The Global Warming Policy Foundation
The Global Warming Policy Foundation
  • 14
  • 245 032

วีดีโอ

Europe's Net Zero Rebellion - Speech by Dr Benny Peiser
มุมมอง 8229 หลายเดือนก่อน
Europe's Net Zero Rebellion - Speech by Dr Benny Peiser
GWPF's Dr Benny Peiser talks to Jonny Gould about the energy transition
มุมมอง 482ปีที่แล้ว
GWPF's Dr Benny Peiser talks to Jonny Gould about the energy transition
2016 Annual GWPF Lecture - Matt Ridley - Global Warming Versus Global Greening
มุมมอง 1.1Kปีที่แล้ว
Matt Ridley delivers the 2016 Annual GWPF Lecture at the Royal Society, London 17 October
2017 Annual GWPF Lecture - Tony Abbott MP - Daring to Doubt
มุมมอง 217ปีที่แล้ว
The Honourable Tony Abbott MP delivers the 2017 Annual GWPF Lecture in London, 09 October. www.thegwpf.org/publications/tony-abbott-daring-to-doubt-2/
2015 Annual GWPF Lecture - Patrick Moore - Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide
มุมมอง 515ปีที่แล้ว
Patrick Moore delivers the 2015 Annual GWPF Lecture London, October 2015 Read transcript: www.thegwpf.org/publications/patrick-moore-should-we-celebrate-carbon-dioxide-2/
2014 Annual GWPF Lecture - Owen Paterson - Keeping The Lights On
มุมมอง 74ปีที่แล้ว
Rt Hon Owen Paterson MP delivered the 2014 Annual GWPF Lecture at the Institute of Mechanical Engineers Read more: www.thegwpf.org/publications/owen-paterson-keeping-the-lights-on/
2013 Annual GWPF Lecture - John Howard - One Religion is Enough
มุมมอง 126ปีที่แล้ว
2013 Annual GWPF Lecture The Honourable John Howard, former Prime Minister of Australia "One Religion Is Enough" London 5 November 2013
2012 Annual GWPF Lecture - Professor Fritz Vahrenholt - Second Thoughts of an Environmentalist
มุมมอง 167ปีที่แล้ว
Read more at www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2012/10/Vahrenholt-2012-Annual-GWPF-Lecture.pdf
2023 Annual GWPF Lecture - Lord Frost: Not Dark Yet, But It's Getting There
มุมมอง 4Kปีที่แล้ว
Lord Frost gives the 2023 Annual GWPF Lecture on the question, is Net Zero compatible with mass prosperity?
2011 Annual GWPF Lecture Cardinal George Pell One Christian Perspective on Climate Change
มุมมอง 654ปีที่แล้ว
In his GWPF lecture, Cardinal Pell questioned the morality and costs of imposing heavy financial burdens on households and families, in particular the poor, in the name of saving the planet and in the hope of curbing the rise of global temperatures.
2018 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Richard Lindzen Global Warming For The Two Cultures
มุมมอง 87K3 ปีที่แล้ว
2018 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Richard Lindzen Global Warming For The Two Cultures London 8 October 2018 Institution of Mechanical Engineers
2019 Annual GWPF Lecture - Prof Michael Kelly: Energy Utopias and Engineering Reality
มุมมอง 33K3 ปีที่แล้ว
2019 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Michael Kelly FRS FREng Energy Utopias and Engineering Reality London, 11 November 2019 Institution of Mechanical Engineers Read the full transcript here: www.thegwpf.org/prof-michael-kelly-energy-policy-needs-herds-of-unicorns/
2021 Annual GWPF Lecture | Steven E Koonin | Unsettled
มุมมอง 89K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Professor Steven E. Koonin, New York University, and former Under Secretary for Science in the US Department of Energy, gives the 2021 Annual GWPF lecture on 'Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't, and Why It Matters'. London, Tuesday 16th November

