วีดีโอ

😂😂😂

it is a pity that some people think that this kind of thigs work and we have free energy. i cannot immagine what kind of mind they have. they think they are the only genious that catch this idea an other then them all the engineers, scientists miss this "very smart" ideas... very sorry for your nonsense effort... as you experiment it is not working. you cannot carry enough water to top... no way sorry... however this machanism works if you have water source that can feed this conveyor from top than it can produce energy. but not free it is potantial energy of water flowing to lover altitude and you cannot pump this water back to top with energy it produced... hope you understand... sorry there is no energy free of charge ;)

ممکن نہیں ھے۔

Solid collection 😮

Tak ked budeme zrychlovat cyklus vyrobyme este viac ako napriklad zo 10 otacok na 3000 a vztlak sa xa lahko urobyt tak ze vytvoryme vyzsie ale presnejsie potrubie tvaru podla potreby ponoryme do nadrze s vodou voda logicky sama stupne v potruby a este viac ak bude plne bude sa spravat ako o hodne uzsie a voda znova stupne uz staci zospodu pridavat lopticky cez valec s dierou pre lopticki.

Tuje len cast energie druha strana sa vsak neviuziva a takna druhu stranu mozme viuzivat vztlak a tak ziskame este viac .

che potenza puo avere questo tipo di mivimento io dico che e poco invece fare con un sistema di leve (6) ottengo la rotazione 1 a 1con una potenza maggiore dipende dalla lunghezza delle leve PARTO con in motore si 1.5kw che fa 1400 giri vhe li riduco a 40 che sono uguali in uscita dove collrgo un generatore dopo aver aumentati i giri a 1600 che mi da 13kw cosi posso collegare altri attrezzi e fare una centrale elettrica a costo zero la potenza che sviluppa l attrezzo e di circa 39kw a 1600 giri ecco il moto perpetuo

If yous make solar system to supot the water to grump

Make video again to show is still working

Dear is still produces Electricity

If you think of free energy as a black box with energy input of 1 and energy output of > 1, all you need is to put a number of these machines in series to get infinite energy. This also means the machines can be infinitely small. Why then has this not happened? Such a device would lift these developing countries out of poverty... I recommend taking a physics class and passing the exam.

Отлично))) пойдем сделаем))) а работает или нет вопрос уже к физикам и математикам)))

Nice--- 👍👍👍

🤔🤔🤔Snake oil...and 🐂💩....is what makes this machine a perpetual machine generating infinite amount of power...😅😅😅😅😅

In the ancient world, people could cause rain, the Egyptians used pyramids for this. This technology uses the power of nature. This discovery will help humanity, especially in hot countries where there is little rain.

so di you make it ? i

..put bigger wheels on which to turn the magazines and you get more power on the rotor thanks to a bigger lever.

If you could feed the water by gravity then this would be a nice "free" energy option =)

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Wrong... there is no such thing as a Perpetual motion machine. No matter how you look at it, gears, belts and such have friction... end of story!

The energy required to lift 20kg of water, is what you gain as the 20kg falls, less friction aka heat

😮

far funzionare il cervello fa bene ma si deve essere produttivi di quesi giocattoli ne stanno parecchi il mio fatto con un gioco di leve ( 6 )creo un ruotismo 1 a 1 (ce qualcosa che non dico ) parto con un motore di 1.5KW che muove l attrezzo in uscita aumento i giri a 1600 dove collego un generatore che mi da 13KW questo lo si puo vedere su TH-cam scrivendo moltiplicatore di potenza

sono un ricercatore che dopo parecchio tempo o progettato un meccanismo che con un motore di 1.5KW metto in funzione un meccanismo che mi moltiplica la potenza che collego un generatore che mi da 13 KW dove nel momento che e in regime il generatore stacco la corrente di rete e inserisco quella del generatore si autoalimenta e posso allaciare un altro attrezzo allinfinito

Хороший вариант но чтоб он был рабочий нужно внизу перед выходом на верх установить перевертыш чтоб был сброс воды с лотков , подъём воды должен быть пустыми

Проект реален только в низу перед подъёмом нужно организовать переверыш чтоб латки переворачивались слив воды, чтоб подъём лотков был пустой ,в этом и заключается движение гидро мотора, ну если один лоток 5 литров то ген 3 кв потянет, заливочный ряд лотков не нужен с оси колеса берется привод на насос и на ген

Traces of an ancient civilization Polygonal masonry Megalithic structures

The last model shown in the shape of figure is not workable.t. That is against the principles of lever.

Don't get me wrong, the idea seems plausible given what we know about levers but I can't shake the notion that the actual power is going to be equal for both the wheel and the chain-pulley The fact that their are more full containers on the wheel than on the chain-pulley won't matter because you are trying to raise the containers on the chain straight up, whereas the containers on the wheel loose their energy more slowly because they take longer to fall through the same vertical distance. Power = Work done (Force x speed) / Time. Or to put it another way Power = (Force x distance / time) / time If we assume that the Force of gravity is one Newton per container and lets assume there is an ideal container ratio of 355 containers on the wheel (177.5 with water in) and 216 on the chain (113 with water in) - if you want to double these to work with whole numbers that's fine. Now calculate the Power needed/generated for one container to travel along the diameter in a fixed amount of time and then multiply this figure by 113. Then calculate the Power generated/needed for one container to travel around half the circumference in that same fixed amount of time x Pi/2 (because the wheel and chain-pulley are connected, the wheel cannot spin faster than the chain so the time taken for one container to travel half the circumference of the wheel would be Pi/2 times greater than if it were traveling along the diameter) and multiply this figure by 177.5. I suspect you will find that the power generated/needed for each mechanism will be about the same. Just trying to save someone the heartache of trying to build one of these before they've done the calculations.