- 2
- 20 916
Over 9000
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 29 ส.ค. 2019
Gaming Channel
Grand Theft Auto Online Car Collection Part 1
Grand Theft Auto Online Car Collection Part 1
more to come...
more to come...
มุมมอง: 16
วีดีโอ
Arma 3 Long Range Sniping - 2.1km using ACE Advanced Ballistics
มุมมอง 21K4 ปีที่แล้ว
2.1km sniper shot using the Advanced Ballistics system in ACE3 for ARMA 3. Takes into consideration: -Gun characteristics (realistic) -Bullet characteristics and trajectory (realistic) -Wind, air pressure, humidity and much more! Shot done using M200 Intervention with Nightforce scope. Vector 21 used as range finder. Kestrel for wind information, the AtragMX and the DAGR
lol all of that just to miss bruh of course in real life you might get one shot then target flees but in arma you have a giant puff of dirt and usually people have the situational awareness of a worm so this is ridiculous to use that scope calculator even with ace3
It's cool even change all the stuff but really here to play a game not calculus and also get is a military SIM
Lile Chris kyle said. He's a monkey with a calculator lol
The first
Nobody cares
@@youdontseeanoldmanhavinatw4904 I believe he was asking what the name of the first scope was, and I think it's a nightforce.
Wich scope is this?
You can use M85A41 name should have been like this, I don't remember exactly.
Pretty cool about 5-6 second flight time. In the future maybe the end of this century 2100 I could see energy weapons or rail gun type weapons shrunk down enough for infantry to carry and if so this could literally revolutionize warfare. Picture this if you could get a laser or energy projectile you might be able to fire at 5-50 km/s I know this is far fetched now but if you had a gun that could fire at those speeds it would be instantaneous at massive distances.
4:14 is the actual shot.
thanks
i shoot 3 km on iron sights of a pistol to a person inside jet
XD nice bro , i was inside that jet
@@jayanitilalshah6116 no i am the jet...
Its impossible bro jjdjdjsb
Battlefield yea? Lol
Not gonna say it was terrible shooting... but this could certainly be refined.
The direction of wind is 5 not 10
4 actually :D
@@The_Tank_Destroyer69420 that is true xd
@@Black-kn9gt :D
because your measuring the direction the wind is coming from not where it's blowing to?
@@bandrea610 that's correct