วีดีโอ

J'apprécie vraiment vos efforts! Un peu hors sujet, mais je voulais demander: J'ai un portefeuille SafePal avec des USDT et j'ai la phrase de récupération. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Comment puis-je les transférer vers Binance?

Merci pour l'explication! Un peu hors sujet, mais je voulais demander: Mon portefeuille OKX contient des USDT et j'ai la phrase de récupération. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Pourriez-vous expliquer comment les déplacer vers Binance?

J'apprécie l'analyse détaillée! Juste une petite question hors sujet: Mon portefeuille OKX contient des USDT et j'ai la phrase de récupération. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Comment puis-je les transférer vers Binance?

J'apprécie vraiment vos efforts! J'ai besoin d'un conseil: Mon portefeuille OKX contient des USDT et j'ai la phrase de récupération. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Pourriez-vous expliquer comment les déplacer vers Binance?

Super contenu, comme toujours! Un peu hors sujet, mais je voulais demander: J'ai un portefeuille SafePal avec des USDT et j'ai la phrase de récupération. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Comment dois-je procéder pour les transférer vers Binance?

Wow Merci pour la diffusion ❤

Vraiment dommage que le son soit aussi pourri (contrairement aux autres vidéos produits). Possibilité de nettoyer la bande son ? Ça en vaudrait la peine !

La fameuse compétitivité... dans notre beau système économique capitaliste. Pas de quoi être rassuré messieurs ! Bonne précision à 12:43 M. Beaumier ! 😉 Faut arrêter de subventionner les compagnies milliardaires. Les $$$ doivent aller à des mesures écologiques qui impactent directement la vie des gens comme le logement (construction écologique et durable).

Bravo et merci à tous et toutes, spécialement à Alejandra !

Avec 0,01 % de la composition de l'air, le CO2 anthropique n'est sûrement pas le vrai responsable des changements climatiques, et avec 0,04 % de l'air, le CO2 global a un effet de serre très limité. th-cam.com/video/RZNFmQpL7lY/w-d-xo.html Les 13 paramètres naturels expliqués par Michel-Yves Gattepaille l'ingénieur qui dit la vérité sur le climat.

Action is better than anxiety.

Oxfam researched the top (worse) ten banks worldwide which finance the oil industry. Of the ten, here are five of them: Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto Dominion, CIBC, Bank of Montreal, and Scotiabank. Take action! Choose carefully your financial institution.

