วีดีโอ

Which form of EDS do you have? I have hypermobile type (hEDS), which is considered the least severe of the thirteen types. If you have Classic, Classic-like, Vascular, etc., then your symptoms will be much worse than mine. Also, not every presentation of the genes is the same. I've said multiple times in my videos that I have a mild presentation that went undiagnosed until I was in my fifties. My child, on the other hand, has a stronger presentation, and it was because of their symptoms that doctors looked at my medical history and my body and determined that I have hEDS. They are a wheelchair user and have much more pronounced presentation than mine. As for my diagnosis being real, I was diagnosed at one of the few Ehlers-Danlos Society-accredited clinics in the United States. If you think their diagnosis was wrong, you can take it up with them. I think you should be careful about gatekeeping who does or does not have EDS based on a single TH-cam video. I hope you are able to find some relief from your symptoms.

You like to make things up and pretend you've made a point, don't you? (That's called a strawman fallacy.) I don't think you even watched the video. I literally said that you shouldn't pretend to find a trans person attractive if you don't. It's one of the first things I said. Nothing I said would violate anyone's consent. As for your incel comment, that kind of comment exposes the weakness of the commenter, as does the strawman fallacy.

This video is about dating, not procreation. Love and connection with another human being. In light of that, your argument is essentially that anyone who is unable to procreate is unworthy of love, regardless of sex or gender. That would include cisgender women who are older, have hormonal problems, were exposed to certain toxins or drugs, have a disorder like cervical mucus issues, Endometriosis, damage to the fallopian tubes, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, autoimmune disorders, connective tissue disorders, blood clotting disorders, uterine defects, blockage of the cervix, uterine fibroids, diabetes, or Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Ultimately, your argument becomes not only anti-trans but misogynistic because it reduces women to nothing but a biological function. I don't know if you meant to make this argument, but saying that only people "who can contribute genetically" are worthy of affection is deeply problematic.

@@addisonsagenda "In light of that, your argument is essentially that anyone who is unable to procreate is unworthy of love, regardless of sex or gender." Interesting statement from someone calling another commentator here out for making use of strawmans. In general, it is very bizarre what you have read out of the comment above that is not even in it. You're definitely not building bridges and contributing to the acceptance of trans people in dating when you react this way to people who have a different perspective than you. You probably don't care either.

@addisonsagenda I'm not I'm just saying trans woman don't produce lubrication liquid that biological woman have Biological man produce sparm Every romantic relationship at some point have sex A vagina who is man maid can't lube it self or you have to use the anus to have sex They are people like me who don't like anal sex Anyway is gay to have sex with trans woman anyway

@@addisonsagenda Your comment shows how you are ignorant 1) george03991 never claimed that people who are unable to procreate, are unworthy of love. 2) Dating can also include procreation, there are some people who wan't to date a women they to have children with them I mean if wanted to date somebody I would like to have children with them or else I don't wan't to date them. 3) no one reduces women on their biological functions again another misrepresentation of the actual argument and strawman, what he's saying is that some People want have a woman/man who can procreate, I mean by your logic wanting a woman or a man who can procreate means that almost all Humans who want children only reduce their partners to their biological functions which again is wrong since procreation is not THE one and only reason to date a person. 4) don't wanting a transwomen dosen't mean you're transphobic as long as you accept them, respect them and don't hate them, then you are not transphobic please be more honest and not dishonest. feel free to debate me on this topic whenever you like to a little side not here: I respect transwomen I see them as a women and I don't hate them but I mySELF wouldn't date them because I want children and someone who's cisgender but again that's only me so don't call me transphobic

I'll assume that you're going by the title and haven't watched the video.

*She still has *her dick 😅

Wow. It's the anti-trans bigot's hit parade of ignorance. Try getting your info from recent research instead of podcast hosts. I'll be launching a new show soon in which I'll address the inanity of much of what you said. I'll be sure to tag you.

Thank you for watching.