ความคิดเห็น

  • @lewisgivner1951
    @lewisgivner1951 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Cattle 70% global warming. Get real stop cattle methane

  • @drmacshscphysics4494
    @drmacshscphysics4494 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Please do some background checking of this group. Be Skeptical. Please read "Merchants Of Doubt"

  • @robertducharme1573
    @robertducharme1573 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Climate Remediation There is a lot of discussion about Global Warming, whether it really exists, how serious a threat and the role of Carbon Dioxide. However, the following is generally agreed. Namely that a lot of CO2 has been released into the atmosphere since the start of the Industrial Revolution and most of it has ended up in solution in sea waters. There is at least 150 times as much CO2 in a cubic meter of sea water as there is in a cubic meter of atmosphere at NTP. This is acidifying the sea waters and harming Coral Reefs. There has also been some agreement that the Temperature of the Earth has warmed somewhat. The Earth's rotation and the Coriolis Effect has formed a number of Tropical/Semi-Tropical Oceanic Gyres, within which the mass of sea water is rotating, clock wise in the Northern Hemisphere and counter clock wise in the Southern Hemisphere. Anything floating, i.e., less dense than sea water tends to float towards the center of the Gyre. There are five main Gyres which are the North Pacific, South Pacific, Indian, North Atlantic, and South Atlantic Oceans. Together they form a very large proportion of the 70% of the Earth's surface which is covered by water. The North Pacific has a lot of floating debris, "the Great Pacific Garbage Patch", some of it being debris washed off Japan by tsunamis following the recent Fukishima Earth Quake. The Southern Hemisphere Gyres do not appear to contain much floating debris. The North Atlantic Gyre is unique. It contains the Sargasso Sea which is characterized by the presence of two species of Sargassum which float by virtue of oxygen-filled follicles. It was discovered (first documented) by Columbus from his voyage in 1492. There is a Sargasso Sea Commission, with an Office in Washington DC, which is charged with protecting the Sargasso Sea from pollution etc. There is a website that basically describes all of the positive ecological values of the Sea. Since 2011 the Sargassum appears to be overflowing from the Sargasso Sea and moving via the west bound currents across the north coast of South America into the Caribbean and sometimes into the Gulf of Mexico. This has been attributed to agricultural run off from the USA or Brazil but might be due to the increased levels of CO2 in solution. It has been washing up on beaches through out this region, as one might expect to happen. When it dies and rots it emits H2S. Since a lot of these beaches have tourism as their main industry, the weed has to be removed manually which has given Sargassum a bad name. There are several Facebook entities that keep track of Sargassum landings and there are frequent postings enquiring about Sargassum occurrence on specific tourist areas. The occurrence of Sargassum in the Caribbean would, however, make it very easy to put live Sargassum into the Pacific off the west coast of Mexico. From there the currents would carry it all the way across the Pacific, photosynthesizing and growing all the way absorbing a lot of CO2 and heat energy, photosynthesis is an endothermic reaction. Absorbing CO2 from the Ocean would allow CO2 from the Atmosphere to dissolve in the sea. The Sargassum would probably stay in the North Pacific Gyre but some might drift into the South Pacific. One might balk at the idea of covering a lot of the Oceans with Sargassum but it does have uses. It can be used to make ethanol, paper or cardboard. Some one in the Caribbean is making construction bricks from it and others are feeding it to goats.. If there appears to be some benefit from Pacific Sargassum we could easily add Sargassum to the other Gyres using ships that are transiting the Panama Canal. It seems likely that some Sargassum will eventually get into the South Atlantic Gyre, but that may take a while.

  • @mburgsey14
    @mburgsey14 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I bet Ed Milliband in the UK has not watched this!!!

  • @StephenGrover-zc4hp
    @StephenGrover-zc4hp หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whst a sham! Just like the supposed insurrection!

