- 45
- 6 933
Paul Lane
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 10 พ.ค. 2013
Day 7-10 Aug 22 25 Switzerland
Final days in Wengen, Thun & Kiesen before going to Northern Italy.
มุมมอง: 95
วีดีโอ
Day 5 & 6 Aug 20 21 2024
มุมมอง 25221 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
Thun, Interlaken, Trummelbach Falls, Lauterbrunnen and Wengen.
Dr Stephen Meyer God is returning to Science
มุมมอง 2.7K14 วันที่ผ่านมา
Dr Stephen Meyer God is returning to Science
Chris Harper Betterman 2024-11-25
มุมมอง 4714 วันที่ผ่านมา
Chris Harper, Founder of Betterman.com, gives a presentation at Cleburne Bible Church 11-25-24. "How to be a better man spiritually".
Stephen Meyer 10 Questions on Fine Tuning
มุมมอง 1.1Kหลายเดือนก่อน
Sean McDowell interviews Dr Stephen Meyer. Dr. Meyer deconstructs the major materialistic arguments against the suggestion that "Fine Tuning" in the Universe and in Biology point to Intelligent Design.
Jeff Foxworthy: Keys To A Successful Christian Life
มุมมอง 923 หลายเดือนก่อน
Jeff shares his testimony & discusses the benefits of the 'Small Group' concept and the blessings of being an encourager.
2nd Two Days in Switzerland August 16 & 17, 2024
มุมมอง 323 หลายเดือนก่อน
Tour around Wengen and Rosmaries' parents dairy and farmhouse - Circa 1764.
Switzerland 1999
มุมมอง 553 หลายเดือนก่อน
This video goes back 25 years. We visited the Vogels in Tagertschi and the Nussbaums in Zurich. Had enough 8 m.m. tape left to record a couple of men's gospel songs back in Fort Worth. "Behold I show you a mystery" and "There's honey in The Rock for you".
Jameson's 7th B'day Party
มุมมอง 3464 หลายเดือนก่อน
Friends and family gather last Saturday, August 3rd @ Neal & Marlens
05 1993 Hollinger's trip to Hope Arkansas and Virginia
มุมมอง 978 หลายเดือนก่อน
05 1993 Hollinger's trip to Hope Arkansas and Virginia
10 1992 Mike & Roberta's Wedding Shower
มุมมอง 568 หลายเดือนก่อน
10 1992 Mike & Roberta's Wedding Shower
Dr. Nickolay Revtov Ukraine Minister 1-7-24 "How is your spiritual home."
มุมมอง 1610 หลายเดือนก่อน
Dr. Nickolay Revtov Ukraine Minister 1-7-24 "How is your spiritual home."
CBC Tom Worthley "Who Told You that?" 07/30/23
มุมมอง 8ปีที่แล้ว
CBC Tom Worthley "Who Told You that?" 07/30/23
#04 Understanding how God views and judges sin
มุมมอง 30ปีที่แล้ว
#04 Understanding how God views and judges sin
Judgment and justice will say, our LORD is gentle and lowly at heart!
Yes, remember thy shared SEATS be gentle unto thy shared SEATS for thy shared SEATS will follow thee!
Welcome to the New Table Banquet my shared "i" Am Hosts Meeks Sean and Meyer!
Who is, yet is not, yet is to come!
Many will wailed because of HIM and will say, hide us from HIM! Who sitteth upon the THRONE and unto the Lamb!
Concerning these principalities who deceiveth and murderers have put curses upon one another exalted themselves above sitteth in high places unseen nor seen! Knows?
Likewise meaning all HIS ANGELS who persevere and heard the WORD knows the Commands from their LORD!
As these principalities who deceiveth exalted themselves above watching their LORD have departed from HIS PRESENCE!
Keep watch!
Paul, where can I read more about the fine tuning of carbon ?
One quick youtube reference is about 1:30 into the following video th-cam.com/video/F6cnTsKcKZk/w-d-xo.html I'll let you know if I find further reading material.
Go to this website for more specifics. www.google.com/search?q=Fine+tuning+of+carbon&oq=Fine+tuning+of+carbon&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIICAEQABgIGB4yDQgCEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgDEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgEEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgFEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyCggGEAAYgAQYogQyBggHEEUYPNIBCTM3MjQ0ajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Unfortunately many principalities who deceiveth and murderers exalted themselves above looking at Sean and Meyer as just a clumps of cells! Easily can be murdered to be aborted but just a thing we used!
