วีดีโอ

Ours is a paper bin sized device that inputs deuterium and outputs helium and electric current. Originally made at the Rutherford lab in 1969 . It cost just over $1000. I suggest we use it. The tokomaks are expensive failures. Christopher strevens

"Ivy Mike was the codename given to the first full-scale test of a thermonuclear device, in which part of the explosive yield comes from nuclear fusion.Ivy Mike was detonated on November 1, 1952, by the United States on the island of Elugelab in Enewetak Atoll." So all we need now is a fully controlled fusion reaction, (just like nuclear fission,) one that will generate almost limitless amounts of almost free energy; after all how hard can it be ? 1962 We're not quite there yet but any day now. 1972 Still a few, "technical," difficulties but we've cracked it in principle. 1982 With the better application of new cutting edge state of the art technology and systems it's almost within reach. 1992 With only few more billion dollars of investment we're now absolutely certain that we can get a result. 2002 OK Maybe the last estimates were a bit over optimistic, but with a mere few billion dollars more it's finally become feasible. 2002 Nearly there. 2012 Any moment now. 2022 Still nothing to see yet, move along please.

you too stupid for this and why do you need it? first you have to develop "AI" to at least level 7, so far you haven't even developed the first one

Fusion News! Not sure if i like the reverb here ngl but else only 46 mio?! like can we not open the floodgates already? about time ngl ;D sadly there is war

Do I really need to point out the MASSIVE glaring show-stopping fault in Xcimer's plan to "only fire at a single [fusion] pellet every few seconds"?? A power plant typically produces around half a gigawatt to a gigawatt of power to the grid, the Carnot efficiency of most plants is around 35%, meaning the plant's reactor is actually producing 1.5 to 3 gigawatts of thermal power to actually spin the turbines. There is a REASON every proposed hypothetical future laser ICF reactor assumes the laser will need to fire on at least 10 pellets per second (10 Hz), because 2 gigawatts of power (2 gigajoules per second) divided into 10 pellet implosions is actually doable; it means each implosion "only" needs to release 200 megajoules of energy. A reactor firing once every 10 seconds like Xcimer proposes will need to produce ONE HUNDRED TIMES AS MUCH energy as that per shot - 20 GIGAjoules per implosion. That's the equivalent of FIVE TONS of TNT going off with every target shot. Do you know how incredibly enormous a target chamber you will need to contain a five ton TNT blast is going to be, such that it isn't blown to smithereens and destroying the building it's contained in on the first shot?

The information you present is very interesting, thanks. But I have some suggestions for improving the presentation and helping viewers: 1) use a microphone to eliminate the echoing; 2) try to avoid "reading aloud" because it makes for unnatural, monotonous speech that is hard for listeners to parse; 3) shorten your sentences - the long sentences probably arise from reading text aloud, and make you either run out of breath towards the end of the sentence, or to unnatural and confusing breaks in the flow when you take a new breath in the middle of a sentence. HTH!

The real solution atm is airjoule. Simple, in production, world changing by updating something that not only we use but new up and coming countries as well

How will Helion cool its proposed power plant... The energy generation volume (copper magnetics) is very small and can't be cooled by sufficient air or water flow

3:26 She mentions Kyoto and net zero in an interview elsewhere. It is interesting that Kyoto is a name quite prominent in the climate narrative. As a mechanical engineer she is probably familiar with the mechanical concept of heat energy. If you hit a rock with a hammer it heats up. Is it just a coincidence that the hurricane and Arctic sea ice extent graphs are identical to the earthquake energy graph going back a hundred years as are the original temperature graphs before they were altered right before the election between a Texas oil candidate and a climate activist to change the long term cooling trend into a warming trend? It is a shame to see innocent people drawn into the climate deception while certain snakes with PhD's laugh and cheer. But their laughing and cheering w.ill turn to wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Nice see the latest in tokomaks. Strikes me that they are going ahead without a working prototype. Our configuration delivers and our prototype runs on air as a chemical fuel. I've not tried deuterium except in 1969 at the Rutherford when we powered a 1/4hp electric motor I've been ignored ever since. Total disbelief. Then the psychiatrist attacked and I lost my job.

