiful with a rich history and wonderful cities. The bad thing is the amount of murders and harassment towards: Women, Children and animals. Hopefully this huge problem will be solved.

You are right. Turkiye should not be for you because it is for only and only for the Turks. All Arabs, Afgans, Iraquies, Rusians, ... get out of our land. You can visit as a tourist but not stay here. Wait for us to rule the country. We will create heaven on earth.

Bro, just curious, how did you and Katya meet? Watched your video re: social anxiety, you came a long way brother 😄

Turkey isn't as affordable as it used to be, but it's not an issue for you at all. During my trip to Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands, I had a very disappointing experience with food-sometimes I even went hungry, and yet each average meal cost around 10 euros. Even simple items like soda, chocolate, and snacks in the markets were about twice as expensive as in Turkey. Here, you get amazing meals, possibly from the world's best cuisine, for just about 8 euros. It's an unforgettable travel destination for tourists. And I'm not even talking about the beautiful coastlines in Antalya, Muğla, or Izmir!

Hi Fernando, I hope your TH-cam channel will be a great success. As a Turkish person, I’m very sorry to hear about the negative experiences you’ve had in Turkey/Türkiye (I don’t mind whichever name you use). Turkey is a beautiful country, but given the economic and cultural challenges it’s facing, it’s no longer a place I desire to live. That’s why I moved to the UK, leaving behind loved ones and familiar places that I love. I can relate to what you shared about the country. I truly wish the best for Turkey and the Turkish people-they deserve a better future in their homeland.

I went to türkiye for the first time this year 2 weeks ago. Visited Kapadokya, antalya, and istanbul, and things were expensive but i enjoyed my stay. The Taxi drivers always try tp get more money from me but never succed 😂. I know a little turkish (conversational) so it was a little easier for me

In many ways, I agree with you because as a Turkish citizen, we are even fed up with Middle Eastern immigrants, and this Islamist government right now in the office in Turkey. But as soon as we will get rid of them, we will send immigrants back and Turkey will be back on track.

brow i have more then 1377 ,i subcritioned. is too much, cant follow, but i will Sucript you,,Mr good luck. Love you 4 you love Turkiye.

get out from Turkey 🖕🖕🖕🖕👊

Your content is very underrated. More and more people need to watch this video. The quality, vibe and everything is just a top-notch

evet haklısın ENFLASYON KÜLTÜRÜMÜZÜ BOZDU BİZİ 22 SENEDİR İDARE EDEN DİNCİ MUHAFAZAKAR HÜKÜMET BİZİ MAHVETTİ.HERKES BİR BİRİNİ ÇALAR. SAYGILARLA

its Turkiye and not...😢

arc

I only fly American & Southwest. And 1 1 way ticket on allegiant.

Perplexity suggested your video

Great intro

Its definitely being processed in the cloud. But that doesnt mean its a privacy concern. I have a Windows version of this service and it does not retain any of the data, but it is processed in the cloud to stay lightweight and powerful

I like your thorough and unbiased (or transparently biased) review and attention to detail. Potential for improvement: I felt that the video was kinda "finished" around 11 minutes but it wasn't. So you could improve the structure a bit in terms of labelling the different sections so that the viewer knows what more is coming up.

I just check my suitcase and haven’t had any problems in 30 years

You're from Peru dude, your not western, the average westerner is faaar more delusional and doesn't give a shit about the world affairs!

Wokeism is being rejected. Cancel Culture is going away. It was always a fad and easy to jump on the band wagon. I've been to Russia. Moscow and St. Petersburg are "Potemkin Villages" compared to the real Russia.

"I was really stupid and believed that because the russian regime is authoritarian and aggressive, all russians must be evil. I also believe that everyone else sees the world in such a ridiculous black and white way. Now I have seen that not all Russians are evil, so I will post pro-russian propaganda on youtube in the middle of a war time situation." If you ever look back on this video, in the years to come, I hope you will have grown enough to see how horrifyingly limited your world view was back on the 24th of August 2024.

