วีดีโอ

Still waiting for his story of being a drug addict.

The way Russel talks is incredible. Every word has so much meaning.

2:37 He's laying down the truth. I'd only add, it's not even malice necessarily. A careless child will trample a bed of flowers. We know better, and it really is the small battles that will make the greatest difference. The day-to-day goings of humanity, our attitudes, what we really believe to be true, all of this really contributes. I believe we're going places. I see America in the stars.

Edward Teller's comment in the video, "Edward Teller - Going to see Einstein give a lecture (31/147)" says it all - Perfectly!!! Was Einstein Wrong or right?!?? - well; a little of both!!

Climate change is 100% a hoax. Every time you give it credence you take this very important discussion way off track.

I cant tell if Joe is dumb or doing a bit

Einstein's theory of gravity must be removed from the university curriculum! Introduction “Two massive bodies interact gravitationally! Einstein says that interaction is transmitted from one body to another with a limited speed c! Nothing more fake! According to Galileo, bodies are in constant motion and, in the absence of a referential at absolute rest, they move in a completely indeterminate way. It follows that one body can never "accurately hit" the other with its gravity, if the latter moves permanently and indeterminately and the gravitational action moves from one body to another with limited speed! In other words, the gravitational actions "hit" their target (exclusively in the direction that joins the two centers of gravity) only if the bodies do not have time to move randomly, undetermined (if the gravitational actions move with infinite speed)! Let's make it clear: Galileo's principle of relativity says that there is no frame of reference (object) with a preferential position of absolute rest (ie THE "position" of any object in the Universe CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED)! But in notebooks, in many years of school, I kept drawing such systems (with the 3 axes, etc.)! What do we have here? Simple: institutionalized manipulation! In what idea? In the idea that in the state of "no position" (in "space" and "time") in which Galileo left us, physics is kaka maka! So, down with Galileo! Or, translated, at school (on notebooks) we must have the opposite of his principle! Means "there is the notion of "position" (determined in "space" and "time") of an object in relation to a preferential reference system, in a state of absolut rest (which we keep drawing)"! In short, if Galileo says that there is no reference system in absolute rest, implicitly then there is no possibility to construct the "position" of any object! Or, all objects move seemingly undetermined! But, despite of all this, the existence of a final order cannot be contested (the "mirror image" of organisms, the stable geometric configurations in which the cosmic objects - the constellations, etc.) fall! Means, the objects, moving "chaotically", remain absolutely at rest in relation to the respective order (they fit into it)! And that order is the very Universe we live in! Resuming the logical route, "chaos" comes from the lack of "position" (lack of absolute reference - Galilei)! In order for the chaos to disappear, the "position" must reappear, well determined absolutely (anywhere and anytime)! Or that doesn't happen, brother, by inventing absolute references in your notebook! "Position" (implicitly the order of unfolding of the phenomena) reappears only when signals are really exchanged between them at such a high speed that no matter how the respective objects move they remain practically in place (absolutely at rest) in relation to the signals! Which means, in a state of strict determination! Relative to this type of signals (with infinite speed) all objects would become "referential in a preferential state of absolute rest" (the referential that Galileo lacked)! In relation to which the strictly ordinated movement of all the elements of the Universe could be generated without problems! Or, the "chaos" of the Universe is overcome by signals with infinite speed! Which is a forced variant: it cannot be otherwise, no matter what the scientific parrots claim! Thus, it is no accident that Newton's Law of Universal Attraction describes a perfectly oriented interaction between two objects that move absolutely indeterminately! Namely, because it does not contain the "time" parameter (the interaction propagates with infinite speed)! And infinite speed signals are trivial in the holographic environment (written by me on the page with great enthusiasm)! *** I have to give you some bad news: this is just an introduction to a return to an older post. We have like this: mobile.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid027npnyjEXi7Bd2gnYt5ewLKFvUrfSd288HZkUa97JTtbDxiSUdKDexQrRzore9JPXl&id=215643642314484 To Van Flandren's question above (in fact, at that address you find two GOOD questions) I answered that gravity, in order to be able to manifest strictly determined (like Newton's apple) in the conditions of the completely indeterminate movement of objects (in the absence of a absolute reference system, according to Galileo), then it (gravity) must cancel the movement in general (indeterminate! That is, act SIMULTANEOUSLY on the two bodies that attract each other! That is, to know them, to consider them, based on a signal that it moves with INFINITE VELOCITY! "Oh, what an abominable forcing! What an attack on the custom of causality ("relativity")?! "Shit!” Let me show you as the forcing realy look! This time "committed" OFFICIALLY?! We have the trivial and simple inertial motion (rectilinear and uniform) between two inertial reference frames. The measured "size" of this motion is given by the velocity v between the two frames. And guess what! It's the same, regardless of frame of reference from which it is measured. It means that do we have an information (value v) accessible to the two observers SIMULTANEOUSLY?! Which can be found at considerable distances, beteeen which the light can travel only in certain time intervals?! Then how does the "v" information get INSTANTLY, from one end of the Universe to the other? What are you saying about that? This is a realy forcing to the custom of causality! Loosely accepted by the fool einstein in the hypothesis of the mental problem from which he deduces the Lorentz transformations! Which means that the "gravity with limited speed c" is a sad manipulation! facebook.com/100076879416271/posts/384143037491674/?app=fbl facebook.com/100081165881758/videos/240232792433553/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v

