วีดีโอ

I’m really glad the video was helpful and the comment is really helpful so more people find these videos! Thank you!

It should match the prior video on NPV sorry about that

I’m really glad this was helpful and I appreciate you leaving a comment!

I’m really glad it was useful thank you so much for the comment!

I’m glad it was helpful and thank you for leaving a comment!

Based on those prices we would assume that the money you had to spend increases from the old period to the new period because the new bundle at the new prices costs more than the old bundle at the old prices exactly as you point out so this is not a warp violation. Good question though!

@ thanks it helps a lot😁

Awesome I’m glad that helped!

I’m sorry to hear this wasn’t helpful. Was there anything in particular that was confusing or you wish was explained better or just overall didn’t help you that much?

I’m really glad you found this helpful! Feel free to share this video and my channel with classmates or other professors as resources for students!

Let me double check my math and get back to you. In the meantime does the conceptual aspect make sense or is that also something you’re unsure about?

Could you clarify where in your math we don’t align so I can better help you?

I’m glad it’s helpful please feel free to share with others in your program!

I’m so glad this was helpful and thank you so much for leaving a comment!

I’m glad you found these videos helpful and I appreciate you leaving a comment!

Thank you for the comment I’m glad it was helpful!

I’ll add it to my list! Thanks for the suggestion/request!

Thank you for the comment I appreciate it and I’m glad this video was helpful!

I agree with your written description of the substitution versus income effect and how they should be depicted on this graph, and agree I don't make that clear in the video. Thank you for catching that! I have pinned your comment so that others can read this until I can upload an updated video where I make sure my explanation is clear and correct. Thank you again for pointing this out!

I’m so glad this was helpful thank you for leaving a comment!

Thank you so much I’m glad this is helpful!

I am glad this was helpful and I appreciate you leaving a comment!

I’m glad this was helpful for you and I really appreciate you leaving a comment, thank you!

I’m glad it was helpful thank you for leaving a comment!

That is exactly the issue! I posted an updated warp video (it’s currently the newest video) and I will drop a link below where I corrected that error. Im glad you were able to see that

Here is the updated version: th-cam.com/video/khplkFgDqtM/w-d-xo.html

​@@InCaseofEconStruggles Thank you for the clarification

I’m glad this was helpful thank you for leaving a comment

I’m glad this was helpful thank you for leaving a comment!

I’m glad it was helpful and thank you for leaving a comment!

Thank you so much I’m glad this is helpful! Feel free to share with classmates and I appreciate the comment!

Did you have a particular unit root test in mind?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles ADF test, PP test, and Agumnted Dickey-Fuller test tests.

I’ll start with the Augmented DF and then if that same type of code doesn’t work I can do other ones

@@InCaseofEconStruggles thank you very much. I remember that we can do all of them in one command.

I would definitely know how to add those statistics as scalars to the regression output if that’s what you were thinking

I’m glad it was helpful!

Do you mean add a note to the table in the stata code or like define it before the add note command?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles add a note to the table in Stata before the table output. For example, in the paper, we don't just put out the table, we often a table description like: This table presents xxx

Oh I see I think that is best to do in latex like that is language you want to change more often than the table and that’s part of writing the paper more than the table

There are ways in latex to reference the table number automatically

@@InCaseofEconStruggles yes yes you are right, then I will stick to my note added in latex. Thank you for your help and time!

I’m glad this was helpful thank you for the comments!

I’m so glad this was helpful thanks for leaving a comment!

I’m so glad this is helping you!

Thanks for leaving a comment I’m glad it was helpful!

I’m glad it was helpful thank you for leaving a comment!

I’m so glad it was helpful thank you for leaving the comment!

Yes they should both be 1/2* w/pi

Here is the updated version: th-cam.com/video/khplkFgDqtM/w-d-xo.html

I’m glad it was helpful! I hope the other videos in the series were also helpful but feel free to let me know if there was something you were looking for and couldn’t find!

I would need to look into those to really understand them but yes I will add that to my research list to look at!

Hey Paul I’m glad you are finding these videos helpful! I will look into both of those and see what I can come up with!

If you use the option unstack and drop(/:) that should work! Example code below: webuse school eststo test: biprobit private vote logptax loginc years esttab test, unstack drop(/:) Does that work for your code?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles This was helpful. Thank you! Separately, if I have a really long note it forces my column on the far right to be too far way from nearest column. Is there a way to make a note that is really long, and therefore wide, to appear on two lines?

@paulsilva627 you have two options. One is to split it in the stata code itself into two lines. The other option is to use the addnote option. I’ll make a video about that as well

@@InCaseofEconStruggles Great!

I can only imagine! Even with stata I feel this reading people’s code

Not at all that makes the meme better in my opinion!

I’m glad this was helpful and I really appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment!

Remember that it’s the cumulative area under F versus the cumulative area under G. I do have a mistake where my integrals should start at - infinity not at 0. Starting at x=20 the cumulative difference in areas starts shrinking but the cumulative area under G is always greater than or equal to the cumulative area under F. Does that help?

It does, thank you very much.😄

@benjaminkjaerhansen4733 awesome I’m glad that helps! Great question and glad the video was helpful!

its a bold strategy for sure Cotton

Thank you so much! I’m glad it was helpful and I appreciate you leaving a comment!

I’m glad this was helpful and I appreciate you leaving a comment!!

I’m glad this was helpful and great question!

I’m so glad this was helpful! Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment!

Thanksssss