  • @h.t.7310
    @h.t.7310 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please next time improve your physical appearance. Your appearance implicates something is just not right. It could be the key frame. Btw, we fear neither fuel or climate change. You have not mention Earth's Energy Balance revealing this is book marketing. A deception justified with a false premise of academic process. Hire a publicist and PR people as well as Make Up Artist. Bottom line you look awful and the implications you extoll, the same.

  • @thatday5070
    @thatday5070 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As good and honest this talk is it would be simpler to say get rid of fascism in the UN and bring back a Fear of God. While many are being manipulated and their good intentions exploited its is obvious that those driving this agenda know the deception they seek to proliferate.....

  • @davidmcmurran8695
    @davidmcmurran8695 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Judith ha nailed it.her presentation shows proper due diligence but does not follow the money which hasbeeb driving thie UN narrative. Theonly winner has been China woh now control 80 - 90% of the minerals needed to supply the UN strategy. Science needs to win this debate not government objectives for societal control.

  • @CDN_Marcy
    @CDN_Marcy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LOOK UP ✈️OPERATION POPEYE.. THEY’RE USING CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL AEROSOLS ALL OVER THE WORLD. 🧐🧐🧐2030AGENDA? LAND GRABS FOR MINING?

  • @tomgreene1843
    @tomgreene1843 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great that she is nallowed to speak ...some climate scientists were silenced in ireland ....but I suppose that is not surprising.

  • @CDN_Marcy
    @CDN_Marcy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I pray all of our scientists are kept safe.

  • @kiki459
    @kiki459 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Merci d'exister Dr Judith Curry .

  • @valdivia1234567
    @valdivia1234567 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I used to be a firm human-caused climate believer. I wasn't a cultist like a lot of people, but definitely believed everything I read and heard. When I realized that climatologists and meteorologists who differed with those widely accepted conclusions were immediately vilified and ostracized, I knew something was wrong.

  • @mr.miyagi9004
    @mr.miyagi9004 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There’s a lot of stuff she’s saying that just isn’t true or exaggerated E.g: the sun and volcanoes are one of the causes of natural climate change. Which is just false, our vehicles produce over 100x more co2 than volcanoes every year. I didn’t hear her address how I’m the late 1990 some of the first people to hire a team of indépendant researchers to research about climate change where big oil companies which found out it is real and a danger but kept the info hidden. These aren’t conspiracies. Look them up and do your research

  • @martinzumstein351
    @martinzumstein351 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Her lecture 8 years ago (also on TH-cam) was much better.

  • @richarddrum9970
    @richarddrum9970 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well all kidding aside, when someone can explain the process for the earth’s cooling enough to create the Laurentide Ice Sheet that covered North America with glaciers a mile thick about 20,000 years ago and then melt all that ice raising the worlds oceans by hundreds of feet, all occurring without any influence by humans or fossil fuels, then I might begin to believe that we puny humans can create a global disaster by driving to the grocery store.

  • @winlinuser
    @winlinuser 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reposted to FB and GAB

  • @robdavidson4945
    @robdavidson4945 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A great dose of Climate Sanity.

  • @Gizepi
    @Gizepi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    She's speaking shite.

  • @dnboro
    @dnboro 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does the GWPF delete all the comments they don't like. Ironic given the claims that scientists like Dr Curry are silenced.

  • @CDN_Marcy
    @CDN_Marcy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video is certainly censored 🤬

  • @Leypath14
    @Leypath14 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Erudite, eloquent and brimming with sober common sense. Just what a lecture should be.

  • @Carthusian1
    @Carthusian1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good

  • @mrunning10
    @mrunning10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Judith Curry is HORSESHIT conspiracy. @7:35 what utter fucking HORSESHIT. "controlling the climate" "Solution: global" so according to Dr. Judy it isn't the co2? it's control on a global scale? What utter HORSESHIT. Dr. Judy Curry is a horseshit conspiracy LIAR.

