- 73
- 82 713
The Society for Radiological Protection
United Kingdom
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 19 พ.ค. 2020
Founded in 1963 the Society for Radiological Protection (SRP) is a professional and learned society, incorporated by Royal Charter in 2007. With over 2200 members we are the largest radiation protection professional body in Europe and the second largest in the world.
The core objective of SRP is to “promote the science and art of radiation protection and allied fields for the public benefit” and our vision is to be “recognised as an independent professional lead for the development and dissemination of radiation protection science, culture and practice for all”.
SRP offers a range of scientific meetings, conferences, workshops and seminars, running an average of 8 events per year, including our 3 day Annual Conference attracting around 350 attendees from the UK and abroad. We also run an active public outreach programme reaching over 80,000 school students each year.
The core objective of SRP is to “promote the science and art of radiation protection and allied fields for the public benefit” and our vision is to be “recognised as an independent professional lead for the development and dissemination of radiation protection science, culture and practice for all”.
SRP offers a range of scientific meetings, conferences, workshops and seminars, running an average of 8 events per year, including our 3 day Annual Conference attracting around 350 attendees from the UK and abroad. We also run an active public outreach programme reaching over 80,000 school students each year.
The Lost Radioactive Source Capsule (Frank Harris) - 2024 Annual Conference
The Lost Radioactive Source Capsule (Frank Harris, Chief Advisor Radiological Governance and Product Stewardship, Rio Tinto) - 2024 Annual Conference
มุมมอง: 116
วีดีโอ
The Atom: The Love Affair Q&A with Director
มุมมอง 1243 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Atom: The Love Affair Q&A with Director
Varskin - An Introduction to SkinDose Module
มุมมอง 40710 หลายเดือนก่อน
Varskin - An Introduction to SkinDose Module
Radon Gas Risks, Regulations & Remediation
มุมมอง 446ปีที่แล้ว
Radon Gas Risks, Regulations & Remediation
Shielding X Ray Rooms - The basic and a CT Example
มุมมอง 3.5Kปีที่แล้ว
Shielding X Ray Rooms - The basic and a CT Example
Radiation Issues Associated with Manned Space Flight
มุมมอง 553ปีที่แล้ว
Radiation Issues Associated with Manned Space Flight
Hey. We were on the same course at Surrey. Glad you're doing well
This was so informative, I would like to learn more about alpha spectrometry
A good, comprehensive presentation. However, I think that Ahmed is incorrect in his views on a repository. The consequences to the public from a criticality in a closed geological repository would almost certainly be negligible. The repository would be underground 100+m below the surface. This (distance plus shielding by host rock ) would attenuate the radiation dose hugely. Also there would not be sufficient energy from the criticality event to significantly increase pathways for radioactive material to escape to the surface. All-in-all the radiation dose to the public is very unlikely to be of significant concern. For structural reasons the thickness of rock between vaults would be sufficient to reduce radiation doses to operators to levels unlikely to be concern.
NICE !!!
Nice webinar !!!
.#zZz#.⚡⬆️⬇️💀☢☣ДЛЯ 60Co#💀⚡🔥 - 1,5МeV/1,8МeV???!.ЭТО ВООБЩЕ - НИЧЕГО💀⚡🔥😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂ТАК И ДЛЯ УРАНОВОГО LEAD#💀⚡🔥 - 2МeV/3МeV???!.ЭТО ПРОСТО - НИЧЕГО!.💀⚡⚫⚫⚫⚫💀💀💀💀💀⚡⚡⚡
Thank you for your question and glad you found the webinar helpful. 1.9 mm to 2.2 mm refers to the equivalent thickness of lead that is included in the glass to provide the shielding capacity. Lead glass is generally marketed with values for the lead equivalence that relate to the amount of lead included in the glass. It does not have any relationship to the thickness of the lead glass.
Thanks! great video but what do you mean with 1.9mm to 2.2mm on control window? Usually lead glass window are 15-20 mm thick?
Really many thanks
good lecture ty
thanks for taking the time to put this together. I'm not a beginner but i did find it to be informative and well done, covering complex subject matter well and without getting mired in some of the stickier details.
In addition to the external radiation hazard from activated components, there will be an internal hazard from the tritium component of the fuel.
Excellent overview, thank you - from Seattle, Washington.
Its very beatifill
'promo sm' 😊
thanks for this video
*SKIP TO **5:12** for start of actual information*
That's very good presentation, keep it up 👌👌🎉🎉
Very good presentation: thank you
Very useful, thanks a lot.
Good lecture. But there is a mistake when you are showing 3 spectrum simultaneously. All spectra of H3, C14 and P32 should start from zero.
Excellent lecture. Thank you.
Nice talk!! I have a question--why Ge detectors are needed to be cooled to 77K temperature!??
semiconductors have a "gap" thats very easy for electrons to jump across and create a "false" signal, resulting in noise. lowering the temperature decreases the probability for thermal excitation so you're much more likely to be reading the actual gamma ray signals you want
Thermal noise has application in astrophotography as well. Cool the sensor so that it does not "see itself".
Better at 50X playback speed
Thank you. Great content.
Fire video bro⚡️
Very educative. Thanks
Thanks, very helpful, concise too
safety culture presentation excellent i agree everything john says
th-cam.com/video/afimrM0UNGw/w-d-xo.html
very informative. thanks.
*Pete was having a blast with his sound problems.*
*Are there any certified Radiation courses being organised, taught and delivered by SRP?*
Excellent presentation, I agree with everything John says.
These webinars are so very useful. Thank you all kindly.
Thanks. Watched it live at the time, watched it just now again (RPA 2000......... ). A very good presentation with some interesting comments - the "who might be harmed and how", within the context of use of Para 70 and 71 got me thinking.
Excellent resource this is - things I have learned before but the calcs etc were a good head scratcher again!
It really is that easy for it to get 'everywhere'. But good practises, checks and controls can keep it very much in check.
Very useful. Thank you.
Thank you, Helen, Oliver, SRP and AURPO. This is great content.
Fantastic, thanks, I couldn't attend this "live", but I'm caught up now. PMW
I can't read the captions on that graph of Pu-241, but I don't suppose it was Pu-239 with Thalf = 24,110y?
Radiologist, radiological dating of an archeological sample.
my question is how do I make money
ahhahahha
Get a job
*I have used SRP and AURPO posters to aid in my teaching.*
Thank you for providing this excellent content online and free to access for everyone !
Don't let the sound issues with the introduction put you off, once the presentation gets going, there are no such problems...
Love this lecture! Very informative!