There has been a 10% decline in natural disasters since 2000 (CRED). Normalised disaster losses have decreased since 1990 and human mortality due to extreme weather has decreased by more than 95% since 1920, so you're 50 times less likely to die from a climate-related disaster in a world that's 1°C warmer than 100 years ago (EM-DAT, CRED/UC). Deaths from drought have declined by 99%! As an example of good news, Climate Change saved 555,103 lives in England and Wales between 2001 and 2020 (ONS, 2022). Globally the ACE index (accumulated cyclone energy) 1980-2021 shows no increasing trend. Global Hurricane Landfalls 1970-2021 (updated from Weinkle et al, 2012) shows no trend. Satellite data since 1980 shows a slight downward global trend for total hurricaine numbers with 2021 being a record low year. From the NOAA GFDL website 'Global Warming and Hurricanes, An Overview of Current Research' (dated Feb. 9, 2023). And I quote "We conclude that the historical Atlantic hurricane data at this stage do not provide compelling evidence for a substantial greenhouse warming-induced century-scale increase in: frequency of tropical storms, hurricanes, or major hurricanes, or in the proportion of hurricanes that become major hurricanes." Multidecadal variability in Atlantic hurricaines is most probably related to the AMO (Vecchi et al, 2021). NOAA data 1851-2021 shows no trend in number of hurricaine landfalls with the record high being 1886. There is also no trend in the frequency of major hurricanes (Cat 3 +) for the same period, although the trend for the last 20 years is downwards. It makes no difference if you look at the Pacific. Using data from the JMA 1951-2022 we see typhoon activity trending downwards for over 7 decades. There is evidence cited in AR6 (IPCC) that Australia is experiencing the lowest frequency of tropical cyclones in the last 550 to 1,500 years, and that windspeed overland throughout the Northern Hemisphere has been dropping in recent decades. Also the number of intense storms (below 960 mbars) in the Northern Atlantic has fallen sharply since 1990 (Tilinina et al, 2021). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR6 report, Chapter 11,"Weather and Climate Extreme Events in Changing Climate" concludes that changes in the frequency and intensity of most severe weather events (with corresponding intense rainfall) have not been detected nor can they be attributed to human caused climate change. What the data from NOAA SPC shows about tornados: EF1-EF5 (1954-2022) no trend; EF3-EF5 (most destructive) (1954-2022) 50% decline. No EF5s in US since 2013 (a record absence). There has been no clear change in annual precipitation over the Earth's landmasses between 1850-2000 (Wijngaarden, 2015). Drought appears to be decreasing globally (Watts et al, 2018) measured by SPI 1901-2017. Deserts have shrunk considerably since the 1980's. The Sahara shrank by 12,000km² per year 1984-2015(Liu & Xue, 2020). The Earth has greened by 15% or more in a human lifetime. "The greening of the planet over the last two decades represents an increase in leaf area on plants and trees equivalent to the area covered by all the Amazon rainforests. There are now more than two million square miles of extra green leaf area per year"(NASA, 2019). Observations of Earth’s vegetative cover since the year 2000 by NASA’s Terra satellite show a 10% increase in vegetation in the first 20 years of the century. Global tree canopy cover increased by 2.24 million square kilometers (865,000 square miles) between 1982 and 2016 (Nature, 2018). As well as human intervention, the reasons for this include forests expanding polewards aided by additional CO2 and a slight rise in temperature. Increased CO2 causes this in two ways: it has a direct fertilising effect (the CFE), and it increases drought tolerance by reducing stomata. This greening of the Earth due to CO2 is now "an indisputable fact" (Chen et al, 2024). In fact, 55.15% of those areas greening have been doing so at an accelerated rate since 2001. Since the start of the Industrial Revolution the Earth's primary productivity has increased by more than 30% (Campbell et al, 2017 and Haverd et al, 2020). The Earth’s natural vegetation productivity actually increased 6% in 18 years (Nemani et al, 2003) with 42% of this increase coming from the Amazon rainforests. Between 1961 and 2021 global cereal production increased 250% and cereal yield increased over 200%. Land used for cereal hardly increased (Data from World Bank, FAO/UN). This is the only time in human history that you are more likely to be overfed rather than underfed. We should be thankful we were borne into an age of such abundance. A US DoE study (Taylor & Schlenker, 2021) estimated that a 1 ppm increase in CO2 led to an increase of 0.4%, 0.6% and 1% in yield for corn, soybeans and wheat, respectively, and that CO2 increase was the main driver of the 500% yield growth in corn since 1940. Global tomato production has set a record each year for the past 10 years. Banana production has doubled in 20 years. All 10 of the largest sugar crops in global history occurred during the past 10 years. All 10 of the 10 largest rice crop years occurred during the past 10 years (UNFAO). 2023 was another record cereal crop. The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022 and 2023 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see. Extinction rates (1500-2009) peaked around 1900 at 50 per decade. Extinction rates have declined dramatically to around 4 to per decade in the 2000s. So the extinction rate is very low: 900 known lost species for 2.1 million known species in 500 years (IUCN), so from observations there are an average of slightly less than 2 species lost every year. Out of a known species total of over 2 million. That gives an annual percentage loss of less than 0.0001%. That's background extinction. At that frequency it will take over 930,000 years to reach 80% extinction of species experienced at the K-T boundary that saw the extinction of the dinosaurs. Of course, extinction is a natural part of the evolution of life on this planet with the average lifespan of a species thought to be about 1 million years (cf 930,000). It is estimated that 99.9% of all plant and animal species that have existed have gone extinct. It should also be noted that no taxonomic families have become extinct in the last 500 years. In fact marine diversity at the taxonomic level of families is the highest it has ever been in the Earth's long history (see Sepkoski Curve). In a review of 16,009 species, most populations (85%) did not show significant trends in abundance, and those that did were balanced between winners (8%) and losers (7%) (Dornelas et al, 2019). There have been only 9 species of continental birds and mammals confirmed extinct since 1500 (Loehle, 2011). No global marine animals have become extinct in the past 50 years (McCauley et, 2015 using IUCN data). There is no climate crisis.