  • @PieterHanja
    @PieterHanja 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interview_ th-cam.com/video/3OX2aUvG51I/w-d-xo.html

  • @ianhamilton3113
    @ianhamilton3113 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But what if you're wrong? Who funds you? Big oil? Better safe than sorry. Oh and renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels anyway.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly.

    • @DrSmooth2000
      @DrSmooth2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Guess cheaper depends on how you count subsidies 😇

    • @ianhamilton3113
      @ianhamilton3113 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DrSmooth2000 Or, how much cheaper depends on the amount of subsidies. China has massively subsidized the solar manufacturers. Saves us billions.

    • @DrSmooth2000
      @DrSmooth2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ianhamilton3113 those are likely days gone by now. 🇺🇸 panels?

    • @ianhamilton3113
      @ianhamilton3113 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DrSmooth2000 Makes it much cheaper for us as consumers. New technology plus massive production cost savings. Win, win.

  • @patricklincoln5942
    @patricklincoln5942 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is this? "The Global Warming Policy Foundation"?? Who are they? Who funds them? You have to wonder.

  • @annahall9610
    @annahall9610 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I f governments are rushing change to renewables, could it be because the cost of fossil fuels are creating high inflation on goods and services world wide, also it seems people procrastinate and tend to be reluctant to change so motivation must be prompted and while there is discrepancy amongst scientists, about the planet warming fossil fuels do have detrimental consequences on humans and animals as well as the environment and when disasters occurr such as Milford Sound Canada, economic consequences as well

  • @davidmchugh-hypnotherapist7213
    @davidmchugh-hypnotherapist7213 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The idea we can grow food at scale, with an additional 6 degree C increase in average global temperature is ludicrous. Arguing about the rate of warming, melting or rising sea level is childish rhetoric.

  • @davidmchugh-hypnotherapist7213
    @davidmchugh-hypnotherapist7213 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How to solve a dilemma by rhetoric. Dr Curry is more political than scientific.

    • @DrSmooth2000
      @DrSmooth2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As opposed to Mann who wrote 'the New Climate Politics'

  • @tim2muntu954
    @tim2muntu954 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That the inaccurate Climate forecasts are not scattered evenly between cooling and heating, but ALWAYS on the alarmist heating side is clear evidence of systemic bias in the Climate Change community.

  • @ashgall8118
    @ashgall8118 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Everything affects climate change" not just humans. Climate Change is going to be the biggest deflection in history to keep people from asking about the real problems in the world today. Sure, they want us to believe that 87% of scientists today believe humans are responsible for climate change when actually 100% believe we have an impact, but not to the extent the politicians and others want us to believe. It's a huge cash cow for them if they can keep us thinking it will kill us if we don't fix it. Ever notice how interviewers never ask these scientists what the ideal amount of CO2 is needed or ideal to sustain life on Earth? If we all sit in a theatre or university class, the CO2 level will be around 1500ppm to 2000ppm after 3 hours. If the CO2 level gets below 150ppm all insects die, all birds die, all animals die, all plants die, and all humans die. Does no-one notice that the Earth is getting greener because of increased CO2? A greener Earth means more crops and therefore more food to feed the World's hungry. Don't fall for this fake agenda. Climatologists are hypocrites, running around in big vehicles and flying all over the world spewing pollutants into the air we breathe. They should be sailing overseas on wooden sail ships or travelling over land on bicycles to reduce their contribution to CO2 in the atmosphere. The dinosaurs didn't kill the planet and they were much bigger than humans. The CO2 levels have gone up and down for billions of years and they will in the future. The planet will take care of itself.

  • @gretaogperlarsen7417
    @gretaogperlarsen7417 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hvordan får vi politikere til at se denne video? Politikere kan ikke selv sætte sig ind i CO2's rolle i klimaet - de er hoppet på en klimareligion/tro som de tror blindt på. Det koster enorme summer og enorme ressourcer for EU. Den kinesiske diktator er klogere end EU's politikere. Dem der har estimeret prisen på grøn omstilling kommer med tal så svimlende - det er alt sammen spild og kunne alternativt bruges på forskning, børn, uddannelse, unge, gamle, hospitaler et cetera.

