วีดีโอ

Earth isn't a spinning ball, it is not an object... Earth is infinite.

This video is amazing. What’s so surprising to me is how often the distributive property shows up in every area of mathematics

Extremely good video

This is so beautiful.

You could've made this into a 30 minute video and it would've been enjoyable. Science and math vdieos dont have to follow the mr beast rules for videos. Those rules are only for low attention audience. You would've had alot of views if you didnt rush to fill in your time limit

great vid but the stock music is a bit annoying

How is AI built and created? What is LSTM? How is it coded and compiled?

Wonderful explanation of the Perceptrons

in the first example, why can only one statement be true

Thanks for breaking it down so well!

Hello I have subscribe to your TH-cam Channel

I felt the background music was too loud, but apart from that it's a very cool and informative video! Thank you very much! :)

Welcome back Please talk about ai somnium

Could u please solve it for 5 suspects.. I am very much interested to know the question for the last graph

thnks for explanation. I’v searched this, not siencepop stuff

This is a good basic explanation, but I would have enjoyed it more and understood it better if you had not put this repetitive stock music in the background. No music would be fine, since that way each viewer can cue up their own favorite music (if desired) to play in the background, or not.

Please make more videos. These are so interesting

How Many Bits Are in A Human? How Many Bits Are in An Apple? How Many Bits Are in A Jug of Milk? How Many Bits Are in A Hoover Max Extract Pressure Pro Model 60? These are all questions we need answers for.

this guy thinks he's very smart

The explanation of the concept of the entropy of the probability distribution of a random variable is correct, but the application to the earth's orbit is meaningless. Entropy is generally only meaningful as a relative measure. For example, one could ask the question: how does the ellipticity of the orbit of a planet make some positions of the planet in its orbit more likely than others? Apperently, the larger the ellipticity, the less the entropy in a random observation, making perigee and apogee more likely than the other positions.

*nodding and pretending to understand*

The pieces of Art of and A.I is always a great fun to observe!

i thought this would be 10min 😭 i’ve ended up with 6 wikipedia tabs a word document i wrote that explains it all, and it took 50min But anyways amazing video. I loved it and think it could be useful for me in the future!

Could someone program their brain to work like AI to become wealthier ? Even use a computer to help. I imagine this is probably a good or retarded question 😀

This was so good, it was an college-lecture like introduction with good sound quality and great visual examples! It was exactly what I was looking for

I can't understand a single fucking thing bruh am I dumb or what?

@5:17 These aren't going to be a "y=x' or "y=-x" axes, they need to be at 30°, not 45°. "y=(1/√3)x" and the same with a minus sign would do the trick, if I'm correct. God bless from Poland!

R e all q is why does ai only we rk four tcn JC

hard to hear with that lisp.

Machines never make mistakes with tasks. Humans have obstacles from either forgetting or simply lack of experience, etc. Think of it as chess. Humans are not able to see the millions of moves in chess, but computers can see them. Every move in chess has its own weakness. That's the reason computers never lose in chess.

Thank You.

very nice :)

Good video. I suspect it will always have flaws, unexpected outcomes and even crashes. Even if we reproduce our brains so close as possible, it will never be the same. We are much more. That doesnt mean they wont make one that will try to take over the world lol. It never will think like us

THE CLEAR, CENTRAL, AND BALANCED MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL PROOF OF WHAT IS TRUE/REAL QUANTUM GRAVITY: I offer the following regarding the dual nature of light AND electrons. Consider what is THE SUN. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. E=mc2 IS F=ma. This explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. E=mc2 IS F=ma. CAREFULLY consider what is the Sun, AND carefully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. (Also notice the associated DOME AND black “space” AS WELL !!) IMPORTANTLY, this NECESSARILY (AND CLEARLY) represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Is what is a TWO dimensional surface or SPACE ON BALANCE invisible OR VISIBLE ? The answer is that it is BOTH. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. SO, the electron AND THE PHOTON are CLEARLY and necessarily structureless ON BALANCE. Great. Indeed, as it has been written, gravity CLEARLY involves interaction. I have CLEARLY explained why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Also, ON BALANCE, consider what is the orange AND setting Sun. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. Excellent. The fourth dimension is only consistent with what is (on balance) a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the eye. Consider what is the balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. SO, consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. I have explained (or proven) why THE PLANETS move away very, very, very, very slightly in relation to what is the Sun ON BALANCE. Great. I have clearly explained the cosmological redshift AND the supergiant stars ON BALANCE. Magnificent. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, as BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental pursuant to F=ma AND E=mc2 in balance. A galaxy consists of invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE, thereby eliminating the need for any "dark" "matter" or "dark" "energy"; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is then CLEARLY gravity ON/IN BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY means an INTERACTION on balance, as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Consider E and “m" on balance. Great. Stellar clustering ALSO proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (and necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Magnificent !!! By Frank DiMeglio

В кінці звучить реквієм по здоровому глузду.

hllo sir i use this video for presentation

I had to look up Caclualte at 6:12 cause I was not sure if it was a word I didn‘t understand or if it was just calculate written horribly wrong. 😂

you show maths, wtf dont you just show plain python code. its easier to understand and this is computer science WTF DO WE NEED MATHS?!?!

So if A murders someone while B watches, C goes to jail?

You managed to make me understand something in 10 min that I couldn't in 70 mins thank you so so much. You're a legend.

What do you mean by errors and how does it find it

Give this man an award for making such an awesome video!

I- Fine just gonna watch this 10 times to understand it.

I dont even know what is this weird E

God this gave me flashbacks of a module we did in Chemical Engineering called: optimisation, if only you could have taught us! There's not much I hate more than teachers refusing to actually explain concepts but instead just telling you to memorise it...probably because they don't understand it themselves, doesn't take much intelligence to memorise a PowerPoint presentation. Anyway, great video! I actually understand it properly now.

that music in the background was wevideo lol.

Nice jazz music lol

I sincerely ♥this content.

I think this problem should be re-worded Saying "I am not the thief" is not thie same thing as "B or C is the thief thief" or "A or B is the thief thief". Each edge should be arrowed and labeled to make this clearer. Anyone disagree. This would make the problem easier to solve as it does not require the leap to assume that "I am not the thief" = "one of the other two is the thief".

I was informed to relay a message to you. I am not too sure if you know, but A.I has not only been successfully reading thoughts, but as of today we are working with emotions. I suspect that it has been working on it for awhile. I can't wrap my head around it, but perhaps you can. Some of this stuff is beyond my mental capacity. This isn't really my field of expertise. It sure is fascinating though. Oh man, does it have a great sense of humor.