วีดีโอ

I’m so sad Karo didn’t win this one. But good on Coco she’s had a tough year so it’s nice she got the title. 🏆

Way to finish Coco you are a true champion good fighting never let up❤❤

great questions from this group of journalists

Whata Beautiful young Woman 💓💯 🌹🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @EmmaRaducanu

Whata Beautiful young Woman 💓💓💯 🌹🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @EmmaRaducanu

Muchova - hopefully

Էլինա Ավանեսյան -#1❤🇦🇲❤🇦🇲❤🇦🇲❤😍💐 Elina Avanesyan -#1❤🇦🇲❤🇦🇲❤🇦🇲❤😍💐

Iga is very intelligent and wise, she is aware of her extraordinary athletic abilities. She is responsible and a perfectionist that must excel and continue too establish herself as a global super star. Iga has endured a lifetime of personal sacrifices and will have to continue to make tough decisions in her current pursuit to be "Second to None". Iga is in a league of her own.

No question - Muchova 💕🏆😇🍀🙏

One of the most popular Polish (as well "diplomatic" and polite...) tennis commentator says that reason is Daria Abramovitz...! Source: th-cam.com/video/kbL2sAnHJRo/w-d-xo.html

Goran would be a great coach for her!

We in Poland think that probably Ig's problem was not coach Wiktorowski, but psychologist Daria Abramowicz. Iga has been losing matches lately rather mentally and has not been able to change her behaviour, game, or tactics on the court, and instead she has been hitting harder and harder and making more mistakes. Iga should probably change the psychologist because this relationship looks rather pathological, and the rumours that are circulating in Poland are that Daria Abrmowicz started to interfere in the training and instruct Wiktorowski on how Iga should play. We don't know if this is true or a rumour, but this is the information/speculation we have about what happened.

If i were her coach the first thing i'd tell her is to find a partner and play doubles for the next couple of tournaments. This would not only improve her hands, reflexes, serve & volley but also give her a light-hearted approach to the game and maybe some camaraderie or even friendships.

Daria Abramovich is not a tennis coach but she has worked with numerous athletes, so i think she has enough insight.

Guys regarding a coach who can teach Swiatek on how to improve in hard courts it’s none other then former Ash Barty’s coach Craig Tyzzer.

How about Uncle Tony?

Think it might be a good idear. Iga play the same way all the time. She needs variarion /diversery . Learn from Muchovas game .

Is Muchova/Sabalenka the best rivalry in women's tennis right now?

Shes beautiful

He is clay courter who cashed adcance checks on his body to win 8 non clay slams. It is what it is.

Let's see who wins more big titles

Carlos top level is unplayable

Thanks guys!

Because he not love hard court ,he win the roland garos.He is king of Philip Shatrie.

Damn thats taugh i just watched AO 2014 damn everything u say is true rafa is bad at hard court

I think it is pretty clear why. His game is not well-suited for indoor. His best chances 2010 and 2013 were 2 seasons where his forehand and serve were great in US Open series. Unfortunately, Rafa was rarely physically fit post US Open especially post 2013. I do feel like he has been unlucky to not win it but his best chances were earlier in his career where his court coverage and consistency were maxed out. Since his resurgence in 2017 he has been less consistent and not as effective in covering the court. That is part of what helped him have some success on faster courts and there is only so much he can achieve by redlining his game now.

Well he made two finals in WTF and this shows that he can play well even on indoor hard. Unfortunately, in the finale he couldn't make much of an impact and caved in so easily.

Where are you all getting this retirement statements from has Rafael nadal made a statement. Until then let’s just keep our mouths shut about this until he does this

He hasn't won Miami and Shanghai as well.

I think it is fair to assume that the Bartolotti case did not include a fault of someone of his team. It is probably this detail that is interesting for WADA to scrutinize. Also Sinner's case is a much higher profile case so also more reason here for WADA to be stricter and look strong.

It's not a doping case. It's a contamination case

Good win for Jannik.

Because other players were better.

Fantastic editing John!!

The most dumbest and craziest player I've ever seen. Watch his game against Pellegrino played at Braga. He was just intentionally hitting and aiming the ball to go outside the lines. Who does that? He should be banned from playing tennis.