Why ye feel pain if pinch thy shared body?
Even a flesh nor thy skin can't talk back but brings pain if tare in pieces!
Yes, all thy flesh is sacred!
Come unto all who can create from nothingness?
Meyer is slowly going mad ….. I’ll pray for him
Life here is being discussed as material life or elements. There is also force, electricities, electromagnetism and magnetism the latter of which nothing is known. They should clarify what they are discussing is physical or elemental life, not life itself of which nothing is known.
The ultimate designer does not have to have another designer if the designer and the design is one and the same. Problem solved. For example when we dream at night our dreams are not other than us they emanate from us, from our minds.
Random natural selection without a prototype to randomly select for is magical thinking.
Atheists would have to be dragged kicking and screaming to this realization and what it implies. However, no one is going to drag them or even try to dissuade them of their worldview. They will see the light in time as science (what an irony) reveals an infinite intelligence as the source of all that exists.
The argument for I D is very strong. However going from intelligent design to a theistic argument is for theologians to do that. Perhaps the Discovery Institute should avoid treading in that area.
Thank you for this
You are welcome. Adequate evidence is not the issue. As Christ said in John 5:39-40, "You are not willing" is the real issue for a Christ rejector.
8:40 so lose the legal case, and just go for propaganda. Sounds right
This headline is as ridiculous as the one on this page from about a month ago when you claimed people were returning to Christianity when in fact people are leaving religions in record numbers.
Dear sir, surely you are not implying Christians lying for Jesus. I'm shocked 😱
His arguments are so pedestrian. There are much more compelling philosophical and fundamental underpinnings to belief in God than noting inconsistencies in our limited theories that require cosmic tinkering by a deity-something so inelegant in any case for any conceivable God. And at the apex of his argument apparently, is the requirement for an ultimate cause for the Big Bang. That such a cause is essential shows how prosaic his thinking, in that an eternal God who is the author of time itself has somehow never occurred to him. I’m a trained scientist as well as a Christian, and I need non of this nonsense to ground my faith. The laws of physics and the apparent purposefulness of complexity is wonder enough to suggest a pervasive intelligence in the known universe, with God as the source of everything. He also, somewhat dishonestly, brings in figures who, like me, have moved to a belief in God, or at least a universal intelligence, but not “intelligent design” as he would conceive, and extrapolates that they argue against Darwinian evolution as a broad concept. This is to completely mischaracterize scientists such as Dennis Noble, for example. I’ll stop there. I was hoping the creationists had moved on but it’s the same old in a different wrapper.
I’m 15 minutes in and still have heard no evidence for intelligent design, let alone a clear definition. Should I go on?
In history, of ALL the phenomena that people didn't understand and were attributed to, an of course imaginary, god, a god was NEVER the RIGHT answer to ANYTHING! Scientists proved that it are ALL NATURAL phenomena! And for a god or the supernatural to be a plausible explanation, first you have to prove that a god or the supernatural exist in reality! But there is not a shred of evidence for the existence of ANY god or Allah or whatever name they gave to their non-existing celestial dictator! So, why would scientists waste their precious time on fiction and magic?
Stephen Meyer continues to lie. The No Discovery Institute is a den of pseudoscientists.
Wow, there are some really beautiful views in these places.
...If I may. Pre Big Bang All Every & Every All existed Eternally. GOD said, I Am that I AM. No Time, no Entropy GOD took a small portion, set it aside, & that separation released a tremendous amount of Energy, which was mis read as an explosion The very first moment of Time/Space was created when GOD created HIS Garden. Entropy was initiated to bleed down that energy released, Time/Space started its Turbulent Flow. When everything settled down, our amazing planet Earth was ready. Fine Tuned. Every person has different fingerprints, observed the octopus, cuddle fish, even the amazing synapses of the human brain & how it functions. Not only these items. The knowledge gain by man in a brief Time/Sace. About sixty years from flight to landing & returning from the surface of the Moon by man. Learned men, when we pass, do we just become a pile of dirt on the floor? I really just can not see that happening. Just maybe, we pass on to the mystery of Quantum My mind just exploded from the wonderful things yet to be in GOD'S Loving hands, respectfully ordinarychuck hotmail... captivus brevis... you tube... Blessings...
