วีดีโอ

Hochinteressanter Kreis und tolle , tiefgreifende Diskussion wie man sie sich nicht besser vorstellen kann. Der interdisziplinäre Ansatz , die Verschmelzung von Theorie und Praxis, was so elementar für die Transformation ist. Verantwortliches Unternehmertum muss sich öffentlich zeigen und eine führende Rolle in der der sozial-ökologischen Wende übernehmen. Dann ändert sich auch das ramponierte Image des Unternehmertums , und nur dann können wir unsere Zukunft sichern!

This woman has no inner conscience. She seems like an angry little girl who can't wait to get back at all the people that hurt her feelings. Something is wrong with our society that she is allowed to teach at a university. I feel sorry for her more than anger.

Echt ne coole Type

sehr nice

So glad to meet you today near Madison Park...Nick

Mukerji wieder mal sehr gut und präzise.

Klasse Vortrag, mit intellektueller Demut und ohne jede Hybris vom Philosophen fachfremde Themen als "Bullsh*t" identifiziert bekommen, damit man ja nicht zum Querdenker degeneriert. Daumen hoch!

Haben wir keine anderen Probleme ????

Interessiert mich nicht wirklich

Great thinker Judith Butler :)

It's very easy for women like her, who earns money selling her crap theories in books that empty headed people pretend to understand, to claim that sex is a spectrum, what matter is how you identify and all that BS that are just "luxury beliefs". I want to see "academics" like her working in the fields, in the countryside, where people don't have any option than face reality and ignore theories that doesnt match the real world. Put her working side by side with men and let's see if she can keep up with those stupid theories who are not more than luxury beliefs typically held by pseudo-intelectuals who doesn't have a clue how this affects people's lifes, specially women and girls. Hey, Butler, leave your basement and skip the drugs! “Hat tip to Derrick Jensen for compiling the quotes from Butler (and for his commentary in between the Butler quotes). Here are Butler’s words “queersplaining” why parents raping children is sometimes okay: In her 2004 book Undoing Gender, she wrote, “It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be­--and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not--­it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside.” [1] So here she is arguing that sometimes parent-child incest is not a violation. She also wrote, “The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.” [2] This is the same old pro-pedo argument we’ve seen so many times already: if you perceive children who are being fucked/raped by adults as the victims of sexual abuse then you are oppressing and objectifying the child. And she wrote, “So I keep adding this qualification: ‘when incest is a violation,’ suggesting that I think that there may be occasions in which it is not. Why would I talk that way? Well, I do think that there are probably forms of incest that are not necessarily traumatic or which gain their traumatic character by virtue of the consciousness of social shame that they produce.” [3] And there we go again, with the same old pro-pedo notion that it’s not the child rape that is harmful: it’s the social stigma that is harmful. And to bring it all home, she suggests, along with the other pro-pedo queer theorists and anarchists, that prohibiting parent/child incest is in itself harmful: “It might, then, be necessary to rethink the prohibition on incest as that which sometimes protects against a violation, and sometimes becomes the very instrument of a violation.” [4] [1] Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender, Routledge, London, 2004, p. 155. [2] Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender, Routledge, London, 2004, p. 155. [3] Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender, Routledge, London, 2004, p. 157. [4] Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender, Routledge, London, 2004, p. 160.

Name: Phattanachoke Thanasirakul Location: Thailand Age: 29 Risk Level: Insanity Weapon Type: Acoustic

*MKULTRA* has been and is still ongoing in Montréal, Québec, Canada. They entered in a woman appartement in 2020. They drugged her, they tortured her for months in her own appartement, than they used energy weapons, microwave bombardment and high frequency voice to skull harrassement. The whole population were participating in that torture humiliation slow kill experiment on her. They made street theater everywere she went harrassing her, threatening her, agressing her. They are *raping her remotely* with energy weapons. They are performing surgery with laser and electromagnetic waves on her everywere she goes. MRI portable devices and microwave beam to litteraly make unbearable vibrations and subcutaneous heating and nervous system attacked in all kind of way. They stoled her ovucytes, blood, kidney, hair and retina. They are all chasing her and harrassing her and electrocuting her inside, outside. Police and hospital are of course highly participating since they are the perpetrators, as it always been with illegal experiments. It's made in unvolountary people who never gave their consent and didn't know what was being done to them, untill they have turned into victims. They sequestreded her, did all kind of execution staging, agressiond, surgery, irgans and OVUCYTES stealing, they are the one who are torturing her. Consequently, that left her no help at all. She is being tortured to death, at the knowledge of everyone with the participation of everyone. PM of Québec and PM of Canada have been alerted. No answers. PM of all provinces in Canada have been advised. No answers. She left the country trying to survive but they are following her making satellite, microwaves and electromagnetic energy weapons slowly and quietly kill her. It's call MIND AND BODY CONTROL* program. It's VIRTUAL HUMAN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING. They are threatening her non stop to catch her, force her to give birth, steal more ovucytes, hair, organs, torture her to death inside walls gor satanic rituals, eat part of her for cannibalism and throw her rest in garbage for humiliation. They are doing this, NOW, in CANADA. If you received an email from her, asking for help, it's called : *Canadian citizen woman victim of mind and body control/electromagnetic torture and V2K harrassment*. She has sent over 2500 request for help, worldwide. They all received this email but they never answered.

