Professor Sankoff
Professor Sankoff
  • 42
  • 161 720
So, You Want to Argue an Appeal? Part 1 (SAMPLER) with Peter Sankoff
Here's a clip from our So, You Want to Argue an Appeal? Part 1 featuring Peter Sankoff. Visit www.petersankoff.com/recorded-seminars/ for the full video!
⭐ Interested in more content? ⭐
Consider becoming an annual pass holder to gain access to:
✨ 12 seminars, recordings included
✨ 45-50 video case alerts
✨ Bi-weekly netletter "The Beacon"
✨ Cheat Sheets
✨ The E-Zine "The Golden Thread"
✨ a 30 minute consultation with Peter Sankoff ($300 value)
➡➡➡ www.petersankoff.com/annual-pass-2023/ ⬅⬅⬅
มุมมอง: 244

วีดีโอ

Sentencing Tool Kit (SAMPLER) with Paul Moreau
มุมมอง 179ปีที่แล้ว
Here's a clip from our Sentencing Tool Kit Seminar featuring Paul Moreau. Visit www.petersankoff.com/recorded-seminars/ for the full video! ⭐ Interested in more content? ⭐ Consider becoming an annual pass holder to gain access to: ✨ 12 seminars, recordings included ✨ 45-50 video case alerts ✨ Bi-weekly netletter "The Beacon" ✨ Cheat Sheets ✨ The E-Zine "The Golden Thread" ✨ a 30 minute consulta...
Professor Sankoff's Guide to Persuasive Legal Writing
มุมมอง 226ปีที่แล้ว
Are you a lawyer or studying to become one? Check out this book to help you in your practice or your studies. Up your game to convey with clarity and precision while persuading your audience on your arguments. As lawyers, we are expected to communicate effectively. If you’re serious about getting concise, you’ll need a copy of this book. Learn how to craft memorable introductions, boost your wr...
Criminal Defence Essentials Podcast
มุมมอง 7322 ปีที่แล้ว
In the final podcast of the season, Professor Sankoff digs deep into the judgment released today - R v JJ, 2022 SCC 28.
Criminal Defence Essentials Podcast - June 16, 2022
มุมมอง 2752 ปีที่แล้ว
This edition of the CDE Podcast features our first guest - Sankoff Criminal Law Associate Heather Gagnier, here to talk about her first trip ever to the Supreme Court. We also discuss a great case from Quebec on distinguishing grounds for suspicion from grounds for arrest.
Criminal Defence Essentials Podcast 10
มุมมอง 2772 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded May 26, this podcast talks mainly about the impact of R v Sullivan and the concept of horizontal stare decisis. More interesting than it sounds! To watch the podcast live and interact, join me Thursdays on Zoom at 12 MT (not next week though). Email professorsankoffseminars at gmail.com to get a permanent Zoom link!
Criminal Defence Essentials Podcast Episode 1 Highlights!
มุมมอง 3462 ปีที่แล้ว
The Criminal Defence Essentials Podcast debuted on February 10, 2022. This podcast is generally intended for criminal lawyers, law students and anyone with an interest in learning more about the law. Episodes are broadcast live every Thursday on TH-cam. You can also subscribe to download podcasts on Spotify, Itunes and all pod catchers. Or get it direct at criminaldefenceessentials.podbean.com....
Seminar: Character Evidence and the Crown Witness
มุมมอง 3732 ปีที่แล้ว
This is a portion of a seminar on Character Evidence given on January 7, 2022. You can purchase the entire seminar, and all of our seminars, at www.petersankoff.com.
SC Privilege - Free Version
มุมมอง 3563 ปีที่แล้ว
This is part of a seminar delivered in January 2021 and discusses three issues relating to Solicitor Client Privilege. First, it explains how the privilege works, and why it's so important. Then it looks at the process of determining whether a claim should be upheld. Finally, it examines the role of confidentiality in the context of "common interest" claims. The entire seminar looks at every as...
Categories of Offending 2
มุมมอง 9104 ปีที่แล้ว