Honte à tous ceux qui participent de près ou de loin au forum économique mondial 🖕🏻🤮

1h09m00sec socio-écologiqie et aussi les sens et l'écologie

Your video is very beautiful. I like it a lot. I have been trying to talk to you for a long time. I am waiting for your response. Please give me a chance to talk to you. I am a professional digital marketer and TH-cam marketing expert.💚📞💗

Fantastic interview! Great to see people on the Prairies standing up for common sense and the public interest in life, health, safety, environment, economy and our common future. It should not be so hard to get people to realize that their physical health and survival are at stake but such is the power of denial and misinformation today.

Vous ne savez clairement pas pour qui vous travaillez et ce que cache l'agenda 2030. Vous serez dans une eco-fasciste dictature. Vous n'aurez plus rien et vous serez heureux. Esperons que les gens vont se reveiller car ca sera pas beau pour l'avenir des enfants. On n'aura plus aucune liberte.

moi je suis a iles maurice on vien avoire une inondation, ca comence vrement nous fait peur

Pelleteux de nuage

Unfortunate that this is so blurry I cannot read the text on the slides.

Mon émission préféré

merci

Hello Climate Reality Project Canada Owner, I saw your TH-cam channel, you upload very nice videos on your channel. I have watched all the videos and noticed that all the videos are beautiful. But your channel has many problems. But the problem is that your videos are not reaching your target audience! Because, your channel does not have SEO! If you don't fix the problem, your video won't get video views organically because the TH-cam algorithm works on keywords, but your channel doesn't have any keywords! These problems can be solved by SEO techniques. Every video will rank on TH-cam if you do SEO perfectly. Doing SEO will help your video reach the right people and increase views. Remember, SEO is not a single task, it is multifaceted. If you want to do SEO on your channel, I can help. I am an SEO expert. Thank you, have a nice day

You should honestly look into educating the youth on media propaganda. I admire you wanting to teach, but you are too young and naive of the ways of this world and the terrible means to which humans seek money and power. Also look up what happened to the ideological supporters of Stalin and Mao after they got into power. Climate info for you: clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/WCD-version-081423.pdf

❤️ *promosm*

Promo-SM 💃

C'était super intéressant. Même pour ceux qui connaissent tout ces sujets catastrophiques. Les témoignages, que ce soit les agriculteurs ou sur le Bénin, c'était super. Merci à vous.

Merci

ils ont soi disant des diplômes ont n’a pu constater sur l’instruction ne fait pas l’intelligence

a oins sur vous refusez la recuit ion de naissance noires en faveurs des virus pour tuer les plus vieux et éviter de leurs verser leurs retraites ?

c’est une mode de parler du climat le réchauffement climatique est dû au nombre de la population qui eurent de plus en plus tard et au naissance abusif des populations africaines et autres y’a rien à faire sinon non à réguler le nombre de gosses par familles c’est le vrai dangers pour l’europe les vrais problèmes c’est les tares drogues et pedophilies sous le tapis ça pue mais c’est aussi les verts non?

mdr quel crise climatique le réchauffement c’est dû au nombre de la population qui a multipliée par 3 je vois pas ce que vient faire la technologie là dedans , neutraliser lés population trop dense pour éviter les invasions et l’effacement du blancs les africains l’europe n’est pas notre garde manger

Thanks Climate Reality!

Début le début je suis sur le bord de ma chaise. ca vient me toucher

Excellent ..thank you.

5:00 Wexler. Weak acoustics/audio. (;-(

Holla! #LocalAmbition

uo4hc vyn.fyi

Name one thing British Columbia has bought to fight climate change, in the 13 years we have been paying into it with carbon taxes?