Hasn’t this stupid sh t taken up enough time already. How to end fun by Judith Butler.

I’m not surprised that a white woman is the one peddling this view. Completely oblivious the dangers vulnerable women (most of whom are women of color) now have to deal with men in female spaces.

I just came for the comments, they have not disappointed, maybe there is hope for humanity😂😂

If you actually wanted people to read your stuff, you'd make it readable.

The high priestess of gender ideology can't grasp fundamental objective truths. Sex is binary.

Pseudo-philosophy from a degenerate.

Men are not women.

This ideology is a cult. No one is born in the wrong body. No one can change sex.

@TracyPicabia, I don't know what bit you find pseudo intellectual or irrational?

Not shown: cyborg soldier pointing a laser gun at him...

Love you Manfred 🫶

This woman makes A LOT of assumptions about others. She speaks a hateful ideology of discontent. Sad for her. Of course, this nonsense comes out of academia. It's hollow. A made up fair tale. What a boring diatribe.

Tic Toc Judy Tic Toc

Who’s afraid of gender? The confused people who have no idea who they are.

this subject is summed up here. th-cam.com/video/dn5D2YGDbEs/w-d-xo.html the quote " your scientist were so preoccupied with whether or not the could they didn't stop to think if they should" drives it home.

wow

I am a medical doctor, radiologist. I lived in Finland for 15 years. Now in the UK. I have been targeted by Nanotechnology neuroscience methods led by intelligence agency. It all started 2 years ago when I discovered that some changes happened to my medical records by adding a diagnosis “Klinefilter syndrome” which I do not have. First they targeted the pelvic nerves responsible for erection for over a year using somekind of electric pulse or similar technology after administration of nano particles by ingestion. They are now targeting my brain, possibly to cause dementia. I wish you can help me to solve this problem. Is there a way to protect myself and get rid of the nanoparticles?

*Free Robert E Crimo III and Alexandre Bissonnette who are victims of this technology*

Sex and gender are a social construct - Judith butler

Judith Butler is happy to sit back and collude with the reification of gender in contemporary politics, despite the fact that it is in direct contradiction with her own stated concept of gender. The slippery avoidance of even defining her object of inquiry further exposes her as an intellectual charlatan.

Do someone know what is "performative"? Judith Butler's bullshits!

Gender is the new philosophy related to humanity ,the reality need human philosophy .

Putin cis. Putin bad. Therefore, cis bad. Logic ✅

How about we all just be kind to each other and you can stop convoluting gender.

no one is afraid of gender.. people who don't know who they are are more afraid and need external validation. Sex and gender is highly determinate in nature. Some people seem to think, and that is merely thought, that you can manipulate your sex and gender through your mind. and that is where we are wrong. IF gender was in the mind, we should be able to transform ourselves. but can we? NO, it remains in the mind. and NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO, you cannot change your genetic sex and therefore gender. In the west gender was externalized because you believe that only women and do certain things and not others. I don't even agree that there needs to be a conversation. when you say there was never a solid theory about it over pace and time, you are saying that people in ancient times did not know who they were and in that I WILL dispute you.

Afraid? More like fed up.

"...the anti-intellectualism, the refusal to read, to discuss, to affirm an open form of inquiry is also an attack on the academy." Read the lecturer into her Apple earbuds

I never heard Judith Buttler take accountability for the absolute chaos, hate and pain her ideas about men and women have caused. Let her debate an evolutionary biologist or even Jordan Peterson!

Every accusation is a confession

The Roman church is diabolical

No one is afraid, we just think they NUTS.

This is the same person who said incestuous family relationship can be healthy, and promots queer theory which claims The demonization of intergenerational relationships aka pedophilia is bad. What a lying hypocrit.

Wow, try listening to this but every time she says 'gender' change it to 'patriarchy'. The chickens have come home to roost, Judith.

