- 21
- 43 843
Rinav
India
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 4 ม.ค. 2016
I talk about stuff that's intresting to me
Philosophy of Arthur Morgan : Time, Regret, and Redemption
Arthur Morgan’s story in Red Dead Redemption 2 is more than an outlaw’s tale-it’s a journey through regret, redemption, and the search for meaning as time slips away. In this video, we dive deep into the philosophy of Red Dead Redemption 2, exploring how Arthur’s choices and struggles mirror our own lives. Can we truly make peace with our past? And is redemption possible before it’s too late? Join us as we unravel the emotional layers behind Arthur’s story, drawing on philosophical insights to reveal the timeless themes of this unforgettable game
Don't forget to leave a like on the video if you enjoyed!
Twitter: rinav_patil
___
Thanks for watching!
Don't forget to leave a like on the video if you enjoyed!
Twitter: rinav_patil
___
Thanks for watching!
มุมมอง: 517
Wow. I didn't know this. Amazing video
Thanks bro
The South moves north, the "North moves south, A star is born, a star burns out The only thing that stays the same is, Everything changes, everything changes." - Time Marches On, Tracey Lawrence, 🎶. That said, if you focus on what was or what could've been, you'll miss out on the present opportunities in front of you, which will in turn impact your future. Learn from the past, but don't let it consume you.
Well said good sir!
I remember when i played it i kept thinking We gonna make it to tahiti. I was legit being manipulated just like Arthur in believing we gonna survive. youtube comments sadly spoiled the end for me on the last few missions i had to do, so it wasnt that hearthbreaking for me since i already accepted it and knew i couldnt go back. (Sadly i also got spoiled by youtube comments for rd1) The last few mission i livestreamed to a friend And i told him I always take good care of my horsy make sure hes well fed And he was like How do i tell her... But yea i even just kept thinking about the entire situation in my bed and being Man... He really is gone.
Spoilers did ruin my experience as well but I can’t believe how Arthur’s death felt very real to me
@@Rinav rd2 is just a great game No other game makes me just walk with my character to admire the sceneries I'm playing with some mods rn to make it even better, like darker and longer nights, more persistent weather. Stuff like that I tried playing as john But I just couldn't I had to go back to Arthur, so I restarted my game and I'm now trying to see more of the seroundings I did play rd2 online too but in my opinion Only play that if you milked all content from story mode
@@Cyabon Have you tried the Ambient Gang mod, It is one of my fav
@Rinav what does it do?
Very Proud of how this video turned out. Let me know if you have any suggestions for another video you would like to watch!
🤣😂 look who's talking you're nothing but a big joke
'I am In good company then'💀
kale is a fucking bot
The big joke blew up the biggest joke
Goku sounds like he's about to break some crates
Now we just need Captain ginyu when he was goku
Should have added goten as the last slot 😂
Yeah i Think Nintendo should sue them and shut the game down cause goku was doing the signature woaaaaaahhhhhh of Mario Honestly just shut down the whole franchise delete every episode ever made and every game ever made
I wouldn’t put it past Nintendo 😂
Bro i got confused kn the first sec xd
These interactions all so cool❤❤❤
Original saiyan armor was special
Well if you mean a lot of saiyans except Vegeta for some reason in the beginning of Z which is like what Super Bardock wore
@ i mean the old model, the pointy one
Oh great theres more boring versions of the same boring character
For all small characters you should've used Goku Diama
Goku sounds like Mario
we need Pui Pui in the game :(
Who is Turles?
He is from the Movie Tree of Might. He looks like goku but they are not related
Gokus: team small Goku team small Goku Goten: I don’t think I’m supposed to be here Gokus: TEAM SMOL GOKU
I like that Turles and bardock actually have slightly different hairstyles
Well it makes sense cuz goku and goku black are the same person while turtles and bardock are 2 totally different people
yh nice touch
Goku became Mario in the beginning lmao
uuuuooaahhhhh
Its funny that black says “copy the visage of goku” because bardock is his dad and turles is older making goku technically the “copy” if you wanna say the genetics that make him look as he does is “copying”
Reload is my favorite
It's a phenomenal game
Sounds like he said f off
This is part of why it stuck with me. I first played it on PS2 and still love it today. Great video!
Thank you!
I love turles's side pinchers compared to the others
3/4 cool turdles doesn’t deserve to be there
So Buu does talk but we don't understand his language. But why does cell understand him?
Cell jr's prolly speak the same language 💀💀💀
"Yosha!"
I think cooler was hinting out the fact that frieza is a terrible team member and that he'd most likely kill his father first...just saying...
Don't worry Goten, there's too many timeline violations already, so you're fine
Goten lol😂😂
Simp alert
Wanna be friends?
There is 2 gogeta non canon and canon
Always remember to blink. Memento Mori.
Persona 3 are such a classic masterpiece. the unique gameplay, well-written characters, melancholic story. make this game one of my favorite Persona entry.