By reflecting away 30% of the incoming solar energy the albedo/atmosphere/GHGs make the Earth cooler than it would be without the atmosphere much like that reflective panel behind a car’s windshield. The non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules render “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a LWIR black body impossible. For example, the 396 W/m^2 upwelling from the surface is a “What if?” theoretical calculation without physical reality. (refer to: TFK_bams09) Without the 396 W/m^2 upwelling there is no 333 W/m^2 GHG energy up/down/”back” LWIR greenhouse gas loop to not “warm” the terrestrial surface. The greenhouse theory and man caused climate change are negated by any one of these three points. Hysterical speculations over sea levels, ice caps, glaciers, extreme weather, etc. are irrelevant noise. Zero greenhouse effect, Zero CO2 global warming and Zero man caused climate change. Version 1.0 090121

09:56 "Here is a picture showing different industries, the sources of greenhouse gases, but really the main source is the burning of fossil fuels." This will be Climate Reality Project's shameful legacy, the willful neglect of solutions that MUST be found in animal agriculture to mitigate methane and to rectify the opportunity costs that our appetite for meat and dairy have abused upon the earth. In 2021 it is time for everyone to challenge these half truths (i.e. "...main source is the burning of fossil fuels..." justifies renewable energy as the ONLY target discussed at the COP summits, in environmental departments of government, and amongst the "heroes" who have sworn to protect the environment but willfully ignore the best solutions to reverse climate change in this decade. Even the IPCC in 2014 declared the GWP100 form of accounting the impact of non-CO2 gases as arbitrary and inaccurate in assessing short-lived gases like methane, yet the corporate loyalty to renewable solutions has corrupted the climate change movement into a monomaniacal thug that cannot make room for agricultural solutions they haven't the political "stomach" for. This slide, and the shameful rhetoric that accompanies it hasn't changed since I took Climate Reality training in 2015. By the solutions offered in this slideshow it is clear that Climate Reality believes in infinite growth on a finite planet and they have checked environmental logic at the door.

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere/GHGs, makes the earth cooler than it would be without that atmosphere like that reflective panel set behind the windshield. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth would become much like the Moon, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory comes from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a LWIR ideal black body which 4) cannot happen because of the non-radiative, kinetic energy, heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules and as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. Version 1.0 070221

49:58 Grant Linney "An interesting evolution for Greta...she has made a subtle shift and she says, 'We need to educate people further.'" Indeed -- the mainstream of climate science is very selective about what solutions they champion, especially as they are determined to solve the crisis by attracting capitalists to be the heroes, the only ones whose support for renewables can grow the economy while the environment is "rescued." The political confounding in the name of renewables -- a silver bullet solution that has so monopolized even well-intentioned activists as to smother all "competing" solutions and diminish the biggest industry to cover the planet to a benign consumer choice. Greta has been aware of the impact of agriculture, yet those who control her access to platform have suppressed it -- until now. th-cam.com/video/7WvehTbuvIo/w-d-xo.html The world will indeed be educated, Grant, and the solutions in our Climate Reality slideshows balanced in their solutions. Are you among those lied to?

10:00 Grant Linney: "Psychologically, many of us believe we are not really doing anything right now and it's not true. We have made a choice. If we continue life as per usual and we continue to burn fossil fuels and cut down trees, we are choosing a very undesirable future." Why didn't Grant say, "...drill holes and cut down trees?" We drill holes to obtain fossil fuels, and the action that is done on behalf of our energy use is burning them. It is the "cut down trees" part of the statement that lacks integrity and courage -- the action done on our behalf is agriculture, a sector from which spring solutions that Climate Reality persists in ignoring. Organizations like Project Drawdown have illustrated that the immediate solutions are in the food sector; by the end of 2021 there will be a reckoning, persistent mistruths exposed and an embarrassing examination of the misdirection of climate activism. th-cam.com/video/uJhgGbRA6Hk/w-d-xo.html

I was enjoying the thoughtful Q&A -- the desire to redirect subsidies is appreciated but is predicated on what grows the economy and that means getting our dessicated environment (which we call "resources") to market. Organizations like Nation Rising are appearing that hope to challenge the perverse subsidies given to animal agriculture, alas, an industry that is forgiven all but a few externalities. Beef has a role in economy that exempts it from environmental scrutiny -- period. (Though it's worth a footnote that as our nation weans Alberta from its fossil fuel we are certainly loathe to be the ones to tell Alberta ranchers the bad news about beef.) It's been a long time since the advice given in the credit sequence of An Inconvenient Truth (fifteen years) yet Climate Reality Project insists on slides like this one at 1:02:31. I can only charge such persistent and willful neglect of the well-known impact of animal agriculture as a total lack of integrity. Establishing political dimensions is understandable, but given that the collective brain trust of Climate Reality Project does not rank our power to choose what's on our plate as relevant does not signify that they are stupid...they think WE are stupid. I keep hoping that this organization will finally overcome the irony of their tragic inability to acknowledge this inconvenient truth. th-cam.com/video/uJhgGbRA6Hk/w-d-xo.html