This introductory capsule is for students learning about criminal law in Canada. It explains the difference between summary conviction and indictable offences providing a basic overview of why the two are different and how. To learn more about the criminal law and evidence, check out my website: petersankoff.com To be notified about new videos, Like my Facebook page: professorsankoff
Legal Advice Privilege and the State of Mind Waiver Exception
มุมมอง 7174 ปีที่แล้ว
In this capsule I explore some common issues that arise when a party tries to rely on legal advice privilege, and the opposing party suggests that privilege was waived when the client's "state of mind" came in issue. Several recent cases have done a good job of clearing up this doctrine, and I look at it in detail. To learn more about the criminal law and evidence, check out my website: petersa...
Section 13 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
มุมมอง 3.4K4 ปีที่แล้ว
In this capsule, I explain the rationale and operation of Section 13 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which provides protection against self-incrimination for those compelled to testify in any sort of judicial proceeding. The capsule also explains how the Canadian privilege differs from the 5th Amendment (pleading the Fifth) of the U.S. Constitution. To learn more about the criminal law a...
Litigation Privilege: Claims by a Non-Party
มุมมอง 5364 ปีที่แล้ว
This Evidence Law Capsule examines the decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Dudley Estate v British Columbia, 2016 BCCA 328. The decision sets some important limits on the scope of litigation privilege, and in the process raises a few questions that I explore in this capsule. To learn more about the criminal law and evidence, check out my website: petersankoff.com To be notified ...
Direct vs Circumstantial Evidence
มุมมอง 25K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Direct vs Circumstantial Evidence
Electronic Evidence
มุมมอง 6K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Electronic Evidence
The Co-Conspirator's Exception to the Hearsay Rule
มุมมอง 2.9K4 ปีที่แล้ว
The Co-Conspirator's Exception to the Hearsay Rule
Marital Communications Privilege
มุมมอง 2.1K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Marital Communications Privilege
The Accused as a Witness in a Criminal Trial
มุมมอง 3.1K4 ปีที่แล้ว
The Accused as a Witness in a Criminal Trial
Legal Advice Privilege
มุมมอง 2.9K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Legal Advice Privilege
The Burden of Proving a Mental Disorder Defence
มุมมอง 1.2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
The Burden of Proving a Mental Disorder Defence
Principled Approach to Evidentiary Admissibility
มุมมอง 1.2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Principled Approach to Evidentiary Admissibility
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Is Section 5(2) of the CEA Still Useful?
มุมมอง 2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Is Section 5(2) of the CEA Still Useful?
Litigation Privilege
มุมมอง 2.3K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Litigation Privilege
Third Parties and Legal Advice Privilege
มุมมอง 1.5K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Third Parties and Legal Advice Privilege
Corroboration Overview
มุมมอง 7K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Corroboration Overview
Corroboration Statutory Conditions
มุมมอง 8384 ปีที่แล้ว
Corroboration Statutory Conditions
Corroboration and Vetrovec Warnings
มุมมอง 1.4K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Corroboration and Vetrovec Warnings
Modes of Proof: Witness Competence and Compellability
มุมมอง 8K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Modes of Proof: Witness Competence and Compellability
Tendering Admissions When the Identity of the Statement Maker is Disputed
มุมมอง 7654 ปีที่แล้ว
Tendering Admissions When the Identity of the Statement Maker is Disputed
The 100 Interns Project
มุมมอง 8524 ปีที่แล้ว
The 100 Interns Project

