วีดีโอ

Fantastic overview and simple explanation of benefits. Excited to have Team Copilot. When will it be Generally available?

Yada yada yada . Post something interesting ..

Hi Richard! Jody Bennett - Copilot Program Manager at Pfizer - I'll probably have a bunch of questions :) Firstly, how do you have the view showing "Stay on Top" and "Try these Prompts"? Would love to know.

This video is a year old but the feature still does not exist in Sharepoint. How was this video created?

I've been using SVGs for site logo's and suchlike and I recently learned how to ensure that the SVG changes with 'dark mode' settings ... haven't tested it on a site, yet ... but ... yeah ... seems like it could be massive.

amazing

"Promo sm"

Hi. I will be very happy to see full video on this. I have subscribed and waiting for full video.

how do we create our own community in viva engage

thank-you this was a good information

Nice coverage here Richard! Love the plugins. Hope all is well with you!

I am currently pitching a Viva-Centric engagement program to my company and hope that it gets the green light; these tools are powerful in the right hands! Just wondering if there are any plans to create a shopify-style employee engagement shop within the 365 platform?

Didn't occur to you to show how to use plugins????

So... any idea if this still exists? No update since it was announced in 2022 despite claim it would be available in 2023, and it's not on the Roadmap regardless. They still kept the Microsoft Search "Floorplan" feature as deprecated, though...

This is so good, thanks for the insights. Where is Step 4 out of 4?

This was extremely insightful and very well presented. Thank You.

Great video. Can you point out the academic research that proofs the ROI on using GenerativeAI/LLMs?

Question: Does this apply for "all" Copilots? In other words, does this information hold true only for the Microsoft 365 Copilot, or also the Dynamics 365 Copilt (for Customer Service, Sales, ...)?

This awesome and totally helps to get a grip on the topic!

Great vid

anything that M$ touches for years now is worsened if it was good to begin with. so thanks but no, thanks

Where can i find that lab ?

When will the Brand Center be released? I am quite interested and want to know.

Great video from an organizational view, especially the bit on determining which users should be granted licenses. thanks!

how to land or export or put this creator tool kit on your sharepoint landing point page.

BASICALLY AS USUAL MS "BORROW WITHOUT RETURNING POLICY" FROM OTHER DEVELOPERS' IDEAS th-cam.com/video/xDLvUqhwHZc/w-d-xo.html

Great video, thanks

why not workday and peakon?

Love this video! I'm sharing it with my management team at our practice as we look to help our clients make the transition to AI. You've provided a great path forward and I'll be reaching out. Thanks!

So figma brings no new functions to the table, but you are able to test and preview your content more effective. you still have to add Theme and design elements by hand in SharePoint once you are done testing?

I dont have any time left for work after using any kind of the MS apps there are. Its too mich

Love working with you guys! Great ideas here!

How much does it cost Mother Nature, and consequently all living beings on planet Earth?

you look like Zelensky

Promo-SM 🎉

Great information Richard, AI protection for corporations is absolutely necessary. The need to just teach the end users what comes with these Chat solutions that are pouring out at a breakneck speed. It could become big borther-ish if we are not careful. Especially for companies like Google who completely fired their entire ethics department. What an embarrassment and tell tale sign of what is important to them. I would steer clear of Google AI products just because of that reason. I am glad Bing Chat is going to be quite protected.

I forgot to include you can buy it for $5 dollars a user per month as an add on if you don't have E3, E5 or Business Standard/Premium. :)

Very useful. Thanks.

Nowhere in these reports will you find examples where an EE initiative improved business metrics. Without verifiable examples of companies using EE to improve performance, Microsoft's research shows the same useless data as decades of Gallup studies; neither Microsoft nor Gallup address transformation. The needle has stayed the same despite the exponential growth of EE/EX experts, EE/EX technology, and the ubiquitous focus on HR. The way to look at this is if there were objectively measured and reported examples of companies improving their bottom line through EE/EX initiatives, CEOs and their boards would be all over this. As it is, the preponderance of literature on EE/EX is about static environments at the companies studied. One hint about the research might be that both Microsoft and Gallup are in the employee engagement services business. Unfortunately, the EE/EX services industry is focused like a laser beam on correlation while ignoring causation. Again, if something delivered results, it would be headline news in the business media. Engagement is an enterprise issue; managers and leaders, even officers, are no more engaged than the general employee population. The attached article shows the results from the CEO asking a simple nine-word survey question; a third party reporting to the CEO collected the data and fought the gauntlet of obstructions always present from culture, politics, and siloed groups. Twelve thousand responses were collected on paper forms, so much for the value of technology. chiefexecutive.net/employee-engagement-ceos-actually-listening/

I need to create some learning paths for our organization on Microsoft 365 Office training leading up to Microsoft certs in things like Excel, Word, Teams, etc. Any insight on how to do this easily?

Thank you

The data is the least impactful aspect of employee engagement. Companies have been collecting employee data since 1920, and the needle has yet to move. Until you have a solution to leadership's ambivalence, the data is just that, data. AI will make no difference. Imagine a leadership team that has ignored employee data for years. How likely are they to change because some algorithm says they should. The proof? The tools and experts have grown exponentially for decades, but there has yet to be any indication they have contributed to EE/EX transformations. The entire talent industry is conflating data with results. Neither the vendors nor HR can force change on disinterested leadership? Here's an example of what can happen in ten weeks when a CEO asks a simple 9-word SURVEY question. 12,000 responses were collected on PAPER FORMS by a third party. The third party could challenge blockers up to the CEO's staff meeting. HR was not involved. The company's stock was $18 and is now $90, so how likely will one more scientific high-tech tool make any difference when the data isn't the problem? This isn't a sales pitch; the company has retired. Instead, it's 25 years of experience solving the real employee engagement problem, forcing transparency on leadership. A string cannot be pushed up, and neither can change. The unfortunate part is that the employees know this before collecting data. They've seen it too many times.

Such great advice there Richard.

Another fantastic explainer video to help organisations prepare for AI and Copilot. I'd like to know more about how admins will deal with unintentionally shared data turning up in Copilot responses. It's great to hear that Copilot only uses what you have access to. My wondering is how Microsoft will get ahead of this potential issue and provide a way to manage that.

Thank you for this great video, I enjoyed watching it! 😊

too much blah blah blah

This is golden. How can I use you as a resource in my self-directed upgrade of our communication systems in emergency medicine

will companies pay us more for more productivity or we remain with the same salary? or will we be penalized for being skillful? validation work is important, but as we depend more and more on these replacement tools we will lose critical analysis to validate its output. It could give us a convincing lie. The company can look so dumb?