Gobbledygook. White Noise. 💩👎

I thought she would have been better at defending the idea. She just sounds like an angry idealistic teenager who has not yet come to terms with the validity of intergenerational traditions, nor the need for them, nor their intergenerational wisdom, which cannot be acquired in many lifetimes by even the most intelligent individual. Gender is not a good nor useful lens to see reality through because it is not reality. You can try to reify a subjective fantasy within a human but you'll only get a cartoon of a human. And that is gender, the attempt to define an entire persona by its relationship to using the physical functions of both sexes, which is a behavior of lust/desire, which is one of the sins. It is not holistic and does not give a person an entire dignity. Is the entirety of your dignity and personality defined by what you do in bed? No. So it is not your identity. So why use it? Why even go there. It does not add anything. The world has not become more holy by the introduction of the terminology. Just more lenient, liberty sold as an expression of dignity, but when you look at a pride parade, in reality it has become over-sexualized, debased, ready to mutilate bodies in the pursuit of personal vanity of one particular aspect of a persona, but not of the whole. It treats bodies as flesh-jackets, customizable. When you create a bifurcation between the human soul and his body, instead of treating it as a whole, a coin with two sides, you end up with a body that is as customizable as a car. But tell me, how impressed are you with your new car two, three years down the road? Does a change of car bring you lifelong happiness? No, of course not. They are objects. The pleasure they gave us for a short moment quickly becomes irrelevant to our lives. Deliberate changes to bodies are equally unimpressive. This is fundamentally different from the human body, which goes through many developmental stages throughout life. Every station has its lesson to teach, for who we are, what we are, and how we stand in life at that age. Young is not old. The young discovers and explores, The crooked broken body, more immobile, forces the old person to become more contemplative; to wonder about the hereafter, to analyze if the life has been used for good. To repent and prepare for the hereafter. That is precisely why it cannot satisfy the soul. The only beneficiaries seem to be pharma and a few scholars peddling this stuff getting an income. Going to mass, accepting the changes to your body as they happen naturally, is far cheaper than turning yourself, willingly, into a medical patient for life. Acceptance is far wiser and cheaper and non-destructive of physical health, which is mental health (two sides of coin). Gender cannot be an identity because it is merely a behavioral aspect. In fact, it is reductive for the human. Besides, humans are created in the image of God, not in the image of social scientists. The One gives you innate dignity, the social scientist only creates division and reduces you to a behavior. And what else can you expect? Social/anthropological scientism is limited in intelligence, precisely because it is the product of human minds, hence it has reductive ideas, and ultimately, reduces even yourself.

As a Christian, her comments about how christian colonialism was the root of all evil is just not true. The Puritans encouraged women to read when most women were illiterate. Christians were at the forefront of abolitionism and aside from some fringe Christian denominations, most are loving towards anyone regardless of how they identify, even if they may disagree with their lifestyle. She also claims that those who oppose gender theory just don't want to read critically is unfair. Watch some James Lindsay who is a brilliant scholar who critically dissects many of the gender and other critical theories.

1. There are plenty of gender criticalists who read, and who read pro-trans or gender ideology works. 2. Plenty accept that gender ideology is not homogeneous, any more than anyone asserts that feminism is homogeneous 3. That education informs gender is not any more an argument for either side. Where confusion over where identity intersects with sex as a part of that education is concerned, it is neglectful to assume that a completely different, and more active education is not more recent, which is not to say that all prior education is not without its flaws 4. To assume that gender is an "overdetermined" site, is a cop-out. It depends on what one considers "overdetermined". The harm that occurs from "gender ideology", can only be understood in a medical, or a biological developmental sense. This is not to say that all biological development ends up interrupted by gender ideology, whatever that is, or that anyone who has subscribed to gender ideology has gone on puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones. But where this does impact children, it is a legitimate point of concern, and far from "overdetermined." 5. To assume that all assertions of what legitimately constitutes "sex" is at heart religious, is laughably easy to do when the only figure you quote and pit yourself against argumentatively is the Pope himself. It's an omission of the inherent secularism of the gender-criticalists as science-based. Which, it seems you discount as a kind of materialistic deism in the form of a biological determinism. Whereas gender-criticalism only points out the ways in which we are determined, where arguments over what that is can occupy their own territory, but regarding which, no one who is gender criticalist denies the profound impact of hormones in the great transformative capacity of endocrinology, still, they assert it does not change sex, and do not subscribe to a gendered understanding of sex. 6. To conflate gender-criticalism with racism or fascism is a reiteration of constant straw-manning. So much for good-faith engagement by doubting the non-homogeneity of your opposition, and only citing the worst forms of intolerance instead, which also helps to assert the falsity that gender-criticalists are in the same lot with the anti-gay. The fact is that no other identity-rights or identity-based issue has ever overlapped with medical ethics until gender-ideology and the trans issue. The only situations in which medical-ethics would ever concern an identity prior to this would be active medical experiments or attempts at sterilizing a population, in which transgressions were made against a vulnerable population on the basis of race. What we are dealing with here, is instead medical intervention on a doctor-to-patient or clinic-to-patient basis, wherein children are patients. And wherein gender-dysphoria is not the same thing as being trans. This makes it a very different issue, for which it's no surprise it engenders scrutiny from and concerning multiple professions.