  • @helenepopulos2438
    @helenepopulos2438 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Simply excelent!

  • @mark747captain
    @mark747captain 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dr. Curry is a wonderful woman who has broken away from the lies, it's all about money, money, money. Everything she says is correct. So, when the money runs out whom are they going to go after, themselves? Typical Communistic tacticts, 'if we can't control you we'll 'attempt' to wipe you out... And then they are next.

  • @nobillismccaw7450
    @nobillismccaw7450 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When the UN demands population reduction, my response is “you first.”

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you have ANY fucking point to make?

    • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
      @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The UN has no plans to eliminate people. You really believe that swill from the internet? Check your critical thinking skills.

  • @sirsultan
    @sirsultan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10/10 lecture. Well explained with reason and core principles

  • @lionofjudah3572
    @lionofjudah3572 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Global warming is caused by HUMANS that live a SINFUL LIFESTYLE because HELL located in the earths core has to EXPAND to hold these people. As HELL EXPANDS, the earth gets hotter and hotter, volcanoes erupts and destruction increases. Christ has to return to save his people or no one would survive⁉️

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      God is watching YOU kill His Gift of Mother Earth and YOU will be JUDGED and CONDEMNED for YOUR Sins.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      God is watching YOU kill His Gift of Mother Earth and YOU will be JUDGED and CONDEMNED for YOUR Sins.

  • @markwilson9935
    @markwilson9935 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When the premise is wrong and not fact...all arguments after that are meaningless!

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really intelligent comment Bot, go away.

  • @TomSmith-in1zj
    @TomSmith-in1zj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is her data demonstrating that climate change is much ado about nothing? Data.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're kidding right? Data?? Judy Curry??? That's not why she does these "lectures" and she fucking knows she's delivering horseshit and that means Judy Curry is LYING.

  • @andrewgeoghegan3526
    @andrewgeoghegan3526 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    some people choose to listen to nut jobs !

  • @MegaDeano1963
    @MegaDeano1963 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is that Richard Tice I see , good on him taking an interest

  • @mrunning10
    @mrunning10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "wind and solar power is impairing grid reliability and increasing the cost of electricity." WHAT UTTER LYING HORSESHIT. Judy you LIE.

    • @MegaDeano1963
      @MegaDeano1963 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right now in the UK it rains, and all we're getting out the renewable grid is 6 Gw . So back to gas we go . And we are paying more for every GW renewable energy , and everytime we don't use gas , we make fossil fuel power cost more . This JC is right again

  • @polw3785
    @polw3785 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Never forget how the UN wants to reduce the population by several billion! If we start with that premise then why would we trust that all of their policies in relation to controlling all aspects of our lives, especially food supply and health, are working for our good?? Rather, they are working for our collective demise

  • @-LightningRod-
    @-LightningRod- 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    remarkably short on numbers and overwhelmingly laden with Political Opinion,.. this ain't science.

    • @harryshaw3760
      @harryshaw3760 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@-LightningRod- read the book dude.

    • @-LightningRod-
      @-LightningRod- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harryshaw3760 i got the abridged edition and also watched Senator Sheldon Whitehouse completely unravel Judith Currys entire career in a senate hearing. A sad oil soaked extreme fringe opinion with no scientific validity.

    • @harryshaw3760
      @harryshaw3760 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@-LightningRod- Hey Lightnin’ Didn’t know Readers Digest did a version of the Professors’ book You should read the proper one. It has all the science and numbers you are looking for ( or aren’t looking for more likely). I watched Senator Whitehouses’ effort, a bulling demagogic rant IMHO. It’s a pity people can’t sit down and discus this important issue like adults, but that would make the Senator redundant I guess. Oil soaked? The Professor does long range weather projections for Oil companies among others (she might do one for you if you ask). I think your attempt at cancelling the Professor immature and unhelpful. I hope you can maintain a more open minded attitude in the future.