Einstein hits the plains!... - Adevărul v-a eliberat | Facebook Einstein hits the plains! ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transform%C4%83rile_lui_Lorentz
To obtain the Lorentz transformations it is considered that "The relative velocity of the two observers is v along the common axis x."
v - the inertial velocity between the two reference frames O and O'!
Which means that the speed is seen (measured) in the same way, SIMULTANEOUSLY, from both?! 
v = - v => s/t = - s'/t' ! "AT THE SAME TIME?!" IT means that v value does not depend on the reference frame from which it is measured!
Ooops!
Inertial velocity v is not relative!
But absolute! Implicitly, time and space are accepted by Stain himself as absolute: (after synchronization from the common origin) at any moment s = s' and t = t', so that the same velocity v results by measurements in either frame of reference! So, when the observers look at each other their clocks always show equal values! But when they look at the wavefront in the "story" the same clocks shows different values?! Anyone with any pretensions to their own sanity must admit that this is possible only if each observer has two clocks: one with which he makes determinations for measuring the speed of light c, and another for the separate determination of the inertial velocity v...
Will this be kosher?
So Einstein's message is not "time is relative"! 
But "the ABSOLUTE time is relative!"
That brings with it the statement "this white sheet is black" made by someone showing you a white sheet of paper!
A pretty well-known trick!
The first part of the statement ("this white sheet") is correct and verifiable!
By default, the guy who does it is worthy of all trust!
So when this respectable guy continues with "she's black" the interlocutor has a mental block of the process of analyzing the statement.
Against the backdrop of this blockage, the "trustworthy" guy can give you some reasoning to "substantiate" his stupid affirmations. Many are robbed by the reasoning (which, if it were not considered the "v" speed, WOULD BE FORMALLY CORRECT!)!
EG. :"if you turn off the LIGHT the white scheet turn black!
Which is hard for you to reject from the first time when, in the beginning, you took him seriously!
But THE EVIDENCES still stand!
"If you turn off the light, YOU DON'T SEE THE SHEET AT ALL, no way to see what color it is!
In which case his hypothesis (This white sheet...) no longer stands, etc.!"
That is, too technical discussions for "public opinion", largely unadvised, not to accept the guy's lie, thoroughly supported and interested in the "system"!
So does Einstein!
At the beginning of his arguments he HIMSELF affirms and accepts the truth (ABSOLUTE TIME) which he denies later?! 
But, for posterity, only the denial of ABSOLUTE time (the lie) remained!
Many criticized Einstein for "time is relative"!
I only defended him, and told the critics: "the man told you the TRUTH RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING!
You didn't want to see it!
And he used it as the sugar with which he made you accept the bitter pill (lie)?!" PS - And we have another stupidity...
If the two reference frames are located at a distance of, let’s say, 5000 light years, however the measurements of the inertial velocity v between them it can be performed simultaneously (absolutely)!
And this is precisely because of the 2nd principle of special relativity (the speed c of light is a universal constant, the same in any inertial reference system)! Which is meaning that time must be absolute precisely because of principle 2!

Jan6 would have never happened if we didn’t watch the country get burned down for 8 months

i remember 2019aug, boris Johnson said there be no homeless people in 2020october in uk, 🤔✌❤

The tangible resolution is this, instead of sending all this money to the ukrainians we should give it to the homeless on a monthly bases, and that will get the police to fuck with them and revenue off them... and that will take care of the homeless problem a bit maybe.... they aint gonna wanna be out exposed lol.... with the cops revenueing off them too

Yeah ok Eric. When are you accepting your nobel prize? Arrogant jerk.

Russel seems to talk "at" people instead of "to" people.

You can’t help wondering if the whole covid thing was a social experiment as a test to see how far the powers that be could control the populations ….turns out they could and very easily.

