วีดีโอ

Grafted Branch Ministry blocked me from there livestream and regular channel he fears the Truth, I think someone need to hold him accountable for his Deception he is ruled by a jezebel and is in error.

bad video tbh

Catch the podcast Indentifiying False Teachers

A real Christian doesn't dwell on that! He seeks the kingdom first and trusts God to give him what he needs! Not what he wants, but what he can survive with! I don't dwell on the worldly things: money,food,etc! My treasures are in heaven! With my Lord Jesus Christ!

I believe if you don’t have to then I don’t think you should but you can’t let your own family suffer just because you want to be stubborn. The slave always has accepted the food given to him by his master no matter how much he hated the master because it was necessary for survival

If an able body man does not work and support his family by himself, he is not a MAN.

Proverbs 23:6-8 (KJV) Eat thou not the bread of him that hath an evil eye, neither desire thou his dainty meats: For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee. The morsel which thou hast eaten shalt thou vomit up, and lose thy sweet words. 2 Thessalonians 3:10-12 (KJV) For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat. For we hear that there are some which walk among you disorderly, working not at all, but are busybodies. Now them that are such we command and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and eat their own bread. Proverbs 28:20 (KJV) A faithful man shall abound with blessings: but he that maketh haste to be rich shall not be innocent. Romans 12:2 (KJV) And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

The correct answer is an absolute no. For years I've paid into the Massachusetts unemployment benefits. Transitioning from my old job to my new job, I would have been well within my rights and entitled to claim unemployment until I started my new job. I did not, have never, and will never claim unemployment. I will work.

Take what you can get in this world. Everything has a reason.

All the wars and battles we can read about in the bible. Israel against the Chaldeans, the Philistines, the Jebusites, etc. The list goes on. I can't find the part about ptsd or how the Israeli army earned their pension fund. Yes, it is sad how lost men will work harder than a man with the Holy Ghost inside of them. You are right. We need to do better with how we come to one another when we do wrong. I need to do better. Pray about it, and not react in anger.

Good stuff brother. 😁

Contentious:( causing or likely to cause an argument; controversial.) 16 But if ANYONE SEEMS TO BE CONTENTIOUS, we have no such custom, nor do the churches of God. "

You forgot the verse right after all that about being contentious " I Corinthians 11:16 But if ANYONE SEEMS TO BE CONTENTIOUS, we have no such custom, nor do the churches of God. " Also food for thought about your straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel.... Then following Pauls other comments... YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE if you allow or speak to women at church! First Corinthians 14:33-35 states, “As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church”

1 Thessalonians 5:17 KJV - Pray without ceasing. I guess for some, that would mean live a barefoot lifestyle.

If you have nothing, make sure you have God on your side! You cannot eat gold!

Allah

Love it brother. 🔥🔥

1 Corinthians 2:2 KJV - For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified. Matthew 16:24 KJV - Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.

GOD & JESUS 🙏

🙏

Everything you said is true.

Catholic beads, orthodox Christian beads or I should say knots even malice are the tools it should be used. It doesn’t have to be in the Bible early Christians or Christian fathers used beads to recite prayers over and over throughout the day with prayer beats as tools. When I use my beads, I experience much more concentrated prayer. I actually feel it. Try it out.

you say in this video that if you have long hair you are not a Christian. you should Never judge anyone relegiously, and for doing so i urge you to repent

living by the bible? Which part? lying, cheating, raping, sacrifice, incest, drunkenness, war, abuse? Christians do walk the walk. They read words from a psychopath and follow them to the letter. Pastors beating their wives and violating their children and the church protects the predator with a title DMin (Demon) Signed, Ex Evangelical

The difference is how many gods we believe in. And that difference is pretty close. There are thousands of deities on the record so to speak. Christians belive in one god. The can be no other gods beside the one. That counts as 1 out of thousands. Atheist doesnt believe in any gods. That counts as 0 out of thousands. The amount of gods both dont belive in is almost the same. Cristians are just lowsy atheist who havent taken that one extra step to stop believing theres a "bearded dude above the clouds".

Good points.

Thank you for posting this. The Lord Jesus Christ bless you for your words of wisdom.

This is an error. Christians love to do this to other Christians, judge their christianity by their works and put a yoke of law on them which Christ died to erase. You’re getting too holy when you judging a Christian by some arbitrary law which you just made up. Almost everything has a pegan origin. Why would I try to justify myself by not watching a sport show. I don’t watch it, but I also think it is a grave error. You’re telling people that they need to justify themselves by following the conscience of another man. Justification isn’t in the law. Especially not a doctrine consisting of the commandments of men. There are people that teach Jesus’s name has pegan origins and it is supposed to be Yeshua and rebuke other Christians for “not having discernment.” Christians should be teaching Christians to focus on Jesus, not to focus on their sins. Why as a Christian do you teach false doctrines? You 100% do, and it is 100% provable, by clear scripture. A lot of them. Apparently you don’t have time to read my letter and open your eyes. I know why you do, because of weak and confused christianity today has produced this. Why would a born again christian have any part with a false doctrine? You see the error? I an setting myself as a bar of righteousness, if I don’t do it, then I can ridicule you for it, because the beams not in my eye right. Except it is, I just don’t perceive it. Which person of the Christian is not right with God by watching the olympics? Old man? Will he wver be right with God? Why is your focus on him, he’s dead, God is the God of the living.

I'm not

Don't want to watch it, then don't.

Wait, the Olympics are on this year??

Olympics are full of evil.