Better she look on Sabalenka service and be more flexible in low back . Get more intuition playing and watch previous game of future oponent 😮😊

Im sorry but how can you as a Tennis pundit still go with the "But how can it be that other players got a provisional ban and Sinner not", reasoning, after all this time? When test results are positive the player gets notified and given the option to appeal, within 10 days. Is the appeal successful the player can keep playing. If unsuccessful the provisional goes ahead and the player cannot play untill cleared by the tribunal. Sorry this is a standard and simple procedure, if you cannot bring yourself to readup on this, but cover in detail the retarted stuff Kyrgios/Paffy put on Twitter? Maybe you should not handle this kind of news at all and just stick to the tennis scores etc? The difference between bortolotti and that of Sinner? 1. In the case of SInner his staff was negligent, so WADA can argue that Sinner is responsible for that. 2. Sinner's case is high profile so there is more urgency for WADA to be extra strict.

Wada just incompetent… leave Sinner alone

Regarding the appeal, WADA is just looking for an image of credibility to please public opinion, especially after the criticism received for the case of the Chinese swimmers, essentially to demonstrate that there is no preferential treatment for anyone, as more than a few "important voices" in tennis had complained (also considering that the possible confirmation of president Witold Bańka will take place shortly) In fact, it usually appeals against decisions of national bodies, which could be affected by favoritism, and does not appeal in the case of independent courts, strangely for the 23 Chinese swimmers acquitted by their own court they did not lift a finger and for Sinner judged by an independent court (with expert WADA consultants) they are now appealing. In any case, in the appeal they do not question that it was an involuntary contamination, but only that there was negligence in controlling the work of its "employees", so much so that they do not request the revocation of all the trophies won after the positivity. The result, in addition to covering themselves with ridicule, will be that they will have to pay the legal costs and that the haters will continue to be consumed with envy.

It is rather disappointing that as commentators in tennis there appears to be a profound lack of understanding of the ITIA and WADA rules and relationship. To be clear the sinner case was no ‘secret’ or kept from the knowledge of WADA. The World Anti-Doping Code (Code) is the core document that harmonizes anti-doping policies, rules and regulations within sport organizations and among public authorities around the world. One of the signatories of the Code is the ITF. Each sport has its has its own rules on doping violations that seek to give effect to the WADA code. In tennis that is the Tennis Anti-Doping Program (2021 Code sometimes called the TADP in tribunal decisions) are the mandatory provisions. ITIA is a delegated third party under the WADA Code responsible for enforcing the Tennis 2021 Code. WADA is given a copy of the charge letter that is given to the athlete indicating the doping violation. They must keep it confidential until such time as the charge is resolved. Under the WADA Code, WADA has a right of appeal to CAS and that is what it is exercising in its appeal now. The usual administration of the Tennis 2021 Code is nevertheless the responsibility of the ITIA. So nothing unusual here. As to why the Sinner case was not known until August, again this is perfectly explicable by reference to rules of the Tennis 2021 Code which are quite clear. A player is not publicly identified of having committed a likely doping violation until a provision suspension has been imposed or accepted. If a player is successful in appealing the provisional suspension then their name will not be disclosed until the final independent tribunal decision is made public. When a player receives a notice of provisional suspension that notice will state the date by when the provisional suspension will into effect (at which point it is public). At any time before or after it comes into force, the player can appeal the provisional suspension. If they can appeal before the provisional suspension comes into effect and are successful then their name will not be disclosed until the determination by the independent tribunal, which is what happened in Sinner’s case. This can be contrasted with Halep’s case who was unable to get the evidence to prove contamination at the provisional suspension stage and so her name was made public. For her, given she could not prove the contamination she had a much harder time demonstrating no fault/negligence until her appeal case.

A bit unfair and unprecedented. Wada does not think Sinner has doped, this is quite clear. Only appeals on the point he may have been negligent. A ban may be (and was in this case) eliminated entirely from the picture as a result of No Fault or Negligence when an individual can establish that they did not know or suspect, or could not have reasonably known or suspected, even with the utmost caution that they had violated an anti-doping rule. The matter was adjudicated independently. ITIA took the matter to an independent tribunal that has ruled the player is innocent, there is no fault or negligence, just gave him a sanction for objective responsibility eliminating the Indian Wells result. This is the first time in history WADA appeals the decision of an independent tribunal. Sinner is treated worse than 100% of sportsmen before him. In the past, WADA has only appealed federation and national anti-doping decisions and sanctions. Also, if there is fault or negligence sanction must include cancellation of all results according to anti-doping law, so Wada is contradictory. Negligence means knowing. WADA must prove Sinner knew - good luck to them - and also that he is the greatest idiot on Planet Earth, because the quantity is one billionth of a gram and he would have risked the destruction of his career for that. Objective responsibility is not negligence.

She supports dictator lukashenka...