"this country is Russia and for the last 6 years it's meant so much to me" . literally after 2 min and 25 sec on the video " so in a winter night in december 2019" .... a video from the future guys!!!! 0consistency .no arguments

Thank you for your video. The subject matter is stimulating. Russia a democracy? I have been struggling with this question for a long time. I'm not going to expand here on Russia's invasion of Ukraine. I'm focused on the question of democracy. First, many westerners don't have a clue how their own democracy works never mind the Russian. Russia's constitution and governmental structure is based on the French political system with some variations. There are many political parties and the largest 5 are actually in their parliament. By law any Russian can join a political party of their choosing. There is even a constitutional stipulation under which the President can be forced to resign. Russia is not like UK or Canada or the USA but Russia is still a structural democracy. So get involved in the matters of your country if you want to make changes. This also applies to the westerns that are complaining about their home governments. Before any snarky comments, please read, if nothing else at least the Wikipedia page on the subject of Russian government.

Freedom and democracy is something you don’t have in Russia, but the people have rallied behind the person that crushed it.

This video can be summarised as type of Russian propaganda where you are about to be convinced that “the West” is as bad as Russia is, and that besides the bad things Russian culture is great. Well the thing is - first of all you can’t separate the culture from the rest of the country because it’s just a whole package and this is true for every country. Secondly, if you see someone in video like this saying “I am not supporting Russian government” then you are warned that this person is aware that they are in reality apologetic towards Russia. It’s exactly the same as people who say “I don’t want to interfere, but (…)” right before starting to interfere. It’s a social engineering operation where you want to blur the lines around your own actions

God damn tool.

"You dont know what you dont know". Exactly right, Mr Fernando. You dont know what you dont know. Why the heck are you puttin this on YT?

I'm French and I worked in Russia before the war, 17 years ago and I remember that the context of work was very different from the rest of Europe. The working pace was very slow, I would say lazy. Conversation were frequently about vodka. The general ambience was defeatist. Maybe it was a continuation of the sovietic era. By comparison, (because they were living under the sovietic system) in Poland, the working ambience was very difference with a feeling of hope and with strong energy to catch up the standards of living of Western Europe. To conclude, I would say that the Russian future is now the misery.

Russia has a past of war and conquest and cruelty. Remember Holodomor and the countless people murdered by the Soviet regime not to mention the daily attacks on civilian residences in Ukraine and that is one thing you need to know above all. I am sure many Russian people are wonderful, but they have been deceived by decades of the most odious propaganda. Their government is one of the most corrupt in the planet's history, stealing trillions of dollars from their own people to build palaces and yachts for their president and oligarchs. Anything you heard there to justify the invasion of their peaceful neighbor is pure BS. Gorbachev gave them the opportunity to become part of the rest of the world, but their leaders squandered that opportunity and turned the country into a terrorist pariah state. And it's citizens are mostly oblivious. By the leader's design.

Bs

Assuming you are a Russian citizen, you may be force to fight in Ukraine but that can always be avoided by promoting propaganda videos.

Some time ago a Canadian couple who moved to Russia had to publicly apologize because they dared to say that they didn't like something in this free country. Well, there are always other countries... I heard that North Korea is beautiful this time of year...

Morals can be bought, poor morals can be bought with rubles! Don't waste your time with this propaganda piece.

In the west woke culture cancels free speech🥱 BULLSHIT, you just move to the next newsoulet, where your views fit in better. In Russia, if what you say is not approved by the leaders, you have no way to express yourself, and you can even be jailed for it. (But woke is bad, and state censorship is good; George Orwell would be proud of you!)

Go say anything negative about ukraine war. Lets see how long its allowed😂

Great video, it's clear now i understand the difference between all of them, thanks Fernando Anselmi!

Slava Ukraine, from Việt Nam 🇻🇳♥️🇺🇦 I grew up with enough nonsense propaganda to now be immune to russian nonsense that tries to hide what their country is doing in Ukraine.

Stupid Propaganda clip.

Russian talking points basically. West 'woke', therefore Russia isn't a terrorist state fthat's invading, murdering, raping, and trying to basically wipe independent Ukraine off the map. I'm not into the woke thing and I think far-left talking points are ridiculous, but then so too is this guy's interpretation that Russians just love history and are actually the real vicitims.

Thanks for the video. I have figured out we have been lied to for a long time👍🏻

The"bubble"is the Russian people looking the other way from the War crimes, Atrocities and Genocide they have inflicted on the Ukrainian people during 2.5 years.All Russia's neighbours are fully aware what they're capable of. They can keep their"Culture".