- 3
- 887 446
Richard Feynman
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 10 พ.ค. 2015
On teaching
Fair Use
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
มุมมอง: 388 252
วีดีโอ
On religion
มุมมอง 500K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Fair Use Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Different degrees of certainty? Nonsense. There are no degrees of certainty, only degrees of confidence. You are either certain, or you're not.
The concept of God i think this guy firmly believes, i dont think a truly smart man would not believe. What he doesnt believe in is stories and religions, mind you these are completely different from ‘God’. It’s a fair point though
Religion and God is what happens when you don't accept metaphysical and epistemological axioms so you start making things up in orther to explain why this axioms, that you already know, are. On the contrary, as you cannot explain them by the same means (perception, reason and logic) you 'use' faith and dogma. You basically invent assumptions that cannot be tested, proved, falsified or have correspondence to what is and how we know it is, in orther to explain it all.
Feynman's too smart to understand anything about God
This hit home, this is the first time Feynman confused me rather than enlightened me.
how can anyone disagree with what he just said?
Please, where does this interview comes from? I need informations about it.
This is from a BBC Horizon programme produced in 1981 called 'The Pleasure of Finding Things Out' and it runs for 50 minutes. It is available on Vimeo and on the BBC but you have to be in the UK to watch it there. His answer to the question about magnetism is particularly interesting
@DevilishScience If I could I would have offered you a drink for this answer. Thanks a lot, mister.
Yes, he proved that christianity is false but he mainly showed that he is a liar. When he says that he can live without knowing, it's a lie. No human being can live without a clear opinion concerning the subject of God. Feynman, for example, had concluded that God did not existed. How I know that ? Because he did great evil to many girls, women and husbands. The only way to act like that is thinking there is no superior being. Each being who think there is a superior being will be respectful about others. Theism and atheism are not revealed by words, but by the way we act towards everything in this world. Here, Feynman used a bad trick to lie to everybody, and people got screwed.
He is talk Advait Philosophy of Sanatan
@@ChilayKalan Your answer is not clear to me. Please, be clearer.
Fynman's emphasis on doubt goes back to Descartes, who started off by rejecting everything he could doubt. Then he realized that he could not doubt he was doubting. He arrived at his famous statement: I think, therefore I am. Feynman needs to question whether or not his understanding of religion is adequate. Hint: It is not.
Buddhist Proverb : '' Believe nothing without at least equal evidence ''.
The funny thing is, the Dalai Lama has the same stance.
This is a careful reminder of everything I believe in -- I revisit this every month or so, so glad to have walked the Infinite Corridor in the same steps as him, but would have loved to have met him in the tunnels and have a chat
💥
💥
Wonderful
Even Richard Feynman has a mustard seed of faith. Even Richard Dawkins for that matter.
'...it doesn't frighten me.' The genius soundbyte...
DR. Feynman anymore Integration tricks?
I’ll bet he was frightened when he looked into the blackness and void at his last breath. Too late then. I’d rather believe in something than believe in nothing. And no, I’m not frightened either, I just prefer faith to doubt.
Excerpt from Wikipedia "There are an estimated 10,000 distinct religions worldwide though nearly all of them have regionally based relatively small followings." Such evidence would tend to suggest that religion for the most part is due to the condition of being human, plus there are no other creatures on this planet that partake in any religious practise although some do get used for religious sacrificial purposes. A more important question to ponder would be why people need the next person to be religious like them and also why if the believed in religion is not the same that the state of play can result in very serious consequences in certain circumstances. Here is another question, imagine being born in to an empty house where you never read anything nor speak with anyone. When you reach adulthood would you be religious and if so which one would be chosen?
He can't argue religion but I can demolish it with basic logic easily
Science is the art of the Gods.
Doing theoretical physics is probably no different from doing philosophy.
Pauli was one of the most scathing and brilliant critics of errors in physics. Yet, Pauli,along with C.G. Jung studied Jung's paranormal theory of 'Synchronicity' and possible connections to quantum mechanics. Pauli was very,very brilliant and hard working. Why would he waste his valuable time studying a paranormal theory unless he thought that it might be true? Feynman valued Pauli's criticisms of his theories. Synchronicity is often connected with a supreme intelligence or God.
Monotheism is the instigator of ignorance, oppression, and violence. Monotheism has been a "totalizing discourse", often co-opting all aspects of a social belief system, resulting in the exclusion of "others". Monotheism is less pluralistic , because monotheism stipulates that people pigeonhole their beliefs into one tenet. "Monotheism is irreconcilable with the existence in our nature of the instincts of benevolence" because it compels followers to devote themselves to a single Creator. The logic of monotheism yields little basis for tolerating other religions". Monotheism anesthetize the sense of wonder as if one were committed to a single line of thought by a cosmic legal contract".
I find it enlightening listening to him.
Science doesn't mean experiments. The processes to get you to science knowledge are different. He called himself a scientist but knew nothing. How?
Religion is man-made. God was, is & will be.