3:50 Grafite obsorbs hidrogen , but tungsten cools the plasma .Covering of the tungsten plates with grafite could be obvious solution of this problem

As a Fusion student, it is nice to get these well structured news overviews! Thanks FIA!

Yay!! Best news of the week are here! Weekly!

what is that 'bouncing ball' spark in the upper left at 4:40 ?

Thanks Mr. Peachman! To the point and well explained as usual. Thank you guys for doing this.

The engineering hurdles are the smallest step to implementing Fusion. The elite will put regulations in place to insure it never gets off the ground. Because its not about clean energy... it's about raw power.

zare u familiar with the SAFIRE project?

What the heck is that bouncing hot "particle" at the top of the WEST tokamak at 4:35??!? It can't be an actual particle, it would be knocked around the vacuum vessel toroidally as soon as it hit the plasma and wouldn't be so regular in its motion. It can't be a Thomson scattering laser beam, the time scale of the video is way too long for a light pulse to be slowed down to what's seen here, and why wouldn't it be traversing the entire bulk of the plasma.... Edit: aha, I thought of something! I bet it's actually a Langmuir probe. A metal ball on a stick that's being periodically mechanically "dipped" into the plasma volume to measure the e temperature and density in the plasma directly. It's being rapidly heated to incandescence every time it hits the edge of the plasma, I bet.

We had a working reactor in 1969 at the Rutherford. I don't know why it was never developed. Dr Chris.

0:21 2:11 The Dyson vacuum fusion reactor: Here is a practical working fusion reactor that might get net power. Take a silver wine chalice and use small jets of compressed air swirling around the bottom and up the sides of the chalice to evacuate the center of the chalice. Inject a tiny jet of hydrogen in through the stem of the chalice. Hydrogen atoms that contact the sides of a tiny hole in the center of a hundred thosand volt positive plate at the bottom of the chalice will turn the hydrogen into a beam of ions. A ring around the top of the chalice charged up to a hundred thousand volts will trap some of the hydrogen ions in a cylindrical volume in the center of the chalice. Put negative voltage plates around the outer edge of the cup at 200 thousand volts. The negative plates should help evacuate the center by pulling ionized air away from the center. . The positive charge in the middle should help establish a better vacuum by pushing positive air ions away from the center that will force air out along with it. Ionizing radiation from the central plasma that strikes the inner surface of the surrounding air will release electrons that will be driven into the plasma by the surrounding negative plates. If enough excess electrons buildup in the plasma, the negative voltage will confine fusion temperature ions. If the plasma is about a billion degrees, tiny particles of Boron11 injected into the plasma will result in fusion between Hydrogen and Boron ions. If the plasma is hot and dense enough, Xrays and other radiation pressure will enhance the vacuum around the plasma by driving air away from the plasma. Alpha particle products of fusion that escape from the plasma at 20 million meters per srcond and crash into the surrounding air will heat up the inner surface of the air to billions of degrees and create a powerful blast of rocket exhaust. th-cam.com/users/clipUgkxz7GGhmbw0JTr39NKGpimfT-eusyZy9te?si=vcaNlF64-n68taOg 9:24 5:29 9:09

Hi! What do you know about KN 9 ? Nuclear battery , by Vladimir Vîrzob, 17 years, student from Romania.

Look forward to Helion’s progress.

1. Zap's Z-pinch method will never work because of the problem of plasma scattering problem. for fusion to happen the ions need to hit dead on. The plasma density and non polar\chaotic direction of ions will prevent it from producing over unity energy. The Univ. of Wisc. experimented with this method over 20 years ago, with dismal results. 2. Common Wealth's compact reactor using High temperature Superconductors is doomed from the start because high neutron flux produced by fusion cause squelching of the superconductor material (ie suddenly losing superconducting). This is way ITER abandoned the use of HT Superconductors during the design phase 20 years ago.

في المستقبل البعيد وبفضل التكنولوجيا المتقدمة سوف يتساوى الخيال مع الواقع ويمتلك الإنسان قوى الآلهة ليحول الكون والأكوان المتعددة إلى جنة خالدة ❤

Very comprehensive!