To the Atheists that are listening to BS and think that it is something new always remember " God of the Gaps". Many opinions of several Scientists were mentioned by this psuedo-intellectual but I would suggest this to the audience, Christians when they had real power showed what they are capable of ( killing scientists that go against their cult) but remember none of their 3 Gods could stop people from questioning the dogma. It's apparent that we are moving towards whatever this is, maybe a new theocracy but who knows.
"Intelligent Design" was thoroughly discredited as merely rebranded Biblical creationism some twenty years ago. Meyer still pushed it because it's all he has.
Meyer was due to take the witness stand in the Dover vs Kitzmiller trial. This was his opportunity to defend ID. He pulled out of the trial. So far he has given three different reasons as to why he did not take the stand. One of them must be true.
@@terryleddra1973 You may be thinking of William Dembski. I think Meyer joined the DI later.
@@littleacorn2244 Dover vs Kitzmiller was in 2004. Meyer founded “The Centre for Science and Culture” in 1996. This is owned by the Discovery Institute. There is a documentary on here “Judgment day: Intelligent design on trial”. Meyer is shown to be one of a number of witnesses who were due to testify for intelligent design but withdrew from the trial. This is also backed up in lectures given by Eugenie Scott and Kenneth R Miller. The later was an expert witness in the trial, for evolution and is also a Theist.
A round ball is a mathematical sphere. A human brain is a Mandelbrot set complex ( both Mandelbrot and connected Julia sets) morphology. There are an infinite number of fractals/equations resulting in fractal geometry. A selection of one out of an infinite number. The Mandelbrot set has a beginning and end and is simultaneously infinite ( borders) and finite (area). It is the mathematical model of a Brain as well as being in structure from the Bose-Einstein condensate to the greatest structures in the universe. As such it is everywhere, make the form of everything and by being everywhere and making everything by necessity is all powerful. God is not the mathematical model. God is spirit. The mathematics that God uses to create is a description of God. No God of the gaps. Everything from now on is only understanding God via his math.
Morphology is not specified in the genome. Morphology is (as I have shown) at least iteratively, rotationally and vibrationally specific to each morphology.
//Ahh the hilarity Of happenstance’s Serendipity Of a single singularity Instantaneous and Spontaneously Mixed in a state Of lowest entropy Stirred by unstable Nothingness Exploded into Everything And so by emergence A mid state of entropy Causing all causality From strings Spinning spinors And twisting twistors Both matter and purpose Intent by blind Engineering Created mind And meaning Whose dark cold End is empty Emptiness once again Sparking infinite expansion Of unstable nothingness Into something again And again eternal Without end Quite the credulity The religion of nihilism From nothing to nothing Is illogical in the face Of any meaning Or purpose of being Self supposed Or otherwise opposed Contradicting existence And factual experience For never one see’s Nothing become something Nor something become nothing By physical laws As so described even Something at lowest Entropy would require Non self induction The spark and bang Of any creation And so without Hesitation and with great Adulation are the Songs and praises Of Anti-creation To infinite universes Of infinite potential And we but one In a game of chance No miracles required Of a being higher Yet Folly on follies Unthought the chance Of Unopposed infinite Potential the absolute One is infinitely possible Let not the nihilist Not fully presume a non nihilist Meaning and purpose Of nothingness creating Somethingness going To nothingness For full presumption Of nihilistic nihilism Would evidentially require The impossible extraction Of any purpose Any meaning From the nothingness Going to nothingness For just as we never see Something come from nothing Neither do we see purposelessness generate intent
In the beginning I am that I am Created that which is From that which is not The spirit of I am who I am Moved on the depths Of the formless and void Moving by spirit The essence of pattern The image of existence Onto which all things Kinds and likenesses Are called to map All meaning and purpose I am what I am Spoke in fractal terms The geometric shapes of All things real, material Being the observer Collapsing the wave Of non being function Of all created things Kinds and likenesses of being In the simultaneity of the pattern Of being I am that I am Divided light from darkness A cosmological constant Of darkness moving Faster than light And light moving At least time Through the pattern Now known as the face Of the deep I am that I am Thus created by moving Speaking and observing Calling to meaning Dividing time-space-energy To form the kinds Likenesses and images Of all being
Meyer is so indoctrinated he is immune to any evidence that contradicts his very limited view. There is no problem with the evolutionary theory but there is a problem with his limited imagination and ability to understand Darwin's discovery. Every argument from him takes the form "he does not understand/know/agree so his god did it."
