- 4
- 313 243
Kris Wile
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2013
History of Racial Wealth Gap
A historical tour of US laws and practices showing why Black Americans have not been able to accrue generational wealth.
มุมมอง: 90
วีดีโอ
Structural Racial Bias in the US, Kris Wile, 2021 Intl Systems Dynamics Conference
มุมมอง 923 ปีที่แล้ว
This is a short conference presentation about Structural Bias in the US wealth building, and 'wealth grounding'. Created for 2021 International System Dynamic Conference. Presenter and creator is Kris Wile, founding partner of the Systems Thinking Collaborative.
Peter Senge Introduction to Organzational Learning
มุมมอง 74K10 ปีที่แล้ว
Peter Senge, author of The Fifth Discipline, Senior lecturer at MIT and Founder of the Society for Organizational Learning shares his perspectives on leadership and systems thinking with IBM. This video has been edited from an original at th-cam.com/video/HOPfVVMCwYg/w-d-xo.html Standard TH-cam license
Peter Senge Introduction to Systems Thinking
มุมมอง 239K10 ปีที่แล้ว
Peter Senge, author of The Fifth Discipline, Senior lecturer at MIT and Founder of the Society for Organizational Learning shares his perspectives on leadership and systems thinking with IBM. This video has been edited from an original at th-cam.com/video/HOPfVVMCwYg/w-d-xo.html Standard TH-cam license
Thanks
I think the family example is a good way to describe system dynamics but not system thinking. It is too localized to really be a great example for the kind of broad thinking that is the essence of systems thinking. Please change my mind. Thank you By too localized I mean that people themselves are systems. So viewing a family as a system is far too simplistic. He didn’t even mention that systems thinking is a simplistic view of the world. The real world is much more complex than any systems chart or methodology. Sure a family can be viewed as a system but that isn’t where systems thinking flourishes, its where systems thinking is at its weakest.
Anywhere you can see patterns over time can be thought of as a system. Certainly true in my family. There is a whole body of research and practitioners who are versed in something called Family Systems Theory. Can you think about variables such as satisfaction in marriage, time spent together, stress from work, ability to meet school requirements, perceived support, etc. Also one person's level of satisfaction/stress/etc can have a causal impact on another's state of being. System dynamics take the next step to quantify those relationships. They are systems all the way down.
@@kriswile3979 Thank you for taking the time to reply I appreciate it. Im just learning about this and wanted someone to talk to. Sorry for baiting you hahaha. In order to learn more*
We need people who can get together collectively. In school we are diverse. In the corporate and adult world, we are segregated. We do our own thinking and forget about the world. I’d like to see a place with diverse people going to sit down with diverse people to discuss one topic. Instead almost guaranteed, when you walk into a room, you are always drawn to your own people. The protege.
I really found his book "the 5th discipline" totally useless, and unnecessary complicated. The best alternative is David Hoyle books about Quality Management Systems.
th-cam.com/video/q2rLZilnq-o/w-d-xo.html
Peter Checkland was strong on HAS, Human Activity Systems. with Analysis 1, and Analysis 2, the Social and Political.
Brilliant
"Webs of interdependence."
He a risk taker
People make money out of talking absolute bollox about anything
I found this concise video that explains what systems thinking is. th-cam.com/video/Miy9uQcwo3U/w-d-xo.html
So what I get from this is that it really is about a very delicate balance between the smartest guy in the room, as well as a shared collective understanding that systems thinking and cooperation between people and ideas is the way to go? The "smartes" guy in the room should be concerned about the collective and the collective should be aware of that the smartes person in the room is somewhat a bit more important to listen to than some? I often find duality between oposites intersting to explore. I am not advocating for indivualism over systems, just finding the balance between those two important
“webs of interdependence” 🪢🧶
This is not how I use it
No we aren’t all part of a family . This is so old. 64% of Americans are estranged from two or more family members
That statistic may or may not be accurate, but they probably are not estranged from their entire family.
Few people are estranged from their entire families, and even those who are estranged from family they grew up with find ways of finding or creating new family with other loved ones. It sounds like you're having a difficult time conceptualizing family as anything outside the nuclear model or something.
@@SeymourDisapproves people always blame the individual while being blind to the dysfunction in our society in every area. Especially the Neoliberal government that assist corps to control and ravage our funds while people die in the streets. This ain’t the 1950s anymore!
@@brienluck4783 if the rest of their family is dead then they have no family. The older you get it is possible. Use your imagination. I lost my husband, my best friend and my daughter all in May 2015. A great year for being in grief and loss.
Awesome video! Are there any careers in systems thinking?
Yes - it is a Methodology for investigation you will find it in OR, Operational Research.
So a useless notion that has nothing to do with real life application.
Much Off Talk less of Output.
We need collective wisdom. Yes!
truisms.....
Please someone explain this to me....i am nt able to identify the diff between system thinking vs. System dynamics.plz help
Systems dynamics is the observation of a system over a time period. it is part of the systems thinking methodologies.
Think in terms of CATWOE (defn on Google) Everyone quotes Elton Mayo, but the real genius was his student Rathlingsburger. - who found we change behavior by Observing it.
Hey Kristina, great video.
Be prepared to be wrong
Does this assume that the concept of a system is always boundless?
No, it doesn't. In fact, in order to think about systems, we need to draw boundaries. Some causal effects are stronger than others, and some small enough to be dropped out of analysis. Setting system boundaries is a thoughtful process. Best practice would be to share the thinking about what is included, and what has been excluded.
I belive it depends on what area you are looking at...
HOWEVER, Peter Checkland always wins arguments by putting another circle around the argument at hand. He was a great exponent too of Open Systems. Add a new Actor, and you have to redefine the System.
How to cite this video according to apa guidelines.... someone answer quick pleeaaase
See IBM Social media channel.
Here's how my instructor cited it: Wile, K. (2014, August). Peter Senge introduction to systems thinking [Video]. Retrieved from th-cam.com/video/eXdzKBWDraM/w-d-xo.html (00:02:20). (Note: The title, ie. "Peter Senge.....systems thinking" would be in italics)
Senge, P. (2014). Peter Senge introduction to systems thinking [Video file]. Retrieved from th-cam.com/video/eXdzKBWDraM/w-d-xo.html
Very elegant explanation of systems thinking.