Fusion NEWWWWSSS lovely accent <3 but ngl you should use a other micro with better mid frequencies, like a shure or smth just as friendly feedback its not nice to listen to this even though you have clearly a really nice voice (or it may be from a hall in your apartment but i doubt that ngl may a popper also would help :P). Bc Fusion needs more attention pls don't underestimate such small things. Hm actually its getting harder with the longer i listen on where it exactly fails but please try a diffrent microphone. This here has some reverb some unbalanced frequencies some even feel like overdrive or smth idk

Excellent presenter! 👏 The standard bearer 🐻

I'm lowkey crushing on Jasmine. I love her voice and the way she reads the news sounds so professional. <3

openstar

Openstar Technologies. New Zealand. Who split the atom first.

Fission and fusion are inherently linked, there are some internal processes that are an exact mirror, fission has beta decay of electrons, fusion has beta decay of positrons. Fission is about 1M times more energy dense than chemical energy, fusion claims to be about 3.5 better still, that tiny extra amount has a huge cost though. Fission would have very high perfomance at only 1000K. Fusion is practically impossible at 100,000 that temperature. They both produce neutron flux, fission has a neutron gain of about 2.5 while fusion has massive losses. Fission produces tritium as a waste product, fusion usually requires tritium but has no practical sources for it. Both can breed fuel, fission can breed fissile material into fissionable material, ie thorium232 or uranium238 into uranium233 or plutonium239 resp. Fusion can in theory breed tritium from lithium but has a gain a fraction of 1. Berylium could double that but it is still less than 1. Most of the tritium isn't even burned. Neutron flux in fission reactors is used to make heat in water or other coolant as the neutrons are slowed down. Neutron flux in fusion reactors must hit the containment vessel and irradiate it turning it into nuclear waste. Some of that flux might produce tritium but not enough to sustain reaction. Fusion has to do many impossible things at the same time, very high temp plasma, irradiated hot walls next to cryogenic cooled magnetics with a water loop inside the vessel walls. Fission reactors can use simple physics to run in stable mode, no computer control is generally needed, other than monitoring. Fusion reactors are inherrently unstable and require computers and now AI to learn how to control them. An elementary fission reactor that produces as little as 1MW of continuous heat is a very low cost university level effort. An elementary fusion reactor that produces as much as 1MW of continuous heat is a very high cost world level effort and won't succeed for another 1000 years. Do let the world know when tritium is allowed to burn in a fusion reactor on a continuous basis, and tells us about the source of the tritium and damage done to the vessel. In thermonuclear weapons, a fission device always triggers a fusion component which then further amplifies the second stage of fission. Fission, fusion, fission play well together. If public perception of fission is negative, wait till they understand the ramifications of fusion. I have to wonder why no one is talking about Lithium Deuteride as a fuel, no breeding needed, but its used in thermonuclear bombs so is kinda top secret.

6th: TH-cam’s algo finds out that a gorgeous woman talking about nuclear fusion increases people's belief in the technology.

I thought fusion and nuclear fusion was the same. I learn something new everyday.

How refreshing. Real news from a real scientist. Thank you. 🙏

This updates are really appreciated.

Thank you. Updates is what im here for. this is more better than ai copy pasted videos which just prolongs the vid

Getting my hopes up of seeing commercial fusion in my lifetime... we need to spread the word that this isn't the Godzilla kind of nuclear...

6:30 they should use a 3 D printing machine to build it .

Bonus newwwwwwws~

The emotional baggage related to nuclear power is huge. If one country leads the way everyone will notice the benifits though. Looking forward to seeing humanity make a star.

Hello....😎😎😎

Trust in regulators? I doubt it.

Great video, thanks! Informative and well presented, very good use of imagery and videos. Love the earrings :-) Keep up the good work FIA!

Dr Keslerrrrrrr! :D

The disconnect between "Fusion" and "Nuclear Fusion" reminds me of when the term NMR was changed to MRI so that people wouldn't be scared of the word "nuclear" in the imaging machine that is going to scan them. Maybe it should be called "Particle Merging Energy" :D

Very good ❤

Where is april? :D

Very interesting 👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

vivis and whis breast plate taker june 10 wenday 2022

liquid lithium in a rotating torus with decreasing baffles to distribute lithium then shoot