วีดีโอ

Gods require things? That does not sound like they are gods.

There’s numerous ways the Bible talks about oneness. And obviously in the Bible being married and being one does not mean they believe in monogamy. It just means they were joined together. And plus the people writing this didn’t have the way we think today about any concept of God in mind.

So when God said, this is my son for who I’m well pleased God was talking to himself but talking to his son. How does that even make any sense?

The Bible does not talk about the Trinity at all whatsoever.

I’m sorry, sir but you know that people wrote these books right? You know that human beings wrote these things. Jesus wrote absolutely nothing in these books. People didn’t even dictate these things that supposedly Jesus said but somehow people have such good memory that go three generations or four generations and all of a sudden somebody picked up a pen and roll it down?Please make it make sense.

If Jesus was God, according to you, why did he just say you know what I’m God. And if you quote, I and the father are one that is a mistranslation. To be on one accord with somebody does not make you that person or that deity.

If Jesus was God, according to you, why did he just say you know what I’m God. And if you quote, I and the father are one that is a mistranslation. To be on one accord with somebody does not make you that person or that deity.

I’m more agnostic than atheist. I’ve studied the Bible extensively and at one point was studying to be a minister. Jesus never said that he was God. And none of these scriptures are eyewitnesses. The synoptic gospels nor John areeyewitnesses. In fact, we do not know who wrote any of these things. So how could we possibly know what Jesus did or did not say when there was no eyewitnesses that dictated any of these thanks? In fact, the things that have been written down say nothing about Jesus divinity.

Atheism is not a faith. Atheism means that you do not see any proof that there is a God therefore, you do not believe in it that is by definition, not faith.

Atheism is not a faith. Atheism means that you do not see any proof that there is a God therefore, you do not believe in it that is by definition, not faith.

Jesus said he would come back in the lifetimes of his followers after the transfiguration (Luke, Mark), but he didn't. Even if he actually said clearly "I am god", it doesn't mean he is/was. Atheism is not a faith. Atheism is a position that there is no evidence for a god, you could say faith in the lack of evidence, but that's because there is no evidence in our day to day lives.

The king of kings and lord of lords said "until the colour if a man's skin is of no more significance than the colour of eyes, then everywhere is war"...as your own bible states...this man came out of Ethiopia and we have living proof he existed...prove me wrong !

Read John 1 chapter 1

Jesus, as the bible described, didn't actually exist. Myths about the Egyptian god Horus were used to create jesus. Horus was the son of a god. He was born of a virgin. He traveled, performing miracles. He had disciples. He also is historically about 2000 years older than jesus.

If you look at the Bible through the lens of a Christian, of course you're going to see Jesus as God. If you look at it through the eyes of a skeptic, Mark, Matthew and Luke contain not claims that Jesus is God and if you actually study the Bible you'll find that he doesn't make these claims there either.

I think that this is looking at it from the wrong perspective Alex was refuting the claim that Jesus and the events of the bible must be true, because of the huge popularity and how fast it spread. You are misrepresenting Atheists completely - not believing the bible is literal, is not believing there is no god. So it is not a belief as a religion is. Turning that around do you believe that hinduism is the true God? One of the worst things is that there is no original scripture ot prove that the version you are reading is actually true.

"I and the father are one" is not the same as saying "I am God". Jesus: "I pray that they will all be one, just as you and I are one-as you are in me, Father, and I am in you. And may they be in us so that the world will believe you sent me." You have clearly misunderstood what Jesus meant by being one with the Father, because he applies exactly the same to his disciples.

Matthew misquotes the Hebrew text because he is reading a Greek translation and not the original Hebrew. Here are the things he twisted: - she's not a virgin but a young woman - she IS ALREADY pregnant (adjective): the pregnant young woman - not THEY (who?) will call him Immanuel but her (the mother) - he completely ignores the context (King Ahaz surrounded by 2 armies) - he completely ignores the rest of the "prophecy"

No, he didn't. That was easy.

So the idea that the universe is self-creating is "really weird", but that an all-powerful & all-knowing god needs us to kill him in his alter ego so he can forgive us for being human, doing things he knew we would do, is logical?

Your position is as silly as his. Sad you are as confused

Jesus outright denied he is was God not numerous times.

So the idea that the universe is self-creating is "really weird", but a timeless spaceless sky wizard is logical?

I don't really think it matters either way. What's important is do we have good reasons to believe he raised from death, is a god and created the universe?

