วีดีโอ

Sorry 🤷‍♂️

@@rinyaldsnotes I'm like a core sample. If there's one of me leaving a message about it, there's probably 100 others who just stopped watching and won't watch the channel again. Feedback helps content creators learn what's irritating to listeners.

when the pendulum breaks.

What?

@@xaviersandoval1765 Don't worry, you'll understand eventually. try walking with your cross.

@@ElDel-p7m I don't think I ever could understand. I felt like I read a lot of words with no real connection between them.

@@xaviersandoval1765 and, you say that's my fault? It's not my fault that you can't understand. If you can read between the lines then i say that's your fault of not understanding. read the part when the pendulum breaks and piece it with the dot to dot understanding.

Wouldn't be called faith if it was the case. Believers in these debates Dinesh D'Souza, or more prominently Peterson should be dubbed convincers imo.

I would be a lot more impressed with these individuals if they correctly defined faith & didn't let lack of facts affect their feelings

I figured he would have at least a little considering he watched Destiny cover it

Asking people to be knowledgeable on a topic that they chose to be outspoken about i guess were asking for too much. Probably just grifting chasing the money.

I love that you didn’t address literally anything I said in the video. Where did you disagree?

@ 1. You mischaracterize the false electors and how that process went about. 2. Is she using “rhetoric” by not saying exactly what you and Destiny want her to? Sure? But Destiny deploys the exact same type of rhetoric by deflecting the ties with Epstein and you instantly run defense for him. Like it’s such obvious bias and bad faith analysis it’s insane. Btw you can clearly infer what I’m disagreeing with by the previous comment. I’m assuming you just don’t remember your own video considering you misquoted the girl 30 seconds after she stated something.

What about the false electors did I misrepresent?

@@rinyaldsnotesplease explain how or what even you mean by “Trump caused the fraudulent electors to be submitted on Jan 6th” cuz it seems to me your applying malice and intentionality where there isn’t any. Also, let the record show you completely ignored me addressing your inconsistency when it comes to rhetoric. It’s either all rhetoric is bad or none is. You gotta choose one lane or the other.

⁠@@rinyaldsnotes Clinton campaign admitted guilt in court to illegally purchasing the false (foreign) Steele dossier

If you wanna come talk about it, I’d be glad :)

Thank you 🙏

TRUUU

❤️

Unfortunately grifters have a chokehold on media because it is so easy for them to make easy to digest quick clips. I also think that there are a lot of smart people with good opinions that do not engage with content as much as the idiots do, if that is the case the algorithms signal boost the grifters by default.

@@rinyaldsnotes Obamas DOJ used false foreign intelligence Clinton’s campaign ILLEGALLY bought to spy on trumps campaign

@@rinyaldsnotesFBI lied to a FISA court to obtain warrants on the trump campaign charges both the FBI & Clinton campaign admired guilt for in court!

You’re right mb

Destiny is bad rhetoric, messy personal life, but right 99% of the time Piers is a bad faith engager. I’d take Destiny 50x over Piers.

Its not bad faith it was the plan to become big media but drift hard when possible

Apparently

He's busy suckin off Nick Fuentes

More of a thing than ever actually

Ask your mom

@@timbroeckhuysen5511 lol no you can ask your dad bro

Because both of them are “independent” but they are hyper charitable to the right and hyper uncharitable to the left

Wanna come on and talk about it?

*anti-Americans for Trump!

​@@rinyaldsnotesare you saying over half of America is anti America?

Trump openly said he’d be willing to “terminate all rules, regulations & articles, and even those found in the constitution” so idk how to get any more anti-American than that

@ the constitution can be amended legally

So true, it’s a shame Trump didn’t say we should “legally amend the constitution” he said he “terminate all rules, regulations and articles”

Wanna come on and talk about it?

Never watched the view in my life :)

exactly.

Should it be an official presidential action to cause fraudulent Government documents to be submitted?

Or because he’s an insurrectionist

@ Trump 2024 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

Where’s my millions?

Not a leftist btw

@@rinyaldsnotes Banging-on about Jan 6th IS a left-wing thing, as is thinking it equates to an 'insurrection' or that Trump spurred it on (his speech immediately beforehand spoke against it). As a neutral, centrist observer (British) the extremism in the US appears overwhelmingly from the hard-left, though our media promotes the same 'progressive' narratives when reporting about the USA as yours. The Russia-phobia in the west is both 'left' and 'right', with the progressive administrations as hawkish in the US as those of Reagan or Bush. You do give more than a hint of leftism, but if you wish to state otherwise, go ahead. Not an anarcho-syndicalist by any chance?