I 100% agree with you
Some people are expectional evil, i wont ever kill people unless my own life is in danger but for some like muslims its easy to kill coz its in their nature
If you have no conscience are you really evil ? Or do you have to recognise acts as evil but still do them to be called evil?
Does a fire need a thermometer to burn you?
Ordinary people are ruining everything. When bunch of NPCs invade your personal space you realize.
If the people who run society are evil, then the citizens are intrinsically evil. To be good, you’ll need to actively conscious of your actions
0:49 It exists. Good is real, and is separate from evil. It's just not always found on the normal side. It very much is good versus evil. But being good is harder than being evil.
Why is the unhealthy or immoral option ALWAYS harder than the healthy and moral option, every single thing without fail?
@@l.psimer6124 Being good is harder than being evil: Good - Protecting the weak Evil - Walking away from the weak Good - Donating to charity Evil - Buying an extra luxury Good - Enduring the pain and sacrifice of being vegan Evil - Comfortably eating defenseless animals that came in plastic packages at the supermarket Good - Disagreeing with your friends and loving a stranger that they hate Evil - Agreeing with your friends and hating a stranger that they hate Good - Doing the right thing even if no one is watching and you'll never be thanked Evil - When no one is watching, taking that opportunity to do whatever you want with no resistance
@@l.psimer6124Being good is harder than being evil: Good - Protecting the weak Evil - Walking away from the weak Good - Donating to charity Evil - Buying an extra luxury Good - Enduring the pain and sacrifice of being vegan Evil - Comfortably eating defenseless animals that came in plastic packages at the supermarket Good - Disagreeing with your friends and loving a stranger that they hate Evil - Agreeing with your friends and hating a stranger that they hate Good - Doing the right thing even if no one is watching and you'll never be thanked Evil - When no one is watching, taking that opportunity to do whatever you want with no resistance
@@l.psimer6124 Being good is harder than being evil: Good - Protecting the weak Evil - Walking away from the weak Good - Donating to charity Evil - Buying an extra luxury Good - Enduring the pain and sacrifice of being vegan Evil - Comfortably eating defenceless animals that came in plastic packages at the supermarket Good - Disagreeing with your friends and loving a stranger that they hate Evil - Agreeing with your friends and hating a stranger that they hate Good - Doing the right thing even if no one is watching and you'll never be thanked Evil - When no one is watching, taking that opportunity to do whatever you want with no resistance
The intention of Singer isn't to indict individuals but to expand the scope of evil and our moral responsibility in the face of it. Too many people are living with a convenient perspective that the evil people are different from the rest of us... when we all have the capacity of good and evil. That our ignorance or refusal to prevent the evil deeds doesn't qualify us ourselves in their rank.
Very true , its not about shaming people , its about helping them recognize the evil inside them and work towards embracing a more positive and "good" nature , realize their responsibilities they turn a blind eye to
Oy. Where to begin? Our bio-chemical senses & form are a framework within which we have no choice but to work. It doesn't mean All Our Choices Are the result of this. I'm not sure if you truly realized it but you're putting out a terrible argument. Apply this to "insert mass murderer here." See the problem? If you wish to make an argument about Systems of Punishment that reduce All actions to a mean that should not apply as we currently do then please DO that. But whether you intended it or not, a _LOT_ of people are gonna take it the way I first worried about here.
Peter Singer's contention that moral correctness requires each of us to work to minimize the total suffering is simply wrong. The universe has no such bias, rather that opinion is solely a result of our careless intellectual processing. In fact, it appears that we, like all other life forms we know of, have developed so as to maximize the likelihood of the propagation of our genes. This may be an unpleasant conclusion however it is physically and demonstrably correct. That we do experience altruistic motivations may be an indication that such charitable motivation in some way improves our reproduction statistics, or schemes intended to encourage us to transfer our power to others (as in religious or political parties), or possibly just erroneous thinking.
There: _that_ is something. Singer framed it quite incorrectly. & how things are framed can influence outcomes. Let's say Kim Jong-un was reported to have injected any American Child with something untested. Every American would call for his entire nation to be blown into a crater by this time tomorrow. Now let's say some American politicians Tell Us to do the same thing to our own children. "What day, time & how much O Master?" & *everyone* in Western society _denies_ this. But here's the proof: I can't get a Single American to act to help Maddie th-cam.com/users/results?search_query=maddie+de+garay here. & you know why? Cowards immediately re-frame the context of everything to justify their cowardice. That's really _all_ Singer needed to say. The Milgram & Stanford experiments removed the context where they even *needed to* justify anything to anyone any more. "Oh, I was ordered to. An Authority _FIGURE_ permitted me to." If you give a group of children choices to get instant rewards by knowingly causing harms to others, some will take it. Others won't. Who here would like to discuss the mechanism by which you _ALL_ come to hate Maddie & protect the immoral politicians who knowingly protect corporations from the harms they did her for Fun & Profit?
Such narrow and hard scientific thinking is unremarkable and unpimressive. As thinking creatures we have a responsibility other animals don't. Period. Hiding behind cosmic nihilism as a justification for evil is cowardly and pathetic.