San Francisco hasn't kicked the homeless out of the many hotels and motels they bought to house them. It's an ongoing experiment and kudos to them for trying at great expense. Addiction is a disease, not a breakdown of morality or a law enforcement problem. That much is clear.

Omg! Ive been trying to understand multifimensions and multiverse but this guy’s explanation blew my mind. It’s amazing how in 1 minute explanation I was finally able to understand 🤯

Yes, capitalism is apocalypse.

The government unfortunately doesn't know a solution other than throwing money around and seeing if that fixes anything

Weinstein’s philosophy is rubbish

Einstein theory is wrong ? That's a real question ,or a fucking sarcasm .... His fairy tale has been debunked many times ,but also rejected by every true inventor . This dogma holds our science back for 100 years already . Today science is just pit full of idiots and corrupt puppets ..

What happened to the full episode that this clip is from? I can’t find it? This is probably one of the most informative and impactful FREE lectures on the internet Protect Eric at all cost

I love that bloke. These are the role models i wish younger people would follow. Independant thinking. Cant beat it. Id so much love to have a joint and a scotch with that man. So much f$&@ing respect for him.

JUST GET THE EXPORTS ON IT…!💸💸💵🫃🏻🕺🏻✊🏿🪢🪢🦇🍆🫄🏻🙆🏻‍♂️💁🏻‍♂️🪡🪡=🤷🏽‍♂️🥷👌🏿💪

Now do the Las Vegas shooting

I don't think they are involved in any of it. I'm not being sarcastic. You found a few weird things, and then used these normal abnormalities to blame some higher power. Normal people are dumb and violent in large groups, it's not that complicated.

Jan 6th was a fed job too

Yeah okay maybe 34k is in the 1% globally, but we aren’t operating in the global economy when we’re living on 34k a year in the USA. We have to live on 34k a year in This country where 34k doesn’t go nearly as far as 34k in a destitute, third world country. SO DON’T SAY THE 99% at OCCUPY WALL-STREET DON’T KNOW WHAT THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT, because I absolutely do.

Black people saw this a long time ago

FBI is always involved in these protest, riots etc. Example: Jan 6, BLM riots

80-90% was the tax bracket in the 40's and 50's so let's not talk about it being socialism. Plus it's an effective tax not just 70% of all your money

thanks joe,while you are real,thank you

The problem is they'll just move to another country to dodge taxes.

Rogan is the new fox democrat owned talk sense untill he backs bernie 🤣

Like joe doesnt know about civil disobedience or something?

I got a crazy idea, how about stop sending all of our jobs out of the country,

Shane Gillis is a guppy or whatever that fish is that swims under sharks bellies.

4:42 when the crack rock hits the brain upon exhale.

Can ANYONE answer this question? Why has Chicago Fire tv series been suggesting that Fentanyl be given to first responders' patients? I'm a fan of the show. I feel like I ABSOLUTELY have to say that. My questions keeps getting taken down by other websites, such as Quora and Reddit. Is it really this taboo to as a question about NBCUniversal or Comcast? Are there questions that citizens are not permitted to ask? I'm looking all over the internet with not even a single article written about the topic. I wonder why is that? I'm positive I'm not the only viewer to notice it. What is the connecting between Fentanyl and the Chicago Fire tv series???

I live in the country. This is all irrelevant to me

To be fair now that blm is over (this is coming from an upper middle class white male) I think there is much less racism in regular folk police brutality was never really a problem; However there was a decent amount of crude remarks by people which have significantly decreased

they even had the UMBRELLA MAN light that autozone on fire.....just as they had an umbrella man at the JFK assassination

Despite what he says he’s quite the capitalist with multiple homes vehicles and and a diversified portfolio

Ari with my Spring Break '02 bucket hat! I wonder if he had to sign up for a credit card too??

Australian firefighters are dealing with ev fires at least once a week at the moment this will only increase with more ev's and kamala wants this in school buses🤯

Correction to title: BLM riots

Same as in the civil rights movements🙃

Fuck me man, Normand literally finds a way to ruin every clip of audio he's in no matter what. "WHOOOOOOOOOOO, AHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" doesn't add anything and neither does "but hey what about the blacks?" IDK how he can talk shit on radio hosts cause he's literally just a cheesy radio guy all the time.

alternate title 3 Dudes Flirt With Socialism Then Let Joe Guide Them Back To Protecting His Money

Who is they?

It's just blatant now trying to think the herd basically. They don't care anymore because they know we can't do shit about it. Most are to scared to stand together. The division is keeping us from stopping the gov from destroying us. It's a vicious circle.