I have not watched one event this year. Never will again. IOC is evil.

i had an encounter with these people at the beginning of covid. a guy approached me while i was waiting for my wife to come out of a store she was in. i accepted an invite to a zoom bible study and during the bible study, one of the guys mentioned "god the mother". i googled that phrase and it told me everything i needed to know. i wrote a 3-page letter pointing out how every verse they use is out of context and how their doctrine is misleading. needless to say, they cut communication with me. i was accused of being combative but in my opinion, if you want me to believe your doctrine is correct, you need to prove it biblically and they could not. they talked about other books (like the green book) go into more details. my argument is that, if it's not in the bible, it's just someone else's words and opinion and it should not be the deciding factor when it comes to salvation. just know that they have an answer for everything and the confidence they have in those answers is what makes it hard to have a logic debate. as if any and everything you know about God and the bible is wrong, and they are the only ones with the real answers because they observe all the feast and the sabbath. i never joined, but my encounter was actually a blessing because the amount of reading i did to prove to these people that their doctrine is false brought me 100000000% times closer to God. the lesson that i learned and that i told them is that We must be ready to defend the gospel at all times. you never know when you'll be in a situation where you have to speak up and defend the truth and i'm glad i was able to do so. i said my piece and walked anyway with no regrets. i just pray that i planted a least one seed of doubt that'll hopefully grow and wake some of them up

Very informative, thank you for sharing this research.

It’s a false dichotomy. If I wrote a meme it would be two people arguing about God, and then God up on heaven shaking his head at how wrong both of them are. I am not even God and I have to do this all the time, for example watching the Calvinist debate the Armenian on the application of TULIP. I just shake my head, all 5 points are objectively both logically and Biblically wrong.

Gun crimes, if you are not the target at least, send a very loud alarm. Knife crimes do not. Our “leaders” know this. They don’t care about the crime; they care about the social disorder. How else will they move to open socialism?

Great message!

Amen brother.

God's beautiful creation!

Beautiful place! My husband and I used to fish a lot, and I miss it. We hike a lot now, though, and it is tough for some trails but worth the climb for the views! Thank you for sharing this view with us!

Great message, thank you for sharing the truth of God's Word!

The NRSV isn't a Catholic Bible. The NRSV, now NRSVue, is a modern, independent translation that follows the literal translation paradigm. There's a version of the NRSV that's been approved for Catholic use and contains the Catholic books in their proper place, but that's just the Catholic-specific subset of the NRSV. As for the argument you're trying to make here, if you'd consult the original Greek manuscripts you'd see that they don't contain the same wording the KJV does. You're trying to argue that something was removed, when in fact, something was added that wasn't originally there because of poor translations and personal agendas. A literal translation such as the NRSVue or NASB2020 or the LSB aim to accurately translate the earliest and best manuscripts that we have, and as such, don't have the extra wording added by the monks during their creation of the KJV. It's a shame how many self-proclaimed Christians go around thumping their Bibles and claiming this about it and that about it when in actuality they seem to know so little about it.

ESV *Evil Satanic Version*

What version do you recommend?

Good video, brother! I needed this reminder - it has been tough over the past few months. I am so glad for the fellowship with sister Tina. Her prayers and kindness have helped me through these hard times, and I thank the Lord Jesus Christ for giving me His strength to get through. I will pray for your knee and overall health!

Thank you for taking time to do this. This reminds me of how the ESV omits Matthew 17:21 and the word "fasting" from Mark 9:29. I can't imagine who would want to get rid of clear instruction on driving out a certain type of demon.

Hi, I want to preface this by saying That I appreciate your spirit in doing what your doing and I hope you keep it up! The esv version is based on much earlier manuscripts. Most of the manuscripts with the variant are from the ninth and tenth centuries with a single outlier from the fith, where as the witness for the esv and other modern trans are from the fourth and those manuscripts are considered of good character (e.g they are consistently cited because their scribs create less textual variants) Also the reason why the KJV, Geneva, Tyndale, and others have the varent and modern translations do not is because they were relying on Byzantine manuscripts (manuscripts created well into the medieval period). Erasmus heavily relied on these manuscripts when collecting the textus receptus. If you want an internal reason, it would be odd if Christ replied it is written and it is said before and after this and said get behind me satan in the middle. Why only rebuke him in the middle and not all through out or at least the end? It seems much more likely that yhe scribe of these later manuscripts had Matthew 4:10 in mind where Christ does rebuke Satan at the last temptation by prefacing it is written with be gone Satan. Again really appreciate what you're doing, here is a good resource on textual Criticism th-cam.com/video/Doi8JxJOtgE/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=HouseformApologetics Futher good resources are a na28 (you don't need to know greek as you can use the blue letter bible interlinear online) which is helpful as it will give you all of the variants and their manuscripts in the apparatus at the bottom and the trxt of the Mew Testament by bruch Metzger. Hope you have a blessed day!

Answer: The phrase 'but by every word of God' does not exist in original Greek for verse 4, chapter 4 of the Gospel of Luke. That phrase was erroneously added to the Greek Textus Receptus by Desiderius Erasmus. The Textus Receptus was used by the English translators of the King James Version. Whereas, modern English translations use the Critical Text or the Majority Text.

The King James Version of the Protestant Bible has 160+ textual errors. The Old Testament of the King James Version is based on the Masoretic Text (MT). The MT removes several prophesies about Jesus that offended Jewish Rabbis. Why compare versions of English translations? Why not compare the underlying text (LXX, SP, DSS, and MT); or at least look at a direct translation like the interlinear (e.g. MOUNCE)? Then ask the question why was the text changed? The answer is one of the following A) textual criticism, or B) copyright. The purpose of textual criticism is to reconstruct the original text as closely as possible. Bible scholars compare all 750+ copies to the earliest copies known to exist. Textual criticism is needed because the process of copying manuscripts sometimes resulted in typographical errors. Through textual criticism, it was discovered that a few scribal notations were added to columns and later incorporated into the text. Those have been removed from more recent translations.