You see the thing is that I don’t care what wing my beliefs are, but Trump absolutely did engage in illegal activity to overturn the 2020 election. If you wanna come on stream and talk about it the Discord is open ❤️

@@rinyaldsnotes Playing Devil's Advocate here. Despite the left-bias -- yes, I realise the left/right paradigm no longer applies now the west's shifted so far to one extreme -- I'm well aware that the Democrat establishment disputed Trump's 2016 election relentlessly, inventing 'Russian collusion' nonsense which even US security agencies dismissed and also embarking on repeated 'lawfare' using Democrat DAs and courts to bring Trump down. One 'charge' was that Trump kept secret documents at home -- something President Biden did on a larger scale but was not charged for. Also, the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop was significant -- had its alleged contents been made public the narrow 2020 election would've gone to Trump. Our British elections are unfair and highly unrepresentative, as are yours, but dodgy aspects like George Bush's 'hanging chad' affair and closing polling stations in Florida, plus the practice of huge drops of Democrat postal votes being counted without authentication checks in blue states in 2020, plus having no requirement for voter ID in Democrat states, is decidedly dodgy. Rationally, such things would make people doubt the integrity of these elections. On the general point of the anti-Trump/TDS types referring to him as a corrupt felon, I'd agree. But I'd be hard pressed to find a non-corrupt politician, many of whom in Congress (after a quick look) have felony convictions. It's the massive anti-Trump bias in western media which defines Trump as 'uniquely corrupt.' Were there a conservative bias in the media they'd find no end of dirt on Biden, Clintons (both) and other Democrats. Sorry, can't contribute more as I'm on a break and have to go back to work. Cheerio from England.

I think the problem here is that there are nuances of our complicated system that not everyone understands, and instead of learning they just feel fearful of what they don’t understand. The problem with the classified docs wasn’t that he had them, the problem is that he wasn’t complying with orders to return them, and was trying to destroy them following a search warrant. The Russian collusion thing wasn’t a hoax or disproven, there just wasn’t enough to charge anyone with the crime of conspiracy. However, look at the charges for Rodger Stone, or Manafort (both of which Trump then pardoned) or the indictment of the IRA. There’s more to this than talking point, but all anyone knows is the talking points. I appreciate you engaging more than the others in this section lol. If you wanna come on stream and talk the Discord is open :)

Wanna come on and talk about it?

@ That would be cool but I’m just some guy 😀

There’s a Discord in the description of the video, feel free to hop in :)

You’re in my comment section babe 😘

Sometimes you gotta be unpopular 🤷‍♂️

​@@rinyaldsnotes Just like kamala hey

Just like Biden. Because id much rather have a good President that was unpopular than a popular President who was an insurrectionist

@@rinyaldsnotes How was Biden (when rational) a 'good President'? He wasn't a good man judging from much information about him that was withheld by a compliant media. And how in Hell was the obvious diversity hire Kamala Harris even considered a suitable candidate? Your last election was opting for the lesser of two evils -- which was Trump, astonishingly!

@@rinyaldsnotes hahah an insurrectionist hey. Well ya can't call him a felon anymore can ya. Yas lost that one

Take a walk, go experience the joys of life 💙

Did he win in 2020?

@rinyaldsnotes yes he did. 10 million voters disappeared off this planet.

Okay so don’t tell me to get over losses when you still have yet to recover from one 4 years ago 💙

@rinyaldsnotes there's a difference between election fraud and mopping the floor with your opponent. Nobody is going to tell Trump no for at least 2 years. It's going to be a good time watching you lose your head.

Is this election fraud in the room with us now?

Aka nothing to do with anything I was talking about?

Wanna come talk about it?

Do you know what the Electoral Count Act is?

Do u know why dems lost their ass this election? We said the economy was bad dems said no its not its great. We don't like the open border dems said it was closed. Same about crime and ww3. U dont like this administration. Win the election.

You wanna come talk about it?

@@rinyaldsnotes sure watch u wanna talk about? do u think trump invited xi jingpi a dictator of china to usa? no it was gavin newsome. your party loves dictators. and i just proved it too u. i dont see my comment from earlier on here. just another censored conservative. because lefties cant defend their s**t bag policies. we said the economy wasnt good u said it was. same with every issue. and the voters said NO I PROMISE U WE DONT LIKE THE COUNTRY RIGHT NOW. and it took a landslide lose for you to get it .muh jan 6th no one gives a s**t about jan 6th.

Join the discord and we can work it out

If you have no idea about it, I’d just go read about the indictment or read the indictment, and not listen to a guy who got paid millions by Russia to lie about it

If they could have charged him, they would have.

It’s not illegal to take the money if you don’t know it’s coming from Russia, it was illegal for Russia to give the money and they did get indicted

J6 was orchestrated by lawful evil dems jailing citizens trying to frame up Trump saying he committed treason. They wanted to end his presidential pursuit.

Did Dems try to submit fraudulent certificates of ascertainment?