Oh, I just did a video on this topic. th-cam.com/video/r5W3EKePsQo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=zzlxvUgmf3lRfTsP Jesus claimed to be the Messiah, the Son of God. But the confusion lies in what the term ‘God’ means.

You are misunderstanding basic logic. If you use an argument to prove that something is true, and someone comes up with a counter example where your argument also works to prove that something is false, then your argument is n invalidated. That's the whole point of comparing the growth of Christianity to that of Mormonism. And btw, the reason those two faiths grew so fast is not because they are good but because they have a very aggressive direct sales force.

You are confusing me you hop around too much -

No. There is no record of anything Iesus "christ" said.

I didn't get my chores done because I stood and watched. I will move on after I say this - a Bible scholar has never impressed me especially if they don't don't follow the Bible,to know the Bible but not do as it says is wrong. Wes to me will only be known to me as the man who brought Billy down... Billy wont $tay down he love$ money too much - we should know money is not the root of all evil but THE LOVE of it is. IMO satan has an agenda for Wes. I also think Joe will not be as popular once Shawn Ryan replaces him - out with the old pup pets and in with the new.

One more thing - Wes says God is not gendered AND he celebrates Christmas!!! My heart told me to un sub from Wes I was subbed for one day.

I'll have to come back to continue watching this video. I am happy Wes has brought Billy down but I was not pleased to see he went on Joe's channel,Joe is evil and in the *club* Joe can be seen with Stanton LaVey (Anton LaVey's grandson) holding up the devil sign and wearing a shirt with 666 on it. Wes never should have gone on Joe's show...I feel something is off about Wes.

Atheists worship no God because they don't believe a God exists... Period. You making comments in trying to put Atheists in a box is BS

I appreciate you, but you need to define your terms and be precise! You cannot say evolution is a religion, it's just factually incoherent. This is coming from a YEC. Animation and emotion are not means by which we decide if something is religious. If our fundamental axioms/presuppositional beliefs are challenged, then of course you can get emotional. That does not mean you're religious. Also, calling atheists religious gives them too much credit, frankly. Religion shouldn't be slandered like that lol.

This is good

Why do you say that Islam is worse? Computer analysis revealed that the Quran is less violent than not just the old testament but the new testament as well.

Isaiah dead sea scrolls are not word for word identical with maseratic texts.

Who in the Bible killed the giant Goliath?

So you call making a human out of clay scientifically sound? As a mechanical Engineer this is not your field of expertise so how about going to actual biologists who are qualified in the field?

So, anything I believe is religious? 2+2=4 is a religious world view? No.

They are NOT religious whatsoever. Evolution is a scientific fact based on evidence. Religion is based entirely off a book written by people thousands of years ago with zero good evidence. Atheism is nothing but not being convinced a god exist. That's it. You can't call not accepting a religion as being a religion. Religious ppl hate the fact they're religious and want to compare religion to science because science is the best way to understand reality. Religious ppl (christians) understand religion is not a good way to understand reality so they really try to put non-religion into the same box so that they can feel better about themselves. It's not the same. Never will be the same no matter how much you want to try to convince yourself. Religion allows relatively smart ppl to accept ridiculous claims from lackluster evidence. You believe a book written by goat herders 1000s of years ago. There's no comparison between religion and evolution whatsoever.

You still have time to delete this lolol STAY IN SCHOOL KIDS

Evolution does not contradict Christianity. You can believe in God and not have to deny the reality we observe.

I don't accept evolution. But "gawd did it" has even less evidence.

What a pile of rubbish… If atheism and science is religion or faith then you should be happy to accept it and stop your childish nonsense right then and there but you go on and on baselessly claiming rubbish

32:34 If I spill milk time allows it to spoil but the mechanism is the bacteria in it which makes it go bad. Saying over time macroevolution will happen but time isn't a actual mechanism for justification it just allows it to happen. Does this make sense or relate idk

Wow, the most supported model and the best explanation for the diversity of life is a religion? Is Atomic theory a religion? Maybe i belong to the church of Gravity, too! That's also a theory that I believe.

Comically ignorant.

This is embarrassing... The need to equivocate science with faith in order to discredit it just shows u have nothing. Evolution does not disprove religion and is not needed to disprove religion. Religious scripture and the facts of the known world regardless of atheism or evolution disprove religion. Can you see the difference?

Religion is nothing more than cult thinking. You need to break free.

Nonsence start to finish..