วีดีโอ

This movie is a parody of 1960s movies. It's parodying the confession scene trope LOL

Mother.

You know, the funny thing about me watching this, is i kinda figured she know he was faking his identity during the relationship and she was playing along, and yet i was still surprised by this plot reveal as a whole.

20th anniversary

This monologue is so good, I don’t even mind it’s told in whispers.

Not only is this a great spin on the “liar revealed” trope by also having her reveal to him and the audience “actually, I haven’t been honest either”, but the fact that Zellweger did this whole three minute confession monologue in just one take! That is just brilliant🤣🤣Ewan’s face at the end says it all

Yo recuerdo cuando vi esta peli por primera vez y ese monólogo me compró completamente

She's a psycho. Run like hell!!

Now that's a monologue

The more i look back on this, this can either be the most diabolical plan to get a boyfriend in the most romantic manipulative way or.... nope this is that, GOOD GOD WOMAN! Not even the CIA or FBI has plans that are this intricate or go this deep!

Fun fact, Renee Zellweger was almost cast as Satine in Moulin Rouge alongside Ewan McGregor. So Down With Love is the closest thing to a Renee/Ewan Moulin Rouge movie pair that we have.

One of the most convoluted and stupid plot twists I've ever seen. The rest of the movie was fun though.

Am i the only one who thinks what she did is kinda phycho and creepy? Or is there something i did not understand properly or missed?

A phenomenal as this monologue was...his expression was the cherry on top!

Damn imagine memorising all those words

Bad casting. It’s too contrived in its blatant attempt to be like an early 60s Doris Day type love story. Zellwiggle just doesn’t have it. The central idea just falls flat. This costs 35 million and made 37 at the box office. The male lead doesn’t have it either! He’s too short, thin, and just not natural. His acting isn’t suave like Hudson or Garner, he’s one dimensional . He’s not naturally good looking either. Couldn’t he do something about those moles? And the Scottish accent! Doris Day was a star in movies for years her rep was well established. Plus, she was talented and cute. Renee was none of those things. And whoever believed this woman to be a great comedic talent, or a bubbling sex symbol? Huh? There isn’t any reason to care one bit about these two characters. There are Low budget love stories have been successful in getting you to care about the male and female leads! Not here! These two wooden characters have no chemistry. Did they even like each other? The look of the film has the color and setting of an early 60s film of this type. Great job on that. People walked out of the theater. Others left at the end quietly. What does that tell you? What a bad title, Down With Love. The explanation of the book in the film’s story just doesn’t make much sense. In fact, that is rather hinted at within the film itself! By the way, David Hyde Pierce, casting, and acting: right on the money! His part is a homage to Tony Randal with his own charm and acting chops! He lights up the screen. But he can’t carry the film by himself. Yes, Tony Randal, who looks horrible, is in the movie. He is listed in the cast. But it’s a one and a half minute cameo! Even that was a failure! Don’t bother watching this!

The Gone Girl plot twist wants what this has

See she really loves him.....because she knows him, better than anyone, maybe even he himself knows him, and she loves him anyhow. She knows how deep his vanity is and exactly how he's act and react to the situation she created, and she still loves him anyhow.

She got an Oscar in 2003 and this movie proved it!

Acting at its peak

Why are there no comments on this?