Interesting thoughts...but some people still think that faith and religion must accommodate in science worldview and think that a person who believes is a person who doesn't doubt. If we look to history of science we'll find a lot of great scientists who believe and doubt simultaneously and, I believe, because of that pursued the "truth" and made a lot of contributions to science and society.
He was a brilliant scientist, but his scientism got in the way of him embracing religion. Ironically, the phenomenon of scientists and science-minded people rejecting religion because of scientism has only been around for two or maybe three centuries. I was one of them.
Scientism😂. Anyway, what got u out? Just curious.
This is what honesty sounds like.
The problem ✡️✝️☪️ The solution 🧠
To što ne plaši njega i mnoge druge ne znači da neče nikada biti onih koje če plašiti. To što on i mnogi drugi uživaju riješavati ne riješive zagonetke ne znači da nema onih koji mrze ili nisu sposobni riješavati zagonetke. Ali najvažnije je da če uvijek biti onih koji če njima ponuditi neko instant riješenje. Kao promjenu spola u trans gender debil. A još i važnije od najvažnijeg je da su mase jako podložne hipnozi.
I love this man.
this is the philosophy of the Holi Quran. The Quran says to us thet we must ask and wandering about the nature of the World. There is a verse in the Qur’an that says: (Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of night and day are signs for those of understanding. Those who remember God while they are standing, sitting, and on their sides, and contemplate the creation of the heavens and the earth. Our Lord, You did not create this in vain. Glory be to You, so protect us from the torment of the Fire)
Praise the lord Jesus Christ.
Nah praise be to Abraham.
@@Qwerty123zzuy Abraham as well.
Anyone who put a comment here is a wanker 😅
It clearly bothered him deeply that he had no faith. Otherwise he wouldn't get all worked up trying to explain it away
Aint nobody worked up here😂
Who is this that darkens my counsel with words without knowledge? Brace yourself like a man; I will question you, and you shall answer me....
Every student is eager to learn knowledge from him. 😊
maybe the world needs all kind of people.
It’s interesting that he acknowledges he has a soul. Did he ever ponder the question where that came from?
Why complicate thing. We all are created, yes?!
No
Best teacher in this civilizáció!
Having an intellectual leave an opening for the possibility of something more then their personal conclusions is refreshing.
That's really common, having a religious leave an opening for the possibility of his dogmas being wrong would be way more refreshing
He didn't know that the Bible never stated humans were the only thing God ever made.....
It only talks about creating creatures in this world and most of his 6 days of createion were wasted here, but you sure can as always dodge by changing the meaning of things, like saying that days are not days but thousands of years or that world doesn't mean world but universe so anything can mean anything or even the opposite of what it actually says, which is the same as saying all that BS means nothing
@@eidiazcas but if that's what the Bible says then everything you just said is correct whether you like it or not buy
@@eidiazcas okay well most of the world knows .... by now I think the Bible was rewritten by man but ultimately what I said is not wrong and what you said is not wrong
@@eidiazcas So the electron is really condensed energy made up from the electromagnetic field.... Now the negative charge around the electron is just the field being pulled in by the electron ... And for the nucleus of the Adam the same thing with positive charge..... And the same thing with the neutral charge inside the nucleus.... Now whenever negative charge meets negative charge the field around the electron is the same density as the other field around the other electron (and of course I'm talking about the charge around the electron or the energy around the electron)so ... Because the negative charge around the electrons are the same density they bounce off one another.... And whenever positive charge meets negative charge they are different densities so they pull into one another.... But positive charge and neutral charge are around the same density so they pull into one another.... And positive charge is more condensed so it condenses the neutral charge inside of it.... Then whenever the electron comes along with its negative charge then the energy that's already condensed inside the positive and neutral fields around the nucleus becomes even more condensed inside the electron and that energy that is condensed inside the electron made up of the neutral and positive charges....... Pulls on the neutral and positive charges more because it is more condensed and they're around the same condensity... So whenever the election leaves the electron does not have a strong enough pull to pull on the positive and neutral charge that it made more condensed inside of it so the electron moves away from the nucleus and then the nucleus pulls out the energy that was in the electron and that creates a photon my name is dylan stone...... If energy in a particle acts like a ghost then you can compact other energy inside of energy.... Which would probably be how you got decay.... Basically what would happen the center energy in the particle would push out other bits of energy and they would become different condensities in other parts of the particle....😂 And obviously the bits of the energy being pushed out of the center of the particle would already be part of the particle..... It would just become packed in other energy on the edge of the particle.
@@eidiazcas hey so if the photon can create a field for a couple of seconds because the energy and the photon pushes to its edges and pulls them just a little bit of the electromagnetic field then you could say the electromagnetic field crushes it to become or give it enough pull to crush the photon into a straight line
He is amazing!
Just WOW :)
i agree with Feynman, it's too local, we can't say the origins of the universe, at least all worlds/ doesn't come from the Sun. It's too provincial as he says.
Feynman was an incredible man
What a legend.
Smart man. Flawed as we all are. King Solomon would've been nice to have in the room. He would've laughed a bit. Then proceeded to question all primitive logic before dropping key proverbs of wisdom that would quiet the room. *exits the room to proceed ruling his kingdom*
Soo cool yes sir