    • @-LightningRod-
      @-LightningRod- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harryshaw3760 Senator Whitehouse simply reviewed 10 to 15 years of Currys presentations to the Senate ,..wrong for over a decade ,..at this point Judith's claims of all Normal are belied by in her case a half a lifetime of Heat records,..how could you possibly have any other opinion/ Also her predicting business drowned in the toilet because it was laughably wrong and not worth the Money I guess her new career path as an entertainer is appealing to someone like you ,..you really seem to enjoy it even tho,..it is very light on facts or correct predictions from MrsCurry.

    • @harryshaw3760
      @harryshaw3760 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@-LightningRod- hmmm. What I said.

  • @xqt39a
    @xqt39a 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I did not hear any remarks about "tipping points" . Paul Beckwith and Hanson both emphasize that an ice free arctic will happen within 20 years. This is guaranteed to happen based on the well documented trends of the reducing area of the summer minimum of arctic ice cover. The summer ice cover is also measurably thinning. This means that the ice cover will suddenly disappear causing a sudden and drastic increase in the amount of heat being absorbed into the arctic ocean. Furthermore scientists that study permafrost are concerned that the rapid rise in temperature could cause a sudden and rapid melting of permafrost causing a "methane burp". Methane is short lived (30 years) but has 80 times the warming impact of CO2 per unit. The methane burp could add significantly to global warming within a year after "the burp". These risks are the elephant in the room that Curry does NOT talk about. Why not? Serious climate scientist such as Beckwith and Hanson put these risks at the top of the list. Curry needs to explicitly talk about these risk to be fully credible.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      blah blah blah...you're talking about the WEATHER.

    • @xqt39a
      @xqt39a 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mrunning10 The future disappearance of the arctic ice sheet is NOT weather, nor is a future methane burp. Curry needs to explicitly talk about these risk to be fully credible.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xqt39a Back to some school please, next time let it not be Hair Styling 101. The future disappearance of the arctic ice sheet is a SINGLE event. A WEATHER event. The sequence of events over TIME of the ice sheet melting, disappearing, season to season is CLIMATE CHANGE. The release of methane occurring now is a WEATHER event, over many seasons is CLIMATE CHANGE. A TREND is climate change, an EVENT like the current arctic ice sheet coverage is the WEATHER. What's your fucking POINT anyway?

    • @xqt39a
      @xqt39a 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grindupBaker what is the difference between geometric and exponential and linear and parabolic ? By suddenly, I mean to imply faster than of these.. these are the tipping points that scare some climate scientists and should not be ignored by the likes of Curry with no explanation!

    • @robertwells1989
      @robertwells1989 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@xqt39aNo she doesn't.

  • @SteffiReitsch
    @SteffiReitsch 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Her thing is being the top MERCHANT OF DOUBT. So when are we supposed to know with absolute certainty ? NEVER! According to her, it could be something natural causing it, something we don't understand... and never will because it's too complicated. The obvious pumping of GIGATONS of known heat trapping gas into the atmosphere 24/7 decade after decade might not be it. Yeah, sure. Every prestigious scientific institution in the world is wrong, but old Curry knows! AAAHAHHAAHAHA For years the tobacco industry pulled the same stunt. In mainstream climate science Curry's a disgraced outlier, a sell out. It doesn't matter anymore, humanity is just going to keep pumping it out, more nails in the coffin, and the planet keeps incrementally warming , f****ing up the climate, no end is sight. We're DOOMED.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Whoa! Spot On.

  • @anthonymorris5084
    @anthonymorris5084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is no evidence of a climate crisis. It's ludicrous.

  • @ldm3027
    @ldm3027 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    complete unadulterated drivel - no wonder the GWPF is such a stupifyingly ineffective group

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Whoa! Spot On!!!

  • @MegaDeano1963
    @MegaDeano1963 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    always great value , Judith Curry is professional and excellent