Which god is returning to science? Yahweh? The intelligent designer theory is as valid as many others but let's not assume that designer is a Bronze Age city-raiding storm god.
Hi Chopper Chad. Please remember the main point of the video. Many atheististic evolutionary scientists are coming to grips with the following. There is an overwhelming preponderance of objective scientific evidence that points to a Creator. You will find this in the fields of Bilology, Chemistry, Cosmology, Astrophysics, Geology and Biblical Archeology. God has revealed Himself and His great love for mankind in many ways. The problem has never been adequate evidence. As Christ (The grand architect-designer of the universe) said in John 5:39-40, ". . .you are not willing" Please stop wasting you precious life and valuable time denying the evidence and rejecting God's wonderful gift of eternal life. With Him are pleasures forever more my dear friend! Stop allowing Satan, The enemy of your precious soul to blind your mind from the light of the glorious gospel ("The best news of all time)!
@@paullane387okay, show 1 just 1 piece of your evidence. Just 1
God is the reason people historically gave to fill the gaps before science discovered the truth. Lightning bolts = Zeus, how were humans created = Adam and Eve via God but we now know about evolution. I honestcant believe in this day and age a belief in God still prevails with so many people. It’s like religion keep trying to twist science to say yeah our magical man did that, when you i traduce ‘magi’ I guess nothing is off limits.
The math from which the morphology of the human brain is in the form( image) has a beginning and an end ( on the real number line, is simultaneously infinite ( borders) and finite ( area) and is in every structure from the Bose -Einstein condensate to the largest structures in the universe. By being everywhere is effectively omnipresent. In being omnipresent is functionally omniscient, in being the structure of everything is omnipotent. These are functionally omnipresence , omnipotence and omnipresence actualities. God is spirit.
Consider : In Genesis 1:1,2 God created. God moved. In Genesis 1:3,4,5 God said, saw, divided,and called. Said: words have structure as well being conveyor of information. Toroidal, vibrational, frequency and energy force in space-time-energy functions. Saw: in quantum physics parlance material comes into existence by the observer. Collapse of the wave function by an observer. Without an observer the wave function does not collapse and reality remains non existent or all probabilities. Schrodinger‘s cat is neither alive or dead until the box is opened but is both alive and dead. All the boxes closed or unobserved. Divided: divided light from darkness as 1/137 the cosmological constant ( which is a “ miracle “ in physics: a miracle is something you know is true but have no idea of how or why it is so). Called: calling is naming but also giving a task, job, profession, vocation, occupation or trade.
Ahh the hilarity Of happenstance’s Serendipity Of a single singularity Instantaneous and Spontaneously Mixed in a state Of lowest entropy Stirred by unstable Nothingness Exploded into Everything And so by emergence A mid state of entropy Causing all causality From strings Spinning spinors And twisting twistors Both matter and purpose Intent by blind Engineering Created mind And meaning Whose dark cold End is empty Emptiness once again Sparking infinite expansion Of unstable nothingness Into something again And again eternal Without end Quite the credulity The religion of nihilism From nothing to nothing Is illogical in the face Of any meaning Or purpose of being Self supposed Or otherwise opposed Contradicting existence And factual experience For never one see’s Nothing become something Nor something become nothing By physical laws As so described even Something at lowest Entropy would require Non self induction The spark and bang Of any creation And so without Hesitation and with great Adulation are the Songs and praises Of Anti-creation To infinite universes Of infinite potential And we but one In a game of chance No miracles required Of a being higher Yet Folly on follies Unthought the chance Of Unopposed infinite Potential the absolute One is infinitely possible Let not the nihilist Not fully presume a non nihilist Meaning and purpose Of nothingness creating Somethingness going To nothingness For full presumption Of nihilistic nihilism Would evidentially require The impossible extraction Of any purpose Any meaning From the nothingness Going to nothingness For just as we never see Something come from nothing Neither do we see purposelessness generate intent
In the beginning I am that I am Created that which is From that which is not The spirit of I am who I am Moved on the depths Of the formless and void Moving by spirit The essence of pattern The image of existence Onto which all things Kinds and likenesses Are called to map All meaning and purpose I am what I am Spoke in fractal terms The geometric shapes of All things real, material Being the observer Collapsing the wave Of non being function Of all created things Kinds and likenesses of being In the simultaneity of the pattern Of being I am that I am Divided light from darkness A cosmological constant Of darkness moving Faster than light And light moving At least time Through the pattern Now known as the face Of the deep I am that I am Thus created by moving Speaking and observing Calling to meaning Dividing time-space-energy To form the kinds Likenesses and images Of all being
That’s great, now quite a science book
@ it maps perfectly to the science/physics. Now understand why the brain is a Mandelbrot set complex morphology.
