วีดีโอ

I think the issue here is probably 'engaging/critical conversation/informed debate'.

Thank you for sharing.

This is a shallow, modern description. Morality is the set of existing community standards of behavior which may have arisen from any number of causes or combination of causes. A community may have one moral standard that arose from the dictates of a monarch, another from the persuasion of a "wise man," another from the aftermath of a disaster, another as the result of contact with a weaker community, another as a result of contact with a stronger community, et cetera. Morality is the community standards of behavior that exist. An ethic, OTOH, is always a rationally determined set of principles for behavior with a particular end good set as a goal of that behavior. I am emphasizing that morality is more of a descriptive concept, reflecting the community's prevailing standards of behavior, regardless of their origin-whether from tradition, authority, or circumstance. Morality, in this view, is a reflection of what is, shaped by history, power dynamics, or social influences. On the other hand, I see ethics as prescriptive and rational, involving a deliberate, reasoned process aimed at achieving a specific "end good" or goal. This suggests ethics are more universal or objective in nature, focused on guiding actions according to a logical framework or set of principles that lead to a desirable outcome. This perspective makes a useful distinction between the empirical nature of morality (what a community does) and the normative nature of ethics (what individuals or societies ought to do based on reason and intended outcomes).

You only mention the reduction of harm once & then you nullified it by saying media can value whatever it wants. Why are you trying to teach something that you don't understand?

Not all ethics are legal. The code of conduct of the Italian mafia says that the code of silence is ethical. Not legal. I agree completely with this video.

thanks

Vital Points

This is basically obidience vs righteousness

What the sigma??????

Isn't Ethics the study of morality? A code of conduct contains norms, not 'ethics'. These norms are derived from underpinning values. Morality is the accepted body of norms, values and attitudes in a society. Ethics studies morality by defining certain norms (descriptive ethics) or it explains when certain norms have changed or ought to change due to shifted values in morality (prescriptive ethics). It looks like the speaker mixes up the difference between norms and 'ethics'.

How the different corporate communication subfunctions can enhance the organizational development

Objective Morality & Ethics: "Create no harm, loss or damage for your fellow Man/WoMan and if you do (life happens, accidents happen), make it right." That covers just about everything and it's simple enough for all humans to comprehend regardless of education level. Subjective Morality & Ethics: - I do what's best for me, regardless of who gets hurt, harmed or damaged in the process. No regard for others, just oneself.

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:07 *🤔 Ethics are rules provided by an external source, governed by professional and legal guidelines, dealing with gray areas in value judgments.* 01:36 *💡 Morals are an individual's own principles regarding right and wrong, not written in legal guidelines but based on personal beliefs.* 02:04 *🌍 Descriptive ethics describe behavior, while prescriptive ethics guide behavior.* 03:32 *📝 Descriptive ethics study what people think is right, while normative ethics determine what should be considered morally right or wrong.* Made with HARPA AI

Incredibly vivid and engrossing work; reminiscent of a book that was vivid and thought-provoking. "The Art of Meaningful Relationships in the 21st Century" by Leo Flint

thank you

👍

I just wasted 5:26 of my life

Thank you. Descriptive ethics is one of the most ridiculous ideas. Any ethics must be based on, and feed into, morality, and of course, must be prescriptive. That’s why we ended- up in a situation where a person can get away with an immoral conduct ‘Oh, but I did abide by the law/ code of practice’. This ‘descriptive ethics’ should not be called ‘ethics’ as it could, at best, just serve as a way of studying different codes of ethics, for example. It’s just an instrument which is not even necessarily useful. What’s the point of taking about, and analysing, ethics of one doesn’t actually act morally?

Organizations build trust and credibility with their stakeholders through strategic communication.

Obama

02:15 why isn't the third point "FOTP in Danger?" Iisted ?

I'm not sure the intersectional spin at the end really holds

This video is describing Feminine ethics, not Feminist ethics. Many feminists disagree with feminine ethics.

Very clear and understandable summary for non-experts. Thank you.

I heard this expression mentioned on WML when introducing Dorothy Kilgallen, a columnist who was popular during the 1950's and 1960's. Thanks for the video.

Correction The Voice of Broadway is the journal Ms Kikgallen wrote for.

What brought me hear is that it was mentioned on an old game show called What's My Line in an introduction of Ms Dorothy Kilgallen. She was a columnist for The Voice of Hollywood. I was wondering what it is. Thanks for the informative video.

Nice

Millennials lack ethics & morals

I loved the video and the explanations, but I wish you would have given more explanations and in-depth case studies.

Wow super mam

Hi , ur way of teaching and sweet voice super mam.

💖💖💖

Thanks so much. Its really helpful.

Look up “manufactured consent” it’s a good look at things

Helpful

I admit that I just heard of care ethics for the first time yesterday, so I am definitely ignorant here. I also have only studied this idea for a total of 30 minutes. My first question is this: If you want to spread this idea of care ethics, why alienate half the population with the name "Feminine Ethics?" Care sounds great to me, but adding the world "Feminine" seems antithetical.

Thank you.

Couldn’t understand you, so I went somewhere else.

here is what is meant by ethics and morals..... th-cam.com/video/Xki2fRA0bY8/w-d-xo.html

no no :(

Totally wrong... Morals are decided by society and group of peoples and Ethics refer to personal view of what is wrong and ri8 pls check...

People are also related to matter: our body, oxygen, food, raw materials as input in our economy. What about extending care ethics to our relation with matter? for many problems the world is facing today are related to neglecting one side of our bi-directional relation with matter: CO2, meat consumption, plastic soup, nano plastics, industrial/one way, not circular, farming ...

Yes! We need a wider perspective that includes both men and women and different persons.

Love this accent

Our doctor made us listen to this SMH🙃🙃

Thank you. The ignorance of the 4th estate is staggering. I blame public education.

thank you, it is a great video.