วีดีโอ

SENECA WAS THE BIGGEST OUT OF THE SIX NATIONS

The claims you make about Christ at time stamp 4:00 i wonder if you have any PROOF? of just claims made? can you find any evidence of this statement?

also your argument of oligarchy makes no sense, the roman empire was run by only a few powerful families and aristocrats who used massive slave populations to maintain their estates, the actual roman citizens had no power or wealth which is why the emperors would use their own wealth to placate them with bread a circuses

there is a problem with this idea that dore meant to portray jesus in a negative light, he was a devout catholic and most of his work revolves around biblical scenes, in fact this seems to be his only work to heavily feature pagan figures, not what you would assume of a guy who was pro pagan Also the idea that Christianity lead to the dark ages is completely bogus as the roman empire was already in steep decline before Christianity began to take over, when Constantine took over christians were still a minority of the population and already by that time much of the artistic and architectural ability of the roman empire was already lost, for example Constantine made his triumphal arch the knowledge on how to make one was already lost so they had to just make it out of a pre-existing triumphal arch. This was most likely a cause of the various civil wars that had been taking place over the previous centuries. A it turns out the church was the one major preserver of knowledge of every sort when the roman empire fell to invasions by barbarian tribes, and it was the church that started the renaissance. Think about it, the only people who could speak or write latin were members of the clergy

You'd think there would be more outrage for the crimes the Nation of Israel is committing. But Christian Zionism has been growing for years.Perhaps these people need an excuse for the.genocide committed against the Native Population,and the slave economy that created so much wealth in the past.

Where Can i find this seminar today?☺️

Astrologers use both heliocentric and geocentric.

So Hiram Abiff is the most important figure in Freemasonry Hiram is The same letters and word as Mithra

I had a blast jamming with you guys and watching the stars with you. I’m grateful I found this. Adding to my daily ritual.

No stars in nasa's video, because one could verify the time and location of the alleged event.😮

Two things: 1. Patrik and also you seem to have a bad grasp of the physics behind the rocket's propulsion. Patrik's description is completely wrong. Rockets are not propelled forward thanks to pressure on the atmosphere. The gas that burns in the combustion chamber throws particles away in all directions, both forwards and backwards relative to the direction of the rocket. The particles that are pushed backwards disappear into the vacuum of space, while particles that travel forward push the rocket forward. In addition, Patrik lies or omits the truth about the article in the New York Times. But you will have to find out for yourself. 2. There is an astronomer who has recently started to review the Tychos model and he intends to go through the entire book. The status after the first chapters is promising for those of us who believe in science, but tough for Simon, Patrik and others who would rather follow their gut feeling than trust the facts. Since I cannot post links here, you can search for "review of tycho's model" to get to Professor Park's PhD and the review.

Those of you who uncritically praise the Tychos model need to think about it. There are people with a lot of knowledge who can see things Simon missed. Not least active astronomers. Search for "review of tychos model" here on TH-cam and you will come to Professor Park's PhD who devotes several hours to Simon's book. He also plans to continue his review in the future.

Those of you who uncritically praise the Tychos model need to think about it. There are people with a lot of knowledge who can see things Simon missed. Not least active astronomers. Search for "review of tychos model" here on TH-cam and you will come to Professor Park's PhD who devotes several hours to Simon's book. He also plans to continue his review in the future.

I'm listening friend

I have no idea why you keep trying to save gravity. The inverse square law is a geometric relation Newton noticed about elliptical orbits. It was not derived experimentally. If the direction of a force is in the direction of the foci of an ellipse , that force would fall off inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Newton noticed this and then poof gravity. He also repudiated it. In a letter to Dr. Richard Bentley on Feb 25th,1692; Isaac Newton says: "Tis inconceivable that inanimate brute matter should, without mediation of something else which is not material, operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact, as it must be if gravitation, in the sense of Epicurus, be essential and inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you WOULD NOT ASCRIBE INNATE GRAVITY TO ME . That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me SO GREAT AN ABSURDITY that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial I have left to the consideration of my readers. "Scheurer, PB., Debrock, G: Newton's Scientific and Philosophical Legacy, 1988, p.52 No heliocentric orbits and you don't need the Universal Law of Gravitation. Go watch Feynman's Lost Lecture or Three Brown One Blues review of Feynmans Lost Lecture.