@ sure, and I respect that you think this, I was just curious if you could quote a science textbook or a scientific model as accurately as you quote Scripture
@ funny person. Tell me why the brain is a Mandelbrot set complex morphology. ( quote a textbook Blahaha) I have no need for that hypothesis.
@So you’ll quote an entire paragraph from Scripture as it buy you can’t quote any science textbook? It seems like you just like saying big words without actually knowing what they mean, hence why you refuse to answer my question
Intelligent Information does come from an intelligent source and to an intelligent receiver, but B.S. Meyers isn't receiving it. What does that say about his unintelligent information that he's pushing to the naive who listen?
Stephen Meyer has a B.S. (bullshit) degree in science. That's why he could never achieve a master's degree in rational and critical thinking which is needed for science. He's got a master's just in Philosophy.
The belief in a God has never had anything to do with science. It can never return to where it has never been. Science has never found a God, and therefore there's not even a clue to anything lost to be found or returned.
Greetings generyan, Perhaps you care to explain why many "Fathers of modern science" before Darwin were Christians. Surely you are familiar with Sir Isaac Newton, Galileo, Johnannes Kepler, and Blaise Paschal. For futher information, kindly consider the "God affirming" statements of other world-renowned scientists - many of them post-Darwin. www.magiscenter.com/blog/23-famous-scientists-who-believe-in-god
Pure sophistry and logical fallacies. There is ZERO data to support your position, let alone that Jesus equals the intelligent designer.
It’s time for Dawkins to step in and set everyone straight.
Materialists or Darwinists cannot explain consciousness is it fundamental and mind is it elemental emerging with quantum events? However that does not deter materialists from their view that the elements are fundamental to life. In addition to consciousness and mind they have limited knowledge of electromagnetism and zero of magnetism which is still a mystery. Of course there was human evolution but to a unique human prototype not to the prototype of any other species. In short, man was a special creation. The missing link is still missing and will remain so because it does not exist.
One realistic religious view is that human consciousness and mind came up through all of nature through all the kingdoms. However it came up to be expressed in its own unique human prototype. That was the higher age view and it makes sense.
No one equals God or Cosmic Consciousness transcendent and immanent. However Jesus is one with that consciousness, he is not that consciousness. As the Muslims rightly say no one is God (or Consciousness) but God.
No one can be God. Jesus said ye are gods and that is the case as we share in consciousness or God, so we are gods. Better than the view of being an evolved ape. Little wonder the youth of today being programmed with materialism and disinformation end up committing suicide. They see the problems of the environment and all else as beyond human control and as there is the perception that there is nothing else in charge they feel despair. Atheist materialism is a disservice to humanity it is not life affirming and it is unrealistic and not the case.
Dr. Myer's book---> Return of the God Hypothesis is cultural shifting. Fact...
If you have scientists who incorporate ID into their theories or hypotheses, of what use is that? Scientists will forever try to understand HOW it is done, not by WHOM.
True that’s because scientists don’t start with a whom, what makes thirst think there is a whom and what is their evidence for this whom. What do they look like, what character traits do they have and how can we test for it? They can’t just assume or introduce a whim without evidence.
Hello Fak_Chekr, Why would you only acknowledge the proccess while rejecting the Architect? The "scientists" you speak of are still atheists. They are simply unwilling to accept the logical conclusion that scientific evidence points to.
By asking "whom" you are smuggling in the concept that there IS a "whom"! But there is not a shred of evidence for the existence of such a "thinking" entity or god or Allah or whatever name they gave to their non-existing celestial dictator!
Whoever thought of intelligent design evidently never had a hemorrhoid.
The body has inbuilt ability to heal