วีดีโอ

En otroligt intressant industri med produktion i rymden och försvars möjligheter med moderna satelliter 🛰️ ”higher ground” är alltid avgörande enligt historien. ”Improvise, adapt, overcome”

Danmark och Sverige bör stänga av Öresund omgående som Ben Hodges sa i Henrik Jönssons show under Almedalsveckan.

Hur kan Sverige gå med USA Nato Nazisterna satans hycklare

4:11

Alltså dags att köpa smutsiga aktier i krigsindustrin😱

VAD HAR HÄNT MED DIPLOMATIN?!

Usch 🤮🤮🤮🤮

By LEAVING it. Dumbest move in Sweden's history to join a cold war era hostile alliance.

WHAT BEING SAYING IS RIGHT AND WHAT THEY ARE SAYING IS THE TRUTH, SWEDEN, POLAND, ICELAND, NORWAY, DENMARK, FINLAND, UKRAINE ARE THE ONES THAT WILL BE ABLE TO STOP RUSSIAN, MORE AND MORE RUSSIAN COUNTRY THAT GO AWAY FROM RUSSIA AND COMES TO NATO WILL BE MUCH BETTER TO STOP RUSSIAN FROM STARTING A WAR

Tyvärr olyssningsbart mht ljudet

Krigsagenda

Far better to have a clear eyed and realistic assessment of the challenge ahead not just for Sweden but the entire Global West. I admire Mr Bronk's ability to explain both the view from 40,000' but also the vital day to day practicalities.

You are as allways spot on Justin dont know why this showed up now instead of when it was publicied.

I dont want to belong to NATO when Erdogans respekt to sweden is like shit .. beter we build a new aliance with more stabel contrys

“ Mind set “ i regerings kansliet

Can't believe I had missed this conversation until now; having followed all three now for a while, I could not have dreamt up a better team of defense thinkers with Katarina, Justin & Oscar. Definitely hope to see them together again soon!

Oscar Jonsson is spot on, re cruise missiles: I've been saying [to myself] for years that Sweden should have a production line, steadily adding to large inventory, large enough to innundate an adversary.

If Gripen were to find demand from NATO nations, what are the chances it could be manufactured under license in other countries, such as in USA by Northrop-Grumman, which does not currently have an active fighter production line? Could Ukraine be the means to bootstrap such an expansion of production for Sweden?

full of shit... western cowardice.. go to ukraine and fight your war,, stop using ukrainian people

Everyone’s forgetting about our most powerful weapon for self-defense, the Justin bronk

Justin is that one guy who can tell u exactly what the objective is objectively.

Excellent and informative, thank you.

Excellent . My old teacher used say the three P's PLANNING , PREPARATION , PRESENTATION . No he was not speaking about warfare . However the more I think about it , the more I see how relevant in warfare the 3 P's are . RUSSIA missed the P's ,UKRAINE was a little ahead . No doubt RUSSIA will persist , so its important NATO the WEST and UKRAINE are up to the task . Good point , Upgrade , More Production , More training , Smarter weapons and technology and AIR POWER , AIR POWER AIR POWER , a new generation of DRONES ( Hunter Killer Stealth DRONES ) .SLAVA UKRAINI . I hope top military ' BRASS' will tune in to this and get the production of KIT up to date . SLAVA UKRAINI . One thought , PUTIN is waiting for TRUMP??????????????? Likely , yes .

USA especially has pretty dim view on countries which ask new systems in middle of crisis. That why Finland has bought JSOW, JASSM, GMLRS, GMLRS-ER, NASAMS 2, SDB II, etc well in advance. Now its time just replenish ammo.

Interesting comparison to Finland. In 2022 we bought no new weapon systems. We had systems already, we are investing heavily on resilience. We did put immediately extra 700 million Euros (+12%) for 2022, and used ALL of that for ammo to current systems and training. Same continues this year and next (save decision on new high tier SAM and new drones). Ammo, ammo and more ammo. Wars against tough enemy arent won with sample packs of munitions. Excellent talk, as usual Justin Bronk.

Given the imminent threat of China invading Taiwan, the US should greatly accelerate its production of B-21 bombers and anti-ship missiles. The government should increase funding so companies can hire more workers and afford to pay unlimited overtime so that the factories that make those weapons can run 24hrs a day, 7 days a week. The Pentagon's lack of urgency seems reckless and irrational -- to the point that it makes many people wonder if the Biden administration is in denial about just how high the risk is that China will try to invade Taiwan sometime in the next few years.

Fantastic content. Not understanding how this only has 81 views. Justin Bronk & Oscar Jonsson are speaking the cold hard truth here. Among the most important points made here that I'm not hearing other so-called experts emphasize is that the West needs to come to grips with the fact that: (i) there's no quick fix for Ukraine or the collective West, (ii) the threat isn't going away and forcing Ukraine to make concessions only increases the threat and the likelihood of additional future aggression, (iii) Europe can't count on the US always being there in sufficient force to save the day in Europe, because the US has to worry about China and Korea, etc., and (iv) deterrence can work, but only if you are committed to demonstrating that it's real by having a force structure, munitions and equipment that's of sufficient scale to demonstrate that you really meant it - which is expensive - but much less so than the alternative. As to point 4 - only Poland seems to truly grasp the scale of investment in defense that's required to create and maintain a credible deterrent effect.