❤

Peter / Jew Peter .... Jupiter ❤

Thank you

David, I just became aware of you through Kesenya Moore. Visiting your site I was drawn to the thumbnail in this video of Mae Brussell. As a "sprout" I am always looking for those who are also aware of her work. You may be interested in this episode of World Watchers from 1985 where she not only mentions Donald Trump but places him near the heart of the deep state through Roy Cohn. The whole episode is worth listening to but Trump appears at 20:34 if you want to just jump to it. I was fortunate enough to meet Mae's daughter, Barbara, and we were in touch for a little while. When Oliver Stone made JFK all references to Mae were eliminated from the final version. It was Mae that Jim Garrison went to for leads on his case but she was never given credit. She mentioned it several times on her shows and was present during the trial. It was great to find you! I look forward to digging into your work. Cheers! P.S. Alglol also was prominent in the election chart of Trump vs. Hillary. Mae Brussell #696 4-8-1985 World Watchers... Dan Rather response to Mae's letter, CIA takeover of ABC by Wiliam Casey, the burgeoning 24/7 cable news cycle and how it got organized, Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch, Roy Cohn and Donald Trump th-cam.com/video/pnDbX0T4f2g/w-d-xo.html

Interesting theory. i suppose the world tree or cosmic tree could be coaxed from this as well, as i believe i recall the professors suggesting a connection to the lunisolar precession in HM

Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched 1:29:37

Thank you David. Has been a pleasure to learn about Medusa's story in it's entirety. The pictures/ paintings as well as the sculptures depicting the story as well as Medusa and Perseus are beautiful. Thank you for sharing your abundant knowledge😊

A mid/side transformation matrix (around Earth/Moon) offers a wider phase angle than a traditional stereographic model, as well. Because there is a fulcrum of symmetry and a nexus of asymmetric balance. The whole of cosmology would benefit from this model, as well as, current electrical theory. Sphere inverts to torus and back to sphere. The audience only sees the spheres. Cross talk between toroids is not seen.

Kepler was Brahe’s mathematician. He posited the geometric progression of 1, Phi, and the square root of phi as a Pythagorean triplet. This triangle encodes the 51.82 degree slope angle of the great pyramid of Giza. I would love to know if you have found connections with the Giza complex and this ‘binary’ or Mid/Side model?

I think all this non monotheistic pagan gods were fallen angels in disguise

This topic is endlessly fascinating. I wonder how much is truly know about the mechanics of our solar system and how much is speculation and grift in disguise?

Have you ever seen Edward Leedskalnin’s curved analemma sundial in coral castle? m.th-cam.com/video/qzeq4e_jky8/w-d-xo.html

You guys really should present this as the ‘Mid/Side’ Solar Model. Which is complimentary to a traditional stereo graphic dichotomy between geocentric and heliocentric extremes.

Michelson and Morley showed Earth had no orbital speed and the bible always sais Earth is still and then CMB Axis of Evil showed Earth to bevat or close to the Cosmic Centre...another indication Earth does not orbit anything.

Similar findings based on Tychonian system. th-cam.com/video/hKCO-TeVEgM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=nTEHEuasB3xgjeKi

An old poem from memory-- too tired at the moment to check for accuracy, but worth a look: Ye stars, which are the poetry of heaven, if in your bright leaves we would read the fates of men and empires, tis to be forgiven that in our aspirations to be great our destinies orleap their mortal state and claim a kindred with you, for ye are a beauty and a mystery and create In us such love and reverence from afar, that fortune, fame, power, life, have named themselves a star. --- Byron

Graham Hancock? Worlds Before Our Own Brad Steiger? Alexander Hislop The Two Babylons and Bullinger The Witness of the Stars?

I'm getting better and better at this. I immediately thought "it's Ophiuchus!"

Compelling, fascinating!