46:30 Rebates that go back to consumers, or to industry to reward them for making green choices. This ought to be a no-brainer for facilitating and rewarding a plant-based transition from animal production, given the unending stream of bad news about meat, a known carcinogen for both humans and incongruent with the nine planetary boundaries seeking a safe living space for humanity. I suppose that the regenerative ranchers will manage to siphon some of that...and "poor farmers" will be exempted from carbon taxes as climate change threatens food security.

42:40 Question 1: "Negative externalities of production increase the cost of goods and services when they are internalized -- let's face it. Right? How can we convince consumers to transition from cheap polluting goods and services to more expensive sustainable alternatives despite their scarce expendable income...how do we reconcile the pathway to sustainable consumerism, if you will, to the fact that the bad stuff is cheaper." It's not a tough question at all. If you represent responsible businesses you DO NOT place the onus on the consumer to place ethics first -- you are only an environmentalist if you recognize that the filthy status quo of ignoring ecological impacts is at the core of the Anthropocene and it is not a burden that when accepted makes you a hero -- in restoring environmental justice you have avoided being a villain, and your corporate signups for your program have indeed leveraged themselves above the scum who like the externalities where they are -- paid with taxes to us poor folks you were worried about. It is so very nice when consumers crave sustainability and it should be encouraged. This starts with sharing a true awareness of the landscape -- not the politically and economically convenient version of the truth. I'm talking about a complete reversal of the climate narrative where the average person is either helpless once they've changed out their incandescent light bulbs or downsized their domestic transportation schemes, or they alone are expected to repair an environmentally corpulent beef industry by frequenting boutique butcher shops for greenwashed meat. The understanding that climate change is not just about fossil fuels is one that climate activists seem to be aware of yet sense that there has been a call for radio silence each is loathe to break. The global meat burden for this next decade is higher than the impact of oil, but this is a taboo subject because the politics (not science) of climate change insists upon targets in 2050 and 2100 -- who measures from 2020-2030? Well, anti-fracking scientists like Robert Howarth of Cornell who doesn't shy away from methane arguments lest natural gas be adopted as a bridge fuel. Who else should? Anyone who believes that there exist points of no return and they are at our feet (if we haven't already passed them!). Of your 79 signees mentioned at 39:00 some are involved in agriculture. My skeptic nature expects that these will be those who are eager to prove that "regenerative agriculture" (a worthy goal) can be achieved using livestock (almost certainly a bandwagon that has no interest in ending the industry of "cheap, dirty products" of CAFOs or the tragedy of the commons of publically grazed cattle. I do have hope for Canada as the subsidization of plant-based protein has begun (though not yet diminishing the false economy of meat in the slightest).

36:37 "We're trying to leverage the strengths and resources of the business community to use their voices, use their clout to influence policy in a good way." You've observed perverse subsidies for the fossil fuel industry -- what about influencing high-carbon food industry? One of the first jobs we need done is to spread awareness...though perhaps there is an inherent meat bias that prevents folks from using "their clout to influence policy in a good way?" I hope I'm wrong, because it's frustrating to think that the climate is about to make growing food more difficult and the USA have recently revealed a bipartisan fear of telling Americans the bad news about burgers -- they play no role other than as an obstacle to the recovery of our atmospheric carbon.

31:11 Race to Zero. Your hopeful tone is because you expect the COP summits will produce binding obligations that the US Congress will ratify. Cute. The COP summits are what you study to see why national politics fails climate change -- over 1/4 century of people in developing nations (ie. on the front lines of climate change) watch the industrial countries who created the mess kick dust and challenge each other to compromise their economies first. The unwritten (but not unspoken) rule at COP summits is that one must not use the "c" word (Consumption). We will figure out how to keep the balloon from popping but we mustn't stop blowing into it...