ความคิดเห็น

  • @JeromeDaniels-jm8qq
    @JeromeDaniels-jm8qq 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Top my dally professor.. for the confirmation of my basic knowledge 😮

  • @bpaajcisna5595
    @bpaajcisna5595 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thats called work product. litigation privilge is something else.

  • @ebubeikewote191
    @ebubeikewote191 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is very helpful. I've listened to all the corroboration capsules and you make it so interesting as well.

  • @AshleyQuijano-p9o
    @AshleyQuijano-p9o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The U S Intelligence who use hidden surveillance, eavesdropping equipment and hidden surveillance has been used to carefully criminalize a negro child through influential events they staged very carefully and implemented during co-vid 19: Federal Abuse Of Power & Intelligence Resources: The criminal intent is clearly seen by Federal Intelligence who have used hidden surveillance for years on a minority family. Federal Intelligence took advantage of a black woman and her child after they initially instructed a Navy Recruiter to follow remote inner instructions that would suggest that the 6 year old had a incestuous attraction towards him. This deceptive scenario took place on Clark Airforce Base Philippines '81. Continued deception and use of federal surveillance and remote communication help plan and arrange an affair for the Navy recruiter. Once the affair occurred as planned federal intelligence who attempted homicide overseas also made sure to remotely communicate to the wife to catch the affair, unaware that U S Intelligence who have been given her inner ear communication was ALSO the same person or group arranging situations and scenarios for her to experience. Once CIA FBI intelligence influenced the divorce U.S intelligence continued to follow the black woman ( ex-wife) & child who originally experienced attempted homicide by U.S Intelligence was also followed back home where U.S intelligence had already involved the ex-wife's relatives with inner ear communication without her knowledge. The ex-wife not knowing that U S Intelligence given her inner ear communication was still guiding her through the assigned remote inner ear device. Unaware the CIA FBI intelligence arranged for her husband's affair also guided and advised her where to live so that U S Intelligence can contain the attempted homicide on her child that took place overseas. U S Intelligence began using the woman and her family to form false impressions and influences around the child. This also involves secretly listening to many conversations and comments that the child made and later given the ex-wife instructions to belt-whip the child in front of the ex-husband's family. The child angered U S Intelligence during a game that took place and referred to the grandmother's as dumb or wrote a letter mad that him & the grandmother lost the an innocent game at the dinner table. U.S intelligence who secretly listened to many conversations without the child or mother knowing also instigated and instructed the ex-wife who is black to belt -whip the child in front of the ex-husband's family as they observed the ex-wife beating the child for U S Intelligence and the ex-husband's family personal amusement. U S Intelligence began using pornographic material to entrap lure and exploit the Negro childs sexuality. This also includes raising suspicions that the child displayed threatening predatorial deviant behavior. U S Intelligence even involved an affluent christian school & church to secretly observe and influence the negro adolescent. This surveillance enabled Sadistic Intelligence to observe the adolescence interactions and intentions to be used as gathering intelligence information and analytical details for research. The details from the adolescence teen was collected to be applied in a operation program that was being tailored customized around the adolescent so that at a certain time they will make a 2nd homicidal attempt to inflict paranoia confusion and suicidal tendencies through forms of abusive psychological approaches that involves Hidden surveillance, hacking, eavesdropping equipment that listens to many conversations and multi-media outlets that applies subtle hints and suggestions that mentally triggers the negro child as an adult. This operation program was implemented once a former white supremacist already in a relationship was selected to play the love interest of the now black crossdresser. The crossdresser was purposely rejected, isolated and returned to the mother who still wears the same inner ear communicator that receives remote instructions that guided her to catch her husband having an affair that FEDERAL INTELLIGENCE PLANNED. The CIA FBI intelligence today shows criminal intent to cause harm to defenseless minorities by abusing power, federal resources and abusive psychological approaches to inflict harm and avoiding implication. PRE-MEDITATING TO DO HARM WHILE TRYING TO AVOID LEGAL REPERCUSSIONS FOR PLANNING A HOMICIDE THROUGH THE USE OF INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE AND OBTAINING PERSONAL DETAILS TO INFLICT PARANOIA. * Criminal intent by federal intelligence and hidden surveillance uses psychological tactics influences and pre-meditation to support false claims and assumptions of the negro child they originally attempted to murder overseas on Clark Airforce Base. * Removal of the Navy Recruiter * Influential scenarios * carefully worded narratives through inner ear communicators * specific acting instructions ( false impressions) * media * abusive psychological practices ( what will victim believe think assume or will do) The above elements are applied on the same individual U S Intelligence attempted to homicide through a medical procedure overseas on Clark Airforce Base Philippines '81. ( the arrogance of hackers who access and communicate to others wearing inner ear communicators follow instructions from arrogant hackers analysts who display extreme bigotry by showing they are unaffected, unbothered by reports of their misconduct and oblique criminal intentions. The mind of Federal Intelligence who uses established hidden surveillance on low-income unit for their personal amusement: * Criminals aware their behavior is criminal by avoiding implication*

  • @Poppy-yx8js
    @Poppy-yx8js 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is someone commits suicide because they have been stalked for 15 years and electronically interfered with - accounts hacks - WiFi - computer malware so they know everywhere you go - and slander you to everyone you come across but they don’t leave much evidence behind.

  • @millieortiz-vk5qq
    @millieortiz-vk5qq 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    About the COVID 19 situation I have come to this conclusion: virologists shouldn't have made any assertion about the vaccines without previous corroboration.

  • @helenewebster-sisk2407
    @helenewebster-sisk2407 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I recently discovered someone at MLK DOL altered my Racial and Disability Discriminations, Fraud, and Retaliated Discriminations social security complaint. Llike the Clark case, some people can go in and change the record.

  • @karenbob3489
    @karenbob3489 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m in sk Saskatoon could you provide with a contact number ? I’m having an summary conviction appeal coming up. Thank you

  • @LitigationHelp
    @LitigationHelp ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation of the difference between privilege and confidentiality at time mark 15:08. Thank you!!

  • @vetusmeam8357
    @vetusmeam8357 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do we say if we simply don't want to answer questions from police?

  • @Lol-k2k3r
    @Lol-k2k3r ปีที่แล้ว

    The facts about the star chamber and the spanish inquisition were very interesting!

  • @terrifictomm
    @terrifictomm ปีที่แล้ว

    I guess he doesn't know about the exception to the hearsay ruler: Conspiracy. If they're charging you with conspiracy to commit armed robbery and your buddies are testifying against you, guess what? As long as they have other evidence for the conspiracy, they can nail YOU with the testimony of your partners in crime.

  • @monaiannucci9434
    @monaiannucci9434 ปีที่แล้ว

    Circuses

  • @quleughy
    @quleughy ปีที่แล้ว

    Every true crime journalist needs to watch this video. I swear, the term “circumstantial evidence” is abused in the media by being treated as synonymous with “weak evidence”. But circumstantial evidence can be far more powerful than direct eyewitness accounts.

  • @SajjadKhan-eu3nz
    @SajjadKhan-eu3nz ปีที่แล้ว

    Have a wonderful day

  • @Alnursaed
    @Alnursaed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank a lot.

  • @kindemphath5210
    @kindemphath5210 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    CCTV RECORDING TO OBSERVE CHILD ABUSE IN FOSTER CARERS.