I Really Enjoy Your Videos. Very Well Researched!!

Seems The Lotus Growing Out Of Vishnu, Is Growing Out Of Sagittarius A*!

Hi Patrik, David, and Kessenya, thank you for the great interview. Do you think you could organize a sort of debate between between someone presenting the geo-heliocentric Tychos model with someone introduced to it or someone who doesn't believe it? It is very difficult to present the topic since 1. it goes against the accepted heliocentric model and 2. it goes against the indirect evidence related to the history of space exploration. How to introduce this model without appearing as a mad-man? You have to go over the history of science which takes time. I found perhaps presenting the ancient (Ptolemaic) view of the world helps; also mentioning the scientific postulate of *dark matter* (which everyone has heard about but no one understands) as a necessary condition only in the heliocentric model, while pointing out it is the conceptual equivalence of the ancient view of _Ether_ (the fifth element) or Ptolemy's bizarre epicycles: there is no need for the postulate of dark matter in a semi-geocentric model or geo-heliocentric model.

Who is the Jesus who so many people who experience NDEs see and talk to?

dude has same problem as most conspiracy theorists. They find one that is true, and then go on to all too easily believe even the most bizarre ones. Like no thrust in space?! You are ready to throw conservation of momentum out the window. Like no satellites?! what are those strings of lights? "high altitude plane towing lights" :D which also conveniently provide high speed low latency internet if you point a satellite dish at them.

Thanks guys for the video❤❤❤❤ nice seeing you together here, in the other hand, now make so much sense why chinas or asias adore the lions, and they have in each entrance of the palace a warrior lion’s guarded in the history of evolution Asia’s photos🤓🤨🧐

The easiest person to deceive is someone seeking the truth. The best liars are those who think they know the real truth. The hardest people to fool are con artist/magicians.

Yes please have the next convention here in Vic! Perhaps the most interesting implication of the tychos in relation to Michelson Morley is the premature dismissal of the “ether” And let’s not forget about the “cult” (obvious front) much closer to home and significant this very week. The so called “the family” Thanks Patrik, David and Kesenya Kilroy was here. 😉

I feature your channel and Kesenya's on my home page. I enjoy many subjects and many perspectives. ...and, yes, I dare to even question this whole globe earth taught to us since we could toddle in books and cartoons and movie and tv show credits, lol, or is that the only thing we can't question,... 😉

Mayas, China, Sumer are bogus jesuit civilizations. Egypt or Babylon comes after Jerusalem that is ancient Rome.

53:36 There are only two mistakes One could make : To believe things that are not so, or to not know ('believe') things that are so. 🙂 Rick Bonner Pennsyltuck

Thank You, All three of You..., for simply honestly discussing ideas; 'models'; "sects"; points of view / perspectives... One of the 'giants' of logical, authentic (Scientific with a capital "S"), actually true thought, gave Us a 'bed-rock', firm foundation for thinking by observing that : "The mark of an educated Man (or Woman) is that They can entertain (consider) an idea without either immediately accepting or rejecting it." Whether it's a postulation of Copernicus or Tycho Brah or Keppler or Einstien or Bohr or even one of Walt Disney's imaginary Characters like Donal' Duck or Pluto... the postulate -- rather the One presenting the idea -- shouldn't be a matter of concern nescessarally. Because, A "Truth" stands on It's Own, and a lie -- or any other figment of a de-ranged 'mind' -- falls under it's own wieght. 🙂 Rick Bonner Pennsyltuck

How interesting was this! Thank you David and thank you dear Kesenya ❤All this knowledge and information truly is tremendously facinating. Love how both of your individual knowledge and perspectives come together in explaining the ancient and the celestial wisdom❤️ One question if i may. Which book of David's should i start with? Thanksss😊

The way you both look at each other, some chemistry and connections are undeniable!! Happy you found each other! And thanks for sharing your information ☺️

At first i had no idea where the story about the friends and the guest was heading/ going until i did😅 Thank you. Was super interesting and it is so true too about 'learning the language' and knowing for oneself ❤

Thank you both 🙏🏾